Gideon wrote:Don't associate a higher pitch with greater ability, otherwise Geddy Lee might be better than Steve Perry himself.
LOL good gawd, puhlease.

Moderator: Andrew
Gideon wrote:Don't associate a higher pitch with greater ability, otherwise Geddy Lee might be better than Steve Perry himself.
journey361 wrote:SORRY, FALSE ALARM:
Are you saying you heard this song from SP upcoming CD? Is this a song from it?
No; this is an ROR era song that never saw the light of day.
Will upload soon...
Sorry; gotta go back to TRAG Band Practice now....
Deb wrote:Gideon wrote:Don't associate a higher pitch with greater ability, otherwise Geddy Lee might be better than Steve Perry himself.
LOL good gawd, puhlease.And have to agree, higher pitch and/or range are much further down on the criteria that makes a voice outstanding to me.
Gideon wrote:Deb wrote:Gideon wrote:Don't associate a higher pitch with greater ability, otherwise Geddy Lee might be better than Steve Perry himself.
LOL good gawd, puhlease.And have to agree, higher pitch and/or range are much further down on the criteria that makes a voice outstanding to me.
A high pitch isn't necessarily indicative of great range, which was the point I was going at. I certainly take pitch and range into great consideration when gauging the abilities of singers. But there are plenty of tenors out there who seemingly can't change tone; limited only to the metaphorical rafters and ceilings of vocals. Unlike Steve Perry, who was phenomenal on all scales.
jrny84 wrote:Gideon wrote:Deb wrote:Gideon wrote:Don't associate a higher pitch with greater ability, otherwise Geddy Lee might be better than Steve Perry himself.
LOL good gawd, puhlease.And have to agree, higher pitch and/or range are much further down on the criteria that makes a voice outstanding to me.
A high pitch isn't necessarily indicative of great range, which was the point I was going at. I certainly take pitch and range into great consideration when gauging the abilities of singers. But there are plenty of tenors out there who seemingly can't change tone; limited only to the metaphorical rafters and ceilings of vocals. Unlike Steve Perry, who was phenomenal on all scales.
Geddy Lee isnt even in the same league as Perry. Perry has a much better tone, range, and vocal ability to his voice. Perry voice is also much stronger and sounds ten times better live than Geddy Lee. I will say that Geddy has a unique and different sounding voice, but for me its really squeeky and annoying.
When my cat hears Geddy, the retard runs under the bedGideon wrote:When my cat hears Geddy, the retard runs under the bedjrny84 wrote:Gideon wrote:Deb wrote:Gideon wrote:Don't associate a higher pitch with greater ability, otherwise Geddy Lee might be better than Steve Perry himself.
LOL good gawd, puhlease.And have to agree, higher pitch and/or range are much further down on the criteria that makes a voice outstanding to me.
A high pitch isn't necessarily indicative of great range, which was the point I was going at. I certainly take pitch and range into great consideration when gauging the abilities of singers. But there are plenty of tenors out there who seemingly can't change tone; limited only to the metaphorical rafters and ceilings of vocals. Unlike Steve Perry, who was phenomenal on all scales.
Geddy Lee isnt even in the same league as Perry. Perry has a much better tone, range, and vocal ability to his voice. Perry voice is also much stronger and sounds ten times better live than Geddy Lee. I will say that Geddy has a unique and different sounding voice, but for me its really squeeky and annoying.
Agreed. That was kind've my whole point.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests