Saint John wrote:Melissa wrote:
Poley as in Ted Poley?
No, Mel. Roley Poley.![]()
LOL, like Dan knows who Poley is.



Moderator: Andrew
Saint John wrote:Melissa wrote:
Poley as in Ted Poley?
No, Mel. Roley Poley.![]()
Blueskies wrote:Behshad wrote:Why is this old hag allowed to go after people like that just cause she reads into things too much. Andrew , wtf mate?!
Reading the printed words "his loss" is not reading in its only reading what is printed.
It is conjecture that the possibilty for them to work together has been discussed already when it hasn't been...
and I have not resorted to calling anyone a single name in my responses.
So, Andrew...look at this thread and see how the group of friends think they should be able to get away with speaking towards someone disrespectfully when someone disagrees with one of their group. Take a look at all the juvenile namecalling that is being said towards me and read my responses and find who is in the wrong. There is a clear difference between disagreeing with what someone says and discussing it in a civil manner vs. attacking them on a personal level with off topic insults.
Jeremey wrote:Thanks for all the replies!
Don't think anyone here knows enough about Eric or myself to wonder if there was some bad blood there or not...Of course not! Yo Eric!What happens when two musicians are traveling the nation (me) or the globe (Eric) is that long stretches of time pass before you have occassion to touch bases again....
Anyway, E, would love to give you a call to catch up....Know you'd be perfect & the first dude I thought of (long before this vacancy to be honest) but know I can't afford to send you to Detroit, Dallas, or New Orleans, etc....Will give you a ring tomorrow to catch up, regardless....I believe you know who our next guitar player will be!
Blueskies wrote:Behshad wrote:Why is this old hag allowed to go after people like that just cause she reads into things too much. Andrew , wtf mate?!
Reading the printed words "his loss" is not reading in its only reading what is printed.
It is conjecture that the possibilty for them to work together has been discussed already when it hasn't been...
and I have not resorted to calling anyone a single name in my responses.
So, Andrew...look at this thread and see how the group of friends think they should be able to get away with speaking towards someone disrespectfully when someone disagrees with one of their group. Take a look at all the juvenile namecalling that is being said towards me and read my responses and find who is in the wrong. There is a clear difference between disagreeing with what someone says and discussing it in a civil manner vs. attacking them on a personal level with off topic insults.
Behshad wrote:Blueskies wrote:Behshad wrote:Why is this old hag allowed to go after people like that just cause she reads into things too much. Andrew , wtf mate?!
Reading the printed words "his loss" is not reading in its only reading what is printed.
It is conjecture that the possibilty for them to work together has been discussed already when it hasn't been...
and I have not resorted to calling anyone a single name in my responses.
So, Andrew...look at this thread and see how the group of friends think they should be able to get away with speaking towards someone disrespectfully when someone disagrees with one of their group. Take a look at all the juvenile namecalling that is being said towards me and read my responses and find who is in the wrong. There is a clear difference between disagreeing with what someone says and discussing it in a civil manner vs. attacking them on a personal level with off topic insults.
Once again, Phyllis is the victim.... booohooo,,,,
So anyone that disagrees with you, is always in the OTHER GROUP,,,, funny how there is no one in your circle of friendship ,,, well not funny, SAD but true....
Back to the batcave
Blueskies wrote:So, Andrew...look at this thread and see how the group of friends think they should be able to get away with speaking towards someone disrespectfully when someone disagrees with one of their group. Take a look at all the juvenile namecalling that is being said towards me and read my responses and find who is in the wrong. There is a clear difference between disagreeing with what someone says and discussing it in a civil manner vs. attacking them on a personal level with off topic insults.
chynablue wrote:Maybe it's my fault... I simply alluded to the fact that I haven't heard from Jeremy in a year, and figured he was just busy.
Melissa wrote:Blueskies wrote:Behshad wrote:Why is this old hag allowed to go after people like that just cause she reads into things too much. Andrew , wtf mate?!
Reading the printed words "his loss" is not reading in its only reading what is printed.
It is conjecture that the possibilty for them to work together has been discussed already when it hasn't been...
and I have not resorted to calling anyone a single name in my responses.
So, Andrew...look at this thread and see how the group of friends think they should be able to get away with speaking towards someone disrespectfully when someone disagrees with one of their group. Take a look at all the juvenile namecalling that is being said towards me and read my responses and find who is in the wrong. There is a clear difference between disagreeing with what someone says and discussing it in a civil manner vs. attacking them on a personal level with off topic insults.
You came after me accusing me of something I did not intend AT ALL. Even Eric could see it was a compliment, and that's ALL it was. Then you take this exact moral high road act as you've done so many other times before on here to so many other people on here, and here we go again, you're the victim, everyone else is just wrong, same old cycle yet again. And drop the "group" garbage, most of the people you've dug into on here before I've never even met, so that doesn't fly.
chynablue wrote:
Blueskies, I know you meant well but I think you may be escalating a situation that isn't even a situation. I'm not upset, Jeremy's not upset and it doesn't seem that Melissa meant any harm. The only one that seems agitated here is you. I'm sure Jeremy appreciates your support, but I don't think this is helping his cause.
chynablue wrote:Blueskies wrote:So, Andrew...look at this thread and see how the group of friends think they should be able to get away with speaking towards someone disrespectfully when someone disagrees with one of their group. Take a look at all the juvenile namecalling that is being said towards me and read my responses and find who is in the wrong. There is a clear difference between disagreeing with what someone says and discussing it in a civil manner vs. attacking them on a personal level with off topic insults.
Wow, what a frigging mess.![]()
Blueskies, I know you meant well but I think you may be escalating a situation that isn't even a situation. I'm not upset, Jeremy's not upset and it doesn't seem that Melissa meant any harm. The only one that seems agitated here is you. I'm sure Jeremy appreciates your support, but I don't think this is helping his cause.
To the folks who asked about the Ted Poley gig - it's an all ages concert in the park in King of Prussia. Ted is opening and Eric Martin is the headliner. I will be playing with both bands again, as I did last year. And there is a TON of footage on you tube from last year's show.
Jeremy! What's goin on man. Man how quick these threads get out of hand. Yeah bro gimme a call when you get some time, I'm up all night and other than an interview tomorrow at 1 PM PST I'm free all day too. I'd love to hear how things have been going, and catch you up with my adventures too! All my best to the family, E
EXACTLY! I have watched that happen here time and time again and that is why I said something to begin with...to squash the rumor mill before it got too out of hand. It's uncool for anyone to jump to conclusions before Jeremey even had a chance to respond.Voyager wrote:chynablue wrote:Maybe it's my fault... I simply alluded to the fact that I haven't heard from Jeremy in a year, and figured he was just busy.
Dude, you say something like that around here about someone and within three hours it will turn into rumors of you two emailing death threats to each other.
![]()
![]()
chynablue wrote:To the folks who asked about the Ted Poley gig - it's an all ages concert in the park in King of Prussia. Ted is opening and Eric Martin is the headliner. I will be playing with both bands again, as I did last year. And there is a TON of footage on you tube from last year's show.
Blueskies wrote:Melissa wrote:Blueskies wrote:Behshad wrote:Why is this old hag allowed to go after people like that just cause she reads into things too much. Andrew , wtf mate?!
Reading the printed words "his loss" is not reading in its only reading what is printed.
It is conjecture that the possibilty for them to work together has been discussed already when it hasn't been...
and I have not resorted to calling anyone a single name in my responses.
So, Andrew...look at this thread and see how the group of friends think they should be able to get away with speaking towards someone disrespectfully when someone disagrees with one of their group. Take a look at all the juvenile namecalling that is being said towards me and read my responses and find who is in the wrong. There is a clear difference between disagreeing with what someone says and discussing it in a civil manner vs. attacking them on a personal level with off topic insults.
