OT: Bill O'Reilly

by **BobbyinTN** » Thu May 14, 2009 4:38 am

Andrew wrote:Complete twat.

I couldn't agree more. He and Rush Pillhead need to to a long walk off a short pier.

by **The_Noble_Cause** » Thu May 14, 2009 4:39 am

Eric wrote:and I'm no fan of Hannity or Coulter and it is pretty ridiculous you'd lump them together.

Why not?
O'Reilly frequently has Coulter on his show as a news analyst.

Eric wrote:Tell you what...I'll pay for the book..and donate $50 to your favorite charity if you review it and post your review on here.

I'm already backlogged with books I've yet to get to.
I'll certainly thumb thru it next time I'm in Barnes and Noble, but for the time being, I will not be reading that.
If it's anything like his newspaper columns, count me out.

Eric wrote:Olbermann doesn't say anything of substance to be debunked...and nobody watches him anyway so we should probably let him and his ratings dry up and go away.

Yes, because the 30 minutes O'Reilly devotes nightly to deciphering celebrity body language, the "American culture quiz", and pimping "No Spin Zone" doormats is really pulitzer worthy stuff. :roll:

While O'Reilly was busy covering tabloid dreck, Olbermann was the lone voice reporting on Bush's depredations against the contitution - a topic one would think would be the official domain of flag draped Teabaggers everywhere.

by **Eric** » Thu May 14, 2009 5:10 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Eric wrote:and I'm no fan of Hannity or Coulter and it is pretty ridiculous you'd lump them together.

Why not?
O'Reilly frequently has Coulter on his show as a news analyst.
Eric wrote:Tell you what...I'll pay for the book..and donate $50 to your favorite charity if you review it and post your review on here.

I'm already backlogged with books I've yet to get to.
I'll certainly thumb thru it next time I'm in Barnes and Noble, but for the time being, I will not be reading that.
If it's anything like his newspaper columns, count me out.

Eric wrote:Olbermann doesn't say anything of substance to be debunked...and nobody watches him anyway so we should probably let him and his ratings dry up and go away.

Yes, because the 30 minutes O'Reilly devotes nightly to deciphering celebrity body language, the "American culture quiz", and pimping "No Spin Zone" doormats is really pulitzer worthy stuff.
While O'Reilly was busy covering tabloid dreck, Olbermann was the lone voice reporting on Bush's depredations against the contitution - a topic one would think would be the official domain of flag draped Teabaggers everywhere.

She's no news analyst...and I laugh at her 95% of time, as do most viewers.

His newspaper columns are usually spot-on...but NO...this book is different.

Olbermann and your opinions of those....they are not mine.

by **Jana** » Thu May 14, 2009 6:15 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Tito wrote:If the fags (Perez Hilton in particular) wouldn't have made such a fuss over this, it wouldn't have even been noticed.

More and more semi-nude shots keep coming out.
That's against beauty pageant rules.
I really don't care what she thinks about two boys kissing, it is clear, however, that she is a sanctimonious hypocrite.
In other words, a perfect addition to the FOX News evening roster.
O'Reilly himself, a staunch defender of the sanctity of hetero marriage, has been accused of doing himself in the ass with a vibrator.
An accusation, among others, he would later settle in court.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/10 ... kris1.html

I loved those Smoking Gun reports when that came out. That legal Complaint with all the lewd details was my entertainment for a week. :lol:

by **Eric** » Thu May 14, 2009 7:02 am

Few of my faves:

http://www.billoreilly.com/column?pid=25916

http://www.billoreilly.com/column?pid=23338

http://www.billoreilly.com/column?pid=19789

Looking at the date
http://www.billoreilly.com/column?pid=19329

Website · by **FishinMagician** » Thu May 14, 2009 11:10 am

G.I.Jim wrote:
The_Noble_Cause wrote:
G.I.Jim wrote:Who has the most viewers?

Who gives a fuck?
Cable news, by itself, is already a small, niche market.
The only reason the Right latches onto cable news like their lives depend on it is because, well, for them, it feels like it actually does.
I wonder just which apocalyptic doomsday horse O’Reilly will trot out of the barn tonight - "activist judges", "socialism", "gay marriage", “liberal media”, “Acorn”, etc. etc.
The stakes are made to appear higher, and the dittohead zombie hordes react accordingly.

Well, maybe it's because people like to hear the truth. Obviously a LOT of people believe in what is said on the network that they keep tuning in. It's not just Cable news either. How about talk radio? Do you guys even HAVE a talk radio station? This is obviously a sore subject with you, so I won't harrass you too much.

is this a joke?

by **Monker** » Thu May 14, 2009 11:55 am

G.I.Jim wrote:
Andrew wrote:Complete twat.

Andrew...you shouldn't talk about your queen like that!

I doubt a former prison colony gives a damn about the royal family!

by **Andrew** » Thu May 14, 2009 12:17 pm

Monker wrote:
G.I.Jim wrote:
Andrew wrote:Complete twat.

Andrew...you shouldn't talk about your queen like that!

I doubt a former prison colony gives a damn about the royal family!

Indeed we don't

by **G.I.Jim** » Thu May 14, 2009 12:41 pm

Andrew wrote:
Monker wrote:
G.I.Jim wrote:
Andrew wrote:Complete twat.

Andrew...you shouldn't talk about your queen like that!

I doubt a former prison colony gives a damn about the royal family!

Indeed we don't

I haven't been under her rule since I was 13...I don't either! :wink:

MR

OT: Bill O'Reilly

Who is online