Vladan wrote:Journey/Survivor wrote:
Actually, I'm pretty sure that you and I have discussed that in the past.![]()
I've said this several times before, but I'll say it again...
Steve Perry has the most amazing voice, but Jimi Jamison has the best voice.
What I mean by that is that Steve Perry can hit these unbelievably high notes that virtually no other man can hit, and he's amazing with that high range. But Jimi Jamison has the best sounding voice. Again, and this goes for every single one of us on this website, that is a matter of preference.
There are people who would tell all of us that both Steve Perry and Jimi Jamison suck as singers. They'd be wrong! But it would still be their opinion.
But believe it or not, I do know a lot of people who feel that Jamison is a better singer than Perry. I consider them to be almost equally great singers, but I know some people who think that it's not even close, that Jamison is a far better singer.
A good friend of mine that is a singer (and who's own singing voice is a lot like Perry's) feels that Jamison is a much better singer.
And there's a member of this websites forums that has said that he prefers a male singer to sound like a male singer, and that's why he prefers Jamison over Perry.
I just feel that Jamison has more "soul" to his voice and vocal delivery than Perry. Not by much, but a little bit anyway.
Interesting. I think "preference" can only take you so far. We need to start looking at what the masses say. For a little research, you will hear singers back in the day compliment Steve Perry and literally call him the voice, this is coming from guys like Jon Bon Jovi who is probably one the most famous and currently successful artists ever, even bigger than Journey/Survivor rolled together. Yo tube comments, you look at them all, Perry this Perry that, there really isn't much said about Jamison, which again I feel he is under rated, but also start to think about the range and diversity of the songs, I like Jamison he is outstanding in the studio, perfect tone all the good stuff for a commercial sound, but LIVE on the other hand he was OK, didn't give as much as Perry did.
Reality, will find the majority of professional singers and fans will consider Steve Perry in another league. You see Jimmy Jamison is considered "one of the best 10 ten" to some, the minority. But! Steve Perry is either considered one of "If not" the best of all time, that is something nobody gets to say.
You can say you prefer Jimmy Jamison to Steve Perry, that is fine, like I can say I prefer John Farnham to Steve Perry - but neither is better! it's that simple, because they are our favourites, it doesn't make them better.
There are several people that have been called "the voice". Sam Cooke, Steve Perry, Glenn Hughes, John Farnham, and probably more that I'm forgetting. I think each of those listed could do things with their voice that the others couldn't. Each also has their own list of admirers.
In Jamison's favor, I don't think many people other than diehard Survivor fans have heard some of his best work (Across the Miles, Man Against the World), and I think popularity ranks fairly high on determining who is the best as far as credit is given, even though it should have no relevance. Perry got far more airplay than Jamison. Truthfully, Bickler got more airplay than Jamison.
You can't influence people if nobody hears you, and it doesn't matter how great you are. Personally, I think Mark Free could hold his own against most of the singers out there, and never got any credit because nobody heard him. Marc Anthony can probably sing circles around 98% of the singers out there, but has rarely ventured into AOR/pop, so is generally not included since he generally stays in a different style of music. John Farnham can sing virtually any style of music, one of the few who actually sounds BETTER live than studio, and has basically lost nothing over 40 years, but virtually nobody outside of Australia has heard of him, even though he is all but worshipped there.
In the end, "best" or "favorite" is going to come down to a combination of personal tastes (style, pitch, etc) vs. technical abilities (clarity, range, tone, etc). Those qualities aren't going to be the same for two people, nor are they going to be the same for different music styles. I like Perry a lot, but I would take Jamison over Perry any day for a blues album. For a Motown album, Perry over Jamison without question.
I think Jamison beats early Perry, even though from a technical standpoint, Perry's voice was virtually effortless. That said, for me, mid 80s Perry was very close to the perfect combination of pitch, phrasing, range and style. I'll take ROR-era Perry any day over WSC-era Jamison, although you really couldn't go wrong with either choice. It's all a matter of preference.