You came after me accusing me of something I did not intend AT ALL. Even Eric could see it was a compliment, and that's ALL it was. Then you take this exact moral high road act as you've done so many other times before on here to so many other people on here, and here we go again, you're the victim, everyone else is just wrong, same old cycle yet again. And drop the "group" garbage, most of the people you've dug into on here before I've never even met, so that doesn't fly.
You need to go back and review... I simply asked you a question for clairification... that you then could choose to answer or not. Did I call you a name within the question? No...but you came back and made an insulting comment in your response instead of just discussing the point. Did I resort to insulting you in return? No, I did not...nor have I to anyone who has directed an insult towards me in this thread so I contend that I have stayed on higher ground by not resorting to calling names when someone disagrees with me..I am able to debate something said on an adult level...would be nice if some of the rest of you could be able to do that as well instead of getting all bent out of shape when someone disagrees or asks a question for clarification to something you've said.
Blueskies wrote:chynablue wrote:Blueskies wrote:So, Andrew...look at this thread and see how the group of friends think they should be able to get away with speaking towards someone disrespectfully when someone disagrees with one of their group. Take a look at all the juvenile namecalling that is being said towards me and read my responses and find who is in the wrong. There is a clear difference between disagreeing with what someone says and discussing it in a civil manner vs. attacking them on a personal level with off topic insults.
Wow, what a frigging mess.![]()
Blueskies, I know you meant well but I think you may be escalating a situation that isn't even a situation. I'm not upset, Jeremy's not upset and it doesn't seem that Melissa meant any harm. The only one that seems agitated here is you. I'm sure Jeremy appreciates your support, but I don't think this is helping his cause.
To the folks who asked about the Ted Poley gig - it's an all ages concert in the park in King of Prussia. Ted is opening and Eric Martin is the headliner. I will be playing with both bands again, as I did last year. And there is a TON of footage on you tube from last year's show.
Jeremy! What's goin on man. Man how quick these threads get out of hand. Yeah bro gimme a call when you get some time, I'm up all night and other than an interview tomorrow at 1 PM PST I'm free all day too. I'd love to hear how things have been going, and catch you up with my adventures too! All my best to the family, E
You are assuming something as much as others are. I am not the one who got agitated here. I asked a question to clarify that there was NOT any contention between you and Jeremey when assumptions may be made too quickly that there was. I also did not get agitated and come in and attack anyone on a personal level in return, did I? Look back through the thread and see who has gotten agitated and called names and who hasn't.![]()
Blueskies wrote:EXACTLY! I have watched that happen here time and time again and that is why I said something to begin with...to squash the rumor mill before it got to out of hand. It's uncool for anyone to jump to conclusions before Jeremey even had a chance to respond.Voyager wrote:chynablue wrote:Maybe it's my fault... I simply alluded to the fact that I haven't heard from Jeremy in a year, and figured he was just busy.
Dude, you say something like that around here about someone and within three hours it will turn into rumors of you two emailing death threats to each other.
![]()
![]()
Jumping to conclusions does seem to be a way of life around here.![]()
Voyager wrote:I hope Eric gets the gig. When he and Jeremey are drinking some wine after their performances they can laugh about Eric finding the gig on a musicians want ad that turned into a penis discussion then turned into a mud slinging festival.
![]()
![]()
If I was assuming then I wouldn't have asked a question for clairification to meaning would I? You jumped to the conclusion that I was asking for the sole purpose of "starting something"....when my purpose was the exact opposite and was to stop something before it got out of hand by the viewers of this board. If you would really take a look at Erics comments and see what could be seen by them and add that to your saying it was his loss before Jeremey even had a chance to respond then maybe you will see what I mean once you calm down.Melissa wrote:Blueskies wrote:Melissa wrote:Blueskies wrote:Behshad wrote:Why is this old hag allowed to go after people like that just cause she reads into things too much. Andrew , wtf mate?!
Reading the printed words "his loss" is not reading in its only reading what is printed.
It is conjecture that the possibilty for them to work together has been discussed already when it hasn't been...
and I have not resorted to calling anyone a single name in my responses.
So, Andrew...look at this thread and see how the group of friends think they should be able to get away with speaking towards someone disrespectfully when someone disagrees with one of their group. Take a look at all the juvenile namecalling that is being said towards me and read my responses and find who is in the wrong. There is a clear difference between disagreeing with what someone says and discussing it in a civil manner vs. attacking them on a personal level with off topic insults.
You came after me accusing me of something I did not intend AT ALL. Even Eric could see it was a compliment, and that's ALL it was. Then you take this exact moral high road act as you've done so many other times before on here to so many other people on here, and here we go again, you're the victim, everyone else is just wrong, same old cycle yet again. And drop the "group" garbage, most of the people you've dug into on here before I've never even met, so that doesn't fly.
You need to go back and review... I simply asked you a question for clairification... that you then could choose to answer or not. Did I call you a name within the question? No...but you came back and made an insulting comment in your response instead of just discussing the point. Did I resort to insulting you in return? No, I did not...nor have I to anyone who has directed an insult towards me in this thread so I contend that I have stayed on higher ground by not resorting to calling names when someone disagrees with me..I am able to debate something said on an adult level...would be nice if some of the rest of you could be able to do that as well instead of getting all bent out of shape when someone disagrees or asks a question for clarification to something you've said.
TWIST it all you want, you asked me if I had firsthand knowledge that there is a problem between them. WHY would ask that? You know damn well why, to start crap like you always do. I have no clue if there is, was, or ever will be a "problem" between them, and don't care! I said "his loss" ONLY as a COMPLIMENT to Eric, NOT a slam to Jeremey. I would have said the same thing if it were ANYONE else too, it was a COMPLIMENT, and NOTHING more. You like to START crap, and you very well know that. You ASSUMED I meant something by it, and you are WRONG.
Melissa wrote:Blueskies wrote:EXACTLY! I have watched that happen here time and time again and that is why I said something to begin with...to squash the rumor mill before it got to out of hand. It's uncool for anyone to jump to conclusions before Jeremey even had a chance to respond.Voyager wrote:chynablue wrote:Maybe it's my fault... I simply alluded to the fact that I haven't heard from Jeremy in a year, and figured he was just busy.
Dude, you say something like that around here about someone and within three hours it will turn into rumors of you two emailing death threats to each other.
![]()
![]()
Jumping to conclusions does seem to be a way of life around here.![]()
YOU "jumping to conclusions" is what started all this BS to begin with. Maybe you should direct your own posts at yourself sometimes. Oh and how lovely to make yourself out to be such a do-gooder, my goodness we must all look like ants in that tall ivory tower of yours.
I asked you a question so you could clarify your meaning...that wasn't jumping it was giving you the benefit of doubt by asking. You concluded that the question was personal to you for some reason... then you got overly defensive due to drawing your own conlusions and went right for the insult. Like I said...when you calm down later..if you would go back and just read my words...read without holding any prejudice then maybe you will see what I really meant by it.Melissa wrote:Blueskies wrote:EXACTLY! I have watched that happen here time and time again and that is why I said something to begin with...to squash the rumor mill before it got to out of hand. It's uncool for anyone to jump to conclusions before Jeremey even had a chance to respond.Voyager wrote:chynablue wrote:Maybe it's my fault... I simply alluded to the fact that I haven't heard from Jeremy in a year, and figured he was just busy.
Dude, you say something like that around here about someone and within three hours it will turn into rumors of you two emailing death threats to each other.
![]()
![]()
Jumping to conclusions does seem to be a way of life around here.![]()
YOU "jumping to conclusions" is what started all this BS to begin with. Maybe you should direct your own posts at yourself sometimes. Oh and how lovely to make yourself out to be such a do-gooder, my goodness we must all look like ants in that tall ivory tower of yours.
Blueskies wrote:If I was assuming then I wouldn't have asked a question for clairification to meaning would I? You jumped to the conclusion that I was asking for the sole purpose of "starting something"....when my purpose was the exact opposite and was to stop something before it got out of hand by the viewers of this board. If you would really take a look at Erics comments and see what could be seen by them and add that to your saying it was his loss before Jeremey even had a chance to respond then maybe you will see what I mean once you calm down.Melissa wrote:Blueskies wrote:Melissa wrote:Blueskies wrote:Behshad wrote:Why is this old hag allowed to go after people like that just cause she reads into things too much. Andrew , wtf mate?!
Reading the printed words "his loss" is not reading in its only reading what is printed.
It is conjecture that the possibilty for them to work together has been discussed already when it hasn't been...
and I have not resorted to calling anyone a single name in my responses.
So, Andrew...look at this thread and see how the group of friends think they should be able to get away with speaking towards someone disrespectfully when someone disagrees with one of their group. Take a look at all the juvenile namecalling that is being said towards me and read my responses and find who is in the wrong. There is a clear difference between disagreeing with what someone says and discussing it in a civil manner vs. attacking them on a personal level with off topic insults.
You came after me accusing me of something I did not intend AT ALL. Even Eric could see it was a compliment, and that's ALL it was. Then you take this exact moral high road act as you've done so many other times before on here to so many other people on here, and here we go again, you're the victim, everyone else is just wrong, same old cycle yet again. And drop the "group" garbage, most of the people you've dug into on here before I've never even met, so that doesn't fly.
You need to go back and review... I simply asked you a question for clairification... that you then could choose to answer or not. Did I call you a name within the question? No...but you came back and made an insulting comment in your response instead of just discussing the point. Did I resort to insulting you in return? No, I did not...nor have I to anyone who has directed an insult towards me in this thread so I contend that I have stayed on higher ground by not resorting to calling names when someone disagrees with me..I am able to debate something said on an adult level...would be nice if some of the rest of you could be able to do that as well instead of getting all bent out of shape when someone disagrees or asks a question for clarification to something you've said.
TWIST it all you want, you asked me if I had firsthand knowledge that there is a problem between them. WHY would ask that? You know damn well why, to start crap like you always do. I have no clue if there is, was, or ever will be a "problem" between them, and don't care! I said "his loss" ONLY as a COMPLIMENT to Eric, NOT a slam to Jeremey. I would have said the same thing if it were ANYONE else too, it was a COMPLIMENT, and NOTHING more. You like to START crap, and you very well know that. You ASSUMED I meant something by it, and you are WRONG.![]()
Blueskies wrote:I asked you a question so you could clarify your meaning...that wasn't jumping it was giving you the benefit of doubt by asking. You concluded that the question was personal to you for some reason... then you got overly defensive due to drawing your own conlusions and went right for the insult. Like I said...when you calm down later..if you would go back and just read my words...read without holding any prejudice then maybe you will see what I really meant by it.Melissa wrote:Blueskies wrote:EXACTLY! I have watched that happen here time and time again and that is why I said something to begin with...to squash the rumor mill before it got to out of hand. It's uncool for anyone to jump to conclusions before Jeremey even had a chance to respond.Voyager wrote:chynablue wrote:Maybe it's my fault... I simply alluded to the fact that I haven't heard from Jeremy in a year, and figured he was just busy.
Dude, you say something like that around here about someone and within three hours it will turn into rumors of you two emailing death threats to each other.
![]()
![]()
Jumping to conclusions does seem to be a way of life around here.![]()
YOU "jumping to conclusions" is what started all this BS to begin with. Maybe you should direct your own posts at yourself sometimes. Oh and how lovely to make yourself out to be such a do-gooder, my goodness we must all look like ants in that tall ivory tower of yours.![]()
Oh...and no...you don't look like ants to me...something else entirely.j/k
![]()
Melissa wrote:Blueskies wrote:I asked you a question so you could clarify your meaning...that wasn't jumping it was giving you the benefit of doubt by asking. You concluded that the question was personal to you for some reason... then you got overly defensive due to drawing your own conlusions and went right for the insult. Like I said...when you calm down later..if you would go back and just read my words...read without holding any prejudice then maybe you will see what I really meant by it.Melissa wrote:Blueskies wrote:EXACTLY! I have watched that happen here time and time again and that is why I said something to begin with...to squash the rumor mill before it got to out of hand. It's uncool for anyone to jump to conclusions before Jeremey even had a chance to respond.Voyager wrote:chynablue wrote:Maybe it's my fault... I simply alluded to the fact that I haven't heard from Jeremy in a year, and figured he was just busy.
Dude, you say something like that around here about someone and within three hours it will turn into rumors of you two emailing death threats to each other.
![]()
![]()
Jumping to conclusions does seem to be a way of life around here.![]()
YOU "jumping to conclusions" is what started all this BS to begin with. Maybe you should direct your own posts at yourself sometimes. Oh and how lovely to make yourself out to be such a do-gooder, my goodness we must all look like ants in that tall ivory tower of yours.![]()
Oh...and no...you don't look like ants to me...something else entirely.j/k
![]()
NO, that is NOT what you intended with what and how you asked, and you very well know that, but like I said...brick wall.
Melissa wrote:Blueskies wrote:If I was assuming then I wouldn't have asked a question for clairification to meaning would I? You jumped to the conclusion that I was asking for the sole purpose of "starting something"....when my purpose was the exact opposite and was to stop something before it got out of hand by the viewers of this board. If you would really take a look at Erics comments and see what could be seen by them and add that to your saying it was his loss before Jeremey even had a chance to respond then maybe you will see what I mean once you calm down.Melissa wrote:Blueskies wrote:Melissa wrote:Blueskies wrote:Behshad wrote:Why is this old hag allowed to go after people like that just cause she reads into things too much. Andrew , wtf mate?!
Reading the printed words "his loss" is not reading in its only reading what is printed.
It is conjecture that the possibilty for them to work together has been discussed already when it hasn't been...
and I have not resorted to calling anyone a single name in my responses.
So, Andrew...look at this thread and see how the group of friends think they should be able to get away with speaking towards someone disrespectfully when someone disagrees with one of their group. Take a look at all the juvenile namecalling that is being said towards me and read my responses and find who is in the wrong. There is a clear difference between disagreeing with what someone says and discussing it in a civil manner vs. attacking them on a personal level with off topic insults.
You came after me accusing me of something I did not intend AT ALL. Even Eric could see it was a compliment, and that's ALL it was. Then you take this exact moral high road act as you've done so many other times before on here to so many other people on here, and here we go again, you're the victim, everyone else is just wrong, same old cycle yet again. And drop the "group" garbage, most of the people you've dug into on here before I've never even met, so that doesn't fly.
You need to go back and review... I simply asked you a question for clairification... that you then could choose to answer or not. Did I call you a name within the question? No...but you came back and made an insulting comment in your response instead of just discussing the point. Did I resort to insulting you in return? No, I did not...nor have I to anyone who has directed an insult towards me in this thread so I contend that I have stayed on higher ground by not resorting to calling names when someone disagrees with me..I am able to debate something said on an adult level...would be nice if some of the rest of you could be able to do that as well instead of getting all bent out of shape when someone disagrees or asks a question for clarification to something you've said.
TWIST it all you want, you asked me if I had firsthand knowledge that there is a problem between them. WHY would ask that? You know damn well why, to start crap like you always do. I have no clue if there is, was, or ever will be a "problem" between them, and don't care! I said "his loss" ONLY as a COMPLIMENT to Eric, NOT a slam to Jeremey. I would have said the same thing if it were ANYONE else too, it was a COMPLIMENT, and NOTHING more. You like to START crap, and you very well know that. You ASSUMED I meant something by it, and you are WRONG.![]()
Your purpose was the "exact opposite"? Gee, kind of like my comment was a compliment yet you, and only you it seems, read it the "exact opposite". Unlike you I didn't have a "purpose", I was simply giving a compliment.
Oh I'm calm, never you worry, and I've kept my husband waiting long enough so I have to go, but one thing I know for sure... it's taken me over 30 years to finally see what it's like to talk to a brick wall, and it's MY LOSS that I'll never get back the minutes I've spent arguing with you. It'll be interesting to see who you go after next, and what for.
Thanks Dan,Im pretty sure i could cut it {not to sound conceaded} But that part of the country is to far away for me, Id have to quit my band and drive thru a swamp to get there.Ive never played a keytar{i call it gaytar}If the chance ever came up to play with Frontiers around where i live and j liked it, i d do it ,and with my Friga shirt which is hanging 3 feet from me in my closet.Saint John wrote:Isn't stevew2 a really good keys player? Do it Steve. I can see it now...you up there with a "Hello Kitty" keytar and your "Jon Friga N" shirt on.
G.I.Jim wrote:Melissa wrote:Blueskies wrote:I asked you a question so you could clarify your meaning...that wasn't jumping it was giving you the benefit of doubt by asking. You concluded that the question was personal to you for some reason... then you got overly defensive due to drawing your own conlusions and went right for the insult. Like I said...when you calm down later..if you would go back and just read my words...read without holding any prejudice then maybe you will see what I really meant by it.Melissa wrote:Blueskies wrote:EXACTLY! I have watched that happen here time and time again and that is why I said something to begin with...to squash the rumor mill before it got to out of hand. It's uncool for anyone to jump to conclusions before Jeremey even had a chance to respond.Voyager wrote:chynablue wrote:Maybe it's my fault... I simply alluded to the fact that I haven't heard from Jeremy in a year, and figured he was just busy.
Dude, you say something like that around here about someone and within three hours it will turn into rumors of you two emailing death threats to each other.
![]()
![]()
Jumping to conclusions does seem to be a way of life around here.![]()
YOU "jumping to conclusions" is what started all this BS to begin with. Maybe you should direct your own posts at yourself sometimes. Oh and how lovely to make yourself out to be such a do-gooder, my goodness we must all look like ants in that tall ivory tower of yours.![]()
Oh...and no...you don't look like ants to me...something else entirely.j/k
![]()
NO, that is NOT what you intended with what and how you asked, and you very well know that, but like I said...brick wall.
I like chicken-pot-pies!
Melissa wrote:Blueskies wrote:I asked you a question so you could clarify your meaning...that wasn't jumping it was giving you the benefit of doubt by asking. You concluded that the question was personal to you for some reason... then you got overly defensive due to drawing your own conlusions and went right for the insult. Like I said...when you calm down later..if you would go back and just read my words...read without holding any prejudice then maybe you will see what I really meant by it.Melissa wrote:Blueskies wrote:EXACTLY! I have watched that happen here time and time again and that is why I said something to begin with...to squash the rumor mill before it got to out of hand. It's uncool for anyone to jump to conclusions before Jeremey even had a chance to respond.Voyager wrote:chynablue wrote:Maybe it's my fault... I simply alluded to the fact that I haven't heard from Jeremy in a year, and figured he was just busy.
Dude, you say something like that around here about someone and within three hours it will turn into rumors of you two emailing death threats to each other.
![]()
![]()
Jumping to conclusions does seem to be a way of life around here.![]()
YOU "jumping to conclusions" is what started all this BS to begin with. Maybe you should direct your own posts at yourself sometimes. Oh and how lovely to make yourself out to be such a do-gooder, my goodness we must all look like ants in that tall ivory tower of yours.![]()
Oh...and no...you don't look like ants to me...something else entirely.j/k
![]()
NO, that is NOT what you intended with what and how you asked, and you very well know that, but like I said...brick wall.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
stevew2 wrote:Thanks Dan,Im pretty sure i could cut it {not to sound conceaded} But that part of the country is to far away for me, Id have to quit my band and drive thru a swamp to get there.Ive never played a keytar{i call it gaytar}If the chance ever came up to play with Frontiers around where i live and j liked it, i d do it ,and with my Friga shirt which is hanging 3 feet from me in my closet.Saint John wrote:Isn't stevew2 a really good keys player? Do it Steve. I can see it now...you up there with a "Hello Kitty" keytar and your "Jon Friga N" shirt on.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests