Moderator: Andrew
Rip Rokken wrote:I understand where you're coming from, but to me there is nothing Karaoke about Kelley Hansen. One of my favorite vocalists of all time.
steveo777 wrote:Vlad, the Karaoke guys are taking over the world, just look what happened to Journey.
Ok, that was total sarcasm, as Rip knows. The loons are out in full force. Maybe they should start their own bands so they could, uh, acheive perfection, since nothing seems to make them happy anymore.
Rip Rokken wrote:steveo777 wrote:Vlad, the Karaoke guys are taking over the world, just look what happened to Journey.
Ok, that was total sarcasm, as Rip knows. The loons are out in full force. Maybe they should start their own bands so they could, uh, acheive perfection, since nothing seems to make them happy anymore.
No, seriously, I do understand the point -- having only one original member in a band like that makes it a real stretch for fans of the classic lineup. They become brands instead of bands, really. Funny thing... this lineup of Foreigner was the very first concert I attended a few years back mainly to see the supporting members instead of the band itself. Never had done that before. But they kicked so much A that I became a renewed fan. I'd see them again anytime they are near.
steveo777 wrote:Rip Rokken wrote:steveo777 wrote:Vlad, the Karaoke guys are taking over the world, just look what happened to Journey.
Ok, that was total sarcasm, as Rip knows. The loons are out in full force. Maybe they should start their own bands so they could, uh, acheive perfection, since nothing seems to make them happy anymore.
No, seriously, I do understand the point -- having only one original member in a band like that makes it a real stretch for fans of the classic lineup. They become brands instead of bands, really. Funny thing... this lineup of Foreigner was the very first concert I attended a few years back mainly to see the supporting members instead of the band itself. Never had done that before. But they kicked so much A that I became a renewed fan. I'd see them again anytime they are near.
Rip and Vlad, sorry, I guess that a a bit of a vent in your thread from some of the buildup I've been reading in other threads, regarding Journey. The stick up my butt these days is with people who's only means of validation, it seems, is getting on a forum and trying to degrade what this and that band is currently doing, their lineups, etc. Some are so far out of reality, they really, really sound loony.
But anyway, party on, my good men. Cheers!
Gunbot wrote:So, when it comes to U2 and Bon Jovi, is having the original singer (even with a ragged voice) the difference between playing stadiums or trying to fill amphitheaters?
Vladan wrote:Gunbot wrote:So, when it comes to U2 and Bon Jovi, is having the original singer (even with a ragged voice) the difference between playing stadiums or trying to fill amphitheaters?
Don't know man. All I know is, that is sux major balls when bands changes their lead singers, for whatever reason. Never been a fan of it!. Besides all that I went to the dentist today, and I am not happy... so probably the best thing for me to do today, is stay away from these forums!
Vladan wrote:Gunbot wrote:So, when it comes to U2 and Bon Jovi, is having the original singer (even with a ragged voice) the difference between playing stadiums or trying to fill amphitheaters?
Don't know man. All I know is, that is sux major balls when bands changes their lead singers, for whatever reason. Never been a fan of it!. Besides all that I went to the dentist today, and I am not happy... so probably the best thing for me to do today, is stay away from these forums!
Vladan wrote:And Rip, no worries mate, I do agree with you on most points there, the only thing I couldn't care less about is seeing them play live today... totally not interested, unless Gramm was fronting them.
G.I.Jim wrote:Vladan wrote:Gunbot wrote:So, when it comes to U2 and Bon Jovi, is having the original singer (even with a ragged voice) the difference between playing stadiums or trying to fill amphitheaters?
Don't know man. All I know is, that is sux major balls when bands changes their lead singers, for whatever reason. Never been a fan of it!. Besides all that I went to the dentist today, and I am not happy... so probably the best thing for me to do today, is stay away from these forums!
Nah, don't sweat it Vladan...I agree with you. Even though Kelly does have a great voice (as does Arnel), there's a certain magic that's missing with both bands. I think it shows BIG time, and it's unfortunate. There aren't many bands out there with different singers that have much success (except maybe Van Halen and AC/DC). Still, it's cool to go see these bands because who knows how much longer we'll get to see any of them? This kind of music (even my own style of writing/playing) will never see the light of day on the airwaves anymore, and we're quickly becoming a dying breed.![]()
Hope you're teeth are feeling better!
steveo777 wrote:Vladan wrote:Gunbot wrote:So, when it comes to U2 and Bon Jovi, is having the original singer (even with a ragged voice) the difference between playing stadiums or trying to fill amphitheaters?
Don't know man. All I know is, that is sux major balls when bands changes their lead singers, for whatever reason. Never been a fan of it!. Besides all that I went to the dentist today, and I am not happy... so probably the best thing for me to do today, is stay away from these forums!
Why, Vlad, is it too easy for us to hit those raw nerves? LOL
Take care of yourself. Tooth pain sucks!!!
Rip Rokken wrote:Vladan wrote:And Rip, no worries mate, I do agree with you on most points there, the only thing I couldn't care less about is seeing them play live today... totally not interested, unless Gramm was fronting them.
Fronting which -- Foreigner or Journey?
Gunbot wrote:I think that is what is missing for me. You can replace the singer and get someone that sounds exactly like the original but you can't replace the memories, the time and space when a particular song was being played on MTV or the radio, camping out in front of Wanamaker's to get tickets, talking about it all day in school waiting for the big show. What Journey and Foreigner have now is nice but it's like an empty pinada. Looks very pretty on the outside but something's missing. that bit of magic that leaves a life time impression.
kgdjpubs wrote:Gunbot wrote:I think that is what is missing for me. You can replace the singer and get someone that sounds exactly like the original but you can't replace the memories, the time and space when a particular song was being played on MTV or the radio, camping out in front of Wanamaker's to get tickets, talking about it all day in school waiting for the big show. What Journey and Foreigner have now is nice but it's like an empty pinada. Looks very pretty on the outside but something's missing. that bit of magic that leaves a life time impression.
So, just curious....are you failing to get any magic NOW, or trying to remember the magic THEN and being disappointed with the result? I've seen Foreigner with Lou Gramm on the Journey tour with Gramm decked out in a bright and colorful Hawiian shirt (which did him NO favors at all!!!) struggling to hit the notes--and generally failing. It may have been more "Foreigner" than the current version, but I can guarantee you there was no magic going on that night.
You can have great memories of a show 20 years ago, while watching a very sucky performance now. Unless you are comparing the present, than all you are getting is nostalgia--which has little relevance to the here and now. I've seen Def Leppard put on some wonderful shows, and some shows where they were on cruise-control. Magic in the former, not so in the latter. Same with Journey, same with many other bands. Some nights have that magic. Some don't. For some bands, the magic is long gone and it may never come back. For those, I don't bother seeing them again, or at least not for a long while.
Gunbot wrote:kgdjpubs wrote:Gunbot wrote:I think that is what is missing for me. You can replace the singer and get someone that sounds exactly like the original but you can't replace the memories, the time and space when a particular song was being played on MTV or the radio, camping out in front of Wanamaker's to get tickets, talking about it all day in school waiting for the big show. What Journey and Foreigner have now is nice but it's like an empty pinada. Looks very pretty on the outside but something's missing. that bit of magic that leaves a life time impression.
So, just curious....are you failing to get any magic NOW, or trying to remember the magic THEN and being disappointed with the result? I've seen Foreigner with Lou Gramm on the Journey tour with Gramm decked out in a bright and colorful Hawiian shirt (which did him NO favors at all!!!) struggling to hit the notes--and generally failing. It may have been more "Foreigner" than the current version, but I can guarantee you there was no magic going on that night.
You can have great memories of a show 20 years ago, while watching a very sucky performance now. Unless you are comparing the present, than all you are getting is nostalgia--which has little relevance to the here and now. I've seen Def Leppard put on some wonderful shows, and some shows where they were on cruise-control. Magic in the former, not so in the latter. Same with Journey, same with many other bands. Some nights have that magic. Some don't. For some bands, the magic is long gone and it may never come back. For those, I don't bother seeing them again, or at least not for a long while.
It's a combination. Seeing the Moody Blues last week, Justin struggled a little bit but he was the same guy I watched 15 years ago and the nostalgia lets me forgive those faults I suppose. I figure Justin has given me my money's worth over the years and I don't mind. With Foreigner and Journey, it's different. If you are a Neal freak, then obviously you are there for him, with the vocalist coming second. Not being a musician, I was more about the singer than the band, so I have to decide if the ticket price is worth it in that regard. AP, Kelly? Great singers, but I have no connection. If new ORIGINAL music by them appeals to me then of course there will be a bond but at the moment no.
Now, I will see Celtic Woman in 10 days. They have gone through quite a few personnel changes but with them the concert is all about the show and presentation, not one singer being the focal point so I get a different enjoyment from that. No nostalgia or nothing like that handicapping their performance for me.
This is my take of course. Different strokes for different folks. I totally get why people love going to the Journey shows and whoever else, but I just feel different about it. And I think it's fair to say that I'm not on my own in that regard.
You kick ass you stoned cold foxCarla777 wrote:and the years goes by....and this band still kick ass!! both version are great, like someone say before they are not 20 anymore..but still is a great performance..kelly Hansen is awesomeeeeeee, the best choice for Foreigner
Gunbot wrote:I think that is what is missing for me. You can replace the singer and get someone that sounds exactly like the original but you can't replace the memories, the time and space when a particular song was being played on MTV or the radio, camping out in front of Wanamaker's to get tickets, talking about it all day in school waiting for the big show.
Coming here and chatting is fun and I for one like how the forum has become a potpourri of different subjects. If it only centered on Journey I would probably have been tired of this place long ago and wondered off to some other place on the web.
What Journey and Foreigner have now is nice but it's like an empty pinada. Looks very pretty on the outside but something's missing. that bit of magic that leaves a life time impression.
DrFU wrote:Saw them a couple of weeks ago & they didn't seem karaoke-ish to me. Granted, they are not 20 anymore, but so what?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxByxf5IFWA
StoneCold wrote:Gunbot wrote:I think that is what is missing for me. You can replace the singer and get someone that sounds exactly like the original but you can't replace the memories, the time and space when a particular song was being played on MTV or the radio, camping out in front of Wanamaker's to get tickets, talking about it all day in school waiting for the big show.
Coming here and chatting is fun and I for one like how the forum has become a potpourri of different subjects. If it only centered on Journey I would probably have been tired of this place long ago and wondered off to some other place on the web.
Ditto this.What Journey and Foreigner have now is nice but it's like an empty pinada. Looks very pretty on the outside but something's missing. that bit of magic that leaves a life time impression.
Until Foreigner cuts new tracks, they haven't really done anything. Hiring a front guy and touring is ok but as you said, what's really "new" about them? One track on another GH doesn't cut it.
Journel did what they've been doing since '01, cutting new music with a new singer. 3rd new singer albeit but this time it stuck so yeah, its not the same as the 80's but its something more than what Foreigner's done since Gramm's been gone.
To be honest, as much as they try, Journey is just a different band with the same name.
This is gonna sound harsh but as good as they are, Cain and Castro are interchangeable to me. Ross is Ross. He's prehistoric and saw the birth of the band so its good he's still there.
The soul of the band was Rolie and Schon, then Perry and Schon and Smitty capped it off. Without Smitty and Perry, it'll never be the same band to me. Good enough to catch a show here and there though.
Not to say there's not potential for more. "We'll see".
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests