Gideon wrote:Arianddu wrote:Two years isn't that long in my experience.
This is where you lose me all together. Two years, if that was the proper figure, is 730 days. Or, more staggeringly, over 17,500 hours. That, to me, is a
great deal of time, particularly when it's not being burdened like... say... a tour.
Ok, I really hate using the age card, but in this case I think it does apply. Giddy, you are 17, two years is nearly one eighth of your whole life. Two years at 45 isn't nearly so much (or even at 36!) And I think you are missing the point - it wasn't a case of "surgery now" = "surgery in 2 years". Joint replacement technology was (and still is) changing on a monthly basis; 2 years in the early to mid 90s was the difference between a 1 in 10 chance of permanent pain and disability and 1 in 50 chance.
Look, when I was sixteen, I dislocated my left knee 180 degrees; I was fortunate that the muscles ripped off the bone rather than tearing and I had no tendon damage, but the connections have never properly healed, and these days the only thing that keeps my knee cap in place and stops my knee bending the wrong way is the strength of the two muscles that run either side and the third that crosses over the knee cap. If I get lazy and don't excercise every day, or if I land awkwardly and put to much strain on it, or I over-excercise and push too hard, the joint bends the wrong way and I damage it; swollen knee and extreme pain for days. I know damn well that one day I'm going to have to have surgery on it, because every time it bends the wrong way the cartilege gets damaged and that damage is accumulative. At the moment, most of the time it isn't an issue. Knee surgery is complicated, but it's improving all the time. Now I've had four different experts (and they are all internationally recognised authorities) give me four different opinions on when I should get surgery, or even if I should have it all. One's told me to leave it as long as I possibly can and trust that the increases in technology will make up for the accumulated damage, one's told me that surgery is going to do nothing for my particular injury, one has said I should get regular 'clean up' surgery and one has said I should consider it in about 5 years time. They've all given me different advice as to what procedure would be used, what the recovery time is, what the success rate is, how effective it will be, and if there is anything that can be done about the main issue which is that the muscles in my leg no longer connect to each other and the bones in the way they should.
Now, when my knee is bad, bending hurts like hell, keeping it straight aches like buggery, walking is problematic even if it's strapped and immobilised. It hurts, all the time, and that makes everything else harder to deal with. The thought of that pain never going away scares the shit out of me, because that is one possibility in my future. Shift that to a hip. You
can't strap a hip, and if it hurts, you can't stand, sit, lie, walk, or do anything without pain. So what happens when you have 6 or so doctors all giving you different advice about radical new technology that is literally improving on a monthly basis, when the one constant is that if it goes wrong, and there is a good chance it will, that you will be in this pain forever, or worse, and possibly permanently in a wheelchair? What do you do?
You wait as long as you can god-damn bear it to let the technology improve as much as it can and the risks involved reduce. And you find out as much as you can about it, and you check the success rate of every god damn surgeon you can, and you take as few risks as you possibly can. Two years compared to the rest of your life? Not a lot of time, really.
Gideon wrote:Arianddu wrote:And I can fully understand resenting the people who were your friends and who used to be as close as brothers pushing you to move faster for commercial gain.
Perhaps. Of course, you never know; their motives could have been as both. Friends who were morally and financially obligated to get Perry out of his physical pain and personal rut. They spent two years, while their window for great success was being pissed away. They waited on this guy once. Are you telling me they were obligated to put their lives on hold in perpetuity to wait?
In contrast, I can fully understand people resenting a man who claimed to be a friend and brother screwing them over time after time again, bitching about "personal decisions" despite obligations, and then
making that decision after the fact. He obviously knew that the surgery was inevitable; Cain and Schon were right, regardless of their motive.
Knowing surgery is inevitable doesn't mean that having it sooner rather than later is better. Like I said, the 2 years he waited got the risks from around 1 in 10 to 1 in 50. I don't blame the rest of the band for the decision they made, but I can see how it would piss Perry off to have his personal life and his health put second to commercial interests.
Gideon wrote:Arianddu wrote:His body, his pain, his absolute right to say when, where and how.
They weren't exactly demanding that the decision be made the day after the problem was identified nor were they demanding circumstances of the surgery. I agree; if there were viable options, he could have done whatever the fuck he wanted. But there wasn't. Once again, he had the surgery. In the end, he knew that it was the right thing to do.
Moreover, the band had a right to move on without him. It's not like it was the first time Perry put them on hold, is it?
Surgery - see above. And yes, the band had a right to move on, of course they did. And I doubt that Perry was an angel to be around, but then I doubt any of them were.
Gideon wrote:Arianddu wrote:And the fact that he did end up getting surgery and not that long after they made their choice to me indicates the band fucked themselves for the sake of one tour.
That's surprising, because it indicates to me that Perry realized "Shit they were right, and I was being a complete tool trying to assert my autonomy despite the fact that they
were right."
Absolutely disagree with you on this one.
Gideon wrote:Arianddu wrote:Should've waited;
This is where you lose me. It's Perry's decision to do whatever the hell he wants and they had an obligation to wait? Somehow, I don't think he told them when he got the infamous phone call from Cain "Well, hey guys! I'm getting the surgery, give me two more weeks!"
Logically, he either: a.) Made the decision in advance and out of obstinance, refused to reveal the fact or b.) Made the decision in a hurry after he was let go, which nullifies the argument that they "were pushing him."
No, I don't think the band had an obligation to wait, I think they made a mistake in not waiting. They had several choices; move on without Perry, tour with a different line up as a 'supergroup' but not under the Journey name, write off the TBF tour and look to the next album, retire Journey completely and move on with their lives and other projects. They made the decision they did. My guess is that if they had waited, writen off the TBF tour, and spent time writing a killer next album and waited for Perry to do what he needed to do in his time, then Journey would be bigger now than it was then. I also think that if they had said 'ok, Journey's done, let's all move on' then at this point a reunion with Perry would be a real option and making a damn site more money that the current incarnation. With the benefit of hindsight, I think they made the wrong choice, but we'll never know. And the choice was absolutely their to make, not Perry's.
Gideon wrote:Arianddu wrote:he still might not have continued with Journey, but now no one will ever know. I think Schon and Cain gambled on commercial gain over Perry, and they got it wrong. Their following dealings with singers don't lead me to change my opinion at all.
I disagree. I think Neal and the boys wanted to get out on the road and move on with their lives.[/i]
Like I said, they had other options to do that with. Bad English had been a success, there was no reason why they couldn't do something similar with another singer, another name. Instead they chose to keep milking the cash cow, and like I said, in hindsight
I think they made the wrong decision.
Bottom line is - Schon, Cain and Valory chose to keep going with Journey without Perry. Smith decided not to follow, and Perry has never forgiven them for making the choice they did. Nothing is going to change that. I don't blame them for the decision they made, but I don't agree that it was the best decision. But I am tired of people claiming that Perry made
his choices with any idea of fucking Journey over, or as some kind of power play. In the end, it's just a band - bands come and go, and there's always the option of another record. But his health, his body - that's his alone, he can't replace it, and no one else has any right to dictate when and how he deals with his health issues. I don't for one second blame him for not being willing to take a risk so a group could get another tour out or promote another album. And while I understand the decision the others made and fully acknowledge they had every right to make it, I can also understand how Perry could feel like he was sold for another album, another tour.
Why treat life as a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving in an attractive & well-preserved body? Get there by skidding in sideways, a glass of wine in one hand, chocolate in the other, body totally worn out, screaming WOOHOO! What a ride!