Moderator: Andrew
strangegrey wrote:Well, what I feared was going to happen, happened.
I was laid off yesterday, less than two months from starting a new job. After returning to school for over 4 years to retrain in a different field. Without getting into the bullshit.....It was clear I was temp help from the beginning and that they just didn't tell me. The work I received over the past 2 months was shit and not plentiful...and yesterday, they sumarily dismissed me without a very good reason at all, citing the lack of work and the economy.
I really hate George Bush and the current fucking idiot manning this country, Barrack Obama. They are the two principle architects for destroying this economy and they should fucking burn in hell for their efforts.
People hold Madoff responsible for fucking their futures when the two fucking idiots who I've been forced to call president for the past 8.5 years have DONE far worse.
And for you fucks out there that are going to say Barrack Hussein YoMoma isn't responsible....go sit on a glass dildo and bend over. That useless piece of draggon fly sucking shit has done twice the damage in his 2 months as douchbagger in chief as Bush tried to accomplish over the past year. Fuck em both!!!
Gibby wrote:Playing on people's fears for votes. Don't you just love politics?
strangegrey wrote:Well, what I feared was going to happen, happened.
I was laid off yesterday, less than two months from starting a new job. After returning to school for over 4 years to retrain in a different field. Without getting into the bullshit.....It was clear I was temp help from the beginning and that they just didn't tell me. The work I received over the past 2 months was shit and not plentiful...and yesterday, they sumarily dismissed me without a very good reason at all, citing the lack of work and the economy.
I really hate George Bush and the current fucking idiot manning this country, Barrack Obama. They are the two principle architects for destroying this economy and they should fucking burn in hell for their efforts.
People hold Madoff responsible for fucking their futures when the two fucking idiots who I've been forced to call president for the past 8.5 years have DONE far worse.
And for you fucks out there that are going to say Barrack Hussein YoMoma isn't responsible....go sit on a glass dildo and bend over. That useless piece of draggon fly sucking shit has done twice the damage in his 2 months as douchbagger in chief as Bush tried to accomplish over the past year. Fuck em both!!!
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Gibby wrote:Playing on people's fears for votes. Don't you just love politics?
Hmm, sounds similar to the past eight years.
Say, what shade of horror-film red is the color-coded alert system today?
I forgot to look.
strangegrey wrote:Well, what I feared was going to happen, happened.
I was laid off yesterday, less than two months from starting a new job. After returning to school for over 4 years to retrain in a different field. Without getting into the bullshit.....It was clear I was temp help from the beginning and that they just didn't tell me. The work I received over the past 2 months was shit and not plentiful...and yesterday, they sumarily dismissed me without a very good reason at all, citing the lack of work and the economy.
I really hate George Bush and the current fucking idiot manning this country, Barrack Obama. They are the two principle architects for destroying this economy and they should fucking burn in hell for their efforts.
People hold Madoff responsible for fucking their futures when the two fucking idiots who I've been forced to call president for the past 8.5 years have DONE far worse.
And for you fucks out there that are going to say Barrack Hussein YoMoma isn't responsible....go sit on a glass dildo and bend over. That useless piece of draggon fly sucking shit has done twice the damage in his 2 months as douchbagger in chief as Bush tried to accomplish over the past year. Fuck em both!!!
Gibby wrote: Does anyone really believe that the economy would be this bad today if 2008 had not been an election year? Hussein Obama is largely responsible for how bad this has become. It wasn't good with Walker Bush but Hussein Obama's campaign, built largely around convincing voters on how bad things were, really helped create a horrific domino effect.
strangegrey wrote:And for you fucks out there that are going to say Barrack Hussein YoMoma isn't responsible....go sit on a glass dildo and bend over.
Voyager wrote:strangegrey wrote:And for you fucks out there that are going to say Barrack Hussein YoMoma isn't responsible....go sit on a glass dildo and bend over.
No thanks. Take one for the team yourself.
Telling people who support Obama to take a dildo up their ass is not a way to get any sympathy for losing your job.
Obama is just trying to clean up Dumbya's mess. I hope he can do it.
Sorry to hear about your loss.
Fact Finder wrote:You are not going to get away with this. The boogeyman is the Democratic Party and their liberal ways with others money, often by force of law...THE seeds of today’s financial meltdown lie in the Community Reinvestment Act - a law passed in 1977 and made riskier by unwise amendments and regulatory rulings in later decades.
CRA was meant to encourage banks to make loans to high-risk borrowers, often minorities living in unstable neighborhoods. That has provided an opening to radical groups like ACORN (the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) to abuse the law by forcing banks to make hundreds of millions of dollars in “subprime” loans to often uncreditworthy poor and minority customers.
Any bank that wants to expand or merge with another has to show it has complied with CRA - and approval can be held up by complaints filed by groups like ACORN.
In fact, intimidation tactics, public charges of racism and threats to use CRA to block business expansion have enabled ACORN to extract hundreds of millions of dollars in loans and contributions from America’s financial institutions.
The Woods Fund report makes it clear Obama was fully aware of the intimidation tactics used by ACORN’s Madeline Talbott in her pioneering efforts to force banks to suspend their usual credit standards.Yet he supported Talbott in every conceivable way. He trained her personal staff and other aspiring ACORN leaders, he consulted with her extensively, and he arranged a major boost in foundation funding for her efforts.
And, as the leader of another charity, the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, Obama channeled morefunding Talbott’sway - ostensibly for education projects but surely supportive of ACORN’s overall efforts.Under the Clinton administration, federal regulators began using the act to combat “red-lining,” a practice by which banks loaned money to some communities but not to others, based on economic status. “No loan is exempt, no bank is immune,” warned then-Attorney General Janet Reno. “For those who thumb their nose at us, I promise vigorous enforcement.”
The Clinton-Reno threat of “vigorous enforcement” pushed banks to make the now infamous loans that many blame for the current meltdown, Richman said. “Banks, in order to not get in trouble with the regulators, had to make loans to people who shouldn’t have been getting mortgage loans.”
This threat combined with the government backing of Fannie and Freddie set the stage for the current uncertainty, because the “banks could just sell the loans off to Fannie or Freddie,” who could buy them with little regard for negative financial outcomes, Richman said.As the New York Times reports, “Aides to Mr. Obama said he had not directly reached out to try to sway any House Democrats who opposed the measure.” Is the reason the fact that the slush fund for ACORN in the original bill, siphoning off 20% of any future profits for such activist groups, was trimmed from the tree?
Obama, who once represented ACORN in a lawsuit against the state of Illinois, was hired by the group to train its community organizers and staff in the methods and tactics of the late Saul Alinsky. ACORN would stage in-your-face protests in bank lobbies, drive-through lanes and even at bank managers’ homes to get them to issue risky loans in the inner city or face charges of racism.
In the early 1990s, reports Stanley Kurtz, senior fellow at the Ethics and Policy Center, Obama was personally recruited by Chicago’s ACORN to run training sessions in “direct action.” That’s the euphemism for the techniques used under the cover of the federal Community Reinvestment Act to intimidate financial institutions into giving what have been called “Ninja” loans — no income, no job, no assets — to people who couldn’t afford them.
CRA was designed to increase minority homeownership. Whenever a bank wanted to grow or expand, ACORN would file complaints that it was not sufficiently sensitive to the needs of minorities in providing home loans. Agitators would then be unleashed.
Chicago’s ACORN used Alinsky’s tactics against institutions such as Bell Federal Savings and Loan and AvondaleFederal Savings. In September 1992, the Chicago Tribune described the group’s agenda as “affirmative action lending.”
Obamaalso helped ACORN get funding. When he served on the board of the Woods Fund for Chicago with Weather Underground terrorist William Ayers, the Woods Fund frequently gave ACORN grants to fund its activist agenda.
In 1995, Kurtz reports, Obama chaired the committee that increased funding of ACORN and other community organizers. The committee report boasted that the fund’s “non-ideological” image “enabled the Trustees to make grants to organizations that use confrontational tactics against the business and governmental ‘establishments’ without undue risk of being accused of partisanship.”
The CRAempowered regulators to punish banks that failed to “meet the credit needs” of “low-income, minority and distressed neighborhoods.” It gave groups such as ACORN a license and a means to intimidate banks, claiming they were “redlining” poor and minority neighborhoods. ACORN employed its tactics in 1991 by taking over the House Banking Committee room for two days to protest efforts to scale back the CRA.
As a former White House staff economist writes in the American Thinker, Obama represented ACORN in a 1994 suit against redlining. ACORN was also a driving force behind a 1995 regulatory revision pushed through by the Clinton administration that greatly expanded the CRA and helped spawn the current financial crisis.
Obama was the attorney representing ACORN in this effort. Last November, he told the group, “I’ve been fighting alongside ACORN on issues you care about my entire career.” Indeed he has. Obama was and is fully aware of what ACORN was doing with the money and expertise he provided. The voters should be aware on Nov. 4 of the roles of both in creating the current crisis.
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticle ... 7123149723
PianoMan1986 wrote:Voyager wrote:strangegrey wrote:And for you fucks out there that are going to say Barrack Hussein YoMoma isn't responsible....go sit on a glass dildo and bend over.
No thanks. Take one for the team yourself.
Telling people who support Obama to take a dildo up their ass is not a way to get any sympathy for losing your job.
Obama is just trying to clean up Dumbya's mess. I hope he can do it.
Sorry to hear about your loss.
I AM sorry to hear about losing your job, but otherwise I agree with Voyager on this.
Marabelle wrote:sorry about what has happened to your future at the moment; and when you simmer down perhaps you will be able to be a bit more objective in placing blame. it's not one or two people who have caught us in this "meltdown" as the noble cause so aptly describes...to me it seems like the pace quickened when reagen decided to let the rich get richer and hoped perhaps then the riches would trickle down to others and spur the economy on. it's been several years of corruption without anyone being held responsible for the less care and attention happening to those who are not as advantaged as others. i'm sure a lot of people are very aware of what has happened to their lives in the the last several years. the economy is just getting worse and worse. i believe we finally have someone who is trying to or at least talking about trying to help us rather than harm. corruption has exploded and we see it everywhere; it is just getting more pronounced and obvious cause it is finally trickling down to us just as reagen predicted; however it's not more money, it's their debt and you are paying for it as all of us by downsizing, losing our jobs, our homes and sinking 401ks.
Marabelle wrote:sorry about what has happened to your future at the moment; and when you simmer down perhaps you will be able to be a bit more objective in placing blame. it's not one or two people who have caught us in this "meltdown" as the noble cause so aptly describes...to me it seems like the pace quickened when reagen decided to let the rich get richer and hoped perhaps then the riches would trickle down to others and spur the economy on. it's been several years of corruption without anyone being held responsible for the less care and attention happening to those who are not as advantaged as others. i'm sure a lot of people are very aware of what has happened to their lives in the the last several years. the economy is just getting worse and worse. i believe we finally have someone who is trying to or at least talking about trying to help us rather than harm. corruption has exploded and we see it everywhere; it is just getting more pronounced and obvious cause it is finally trickling down to us just as reagen predicted; however it's not more money, it's their debt and you are paying for it as all of us by downsizing, losing our jobs, our homes and sinking 401ks.
strangegrey wrote:Fuck that Dan....I don't shed my morals and standards when I get angry or sad....I dont listen to shit that isn't music.
and Rap isn't music...it's shit.
RossValoryRocks wrote:A better solution would have been to stop witholding income tax from people for 6 months (depending on income level to keep it "fair" as possible)
RossValoryRocks wrote:...increase the amount of money going to unemployment, or extend it for those who have run out,
RossValoryRocks wrote:...and generally let the companies that gambled and lost die, or go into bankruptcy and restructure without the government pouring billions of our dollars into them.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests