President Barack Obama - Term 1 and 2 Thread

General Intelligent Discussion & One Thread About That Buttknuckle

Moderator: Andrew

Postby Rockindeano » Tue Apr 21, 2009 12:55 am

Why is Harry Reid a piece of shit? What did he say so wrong? The war was lost? I got news for you, it is lost. Over 4,000 American casualties, allies bailing on us, terrible mismanagement therof, and NO exit plan. What's so incorrect with what the Senator said?

That war should of A). been done and over in 6 months or less, B) had a viable and somewhat strategic exit plan, C) should have been conducted with a decent amount of allied help(not the token three countries who showed up), and maybe the most important, D) Never been waged. Bullshit, unnecessary war, based on lies and fear tactics, to rally the electorate.

Now Obama is stuck holding the shit bag that is W's War.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Tue Apr 21, 2009 12:59 am

RossValoryRocks wrote:Gee...did you READ the article??? In RECENT months...as in under OBAMA'S watch...


And accordingly, Obama recieved flack for his wiretap appproval, during the campaign and now.

RossValoryRocks wrote:Oh and they DIDN'T spy on him...they WANTED to spy on him...but it was blocked.

You said the wiretaps did not extend to domestic communications.
That's been proven false.
In Europe, the Conservatives actually care about things like civil liberties.
Here, we have big brother brownshirts who put their blind faith in the government as long as it's under the guise of "national security" - despite the instructive precedent of history.

RossValoryRocks wrote:Did you even notice that a memeber of congress was talking to a TERRORIST?


And Nixon said he was justified to wiretap citizens to find Vietnam war intel leaks.
Either you believe in the law or not.

RossValoryRocks wrote:OF COURSE NOT! It doesn't match your political ideology...which is so far left you can even see the center let alone claim to be a part of it.


Enforcing the law has nothing to do with which way your political barometer swings.
If only for posterity's sake, you cannot impeach Clinton for a pecadillo, and then give the most massive executive overreach since Nixon a pass.

RossValoryRocks wrote:Again...step away from the Donkey dung, and Elephant drool and see what is really happening dude. Your golden boy Obama is as bad as the rest of them.


And justice will be brought to bear, whether he stands in the way or not.
The difference is, liberals didn't come down with moral amnesia the moment our "golden boy" was in office.
Spain and the UN have already looked into prosecutions, just a matter of time.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16053
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Tue Apr 21, 2009 1:07 am

Eric wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/04/19/cia.torture.chief/

Reckless


Maybe Obama could've kept the torture documents classified and then turned around and waged war on the press when they inevitably got leaked, as hapened with the Pentagon Papers in the 70s. :roll:
By releasing the memos, Obama renews the country's commitment to an open democracy.
Meanwhile, the pro-torture, pro-censorship GOP continues its slide into stormtrooper fascism.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16053
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby Eric » Tue Apr 21, 2009 1:37 am

Rockindeano wrote:Why is Harry Reid a piece of shit? What did he say so wrong? The war was lost? I got news for you, it is lost. Over 4,000 American casualties, allies bailing on us, terrible mismanagement therof, and NO exit plan. What's so incorrect with what the Senator said?

That war should of A). been done and over in 6 months or less, B) had a viable and somewhat strategic exit plan, C) should have been conducted with a decent amount of allied help(not the token three countries who showed up), and maybe the most important, D) Never been waged. Bullshit, unnecessary war, based on lies and fear tactics, to rally the electorate.

Now Obama is stuck holding the shit bag that is W's War.


War is won...W had already agreed with Iraqi officials on withdrawal plans, contrary to the the media pretending these dates are new. We toppled Saddam+thugs, spread freedom in a region desperately needing it, scared the shit out of Kadahfi...and drew Al Queda in and beat them delivering a blow to their momentum. all the while distracting them from our homeland.

It was waged very poorly for a long time - nobody rationale disagrees with that, and that caused way too many casualties.
Eric
Eric
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3932
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2002 12:51 am

Postby Eric » Tue Apr 21, 2009 1:42 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:Meanwhile, the pro-torture, pro-censorship GOP continues its slide into stormtrooper fascism.


The only one using storm troopers was the Obama campaign:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2070026/posts

Oh and the "torture" or should I say Fraternity Hazing-esque interrogation methods used saved American lives:
http://www.veteranstoday.com/modules.ph ... e&sid=5825
Eric
Eric
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3932
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2002 12:51 am

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Tue Apr 21, 2009 2:03 am

Eric wrote:The only one using storm troopers was the Obama campaign:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2070026/posts


LOL.
I'm talking about institutionalized torture and witholding documents from the public, and the best you can muster is Obama's groupies flooding a radio station switchboard? :shock: :lol:
You know what they say, the first casualty of war is Casey Kasem's Top 40 American Countdown. :?

Eric wrote:Oh and the "torture" or should I say Fraternity Hazing-esque interrogation methods used saved American lives:
http://www.veteranstoday.com/modules.ph ... e&sid=5825


Great.
Then it should've been debated in Congress initially, just like the Patriot Act.
You seem to have a problem with this thing called Democracy, Eric.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16053
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Tue Apr 21, 2009 2:13 am

Eric wrote:...scared the shit out of Kadahfi...


Bullshit.
Those negotiations were underway long before Bush was even in office.
Libya came to us and the Brits in the 90's agreeing to give up weapons if we let up on sanctions.
Sounds very much the type of move the GOP would label as appeasement.
Cheney took credit (and hey, why not, they had nothing else going for them) and the GOP flock lapped it up.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16053
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby Eric » Tue Apr 21, 2009 3:00 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Eric wrote:The only one using storm troopers was the Obama campaign:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2070026/posts


LOL.
I'm talking about institutionalized torture and witholding documents from the public, and the best you can muster is Obama's groupies flooding a radio station switchboard? :shock: :lol:
You know what they say, the first casualty of war is Casey Kasem's Top 40 American Countdown. :?

Eric wrote:Oh and the "torture" or should I say Fraternity Hazing-esque interrogation methods used saved American lives:
http://www.veteranstoday.com/modules.ph ... e&sid=5825


Great.
Then it should've been debated in Congress initially, just like the Patriot Act.
You seem to have a problem with this thing called Democracy, Eric.


Hundreds and hundreds of examples of his campaign's storm trooper tactics, here are a couple of more:
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/2031500/o ... ers_in_pa/
http://www.kmov.com/localnews/stories/k ... 69e89.html

And you seem to have a problem with the notion that you don't give our enemies our playbook.
Eric
Eric
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3932
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2002 12:51 am

Postby Eric » Tue Apr 21, 2009 3:06 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Eric wrote:...scared the shit out of Kadahfi...


Bullshit.
Those negotiations were underway long before Bush was even in office.
Libya came to us and the Brits in the 90's agreeing to give up weapons if we let up on sanctions.
Sounds very much the type of move the GOP would label as appeasement.
Cheney took credit (and hey, why not, they had nothing else going for them) and the GOP flock lapped it up.


There were negotiations for years and years but he didn't give up the program until December, 2003...after the Iraq invasion. I think he feared an Iraq style invasion.
Eric
Eric
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3932
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2002 12:51 am

Postby Eric » Tue Apr 21, 2009 3:08 am

Geez, I sure hope Barry sits down with this evil fuck next!

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/w ... 132972.ece
Eric
Eric
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3932
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2002 12:51 am

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Tue Apr 21, 2009 3:13 am

Eric wrote:There were negotiations for years and years but he didn't give up the program until December, 2003...after the Iraq invasion. I think he feared an Iraq style invasion.


Not true.
Libya's WMDs were already put on the table back in 1999.
Even if you are correct, I don't think anyone can objectively say Iraq has pacified Iran, North Korea, Russia etc. - just the opposite.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16053
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby Rockindeano » Tue Apr 21, 2009 3:30 am

Eric wrote:
War is won...W had already agreed with Iraqi officials on withdrawal plans, contrary to the the media pretending these dates are new. We toppled Saddam+thugs, spread freedom in a region desperately needing it, scared the shit out of Kadahfi...and drew Al Queda in and beat them delivering a blow to their momentum. all the while distracting them from our homeland.

It was waged very poorly for a long time - nobody rationale disagrees with that, and that caused way too many casualties.


:shock: "War is Won?" Are you fucking serious? What should have been a gleeful skip over the river and through the woods became a nightmare middle of the night blind journey through a 5 mile long maze. Hell, by your definition, we will never "lose" a war, but come on already? Sure we'll eventually outlast everyone in battle, but my God, with all the billions we spend on technology, our casualties should be 1/4000th of what they are in this "won war." What a joke.

I have said it many times before, my son wanted to join up and serve and I wouldn't let him. I threatened to break his arm. No way can I as a father, let my naive 17 at the time some, go to "war" for George W Bush. No way do I let him ship off to die for a mistake. Now had he wanted to go to Afghanistan, and actually somewhat knew what the differences were between the two, I could live with his decision, but Iraq, under Bush/Cheney and Rumsfeld? No fucking way at all, never, ever. We would be in Vancouver on conscientious objector emmigrate desires in 4 hours.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:03 am

Eric wrote:Hundreds and hundreds of examples of his campaign's storm trooper tactics, here are a couple of more:


Ok..let's have it...

Eric wrote:http://www.metacafe.com/watch/2031500/obamas_ss_storm_troopers_blocking_white_voters_in_pa/

No proof whatsoever that the black panthers have any affiliation with Obama or are on the DNC payroll.
None.
The cops were called and these men were removed, as they should have been.
This is the best you got?

Eric wrote:http://www.kmov.com/localnews/stories/kmov_election_092808_truthsquad.bec69e89.html

So some cop chose to support Obama's presidential bid over McCains'?
What's the problem here?
This is some seriously weak shit.
Laughable, really.

Eric wrote:And you seem to have a problem with the notion that you don't give our enemies our playbook.

That's just a soundbyte.
The memos didn't say anything that wasn't already public knowledge.
If anything, it just saves a future president the trouble of apologising for our actions later.
Y'know, kinda how that traitorous commie Reagan apologized to the Japs for internment camps in WW2.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16053
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby Eric » Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:37 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:Y'know, kinda how that traitorous commie Reagan apologized to the Japs for internment camps in WW2.


You don't see the difference?????
Eric
Eric
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3932
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2002 12:51 am

Postby Eric » Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:40 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Eric wrote:Hundreds and hundreds of examples of his campaign's storm trooper tactics, here are a couple of more:


Ok..let's have it...

Eric wrote:http://www.metacafe.com/watch/2031500/obamas_ss_storm_troopers_blocking_white_voters_in_pa/

No proof whatsoever that the black panthers have any affiliation with Obama or are on the DNC payroll.
None.
The cops were called and these men were removed, as they should have been.
This is the best you got?

Eric wrote:http://www.kmov.com/localnews/stories/kmov_election_092808_truthsquad.bec69e89.html

So some cop chose to support Obama's presidential bid over McCains'?
What's the problem here?
This is some seriously weak shit.
Laughable, really.


Spin and gloss over these things all you want, but YOU used storm troopers to label W, when Obama has people conducting themselves in a much more storm trooperish way.
Eric
Eric
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3932
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2002 12:51 am

Postby Eric » Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:45 am

Rockindeano wrote:
Eric wrote:
War is won...W had already agreed with Iraqi officials on withdrawal plans, contrary to the the media pretending these dates are new. We toppled Saddam+thugs, spread freedom in a region desperately needing it, scared the shit out of Kadahfi...and drew Al Queda in and beat them delivering a blow to their momentum. all the while distracting them from our homeland.

It was waged very poorly for a long time - nobody rationale disagrees with that, and that caused way too many casualties.


:shock: "War is Won?" Are you fucking serious? What should have been a gleeful skip over the river and through the woods became a nightmare middle of the night blind journey through a 5 mile long maze. Hell, by your definition, we will never "lose" a war, but come on already? Sure we'll eventually outlast everyone in battle, but my God, with all the billions we spend on technology, our casualties should be 1/4000th of what they are in this "won war." What a joke.

I have said it many times before, my son wanted to join up and serve and I wouldn't let him. I threatened to break his arm. No way can I as a father, let my naive 17 at the time some, go to "war" for George W Bush. No way do I let him ship off to die for a mistake. Now had he wanted to go to Afghanistan, and actually somewhat knew what the differences were between the two, I could live with his decision, but Iraq, under Bush/Cheney and Rumsfeld? No fucking way at all, never, ever. We would be in Vancouver on conscientious objector emmigrate desires in 4 hours.


You're arguing about whether the war was worth it and about how it was waged. Whether it was worth it or not is way too over my head and only time will tell, however, I'll argue there was good to come out of it (points made in above post) unlike Vietnam. I also don't see how it was good for the soldiers to have someone in their Government saying that the war was lost. And again - the way it was waged for a long time was disgraceful.
Eric
Eric
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3932
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2002 12:51 am

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:49 am

Eric wrote:
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Y'know, kinda how that traitorous commie Reagan apologized to the Japs for internment camps in WW2.


You don't see the difference?????


Yes.
FDR passed an executive order and eventually went to the Supreme Court over detainee camps.
Bush Co., on the other hand, acted like a dictatorship.
Is that what you meant?
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16053
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby Eric » Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:59 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Eric wrote:
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Y'know, kinda how that traitorous commie Reagan apologized to the Japs for internment camps in WW2.


You don't see the difference?????


Yes.
FDR passed an executive order and eventually went to the Supreme Court over detainee camps.
Bush Co., on the other hand, acted like a dictatorship.
Is that what you meant?


If you want to compare Japanese-Americans to Terrorists who want to kill us its your right, but I'm not buying it.
Eric
Eric
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3932
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2002 12:51 am

Postby RossValoryRocks » Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:00 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Eric wrote:
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Y'know, kinda how that traitorous commie Reagan apologized to the Japs for internment camps in WW2.


You don't see the difference?????


Yes.
FDR passed an executive order and eventually went to the Supreme Court over detainee camps.
Bush Co., on the other hand, acted like a dictatorship.
Is that what you meant?


Ok...I see now...the modus operani is blame it all on Bush...even though the current Democrat controlled Congress approved the wiretaps all over again...didn't change a damn thing...and this is what the Obama administration is currently doing...but because it is Obama it is ok...or rather...you change the subject and blame Bush?

Dude...you are completely wacked...they are BOTH wrong...or both right...you can't have one be ok and one not.

Also...in response to your earlier post to me...it may be a difference of symantecs...but note they TRIED...the Obama administration that is...to warrantless tap a congressmen...they were shot down...I have seen no proof from you...or anyone else...that at ANYTIME during the Bush administration or the Obama adminisrtration that they actually did so.

So nice try but you are getting crazier by the day.
User avatar
RossValoryRocks
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3830
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 4:47 pm

Now props to obama...

Postby RossValoryRocks » Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:01 am

Going to force the Cabinet to cut $100 million in spending!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090420/ap_ ... r_wh/obama
User avatar
RossValoryRocks
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3830
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 4:47 pm

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:13 am

Eric wrote:Spin and gloss over these things all you want,..


You mean calling you out on your lies?

Eric wrote:but YOU used storm troopers to label W,


Yes, the curtailment of civil liberties and the use of torture is very Nazi like.
Hell, the term "enhanced interogration" is actually from the Nazis.
Defend or denounce it's efficacy in the War on Terror, but that is a fact.

Eric wrote: When Obama has people conducting themselves in a much more storm trooperish way.


You are talking about a campaign that had volunteers in the hundreds of thousands.
Many of the instances you cite, like the Black Panthers, don't even have any relationship to Obama.
I am talking about decisions that originated in the oval office and cost people their lives.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16053
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:14 am

Eric wrote:If you want to compare Japanese-Americans to Terrorists who want to kill us its your right, but I'm not buying it.


Why do you think we locked them up, dumbshit?
Like the indiscriminate dragnet that brought innocents to Gitmo and Abu Ghraib, all the Japs were broadbrushed as wanting to destroy America.
Last edited by The_Noble_Cause on Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16053
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Re: Now props to obama...

Postby Barb » Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:21 am

RossValoryRocks wrote:Going to force the Cabinet to cut $100 million in spending!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090420/ap_ ... r_wh/obama


That will have a HUGE impact. Good job!! :roll:
Barb
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:55 pm
Location: Nor Cal

Re: Now props to obama...

Postby RossValoryRocks » Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:27 am

Barb wrote:
RossValoryRocks wrote:Going to force the Cabinet to cut $100 million in spending!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090420/ap_ ... r_wh/obama


That will have a HUGE impact. Good job!! :roll:


It's a START...I will give him props for it...I said I would be fair, unlike the libs, and will compliment or bash accordingly.

Neither Clinton nor Bush tried to cut shit. So Obama is one up on them here.
User avatar
RossValoryRocks
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3830
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 4:47 pm

Re: Now props to obama...

Postby Eric » Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:29 am

RossValoryRocks wrote:
Barb wrote:
RossValoryRocks wrote:Going to force the Cabinet to cut $100 million in spending!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090420/ap_ ... r_wh/obama


That will have a HUGE impact. Good job!! :roll:


It's a START...I will give him props for it...I said I would be fair, unlike the libs, and will compliment or bash accordingly.

Neither Clinton nor Bush tried to cut shit. So Obama is one up on them here.


Indeed this is good. I'll toss it in the good bucket with his stem cell reversal and the way he handled the Somali pirate thing......
Eric
Eric
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3932
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2002 12:51 am

Re: Now props to obama...

Postby Barb » Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:34 am

RossValoryRocks wrote:
Barb wrote:
RossValoryRocks wrote:Going to force the Cabinet to cut $100 million in spending!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090420/ap_ ... r_wh/obama


That will have a HUGE impact. Good job!! :roll:


It's a START...I will give him props for it...I said I would be fair, unlike the libs, and will compliment or bash accordingly.

Neither Clinton nor Bush tried to cut shit. So Obama is one up on them here.


Considering the monstrosity of the deficit, cutting $100M is the equivalent of not cutting shit. What is the point, really?
Barb
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:55 pm
Location: Nor Cal

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:35 am

RossValoryRocks wrote:Ok...I see now...the modus operani is blame it all on Bush...even though the current Democrat controlled Congress approved the wiretaps all over again...didn't change a damn thing...and this is what the Obama administration is currently doing...but because it is Obama it is ok...or rather...you change the subject and blame Bush?

Bush didn't do it with Congress's approval.
Only after the NYTimes exposed the wiretaps (after sitting on it per Bush's request), was Congress brought in.
Bush acted like a King, ignored FISA, and broke the law.
End of story.

RossValoryRocks wrote:Dude...you are completely wacked...they are BOTH wrong...or both right...you can't have one be ok and one not.

Obama did not circumvent checks and balances like Bush.
The issue was brought to the floor and it was voted on.
Y'know, the American way.

RossValoryRocks wrote:Also...in response to your earlier post to me...it may be a difference of symantecs...but note they TRIED...the Obama administration that is...to warrantless tap a congressmen...they were shot down...I have seen no proof from you...or anyone else...that at ANYTIME during the Bush administration or the Obama adminisrtration that they actually did so.

Just last week you were also under the impression that Bush followed FISA, the very law which he deliberately flaunted.
I don't think you know the facts of this case, nor do you care.
You're just defending Bush at all costs.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16053
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Re: Now props to obama...

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:39 am

RossValoryRocks wrote:Neither Clinton nor Bush tried to cut shit. So Obama is one up on them here.


You're kidding right?
Clinton is the only president in modern history to actually reduce the size of gov't.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16053
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby Eric » Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:41 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Eric wrote:If you want to compare Japanese-Americans to Terrorists who want to kill us its your right, but I'm not buying it.


Why do you think we locked them up, dumbshit?
Like the indiscriminate dragnet that brought innocents to Gitmo and Abu Ghraib, all the Japs were broadbrushed as wanting to destroy America.


Innocents? Come on! If you're found in Kabul and you're not from there and are doing terrorist activities you are a terrorist. You still don't seem to care about saving American lives as much as you do about whining about anything W.

Jap-Americans were not a threat......the evil mofo's at Gitmo are. We're also talking about 340 terrorists at Gitmo as opposed tens of thousands of Japanese-Americans. Just a real unfair and ignorant comparison. Just atrocious!
Eric
Eric
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3932
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2002 12:51 am

Postby Eric » Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:42 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Eric wrote:Spin and gloss over these things all you want,..


You mean calling you out on your lies?



Name one?
Eric
Eric
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3932
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2002 12:51 am

PreviousNext

Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests