
I have to agree with Dean that Bruce is great on stage. I just wish his songs weren't so boring.
Moderator: Andrew
Behshad wrote:Is it just me or does Springsteen look more and more like Neal the older he gets ?!
I have to agree with Dean that Bruce is great on stage. I just wish his songs weren't so boring.
Behshad wrote:Is it just me or does Springsteen look more and more like Neal the older he gets ?!
great minds think a like, I thought the same thing, Im not much of a Bruce fan, but he put on one hell of a show.Behshad wrote:Is it just me or does Springsteen look more and more like Neal the older he gets ?!
I have to agree with Dean that Bruce is great on stage. I just wish his songs weren't so boring.
stevew2 wrote:great minds think a like, I thought the same thing, Im not much of a Bruce fan, but he put on one hell of a show.Behshad wrote:Is it just me or does Springsteen look more and more like Neal the older he gets ?!
I have to agree with Dean that Bruce is great on stage. I just wish his songs weren't so boring.
It would take Friga that long just to find his crankSP Fan in Oregon wrote:stevew2 wrote:great minds think a like, I thought the same thing, Im not much of a Bruce fan, but he put on one hell of a show.Behshad wrote:Is it just me or does Springsteen look more and more like Neal the older he gets ?!
I have to agree with Dean that Bruce is great on stage. I just wish his songs weren't so boring.
in 12 MINUTES TOO!!!!
Behshad wrote:TRAGChick wrote:Had it on as "background"....was doing TRAG email promo work during halftime.
SOUNDED alright....
Damn you Nora,,,I thought it said Trag email porno at first and right before I attempted to sign up I realized it said promo
Behshad wrote:Is it just me or does Springsteen look more and more like Neal and PAUL the older he gets .
Triple S wrote:It was OK, not the 'best ever' for me (Prince in 2007 still holds that honor).
Luvsaugeri wrote:Triple S wrote:It was OK, not the 'best ever' for me (Prince in 2007 still holds that honor).
I was gonna say the same thing. It was good but I liked Prince better.
I thought Bruce looked great. It looks like he hasn't aged hardly at all.
conversationpc wrote:Luvsaugeri wrote:Triple S wrote:It was OK, not the 'best ever' for me (Prince in 2007 still holds that honor).
I was gonna say the same thing. It was good but I liked Prince better.
I thought Bruce looked great. It looks like he hasn't aged hardly at all.
Were you watching a black and white TV?
Luvsaugeri wrote:conversationpc wrote:Luvsaugeri wrote:Triple S wrote:It was OK, not the 'best ever' for me (Prince in 2007 still holds that honor).
I was gonna say the same thing. It was good but I liked Prince better.
I thought Bruce looked great. It looks like he hasn't aged hardly at all.
Were you watching a black and white TV?
Hehehe....you didn't think he looked good?
How old is he now?
Rhiannon wrote:Behshad wrote:Is it just me or does Springsteen look more and more like Neal the older he gets ?!
YES.
Behshad wrote:He looks good for his age. But saying he hasn't age means you need to either get your eyes checked or as dave said get rid of that b/w TV ,,,, unless Kelli is comparing Bruce to his evil twin Neal
artist4perry wrote:Rhiannon wrote:Behshad wrote:Is it just me or does Springsteen look more and more like Neal the older he gets ?!
YES.
I told my husband he looks like the love child of Neal Schon and Neal Diamond.........![]()
![]()
![]()
DrFU wrote:artist4perry wrote:Rhiannon wrote:Behshad wrote:Is it just me or does Springsteen look more and more like Neal the older he gets ?!
YES.
I told my husband he looks like the love child of Neal Schon and Neal Diamond.........![]()
![]()
![]()
Must be a plastic surgeon who specializes in wrinkly rockers ...
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 28 guests