Moderator: Andrew
Rockindeano wrote:As a taxpayer, I think we should pay for those kids. It isn't the children's fault they were born. We can't turn our backs on 14 kids can we? Now the mother is a different story. There has to be or should soon be a law of some kind to limit this. If she is doing this in order to receive extra handout money, then yes, we should run her over with a steamroller and paste her thinned out body on the wall of the United Way building.
RossValoryRocks wrote:Rockindeano wrote:As a taxpayer, I think we should pay for those kids. It isn't the children's fault they were born. We can't turn our backs on 14 kids can we? Now the mother is a different story. There has to be or should soon be a law of some kind to limit this. If she is doing this in order to receive extra handout money, then yes, we should run her over with a steamroller and paste her thinned out body on the wall of the United Way building.
Completely agree here. Someone has to take care of the innocent children here...Mom is a wack job and can't do it obviously.
StevePerryHair wrote: It's that it was allowed in the first place, especially if she was allowed to have her invitro on medicaid. I wonder.
Rockindeano wrote:StevePerryHair wrote: It's that it was allowed in the first place, especially if she was allowed to have her invitro on medicaid. I wonder.
You are onto something here. If Medicaid allowed this, then this is disturbing.
StevePerryHair wrote:To me, the doctor who allowed this is to blame. I heard some women talking about this last night. What an abuse of medicine. She may be dumb, but the doctor was supposed to have a brain.
Luvsaugeri wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:To me, the doctor who allowed this is to blame. I heard some women talking about this last night. What an abuse of medicine. She may be dumb, but the doctor was supposed to have a brain.
I totally agree. He can pay for these children!!!
I don't think as a taxpayer I should have to pay for stupid people that can't know enough to stay off your back or at the very least use birth control instead of popping out kids you can't support!!!!
Luvsaugeri wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:To me, the doctor who allowed this is to blame. I heard some women talking about this last night. What an abuse of medicine. She may be dumb, but the doctor was supposed to have a brain.
I totally agree. He can pay for these children!!!
I don't think as a taxpayer I should have to pay for stupid people that can't know enough to stay off your back or at the very least use birth control instead of popping out kids you can't support!!!!
Rockindeano wrote:Luvsaugeri wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:To me, the doctor who allowed this is to blame. I heard some women talking about this last night. What an abuse of medicine. She may be dumb, but the doctor was supposed to have a brain.
I totally agree. He can pay for these children!!!
I don't think as a taxpayer I should have to pay for stupid people that can't know enough to stay off your back or at the very least use birth control instead of popping out kids you can't support!!!!
So you are against paying taxes to feed these little kids?
Rockindeano wrote:Kelli, that is not a sufficient answer. I am not asking for moral opinions, I am asking what we should do for these kids. The fact of the matter is that they are here now. We cannot turn our backs n them, regardless of how bad and fucked up she is. She could have 30 more kids and my answer would be the same. The kids are innocent.
Taking out her pussy is a bit extreme isn't it?
StevePerryHair wrote:As long as we are a free country though, we can only suggest birth control and mental health counseling. I wouldn't want to see that change! I think the doctor's should refuse treatment though. It's the same for the plastic surgery addicts. Doctor's allow that to an extreme when those people need counseling. There is a fine line where it seems unethical. I don't think those kids should suffer though.
Luvsaugeri wrote:Rockindeano wrote:Kelli, that is not a sufficient answer. I am not asking for moral opinions, I am asking what we should do for these kids. The fact of the matter is that they are here now. We cannot turn our backs n them, regardless of how bad and fucked up she is. She could have 30 more kids and my answer would be the same. The kids are innocent.
Taking out her pussy is a bit extreme isn't it?
Agreed. They are here now....it's too late.
But the whole system needs to change.
No pussy removal needed.....just a simple (and inexpensive) form of birth control......
Behshad wrote:
I think they should take ALL of the children away from her and give them to families who not only deserve them but also can afford to raise them.
StoneCold wrote:Behshad wrote:
I think they should take ALL of the children away from her and give them to families who not only deserve them but also can afford to raise them.
I definitely agree about removal of the 8 new kids. Jolie and Pitt will be flying into LAX shortly to pick them up.
Gunbot wrote:I think I found a job for this chick. She can start up her own factory.
Jubilee wrote:Gunbot wrote:I think I found a job for this chick. She can start up her own factory.
Mommy Dearest better keep a tight reign on things around the house, or it just may come down to that. I see a real-life "Lord of the Flies" developing in her home in the very near future....
Behshad wrote:The babies will be fed and taken care of one way or another. Who should pay for it ? The mom and those who assisted her to get pregnant. Who will pay for it, the taxpayers. Do we have a choice, fuck no.
I think they should take ALL of the children away from her and give them to families who not only deserve them but also can afford to raise them. The mother needs to be sent to a mental hospital and or jail.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests