
Sorry if this has been posted and I missed it. (no I didn't make this)
If you don't know what a furry is, you're better off not knowing.
Moderator: Andrew
Sarah wrote:
Sorry if this has been posted and I missed it. (no I didn't make this)
If you don't know what a furry is, you're better off not knowing.
Arianddu wrote:Sarah wrote:
Sorry if this has been posted and I missed it. (no I didn't make this)
If you don't know what a furry is, you're better off not knowing.
I'm hoping the odd bulge in the left leg is just me seeing lines oddly!![]()
![]()
![]()
Voyager wrote:Arianddu wrote:Sarah wrote:
Sorry if this has been posted and I missed it. (no I didn't make this)
If you don't know what a furry is, you're better off not knowing.
I'm hoping the odd bulge in the left leg is just me seeing lines oddly!![]()
![]()
![]()
Nope, your eyes are okay - it is definitely a big bulging package on a fox with jeans on. I'd say it borders on beastiality.
![]()
![]()
walkslikealady wrote:Noticed something interesting...
As for a 17 year old in this day and age (inhabiting the Perry/Journey forums), I'd think she knows what she's doing.
Jubilee wrote::?:![]()
![]()
I don't get it. With the possible exception of the schnoz, I really don't see any resemblance. As for the line/bulge on the pants, with all due respect I think the artist is being rather generous.
no1uknow wrote:Generous? From the photos I've seen I'd say she is right on the mark.![]()
Linda
bluejeangirl76 wrote:no1uknow wrote:Generous? From the photos I've seen I'd say she is right on the mark.![]()
Linda
That means nothing. Unless you've seen photos of the man without apparel and in a rigid state of affairs, ya can't tell anything by the pants.
DrFU wrote:bluejeangirl76 wrote:no1uknow wrote:Generous? From the photos I've seen I'd say she is right on the mark.![]()
Linda
That means nothing. Unless you've seen photos of the man without apparel and in a rigid state of affairs, ya can't tell anything by the pants.
and sometimes, you're just really, really pleasantly surprised ...
artist4perry wrote: I doubt she meant that to be that way ...............
Sarah wrote:I'm sure she's nice. No one said she's not.
walkslikealady wrote:For clarification purposes...the interesting thing I noticed was that AFP's post seemed to say one thing and then there was something else there without showing it had been edited. Computers! The interesting thing had nothing to do with endowments even though some sites have discussed this...at length.
What the hell are you taking?artist4perry wrote:walkslikealady wrote:For clarification purposes...the interesting thing I noticed was that AFP's post seemed to say one thing and then there was something else there without showing it had been edited. Computers! The interesting thing had nothing to do with endowments even though some sites have discussed this...at length.
Not following you, sometimes I edit because my sentences when I am on pain medication make no sense after I read them again. Was that it?
stevew2 wrote:What the hell are you taking?artist4perry wrote:walkslikealady wrote:For clarification purposes...the interesting thing I noticed was that AFP's post seemed to say one thing and then there was something else there without showing it had been edited. Computers! The interesting thing had nothing to do with endowments even though some sites have discussed this...at length.
Not following you, sometimes I edit because my sentences when I am on pain medication make no sense after I read them again. Was that it?
walkslikealady wrote:Just something strange I noticed. I looked down at your post in the thread while typing my post. After I submitted my post your post was different.
I thought usually when a post is edited it shows it's been edited. Maybe not though 'cause at another site I used to be on the administrator/moderator would change things and it didn't show they'd changed things there.
walkslikealady wrote:My problem is I can usually remember what I've read...used to get me A's in school. Not too useful on forums though 'cause you can get confused and reply to something that's no longer there.![]()
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests