Aaron wrote:One thing we do agree on is detuning for Steve Perry. I would tolerate that because Steve is the absolute best and created this music we love. I would make an exception because Perry is the best, period. However, I'm not on page of detuning for a replacement singer that can't cut it after a year of touring. Sorry, if you're running with a replacement, it better sound like it should. If Arnel can't do the job then find someone that can. Detuning is the wrong decision to make for a replacement singer. The "legacy sound" detuned a half step ... ha, what a bunch of plonkers.
Actually, this is where we
disagree. You gave me your opinion, so if you don't mind too much, I'd like to offer my own.
Steve Perry is my favorite singer of all time and truly one of the very best in history, objectively. He was a vocalist par excellence all around on all fronts: phrasing, range, power, control, and even stamina. Because he did give it his all, he crafted the foundation for a catalogue of songs that simply require the singer's absolute A-game every night to do them justice. As he aged and due to irresponsible touring (not necessarily his fault, but those of his managers), his technical abilities began to dwindle and fade. Had the management or Perry himself the foresight to suggest taking it easy or detune, he still might be around singing his ass off today.
Now where we differ is that you, in your own words, are "not a puss and call them when [you] see them." I consider the same of myself, actually. The key difference is that not even the great Steve Perry is immune to my criticism. Because he was such a powerhouse vocalist, he is naturally critiqued according to a high set of standards -- standards that do not adjust themselves simply because he is the great Steve Perry. If he gives a shitty performance, I am just as harsh in my critique of him as I am with any other singer on the planet. Perhaps even moreso because he was the best. And we [should, anyways] always expect the best from... er... the best. Perry himself clearly agrees with me, as we've all discussed how much of a perfectionist he was when it came to singing.
Looking at it objectively, Arnel Pineda is tackling a catalogue that eventually overcame the man whom it was crafted around. More importantly, he was older than that man himself and (as I recall) has had suffered from medical complications related to his voice in the past, if Wikipedia is to be trusted. These are key issues that Perry never really had to deal with. The band and/or its management is taking precautions to ensure that this shit doesn't happen thrice, given the same thing happened to Augeri.
So, I guess what I mean is that I'm probably even less of a puss and quicker to call it when I see it than you yourself are.
I personally don't think the half step makes much a difference, given that Perry has done the same thing. The performances are still great. But I'm not a musician and so that's probably why it doesn't stick out as much.
The bottom line? It's your money and you spend it the way you want to.
'Nothing was bigger for Journey than 1981’s “Escape” album. “I have to attribute that to Jonathan coming in and joining the writing team,” Steve Perry (Feb 2012).'