OT: Jacko Rumored to Announce Concert Tour

by **jrnyman28** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 3:43 am

Let's see Michael go "unplugged"!!

by **4everkop** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 5:35 am

I love Mike, but his track record as of late, he probably wont perform. But when you think about him, anytime MJ is named at an event, the ratings immediately go up. Whether people like him or not, he still gets the most media attention out of any celebrity. I'd go see him live if I had the money and the means of getting there. Great performer. He's just tormented...shame.

by **brywool** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 5:42 am

4everkop wrote:I love Mike, but his track record as of late, he probably wont perform. But when you think about him, anytime MJ is named at an event, the ratings immediately go up. Whether people like him or not, he still gets the most media attention out of any celebrity. I'd go see him live if I had the money and the means of getting there. Great performer. He's just tormented...shame.

more like "He's just a tormenter, he should BE ashamed"

by **Michigan Girl** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 6:20 am

jrnyman28 wrote:Let's see Michael go "unplugged"!!

lol!!

by **brywool** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 6:32 am

Michigan Girl wrote:
jrnyman28 wrote:Let's see Michael go "unplugged"!!

lol!!

I'm waiting for "Un-nosed"

by **The Sushi Hunter** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:31 am

I'm envisioning a live Jackson performance to be more like a Fantom of the Opera type of deal, where Jackson, being the main charactor of the plot/performance, will be wearing a mask of some type on stage during the duration of this evolution and the dancers, stage work and others on stage will pretty much be acting a story line in regards to something about Jackson. It may be titled: The Jackson "Life" Tour or Concert. And I think the inspiration behind it for Jackson is the fact that the first Afro-American is president of the United States. It's just odd that after years of nothing from Jackson, he's now all of a sudden coming out to do something. Either has to do with his failing health, failing face, or just the time in our American history with president Obama.

Either way, it's very interesting to see what this kook's up to.

by **YoungJRNY** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 2:59 pm

I don't care if he screws his pooch for a living, I'd go see this guy perform on stage any day.

Michael Jackson if he just LEFT HIMSELF ALONE!!!!

Of course I don't know what's worse, that projection of age, or this

I.
Just.
Don't.
Get.
It.
Mike..

by **The Sushi Hunter** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 5:09 pm

YoungJRNY wrote:Of course I don't know what's worse, that projection of age, or..

Well I know what's worse hands down, how Jackson actually looks now. The aged projection pic just looks like a normal guy, where as the actual pic of Jackson looks freaking weird.

by **Michigan Girl** » Fri Mar 06, 2009 2:26 am

YoungJRNY wrote:I don't care if he screws his pooch for a living, I'd go see this guy perform on stage any day.

Michael Jackson if he just LEFT HIMSELF ALONE!!!!

Of course I don't know what's worse, that projection of age, or this

I.
Just.
Don't.
Get.
It.
Mike..

ONE nose job wouldn't have hurt!! :wink:

by **artist4perry** » Fri Mar 06, 2009 2:39 am

He would have more looked like this with a little more ageing. Not bad at all. He had a low self immage. I think his dad's quest to make those kids successful made them messed up. He could have been bigger than anyone, if he had not went off the deep end.

by **Michigan Girl** » Fri Mar 06, 2009 2:42 am

This is perfect, Gin....he should've stopped right here!!! :wink:

by **artist4perry** » Fri Mar 06, 2009 2:49 am

Unfortunately now he looks like a madman. Much like a crazed maniquin, or a wooden puppet. :shock:

by **The Sushi Hunter** » Fri Mar 06, 2009 5:13 am

I got to thinking that perhaps this was just part of the deal Jackson made with the Devil to become famous. Sort of on the same lines as the movie Crossroads....making a deal with the Devil. Jackson became famous, but the Devil got his soul and had fun scrambling it up like a bad three egg Denver omelet with extra cheese.

by **Voyager** » Fri Mar 06, 2009 5:19 am

YoungJRNY wrote:I don't care if he screws his pooch for a living, I'd go see this guy perform on stage any day.

Michael Jackson if he just LEFT HIMSELF ALONE!!!!

Of course I don't know what's worse, that projection of age, or this

I.
Just.
Don't.
Get.
It.
Mike..

How about that Steve Urkel dude... he went the opposite way of Michael - he started out a freak then went normal. Jacko started out normal and then turned into a freak.

by **Don** » Fri Mar 06, 2009 5:21 am

10 nights at the O2 in June. 20k seating capacity, Michael should make a little bit of money off of that.

by **WiseOldTabbyCat** » Fri Mar 06, 2009 5:27 am

Gonna try and get a ticket.

It's gonna be a messy, messy battle. I'll have to get up at 7am in the morning and I should be so lucky as to get even ONE ticket.

But wish me luck all the same.

by **The Sushi Hunter** » Fri Mar 06, 2009 5:29 am

Voyager wrote:How about that Steve Urkel dude... he went the opposite way of Michael - he started out a freak then went normal. Jacko started out normal and then turned into a freak.

Yeah, but Urkel was dressed up to look like a nerd specifically for that show. He wasn't dorky like that when he was off the set.

by **Voyager** » Fri Mar 06, 2009 8:37 am

WiseOldTabbyCat wrote:Gonna try and get a ticket.

It's gonna be a messy, messy battle. I'll have to get up at 7am in the morning and I should be so lucky as to get even ONE ticket.

But wish me luck all the same.

Make sure to take a six-pack of Jesus Juice with you, because you might get thirsty waiting in that long line.

by **brywool** » Fri Mar 06, 2009 8:56 am

Um yeah, I really wanna pay to see a child molester... Are you guys nuts? Why give this scumbag another dime? The fact that he basically ripped off McCartney should be enough for the British to ban him from their country.

by **WiseOldTabbyCat** » Fri Mar 06, 2009 9:07 am

brywool wrote:

Um yeah, I really wanna pay to see a child molester... Are you guys nuts? Why give this scumbag another dime? The fact that he basically ripped off McCartney should be enough for the British to ban him from their country.

Love the sinner hate the sin, no? :P

Voyager wrote:
Make sure to take a six-pack of Jesus Juice with you, because you might get thirsty waiting in that long line.

If it's what I think it is, then YES.

by **Carla777** » Fri Mar 06, 2009 9:34 am

I won't pay for see this guy either..but i like two songs, thriller for the vid and Beat it, because Eddie Van Halen guitar solo is fantastic

by **G.I.Jim** » Fri Mar 06, 2009 11:26 am

Carla777 wrote:I won't pay for see this guy either..but i like two songs, thriller for the vid and Beat it, because Eddie Van Halen guitar solo is fantastic

I'd definitely pay to see him just out of curiosity. I was a HUGE fan in my early teens! I hate to admit this here, but I even had the "Beat it" jacket with the zippers when I was 12 or 13. :oops:

I really love the song "Dirty Diana", and I love Steve Vai's solo on that song. Yeah...I'd definitely go see him if I had the chance. Of course, I can't fathom what kind of show he'd be able to pull off in his recent physical condition? Who knows, maybe he'll surprise us. :wink:

by **Rick** » Fri Mar 06, 2009 11:28 am

G.I.Jim wrote:
Carla777 wrote:I won't pay for see this guy either..but i like two songs, thriller for the vid and Beat it, because Eddie Van Halen guitar solo is fantastic

I'd definitely pay to see him just out of curiosity. I was a HUGE fan in my early teens! I hate to admit this here, but I even had the "Beat it" jacket with the zippers when I was 12 or 13. I really love the song "Dirty Diana", and I love Steve Vai's solo on that song. Yeah...I'd definitely go see him if I had the chance. Of course, I can't fathom what kind of show he'd be able to pull off in his recent physical condition? Who knows, maybe he'll surprise us.

Fag.

by **G.I.Jim** » Fri Mar 06, 2009 11:32 am

Rick wrote:
G.I.Jim wrote:
Carla777 wrote:I won't pay for see this guy either..but i like two songs, thriller for the vid and Beat it, because Eddie Van Halen guitar solo is fantastic

I'd definitely pay to see him just out of curiosity. I was a HUGE fan in my early teens! I hate to admit this here, but I even had the "Beat it" jacket with the zippers when I was 12 or 13. I really love the song "Dirty Diana", and I love Steve Vai's solo on that song. Yeah...I'd definitely go see him if I had the chance. Of course, I can't fathom what kind of show he'd be able to pull off in his recent physical condition? Who knows, maybe he'll surprise us.

Fag.

STOP TEASING ME! Tito...get me a tissue! :cry:

by **Rick** » Fri Mar 06, 2009 11:37 am

G.I.Jim wrote:
Rick wrote:
G.I.Jim wrote:
Carla777 wrote:I won't pay for see this guy either..but i like two songs, thriller for the vid and Beat it, because Eddie Van Halen guitar solo is fantastic

I'd definitely pay to see him just out of curiosity. I was a HUGE fan in my early teens! I hate to admit this here, but I even had the "Beat it" jacket with the zippers when I was 12 or 13. I really love the song "Dirty Diana", and I love Steve Vai's solo on that song. Yeah...I'd definitely go see him if I had the chance. Of course, I can't fathom what kind of show he'd be able to pull off in his recent physical condition? Who knows, maybe he'll surprise us.

Fag.

STOP TEASING ME! Tito...get me a tissue!

by **artist4perry** » Fri Mar 06, 2009 11:38 am

He's gone too over the deep end for me. You have to think about the rumors, if they are true, then your supporting a serial child mollester.

Money talks in court, and I cannot see normal folks inviting children over, secluding them away from their parents, and that many accusations.

I also hated what he did to Mc Cartney. Still wish he had turned out otherwise, but talent does not take precidence over safety of children.

by **G.I.Jim** » Fri Mar 06, 2009 11:40 am

artist4perry wrote:He's gone too over the deep end for me. You have to think about the rumors, if they are true, then your supporting a serial child mollester.

Money talks in court, and I cannot see normal folks inviting children over, secluding them away from their parents, and that many accusations.

I also hated what he did to Mc Cartney. Still wish he had turned out otherwise, but talent does not take precidence over safety of children.

What are you referring to with McCartney?

by **Michigan Girl** » Fri Mar 06, 2009 11:42 am

artist4perry wrote:He's gone too over the deep end for me. You have to think about the rumors, if they are true, then your supporting a serial child mollester.

Money talks in court, and I cannot see normal folks inviting children over, secluding them away from their parents, and that many accusations.

I also hated what he did to Mc Cartney. Still wish he had turned out otherwise, but talent does not take precidence over safety of children.

Not excusing him in any way, shape or form, but how many parents do you know
that would allow their children to stay with adults that they don't really know, other than the fact
that he's a celeb?!?!?
I blame everyone involved, except the children!! :wink:

by **Michigan Girl** » Fri Mar 06, 2009 11:44 am

G.I.Jim wrote:
artist4perry wrote:He's gone too over the deep end for me. You have to think about the rumors, if they are true, then your supporting a serial child mollester.

Money talks in court, and I cannot see normal folks inviting children over, secluding them away from their parents, and that many accusations.

I also hated what he did to Mc Cartney. Still wish he had turned out otherwise, but talent does not take precidence over safety of children.

What are you referring to with McCartney?

The catalog..... :wink:

by **artist4perry** » Fri Mar 06, 2009 11:45 am

G.I.Jim wrote:
artist4perry wrote:He's gone too over the deep end for me. You have to think about the rumors, if they are true, then your supporting a serial child mollester.

Money talks in court, and I cannot see normal folks inviting children over, secluding them away from their parents, and that many accusations.

I also hated what he did to Mc Cartney. Still wish he had turned out otherwise, but talent does not take precidence over safety of children.

What are you referring to with McCartney?

He bought the rights to the old Beatles tunes, and would not sell them back to him, even after the whole singing on his album and all. He says he's leaving them to him in his will...nice guy

Paul has to pay to sing his own songs to Michael.

http://www.spinner.com/2009/01/06/jackson-leaving-beatles-songs-to-mccartney-in-will?icid=sphere_newsaol_inpage_popeater

MR

OT: Jacko Rumored to Announce Concert Tour

Who is online