OT: Here's What's in the $825 Billion Stimulus Bill

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

Postby LazzMan » Thu Jan 29, 2009 3:21 pm

Jubilee wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:Here is the first paragraph from that WSJ article:

We've looked it over, and even we can't quite believe it. There's $1 billion for Amtrak, the federal railroad that hasn't turned a profit in 40 years; $2 billion for child-care subsidies; $50 million for that great engine of job creation, the National Endowment for the Arts; $400 million for global-warming research and another $2.4 billion for carbon-capture demonstration projects.

Even we? You mean the far leaning righties at the WSJ? Go fuck yourselves.

I don't see a penny wasted in any of those programs.

1 Billion for Amtrak. Currently they receive 750 million. What is a 250 million raise going to hurt? You folks have short memories. 6 months ago, people couldn't drive anywhere without mortgaging their homes for gas. Amtrak if given a chance is the prime example of what program can really help out in America's oil crisis. And as for turning a profit? The writer of this article should do his or her homework-No rail system in the world turns a profit. And if not for countless airport and traffic controller subsidies from Uncle Sam, not a single airline would be close to turning a profit. In fact, this last year Amtrak did much better than any airline save Southwest. By the way, does any interstate highway in the land turn a profit?

2 -Billion for child care. Tell me how that is a bad thing? I want to hear especially from the republicans here who are adamantly against abortion. The point being that once born, the GOP turns it's back on people. Child care is never a bad subsidy.

3- $50 million National Endowment for the Arts. I am shocked that any here would bitch about this. The Arts are so important, and 50 million is a lost penny. Arts people. For Christs sake, you are on a music forum! Without Arts, we might not have our next Steve Perry, Mr Big or gasp, Arnel Pineda.

4- $400 million for global-warming research. Another worthwhile investment. We need to learn to live greener, might as well take this opportunity to do it right, and pay people along the way. It's going to happen folks, and frankly needs to happen- the need to live off other fuel sources than oil; wind, solar and hydro. Studying better ways is not money wasted.

5- $2.4 billion for carbon-capture demonstration projects.- Absolutely needed.

Are all these Democratic ideals and principals? Yep. They won, and they are in charge. Deal with it. Start writing Sarah some checks, so she can get ready to change us back to pure fucking misery. :lol: :lol:




The first time I read this I thought you were kidding, but you're dead serious, aren't you?!? I don't even know where to begin...

1 - Amtrak has been missmanaged from the start. With the exception of the eastern corridor, Amtrak really doesn't even serve most of the country. Unless they're going to use this infusion to start laying new tracks to serve new markets, I don't see the cost benefit.

2 - Billion for child care? Seriously. That's part of raising kids. No place for government intervention.

3 - 50b for National Endowment for the Arts. Sorry, let the artsy-fartsy crowd buy their own pink tights. How much does it really cost to create a jar full of urine with various things suspended in it?

4 - 400m on global warming research? Here, I'll help you out on this one. In the summer it gets hot. Sometimes really hot. In the winter, it gets cold. Sometimes really cold. The planet is 4 billion years old. At times the planet has been covered in ice, at other times there has been very little glaciation. All of human existence has occured between these two extremes. Cleaner air is a good thing, but let's not start thinking we can control things we have no control over. Keep your money. That one's on me.

5 - What?!?

And as for these so called "shovel-ready" projects - don't you believe it. By the time they go through the process of deciding how much money to allocate to which project, going through the bidding process, and the unions trying to get their piece of the action, these projects won't be off the ground for at least a year - and they'll already be over budget.

Woooo. That was a mouth full. End of rant.... carry on...


You're right on. $200M for seeding the capital mall, $450M to give to third-world countries to help with family planning. Global warming research? Please. All of this pork is nothing but social interest project funding that has nothing at all to do with stimulating anything. As for the public works projects, OK, those are well-intended and in many cases needed but, by the time any of the money hits the streets we will be on the other end of the recession. But, I suppose something has to be done to instill a bit of confidence. However, there are a lot of other things that could stimulate the economy much faster. We are about to embark upon the biggest increase of government in our history and that doesn't smell like capitalism to me.

There are those on this board who clearly feel that Bush was, by far, the worst president in history and that Obama is the best we've ever had. Well, history will play that out but, I see a lot of the "same" from Obama including breaking some of his campaign promises. I.E. Appointing lobyists, as an example. He's only been in office for a week. I'm optimistic but, let's see.
LazzMan
45 RPM
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:25 am

Postby Melissa » Thu Jan 29, 2009 10:18 pm

Great post G.I. Jim.
Melissa
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5542
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:00 pm

Postby G.I.Jim » Thu Jan 29, 2009 10:24 pm

Melissa wrote:Great post G.I. Jim.


Thank you..sorry I got so long-winded! :roll: :lol:
The artist formerly known as Jim. :-)
G.I.Jim
MP3
 
Posts: 10100
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 1:06 pm
Location: Your Momma's house

Postby Melissa » Fri Jan 30, 2009 12:11 am

G.I.Jim wrote:
Melissa wrote:Great post G.I. Jim.


Thank you..sorry I got so long-winded! :roll: :lol:


Nah! It was a great read! 8)
Melissa
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5542
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:00 pm

Postby SF-Dano » Fri Jan 30, 2009 3:08 am

G.I.Jim wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:
Saint John wrote:I don't think the government should do anything. It's the mentality of this country that needs to be "stimulated." People need to stand up and be accountable. Their were a lot of good years. And through those good years what do people have to show for? Credit card debt, fancy, over-priced shoes, clothes, cars, purses, phones, and everything else known to man. It's really pretty simple. The majority of people that will weather this storm are the ones that budgeted, saved and prepared for lean times.

We need a massive reduction in social programs. Personally, I would put an immediate end to free education. There is nothing more frustrating than the lack of accountability that parents have these days. Their kids don't do their homework and the parents simply don't give a fuck. Why? Because it doesn't cost them anything. Charge these motherfuckers $50 a month per child and you'll see test scores soar. Additionally, Enrique and Guadalupe Salazar might actually decide that having 9 kids isn't really fucking necessary!!! I would give scholarships to those students that were in the top 25 percentile. Special Education/Special Needs students would be the only ones that got a free ride. Their parents have it tough enough already.


Dude, my opinion, which you are about to read front and center doesn't change the fact we are friends, so listen up.

Go educate yourself on the acrobatics of society and the effects of it on a person. While you are at it, take some government classes, as well as some political ones as well.

To single out poor people as lazy and not having responsibility is complete horse shit spewed by the right. Every morning you go to work, take a look at the bus stops, and train stations. Really early, these people are up early, going to perhaps poor income jobs, and work hard, really hard. These folks work every bit as hard as an educated white collar professional. Maybe they slipped up in life, or had a broken home, or couldn't afford secondary education to better themselves. It does not take away the fact that they are your equals, fellow countrymen, fellow patriots and fellow Americans. It's sad that the Haves look down on the have not's in this nation. America is all about self promotion, pulling one's self up by the bootstraps complete with ample opportunity, however, it is also a nation of compassion, or it's supposed to be. Lately, the USA has turned it's back on the lower income earners, and that absolutely crushes me. These people, whether mopping floors, or serving sandwiches, or cleaning toilets still deserve the same respect as a President Obama or a Bill Gates. They work hard, show up daily to do a not so exciting job, and then many commute home on a fucking bus, to take care of their family, and then sleep, only to rise again early in the morning to do it all over again. There shouldn't be a snicker or two from the elitists like Rush Limbaugh, who proclaimed the poor people of America need to be more responsible. And before you or any of you Cons harp on responsibility and link it to the poor of this nation, take a look at CEO's from the biggest, and now bankrupt businesses. You call these assholes from Ford, Chevy and Chrysler responsible? Taking million dollar bonuses with their companies failing miserably? This war on the middle class is a war, but there is a secret ops mission happening and the poor of this country are being raped and annihilated by the republican party and it needs to stop.

You folks who continuously bitch and moan about your taxes can fuck off. Country first remember? Oh yeah, that was back in JFK's time. That's when America was a nation of one and there wasn't such a dichotomy between rich and poor. Let's just agree to disagree here. I have a very different vision than you Dan, and that's ok. As for Fact Finder, you can go fuck yourself you selfish sonofabitch. All you do is whine, bitch and moan about your taxes and anything that isn't propelled or initiated by the GOP. I thought you were a fucking American?

Off soapbox now.


Gotta disagree with you Deano. While I also disagree (to some extent) with Dan's post when it comes to education, I also disagree with your reasoning of giving to people less fortunate than myself. I do donate money each year to help a couple of causes, and I'm the type who will always pull over and fix a tire for someone, etc... Not saying I'm better than anyone...I just try to help when I can.

With that said, according to your reasoning...we should have no scoreboards in sports so that everyone's a winner. We should have no wealthy, because they should give it away to others who in a lot of cases are lazy. Say what you want, but there are lazy-ass people in this world that want everything handed to them. I respect your ideas, but I seriously disagree.

The great thing about this country, is that if people have a dream, are self driven, and hard working...they CAN make something of themselves. When I see people getting on busses...I don't feel bad for them (unless they have physical or mental disabilities), I just think of them as not having as much success at life as others. Not everyone is smart enough to be a CEO or own a business. Not everyone is talented enough to paint a million dollar painting, and not everyone is skilled enough (or determined enough) to go through medical shool or law school for 8 years.

According to your train of thought...we should expect those people who DO invest 8 years of their lives along with a lot of sacrifices and hardships themselves, to give that wealth away once they reach succesfull income levels. We'd give that money to people who dropped out of school, got pregnant (or got someone else pregnant), didn't get educated, and show up late for work, etc... There are some unfortunate situations in life, but that's just it...it's life, and life isn't always fun or fair.

I wish I was born to millionare parents and that I got everything I always wanted...I didn't! I've worked my ass off from the age of 14 at everything from pizza delivery to dishwashing, to working on a farm, to roofing, to air condition repair, to installing security systems/cameras, to 18 years of military where a lot of times I worked 70-80 hours a week. I'm not complaining, but I don't expect handouts...I earn my paycheck. That's all I ask of everyone else out there...nothing's free.

As far as those CEO's go...I think if they drive their companies into the ground...they should have to forfeit any bonuses and give it back to the companies they ruined. That's not wealth redistribution...that's just NOT getting paid extra for something YOU fucked up! JMHO



I find my opinions to be somewhat on the middle on the statements above. However, working in the business field for the past 20 some odd years as a bookkeeper/accounting clerk, I would like to share an observation regarding management/CEO well educated types. Now I know many work very hard, however to my experience many also do not work very hard. There seems to be a feeling among some that since they put in the time and "sacrificed" during college, that they should not have to work so hard now. Unless you consider two -three hour "business" lunches three times a week during a six hour work day hard work. And that is with a full 18 holes of golf the other two. And this is all well and good if they are paying someone a living wage to pick up the slack, but lately it seems as if a "living" wage has become less than it was a few years ago, instead of more, while the cost of everything soars around us. Many get their jobs/positions from college "buddies", while a more experienced hard worker is continually passed over. Now, I live in Northern California, so this may just be the way it is here, but in this state if you want to get ahead- it is definitely "who you know" not what you know.(Unless affirmative action kicks in).

Just for clarification, I am a college grad, but I do not consider myself better than someone who never graduated high-school and pounds nails or digs ditches for a living. As long as we can hang out and get along over a few beers anyone is cool with me. And I do think everyone should work and try to pull their own weight. It is just that the working man does not seem to be as valued by employers or society as he once was in the country.

Lastly I was having dinner with some friends the other night. My friend's wife, who is a computer engineer at a large computer processor firm, made the statement " I don't know how anyone without a college education can contribute anything to society today." :shock: After biting my tongue for a spell, I retorted "Please tell that to the construction workers who built your million dollar home, or the car mechanic that keeps your mercedes going all the time, or the nanny that takes care of your child for you while your away."

As far as the political debate here goes, in my opinion neither party really gives a damn about the people anymore, at least not the people of the "middle" class. There will soon no-longer be a middle class in this country. I was paid a higher wage for doing the same job 5 years ago than I am today. Prices go up - pay goes down. It doesn't make any sense, unless something bigger or more sinister than I can comprehend is at foot here.

Sorry - end rant.
Image
User avatar
SF-Dano
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1991
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2002 9:00 am
Location: Near Sacramento missin' my City by the Bay

Postby Michigan Girl » Fri Jan 30, 2009 3:13 am

Nice post, SF-Dano!!! :wink:
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Postby Michael Leigh » Fri Jan 30, 2009 3:47 am

G.I.Jim wrote:
Melissa wrote:Great post G.I. Jim.


Thank you..sorry I got so long-winded! :roll: :lol:

Agreed.Great post Jim.
There really needs to be a 3rd party in this country, that TRULY looks out for the middle class.
Seems to me both parties are more concerned with special interests.
Michael Leigh
45 RPM
 
Posts: 340
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 10:14 pm

Postby NealIsGod » Fri Jan 30, 2009 5:15 am

G.I.Jim wrote:Gotta disagree with you Deano. While I also disagree (to some extent) with Dan's post when it comes to education, I also disagree with your reasoning of giving to people less fortunate than myself. I do donate money each year to help a couple of causes, and I'm the type who will always pull over and fix a tire for someone, etc... Not saying I'm better than anyone...I just try to help when I can.

With that said, according to your reasoning...we should have no scoreboards in sports so that everyone's a winner. We should have no wealthy, because they should give it away to others who in a lot of cases are lazy. Say what you want, but there are lazy-ass people in this world that want everything handed to them. I respect your ideas, but I seriously disagree.

The great thing about this country, is that if people have a dream, are self driven, and hard working...they CAN make something of themselves. When I see people getting on busses...I don't feel bad for them (unless they have physical or mental disabilities), I just think of them as not having as much success at life as others. Not everyone is smart enough to be a CEO or own a business. Not everyone is talented enough to paint a million dollar painting, and not everyone is skilled enough (or determined enough) to go through medical shool or law school for 8 years.

According to your train of thought...we should expect those people who DO invest 8 years of their lives along with a lot of sacrifices and hardships themselves, to give that wealth away once they reach succesfull income levels. We'd give that money to people who dropped out of school, got pregnant (or got someone else pregnant), didn't get educated, and show up late for work, etc... There are some unfortunate situations in life, but that's just it...it's life, and life isn't always fun or fair.

I wish I was born to millionare parents and that I got everything I always wanted...I didn't! I've worked my ass off from the age of 14 at everything from pizza delivery to dishwashing, to working on a farm, to roofing, to air condition repair, to installing security systems/cameras, to 18 years of military where a lot of times I worked 70-80 hours a week. I'm not complaining, but I don't expect handouts...I earn my paycheck. That's all I ask of everyone else out there...nothing's free.

As far as those CEO's go...I think if they drive their companies into the ground...they should have to forfeit any bonuses and give it back to the companies they ruined. That's not wealth redistribution...that's just NOT getting paid extra for something YOU fucked up! JMHO


Great post. Reminds me of this story...

A young woman was about to finish her first year of college. Like so many others her age, she considered herself to be a very liberal Democrat, and was very much in favor of the redistribution of wealth.

She was deeply ashamed that her father was a rather staunch Republican, a feeling she openly expressed. Based on the lectures that she had participated, the occasional chat with a professor, she felt that her father had for years harbored an evil, selfish desire to keep what he thought should be his.

One day she was challenging her father on his opposition to higher taxes on the rich and the addition of more government welfare programs. The self-professed objectivity proclaimed by her professors had to be the truth and she indicated so to her father. He responded by asking how she was doing in school.

Taken aback, she answered rather haughtily that she had a 4.0 GPA, and let him know that it was tough to maintain, insisting that she was taking a very difficult course load and was constantly studying, which left her no time to go out and party like other people she knew. She didn0t even have time for a boyfriend, and didn’t really have many college friends because she spent all her time studying.

Her father listened and then asked, “How is your friend Audrey doing?” She replied, “Audrey is barely getting by. All she takes are easy classes, she never studies, and she barely has a 2.0 GPA. She s so popular on campus, college for her is a blast. She’s always invited to all the parties, and lots of times she doesn’t even show up for classes because she’s too hung over.”

Her father asked his daughter, “Why don’t you go to the Dean’s office and ask him to deduct a 1.0 off your GPA and give it to your friend who only has a 2.0. That way you will both have a 3.0 GPA and certainly that would be a fair and equal distribution of GPA.”

The daughter, visibly shocked by her father’s suggestion, angrily fired back, “That wouldn’t be fair! I have worked really hard for my grades! I’ve invested a lot of time, and a lot of hard work! Audrey has done next to nothing toward her degree. She played while I worked my tail off!”

The father slowly smiled, winked and said gently, “Welcome to the Republican Party.”
User avatar
NealIsGod
MP3
 
Posts: 12512
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 2:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Postby Melissa » Fri Jan 30, 2009 5:33 am

Great story. Reminds me too of the "death tax", I know people whose parents left them their money once they both died (the parents died of old age about a year apart), and the amount they HAD to pay in "death tax" on what they inherited from their own parents was absolutely nauseating.
Melissa
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5542
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:00 pm

Postby Ehwmatt » Fri Jan 30, 2009 6:08 am

Melissa wrote:Great story. Reminds me too of the "death tax", I know people whose parents left them their money once they both died (the parents died of old age about a year apart), and the amount they HAD to pay in "death tax" on what they inherited from their own parents was absolutely nauseating.


Most immoral tax that could possibly be levied on people. If you're planning to die soon, make sure you do it in 2010, not before or after, when the confiscatory 55% rate returns in force in 2011. There is NO reason for this tax that harshly penalizes responsible saving/investing/nest-egg maintenance over the course of a lifetime.
User avatar
Ehwmatt
MP3
 
Posts: 10907
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:15 am
Location: Cleveland, OH

Postby AlteredDNA » Fri Jan 30, 2009 6:11 am

Ehwmatt wrote:
Melissa wrote:Great story. Reminds me too of the "death tax", I know people whose parents left them their money once they both died (the parents died of old age about a year apart), and the amount they HAD to pay in "death tax" on what they inherited from their own parents was absolutely nauseating.


Most immoral tax that could possibly be levied on people. If you're planning to die soon, make sure you do it in 2010, not before or after, when the confiscatory 55% rate returns in force in 2011. There is NO reason for this tax that harshly penalizes responsible saving/investing/nest-egg maintenance over the course of a lifetime.


Not to mention that it is double dipping in that it is a tax on revenue and assets that by and large have ALREADY BEEN TAXED.
I Love Pineapple!!!
User avatar
AlteredDNA
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2171
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 5:08 am
Location: Baton Rouge

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Fri Jan 30, 2009 6:12 am

Ehwmatt wrote:Great post Dave.

JFK is rolling in his grave right now looking at what his party has become. Now there was a guy who understood economics and the malaise of high taxes.


This is bogus.
That's like Democrats taking credit for Nixon, since he signed the Clean Air Act.

JFK would find much of Obama's stimulus aims totally in keeping with his own New Frontier spending program.
Try as you may, you can't claim him as your own.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16055
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby Melissa » Fri Jan 30, 2009 6:12 am

AlteredDNA wrote:
Ehwmatt wrote:
Melissa wrote:Great story. Reminds me too of the "death tax", I know people whose parents left them their money once they both died (the parents died of old age about a year apart), and the amount they HAD to pay in "death tax" on what they inherited from their own parents was absolutely nauseating.


Most immoral tax that could possibly be levied on people. If you're planning to die soon, make sure you do it in 2010, not before or after, when the confiscatory 55% rate returns in force in 2011. There is NO reason for this tax that harshly penalizes responsible saving/investing/nest-egg maintenance over the course of a lifetime.


Not to mention that it is double dipping in that it is a tax on revenue and assets that by and large have ALREADY BEEN TAXED.


Exactly.
Melissa
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5542
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:00 pm

Postby conversationpc » Fri Jan 30, 2009 6:14 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Ehwmatt wrote:Great post Dave.

JFK is rolling in his grave right now looking at what his party has become. Now there was a guy who understood economics and the malaise of high taxes.


This is bogus.
That's like Democrats taking credit for Nixon, since he signed the Clean Air Act.

JFK would find much of Obama's stimulus aims totally in keeping with his own New Frontier spending program.
Try as you may, you can't claim him as your own.


No one's claiming him for his own. I couldn't care less what party JFK was in but I'm pretty sure he would be totally embarrassed by your party AND the Republicans, for that matter.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby AlteredDNA » Fri Jan 30, 2009 6:18 am

Fact Finder wrote:Hey Deano, about that selfish remark, what else do you want us all to pay for? We're all obviously rolling in the dough so where should I send more?

Income taxes on wages
Income tax on dividends and interest
Income tax on capital gains
Social Security tax (FICA)
Unemployment tax
General sales tax
Gross receipts taxes
Business income taxes
Business and sales permits
Workers compensation tax
Unemployment tax
Contractor taxes
Occupation, business, NEC, public utility, and corporate licensure fees
Tariffs
Death (estate) taxes
Gift tax
Meals tax
Soft drinks tax
Margarine tax
Documentary and stock transfer taxes
Property tax on real estate
Personal property tax on items such as computers and boats
School bus and other K-12 school fees (attendance mandatory)
State college and university fees (attendance required to legally practice many professions)
Turnpike, bridge and tunnel tolls; tollbooth transponders
Airport and airway taxes
Gasoline and fuel taxes
Insurance premium tax
Alcohol tax
Amusement taxes
Cigarette tax
Livestock tax
Pari-mutuels (gambling tax)
State lottery gambling profits
Water and sewer assessments
Motor vehicle registration and license fees
Motor vehicle tax
Auto excise tax
Aircraft and boat registration fees
Fishing, hunting, and gun license fees
Cable TV tax
Long distance phone tax
Electricity tax
Room occupancy (hotel) taxes
Court costs
Fees for copies of government documentation
Taxi medallions and other vehicle operator taxes
Ferry, bus, and train taxes
Building, equipment, and land use permits
Health permits
Liquor license fees and liquor tax
Rental car tax
Dump permits
Marriage, birth, and death certificates
Adoption fees


Thank You...

Furthermore, if everyone had to get out their own checkbook and write a check to the IRS every month, rather than half of the amount being deducted and the other half paid by the employer as it is now, there would be a second coming of the Boston Tea Party...
I Love Pineapple!!!
User avatar
AlteredDNA
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2171
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 5:08 am
Location: Baton Rouge

Postby Lula » Fri Jan 30, 2009 6:18 am

resident teacher chiming in here. first off, one can not become a contracted teacher with only 4 years of college. if one chooses to not get a higher degree they have to do something more. one can take an additional year for student teching through a 4 yr school or some districts offer classes and the individual signs on as a district intern (5 yr process) with the promise of serving a specific amount of time. i realize a teacher does not have to attend an additional 3 or 4 yrs as do other professionals, but teaching does require continuing education. i went to grad school to receive my master's and credential. i still have to work towards the next level of my credential which requires more school- at least 30 units. so please my fellow posters do not make assumptions about teachers.

i realize society does not view teachers as they view other professionals. for some reason educating our children is not as valuable as treating disease or filing a lawsuit. oh well, such is life. just know that there are good teachers out there and appreciation goes a long way 8) .

as for the stimulus package, i'm one of those that sees some good in it. before y'all slam obama for destroying the economy i'll ask that we give him 8 months of a free pass as we did bush.
User avatar
Lula
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4561
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 12:10 pm
Location: santa monica

Postby conversationpc » Fri Jan 30, 2009 6:20 am

Lula wrote:as for the stimulus package, i'm one of those that sees some good in it. before y'all slam obama for destroying the economy i'll ask that we give him 8 months of a free pass as we did bush.


Unfortunately, the stimulus package is being discussed now so there is no free pass on it.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby AlteredDNA » Fri Jan 30, 2009 6:22 am

conversationpc wrote:
Lula wrote:as for the stimulus package, i'm one of those that sees some good in it. before y'all slam obama for destroying the economy i'll ask that we give him 8 months of a free pass as we did bush.


Unfortunately, the stimulus package is being discussed now so there is no free pass on it.


Sadly, though, not discussed enough...

And why should anyone, especially politicians, be given a free pass?
I Love Pineapple!!!
User avatar
AlteredDNA
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2171
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 5:08 am
Location: Baton Rouge

Postby Lula » Fri Jan 30, 2009 6:25 am

my free pass was sarcasm... in the same sense that w was not responsible for the attacks on 9/11. obama has come into office at a time like nt other with our country in a recession, not a looming recession, but a full blown recession as well as two wars. i don't know if his plan will work, but i do know that he ought to receive the opportunity to try. we won't even see any real eveidnece until next sept or so i understand.
User avatar
Lula
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4561
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 12:10 pm
Location: santa monica

Postby Ehwmatt » Fri Jan 30, 2009 6:27 am

conversationpc wrote:
The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Ehwmatt wrote:Great post Dave.

JFK is rolling in his grave right now looking at what his party has become. Now there was a guy who understood economics and the malaise of high taxes.


This is bogus.
That's like Democrats taking credit for Nixon, since he signed the Clean Air Act.

JFK would find much of Obama's stimulus aims totally in keeping with his own New Frontier spending program.
Try as you may, you can't claim him as your own.


No one's claiming him for his own. I couldn't care less what party JFK was in but I'm pretty sure he would be totally embarrassed by your party AND the Republicans, for that matter.


Exactly Dave. I wouldn't chide a Democrat for admiring Lincoln. Kennedy was a good leader and certainly did and said many intelligent/pragmatic things. I don't have to be a registered Democrat to admire that in him.
User avatar
Ehwmatt
MP3
 
Posts: 10907
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:15 am
Location: Cleveland, OH

Postby Ehwmatt » Fri Jan 30, 2009 6:30 am

Lula wrote:resident teacher chiming in here. first off, one can not become a contracted teacher with only 4 years of college. if one chooses to not get a higher degree they have to do something more. one can take an additional year for student teching through a 4 yr school or some districts offer classes and the individual signs on as a district intern (5 yr process) with the promise of serving a specific amount of time. i realize a teacher does not have to attend an additional 3 or 4 yrs as do other professionals, but teaching does require continuing education. i went to grad school to receive my master's and credential. i still have to work towards the next level of my credential which requires more school- at least 30 units. so please my fellow posters do not make assumptions about teachers.

i realize society does not view teachers as they view other professionals. for some reason educating our children is not as valuable as treating disease or filing a lawsuit. oh well, such is life. just know that there are good teachers out there and appreciation goes a long way 8) .

as for the stimulus package, i'm one of those that sees some good in it. before y'all slam obama for destroying the economy i'll ask that we give him 8 months of a free pass as we did bush.


Hey Lula - I know you teachers go through more schooling and hoops than given credit for. My sister's doing it right now. Everybody cuts down and denigrates professions and job titles based on the worst of the lot - corrupt cops, bad/lazy teachers, scummy CEOs, dishonest lawyers, bad doctors etc etc. The people out there doing their jobs right all deserve more respect.
User avatar
Ehwmatt
MP3
 
Posts: 10907
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:15 am
Location: Cleveland, OH

Postby conversationpc » Fri Jan 30, 2009 6:34 am

Ehwmatt wrote:Exactly Dave. I wouldn't chide a Democrat for admiring Lincoln. Kennedy was a good leader and certainly did and said many intelligent/pragmatic things. I don't have to be a registered Democrat to admire that in him.


Exactly my point. Same goes for Obama and his fascination with Lincoln.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby Lula » Fri Jan 30, 2009 6:37 am

wow, typos on my part :lol: lunch is over. kiss kiss
User avatar
Lula
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4561
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 12:10 pm
Location: santa monica

Postby Melissa » Fri Jan 30, 2009 6:38 am

Ehwmatt wrote:
Lula wrote:resident teacher chiming in here. first off, one can not become a contracted teacher with only 4 years of college. if one chooses to not get a higher degree they have to do something more. one can take an additional year for student teching through a 4 yr school or some districts offer classes and the individual signs on as a district intern (5 yr process) with the promise of serving a specific amount of time. i realize a teacher does not have to attend an additional 3 or 4 yrs as do other professionals, but teaching does require continuing education. i went to grad school to receive my master's and credential. i still have to work towards the next level of my credential which requires more school- at least 30 units. so please my fellow posters do not make assumptions about teachers.

i realize society does not view teachers as they view other professionals. for some reason educating our children is not as valuable as treating disease or filing a lawsuit. oh well, such is life. just know that there are good teachers out there and appreciation goes a long way 8) .

as for the stimulus package, i'm one of those that sees some good in it. before y'all slam obama for destroying the economy i'll ask that we give him 8 months of a free pass as we did bush.


Hey Lula - I know you teachers go through more schooling and hoops than given credit for. My sister's doing it right now. Everybody cuts down and denigrates professions and job titles based on the worst of the lot - corrupt cops, bad/lazy teachers, scummy CEOs, dishonest lawyers, bad doctors etc etc. The people out there doing their jobs right all deserve more respect.


Agreed.
Melissa
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5542
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:00 pm

Postby squirt1 » Fri Jan 30, 2009 6:41 am

Lula- Teachers are so underpaid for the hrs they have to put in and the nonsense they get from some parents. Now as far as the vote yesterday it is no more than a pork bill. It is to buy votes ! There is even one in there to put ALL Americans medical records on line by 2014 I think. How long will it take for that to be used punatively by employers,lenders and Ins companies. Most that voted have never read it. The people should have the money and they will stimulate the economy. No more bloated gov't programs that seem to never go away.
squirt1
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1914
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 10:47 am

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Fri Jan 30, 2009 6:46 am

conversationpc wrote:No one's claiming him for his own. I couldn't care less what party JFK was in but I'm pretty sure he would be totally embarrassed by your party AND the Republicans, for that matter.


The "JFK was a conservative" trope has been assimilated into the Right-wing catchetism, and is now routinely repeated like some universal truth.
The fact is, as much as Limbaugh, Beck, etc. love to point to JFK’s tax cuts, they forget to mention his FDR-style New Frontier program, or his push for Medicare.
Sure, you could make a thin case that interventionist policies like Bay of Pigs share more in common with the modern Neo-Cons who've infested the GOP ranks, but once again, JFK fiercely fought against invading Cuba during the missile crisis.

Touting JFK’s conservative credentials is about as dishonest as saying Dubya betrayed Reagan principles.
On almost every front (recruiting evangelicals, tax cuts, hawkish foriegn policy, expanding the size of gov't) Bush was a faithful executor of the party as Reagan defined it.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16055
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby Ehwmatt » Fri Jan 30, 2009 6:50 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
conversationpc wrote:No one's claiming him for his own. I couldn't care less what party JFK was in but I'm pretty sure he would be totally embarrassed by your party AND the Republicans, for that matter.


The "JFK was a conservative" trope has been assimilated into the Right-wing catchetism, and is now routinely repeated like a universal truth.
The fact is, as much as Limbaugh, Beck, etc. love to point to JFK’s tax cuts, they forget to mention his FDR-style New Frontier program, or his push for Medicare.
Sure, you could make a thin case that interventionist policies like Bay of Pigs share more in common with the modern Neo-Cons who've infested the GOP, but once again, JFK fiercely fought against invading Cuba during the missile crisis.
Touting JFK’s conservative credentials is about as dishonest as saying Dubya betrayed Reagan principles.
On almost every front (recruiting evangelicals, tax cuts, hawkish foriegn policy) Bush was a faithful executor of the party as Reagan defined it.


Again, no one here said he was a conservative. I just don't think JFK would have ever been caught dabbling in the kinds of "stimuli" plans routinely going through Congress as of late.
User avatar
Ehwmatt
MP3
 
Posts: 10907
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:15 am
Location: Cleveland, OH

Postby Rockindeano » Fri Jan 30, 2009 7:07 am

Ehwmatt wrote:Again, no one here said he was a conservative. I just don't think JFK would have ever been caught dabbling in the kinds of "stimuli" plans routinely going through Congress as of late.


JFK never followed 8 years of a Bush presidency either.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Re: OT: Here's What's in the $825 Billion Stimulus Bill

Postby Rockindeano » Fri Jan 30, 2009 7:10 am

conversationpc wrote:
The only things the government can do to stimulate the economy, in my opinion, is to get out of the way, i.e. lower taxes.


Well your opinion sucks. There's a reason your party got blown away in the last two elections. Tax cuts are not the Holy grail of economic magic.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby Rockindeano » Fri Jan 30, 2009 7:16 am

conversationpc wrote:Exactly my point. Same goes for Obama and his fascination with Lincoln.


LOL, back then, the parties were reversed. Lincoln today would be a Democrat. He did end slavery you know? Republicans today wouldn't end slavery, they would try to figure out a way to give tax credits to owners with good slaves.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

PreviousNext

Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests