RECENT SP mention RE: "new material"

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

Postby Peartree12249 » Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:49 pm

donnaplease wrote:
Gideon wrote:I'm so tempted to jump into the fray. If this argument goes further, I will, but I think Rhiannon handled it succinctly: Perry may have been the focal point of Journey's success, but to say that he was the sole reason for it is completely unsubstantiated. Fuck, if you want to get technical, Jonathan Cain joining Journey yielded more financial success for the band than Perry's (compare Infinity to Escape and see how far it lags). :wink:

This, in particular, stood out and it's something I'd like to address:

Rockindeano wrote:let's see journey play NO Perry songs at all, and then show me the tour numbers. They would be lucky to draw 500 people a gig.


No offense, Deano, but I think this isn't workable logic. You do recall that Perry was playing more Journey songs when he went on tour than actual Steve Perry songs, right? When Perry tours (lol), let's see him play no Journey songs whatsoever (particularly the ones that belong to Jonathan Cain: "Faithfully" and "Open Arms") and see his numbers.



This has been a good read... now for my 0.002 cents (effin economy! :evil: )

I totally agree that the whole is greater than the individual parts that make it up. HOWEVER, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to conclude that when Jon Cain says "we want the legacy sound" that he's talking about none other than SMFP. Neal, Jon and Ross play the same notes on their instruments, Deen (I assume) doesn't stray too far from Smitty's performance on the drums, so what exactly do they need to get 'back to' by firing JSS and hiring Arnel (or Jeremey, or Hugo, or KC)? You guessed it! Someone who's VOICE is similar enough to SP's to be reminiscent of the magic that was created by the group during SP's tenure. Rationalize it all you want, there's just no getting around the fact that Journey of today is nothing more than a tribute to Steve Perry and the greatness that he brought to the group. SP will never be as successful sans Journey, nor will Journey ever get out from under SP's shadow, and will therefore forever be hanging on to his coattails... (pun intended :wink: )

I think you make an excellent point. The legacy sound is all about SMFP. When fans argue about AP it's whether or not he can out-Perry Perry. Love him, hate him or indifferent, Journey is nothing without him. Steve Perry is hanging around this group like the chains around Jacob Marley's ghost. They will carry him around forever.
Grammar, the difference between knowing your shit and knowing you're shit.
User avatar
Peartree12249
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2946
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 2:47 pm

Postby jrnyman28 » Fri Mar 20, 2009 1:47 am

I don't entirely agree that the legacy sound is solely Perry's voice. That certainly is a key factor but look at what Journey had been doing since Perry left the band. Arrival certainly was an attempt to still sound like Perry-era excluding a few songs like "Kiss Me Softly", "We Will Meet Again" and "Livin' To Do". Even though some of those songs sound related to some TBF songs they still signal a new direction for the band to follow. Then comes Red13 with a solid change to a rockin' raw direction for the band. Admittedly too raw sounding. Generations stayed the course of a little more rock, a little less 'smooth'. And we can surmise that with JSS the band would definately have stayed with that rockier direction. With Arnel, not only do they return to the Perry-ish vocalizing but also a return to polished AOR melodic rock. The music has also returned to the 'legacy' sound.
jrnyman28
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6732
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 2:15 pm

Postby Gideon » Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:37 am

jrnyman28 wrote:I don't entirely agree that the legacy sound is solely Perry's voice. That certainly is a key factor but look at what Journey had been doing since Perry left the band. Arrival certainly was an attempt to still sound like Perry-era excluding a few songs like "Kiss Me Softly", "We Will Meet Again" and "Livin' To Do". Even though some of those songs sound related to some TBF songs they still signal a new direction for the band to follow. Then comes Red13 with a solid change to a rockin' raw direction for the band. Admittedly too raw sounding. Generations stayed the course of a little more rock, a little less 'smooth'. And we can surmise that with JSS the band would definately have stayed with that rockier direction. With Arnel, not only do they return to the Perry-ish vocalizing but also a return to polished AOR melodic rock. The music has also returned to the 'legacy' sound.


+1.
'Nothing was bigger for Journey than 1981’s “Escape” album. “I have to attribute that to Jonathan coming in and joining the writing team,” Steve Perry (Feb 2012).'
User avatar
Gideon
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4560
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 5:12 am
Location: Kentucky.

Postby annie89509 » Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:36 am

jrnyman28 wrote:I don't entirely agree that the legacy sound is solely Perry's voice. That certainly is a key factor but look at what Journey had been doing since Perry left the band. Arrival certainly was an attempt to still sound like Perry-era excluding a few songs like "Kiss Me Softly", "We Will Meet Again" and "Livin' To Do". Even though some of those songs sound related to some TBF songs they still signal a new direction for the band to follow. Then comes Red13 with a solid change to a rockin' raw direction for the band. Admittedly too raw sounding. Generations stayed the course of a little more rock, a little less 'smooth'. And we can surmise that with JSS the band would definately have stayed with that rockier direction. With Arnel, not only do they return to the Perry-ish vocalizing but also a return to polished AOR melodic rock. The music has also returned to the 'legacy' sound.

.... which is what DP and Peartree were saying, I think. The "legacy sound" is associated with SP.
User avatar
annie89509
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2849
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 5:55 am
Location: the big 5-8

Postby donnaplease » Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:00 am

annie89509 wrote:
jrnyman28 wrote:I don't entirely agree that the legacy sound is solely Perry's voice. That certainly is a key factor but look at what Journey had been doing since Perry left the band. Arrival certainly was an attempt to still sound like Perry-era excluding a few songs like "Kiss Me Softly", "We Will Meet Again" and "Livin' To Do". Even though some of those songs sound related to some TBF songs they still signal a new direction for the band to follow. Then comes Red13 with a solid change to a rockin' raw direction for the band. Admittedly too raw sounding. Generations stayed the course of a little more rock, a little less 'smooth'. And we can surmise that with JSS the band would definately have stayed with that rockier direction. With Arnel, not only do they return to the Perry-ish vocalizing but also a return to polished AOR melodic rock. The music has also returned to the 'legacy' sound.

.... which is what DP and Peartree were saying, I think. The "legacy sound" is associated with SP.


Exactly. The songs haven't changed since 1998; the notes remain the same. Only the singer has been different. The LEGACY SOUND is the way the group sounded with SMFP singing, and to "get back to" that sound they have to replicate his voice as closely as they can. I understand them wanting to do that, because his voice was so unique and special, but I'd just like to see them call it what it is. Had Arnel sounded like Axl Rose, do you think he would be fronting Journey right now, despite what a super voice he has? Of course not.

Again, I believe together they possess a special quality that none of them have individually, but if I had to choose, SP would always get my vote. 8)
User avatar
donnaplease
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:38 am
Location: shenandoah valley

Postby perryfaithful » Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:49 pm

donnaplease wrote: but if I had to choose, SP would always get my vote. 8)




...and mine!

"In Journey, all the hit songs we had were based around Steve Perry's vocals."

Neal Schon
User avatar
perryfaithful
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1573
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 5:29 am

Postby SP Fan in Oregon » Sat Mar 21, 2009 1:13 am

perryfaithful wrote:
donnaplease wrote: but if I had to choose, SP would always get my vote. 8)




...and mine!



Ditto :D


Image
The Common Loon
SP Fan in Oregon
 

Postby jrnyman28 » Sat Mar 21, 2009 2:04 am

donnaplease wrote:
annie89509 wrote:
jrnyman28 wrote:I don't entirely agree that the legacy sound is solely Perry's voice. That certainly is a key factor but look at what Journey had been doing since Perry left the band. Arrival certainly was an attempt to still sound like Perry-era excluding a few songs like "Kiss Me Softly", "We Will Meet Again" and "Livin' To Do". Even though some of those songs sound related to some TBF songs they still signal a new direction for the band to follow. Then comes Red13 with a solid change to a rockin' raw direction for the band. Admittedly too raw sounding. Generations stayed the course of a little more rock, a little less 'smooth'. And we can surmise that with JSS the band would definately have stayed with that rockier direction. With Arnel, not only do they return to the Perry-ish vocalizing but also a return to polished AOR melodic rock. The music has also returned to the 'legacy' sound.

.... which is what DP and Peartree were saying, I think. The "legacy sound" is associated with SP.


Exactly. The songs haven't changed since 1998; the notes remain the same. Only the singer has been different. The LEGACY SOUND is the way the group sounded with SMFP singing, and to "get back to" that sound they have to replicate his voice as closely as they can. I understand them wanting to do that, because his voice was so unique and special, but I'd just like to see them call it what it is. Had Arnel sounded like Axl Rose, do you think he would be fronting Journey right now, despite what a super voice he has? Of course not.

Again, I believe together they possess a special quality that none of them have individually, but if I had to choose, SP would always get my vote. 8)


Annie, I know what DP was referring to. But if you read my entire post you will see that I am stating that the music is ALSO returning to the legacy sound. It is NOT just about the Perry vocals. DP, the songs did change since 1998. There has been a shift in direction that I imagine would have been complete with the addition of JSS. In fact, to argue your point further, the addition of Steve Augeri was calculated the same as Arnel. Both were chosen because of their ability to sound similar to Perry. Moreso in Arnel's case. So essentially the vocals did not change (except with the truncated stint with JSS) but the music did.
jrnyman28
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6732
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 2:15 pm

Postby Don » Sat Mar 21, 2009 2:39 am

To me, everything pre-Captured had its own sound. Escape, Frontiers, ROR, and TBF all sounded different to me.
When they say legacy sound I would have to think they are mostly going for the Frontiers era sound, with a little ROR thrown in.
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Postby Granny » Sat Mar 21, 2009 3:38 am

NealIsGod wrote:
madsplash wrote:Ain't Nothin' Like The Real Thing Baby


You need to go to a Frontiers show. As close to the real thing as you can possibly get.



So true, NIGGY...

and Hi, how are u? Cindy says Hi too.. :)
Carol



Image
User avatar
Granny
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2651
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 2:35 am
Location: Ocean City, MD

Postby stevew2 » Sat Mar 21, 2009 4:42 am

Rhiannon wrote:
donnaplease wrote:1) Rhi, you've sure come a long way from when you first joined here. Weren't you a moderator at a Steve Perry fansite then?? :oops:


Yes, I sure was. As for "coming a long way", that kinda happens. I'm changing (my mind) constantly as I grow further into my adult years... nothing wrong at all with that. Just because I'm not polishing a man's ass doesn't make one bit of difference as to my fan-status. Nor does liking Journey now.
How do you polish a mans ass?/ Friga needs to know
User avatar
stevew2
MP3
 
Posts: 13073
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:20 pm
Location: Maryland

Postby Rhiannon » Sat Mar 21, 2009 4:47 am

stevew2 wrote:How do you polish a mans ass?/ Friga needs to know


Very carefully, I guess..? :lol:
Rhiannon
MP3
 
Posts: 10829
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 9:09 am

Postby stevew2 » Sat Mar 21, 2009 4:49 am

Rhiannon wrote:
stevew2 wrote:How do you polish a mans ass?/ Friga needs to know


Very carefully, I guess..? :lol:
I guess you would use Turtle wax, or lemon pledge
User avatar
stevew2
MP3
 
Posts: 13073
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:20 pm
Location: Maryland

Postby donnaplease » Sat Mar 21, 2009 7:29 am

jrnyman28 wrote:
donnaplease wrote:
annie89509 wrote:
jrnyman28 wrote:I don't entirely agree that the legacy sound is solely Perry's voice. That certainly is a key factor but look at what Journey had been doing since Perry left the band. Arrival certainly was an attempt to still sound like Perry-era excluding a few songs like "Kiss Me Softly", "We Will Meet Again" and "Livin' To Do". Even though some of those songs sound related to some TBF songs they still signal a new direction for the band to follow. Then comes Red13 with a solid change to a rockin' raw direction for the band. Admittedly too raw sounding. Generations stayed the course of a little more rock, a little less 'smooth'. And we can surmise that with JSS the band would definately have stayed with that rockier direction. With Arnel, not only do they return to the Perry-ish vocalizing but also a return to polished AOR melodic rock. The music has also returned to the 'legacy' sound.

.... which is what DP and Peartree were saying, I think. The "legacy sound" is associated with SP.


Exactly. The songs haven't changed since 1998; the notes remain the same. Only the singer has been different. The LEGACY SOUND is the way the group sounded with SMFP singing, and to "get back to" that sound they have to replicate his voice as closely as they can. I understand them wanting to do that, because his voice was so unique and special, but I'd just like to see them call it what it is. Had Arnel sounded like Axl Rose, do you think he would be fronting Journey right now, despite what a super voice he has? Of course not.

Again, I believe together they possess a special quality that none of them have individually, but if I had to choose, SP would always get my vote. 8)


Annie, I know what DP was referring to. But if you read my entire post you will see that I am stating that the music is ALSO returning to the legacy sound. It is NOT just about the Perry vocals. DP, the songs did change since 1998. There has been a shift in direction that I imagine would have been complete with the addition of JSS. In fact, to argue your point further, the addition of Steve Augeri was calculated the same as Arnel. Both were chosen because of their ability to sound similar to Perry. Moreso in Arnel's case. So essentially the vocals did not change (except with the truncated stint with JSS) but the music did.


Explain how the songs changed. I'm talking about the songs that are currently being sung on each and every Journey tour...the dirty dozen et al. Maybe you're talking about something else, IDK. :)
User avatar
donnaplease
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:38 am
Location: shenandoah valley

Postby annie89509 » Sat Mar 21, 2009 1:02 pm

True, it took the whole group to produce those songs, but only 1 voice that made it classics. I think most of us were eager to see where JSS takes Journey. In their own words, they were ready for “a new direction.”

Poof … 6 months later, we’re back to a SP-sounding singer … re-recording those classics … note for note. Jeezus, if you’re going to re-do the hits, change it up a little. Did Wal-Mart insist they make it sound like the original recording, too?
User avatar
annie89509
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2849
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 5:55 am
Location: the big 5-8

Postby Deacon » Sat Mar 21, 2009 1:08 pm

annie89509 wrote:Poof … 6 months later, we’re back to a SP-sounding singer … re-recording those classics … note for note. Jeezus, if you’re going to re-do the hits, change it up a little. Did Wal-Mart insist they make it sound like the original recording, too?


I don't see where you're coming from.

Not only did Neal re-do most of the solos within those songs, they clarified the music, balanced the production of the instruments' music, and even added in instrumentals where they were not before.
User avatar
Deacon
8 Track
 
Posts: 652
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:33 am
Location: Russellville, Kentucky

Postby annie89509 » Sat Mar 21, 2009 1:23 pm

Deacon wrote:
annie89509 wrote:Poof … 6 months later, we’re back to a SP-sounding singer … re-recording those classics … note for note. Jeezus, if you’re going to re-do the hits, change it up a little. Did Wal-Mart insist they make it sound like the original recording, too?


I don't see where you're coming from.

Not only did Neal re-do most of the solos within those songs, they clarified the music, balanced the production of the instruments' music, and even added in instrumentals where they were not before.

I'm talking about Rev D2 (sounds just like the original recordings to me ... except the ending to DSB where they duplicated how they played the song live ... and even that was originated by SP).

Are you talking about all the extra stuff they do with the songs in the live shows now?
User avatar
annie89509
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2849
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 5:55 am
Location: the big 5-8

Postby Deacon » Sat Mar 21, 2009 1:29 pm

annie89509 wrote:
Deacon wrote:
annie89509 wrote:Poof … 6 months later, we’re back to a SP-sounding singer … re-recording those classics … note for note. Jeezus, if you’re going to re-do the hits, change it up a little. Did Wal-Mart insist they make it sound like the original recording, too?


I don't see where you're coming from.

Not only did Neal re-do most of the solos within those songs, they clarified the music, balanced the production of the instruments' music, and even added in instrumentals where they were not before.

I'm talking about Rev D2 (sounds just like the original recordings to me ... except the ending to DSB where they duplicated how they played the song live ... and even that was originated by SP).

Are you talking about all the extra stuff they do with the songs in the live shows now?


No, I'm discussing all of the additions and recreations of D2.

Case-in-point, three songs that were recreated, Faith in the Heartland, Wheel in the Sky, and Be Good to Yourself. Faith in the Heartland has noticeable keyboards/piano now, Wheel in the Sky has its acoustics eliminated, and Be Good To Yourself has a totally new ending solo. They're not the original recordings.
User avatar
Deacon
8 Track
 
Posts: 652
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:33 am
Location: Russellville, Kentucky

Postby annie89509 » Sat Mar 21, 2009 1:41 pm

Deacon wrote:
annie89509 wrote:
Deacon wrote:
annie89509 wrote:Poof … 6 months later, we’re back to a SP-sounding singer … re-recording those classics … note for note. Jeezus, if you’re going to re-do the hits, change it up a little. Did Wal-Mart insist they make it sound like the original recording, too?


I don't see where you're coming from.

Not only did Neal re-do most of the solos within those songs, they clarified the music, balanced the production of the instruments' music, and even added in instrumentals where they were not before.

I'm talking about Rev D2 (sounds just like the original recordings to me ... except the ending to DSB where they duplicated how they played the song live ... and even that was originated by SP).

Are you talking about all the extra stuff they do with the songs in the live shows now?


No, I'm discussing all of the additions and recreations of D2

Case-in-point, three songs that were recreated, Faith in the Heartland, Wheel in the Sky, and Be Good to Yourself. Faith in the Heartland has noticeable keyboards/piano now, Wheel in the Sky has its acoustics eliminated, and Be Good To Yourself has a totally new ending solo. They're not the original recordings.

I don't care about FITH ... it's not in D2 (re-recording of the hits). WITS and BGTY are different? Okay, if you say so, that's 2 out of 11.
User avatar
annie89509
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2849
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 5:55 am
Location: the big 5-8

Postby Deacon » Sat Mar 21, 2009 1:44 pm

annie89509 wrote:I don't care about FITH ... it's not in D2 (re-recording of the hits). WITS and BGTY are different? Okay, if you say so, that's 2 out of 11.


If you truly want me to go through the entirety of the disc, I can.
User avatar
Deacon
8 Track
 
Posts: 652
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:33 am
Location: Russellville, Kentucky

Postby annie89509 » Sat Mar 21, 2009 1:47 pm

Deacon wrote:
annie89509 wrote:I don't care about FITH ... it's not in D2 (re-recording of the hits). WITS and BGTY are different? Okay, if you say so, that's 2 out of 11.


If you truly want me to go through the entirety of the disc, I can.

Yes ... please educate me.
User avatar
annie89509
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2849
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 5:55 am
Location: the big 5-8

Postby Gideon » Sat Mar 21, 2009 1:48 pm

Actually, there are alterations made to several of them.

"Only the Young" has a slightly different tempo and use of guitar; the rhythm parts are all electric now. The solo is also slightly different.
"Don't Stop Believin'" is longer, includes a longer riff session before the lyric "working hard...", a much longer chorus and improvements to the synthesizers.
"Wheel in the Sky" has a different ending and an accoustic guitar in accordance with the electric guitar.
"Faithfully" has a longer "whoa oh" session and solo at the end than the original.
"Any Way You Want It" is slightly slower with slight modifications to the guitar solos.
"Who's Cryin' Now"... er... don't know. Only listened to Neal's solo, which sounds similar, but I think the very end of it is different.
"Lights"... er... I don't know. Probably none.
"Separate Ways" has a slight modification to the jam session after Neal's solo, Arnel tackles the scream differently, and the guitar is much louder in the mix.
"Open Arms" is much different and a major improvement for me. Arnel sings the song with much more power rather than the theatric countertenor of the original.
"Be Good To Yourself" has a completely different guitar solo. Much improved.
"Stone In Love" has altered the solos differently than the original, especially the end as it fades out.

Nothing particularly major, but it's not note-for-note the same.
'Nothing was bigger for Journey than 1981’s “Escape” album. “I have to attribute that to Jonathan coming in and joining the writing team,” Steve Perry (Feb 2012).'
User avatar
Gideon
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4560
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 5:12 am
Location: Kentucky.

Postby Deacon » Sat Mar 21, 2009 1:49 pm

Gideon wrote:Actually, there are alterations made to several of them.

"Only the Young" has a slightly different tempo and use of guitar; the rhythm parts are all electric now. The solo is also slightly different.
"Don't Stop Believin'" is longer, includes a longer riff session before the lyric "working hard...", a much longer chorus and improvements to the synthesizers.
"Wheel in the Sky" has a different ending and an accoustic guitar in accordance with the electric guitar.
"Faithfully" has a longer "whoa oh" session and solo at the end than the original.
"Any Way You Want It" is slightly slower with slight modifications to the guitar solos.
"Who's Cryin' Now"... er... don't know. Only listened to Neal's solo, which sounds similar, but I think the very end of it is different.
"Lights"... er... I don't know. Probably none.
"Separate Ways" has a slight modification to the jam session after Neal's solo, Arnel tackles the scream differently, and the guitar is much louder in the mix.
"Open Arms" is much different and a major improvement for me. Arnel sings the song with much more power rather than the theatric countertenor of the original.
"Be Good To Yourself" has a completely different guitar solo. Much improved.
"Stone In Love" has altered the solos differently than the original, especially the end as it fades out.

Nothing particularly major, but it's not note-for-note the same.


There you go.
User avatar
Deacon
8 Track
 
Posts: 652
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:33 am
Location: Russellville, Kentucky

Postby annie89509 » Sat Mar 21, 2009 2:21 pm

Deacon wrote:
Gideon wrote:Actually, there are alterations made to several of them.

"Only the Young" has a slightly different tempo and use of guitar; the rhythm parts are all electric now. The solo is also slightly different.
"Don't Stop Believin'" is longer, includes a longer riff session before the lyric "working hard...", a much longer chorus and improvements to the synthesizers.
"Wheel in the Sky" has a different ending and an accoustic guitar in accordance with the electric guitar.
"Faithfully" has a longer "whoa oh" session and solo at the end than the original.
"Any Way You Want It" is slightly slower with slight modifications to the guitar solos.
"Who's Cryin' Now"... er... don't know. Only listened to Neal's solo, which sounds similar, but I think the very end of it is different.
"Lights"... er... I don't know. Probably none.
"Separate Ways" has a slight modification to the jam session after Neal's solo, Arnel tackles the scream differently, and the guitar is much louder in the mix.
"Open Arms" is much different and a major improvement for me. Arnel sings the song with much more power rather than the theatric countertenor of the original.
"Be Good To Yourself" has a completely different guitar solo. Much improved.
"Stone In Love" has altered the solos differently than the original, especially the end as it fades out.

Nothing particularly major, but it's not note-for-note the same.


There you go.

Okay, will go listen for the differences now. I remember only liking Arnel's singing in 3 of the hits (OTY, BGTY, Lights). The others ... I think his accent showed through with a wrong enunciation on a certain word/note, which completely ruined the songs for me. Examples: the "Noooo" in SW and "Woooaaah" in DSB and SIL was butchered. He was great in the Manila concert, though. No notable accent detected there; he was on fire that day -- his best yet with Journey.
User avatar
annie89509
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2849
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 5:55 am
Location: the big 5-8

Postby jrnyman28 » Tue Mar 24, 2009 6:45 am

donnaplease wrote:
jrnyman28 wrote:
donnaplease wrote:
annie89509 wrote:
jrnyman28 wrote:I don't entirely agree that the legacy sound is solely Perry's voice. That certainly is a key factor but look at what Journey had been doing since Perry left the band. Arrival certainly was an attempt to still sound like Perry-era excluding a few songs like "Kiss Me Softly", "We Will Meet Again" and "Livin' To Do". Even though some of those songs sound related to some TBF songs they still signal a new direction for the band to follow. Then comes Red13 with a solid change to a rockin' raw direction for the band. Admittedly too raw sounding. Generations stayed the course of a little more rock, a little less 'smooth'. And we can surmise that with JSS the band would definately have stayed with that rockier direction. With Arnel, not only do they return to the Perry-ish vocalizing but also a return to polished AOR melodic rock. The music has also returned to the 'legacy' sound.

.... which is what DP and Peartree were saying, I think. The "legacy sound" is associated with SP.


Exactly. The songs haven't changed since 1998; the notes remain the same. Only the singer has been different. The LEGACY SOUND is the way the group sounded with SMFP singing, and to "get back to" that sound they have to replicate his voice as closely as they can. I understand them wanting to do that, because his voice was so unique and special, but I'd just like to see them call it what it is. Had Arnel sounded like Axl Rose, do you think he would be fronting Journey right now, despite what a super voice he has? Of course not.

Again, I believe together they possess a special quality that none of them have individually, but if I had to choose, SP would always get my vote. 8)


Annie, I know what DP was referring to. But if you read my entire post you will see that I am stating that the music is ALSO returning to the legacy sound. It is NOT just about the Perry vocals. DP, the songs did change since 1998. There has been a shift in direction that I imagine would have been complete with the addition of JSS. In fact, to argue your point further, the addition of Steve Augeri was calculated the same as Arnel. Both were chosen because of their ability to sound similar to Perry. Moreso in Arnel's case. So essentially the vocals did not change (except with the truncated stint with JSS) but the music did.


Explain how the songs changed. I'm talking about the songs that are currently being sung on each and every Journey tour...the dirty dozen et al. Maybe you're talking about something else, IDK. :)


Donnaplease, I bolded the comments in my original post that explain what I am talking about.
jrnyman28
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6732
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 2:15 pm

Previous

Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests