What 70-80's band still have original lineups?

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

Postby JasonD » Sat May 30, 2009 4:09 am

Jonas Brothers. What???? They are too in their 50s. :lol:

Image
.
.

Image

Image
User avatar
JasonD
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2477
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 8:33 am
Location: Detroit, Michigan

Postby Voyager » Sat May 30, 2009 4:13 am

JasonD wrote:My Pendulum Swings Both Ways


You may want to clarify that or people will think you're publicly proclaiming you are bisexual. Nothing wrong with that if you are, but I'm not sure that's what you meant to broadcast.

:lol:
User avatar
Voyager
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5929
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 4:23 pm
Location: BumFunk Egypt

Postby portland » Sat May 30, 2009 4:15 am

Voyager wrote:
JasonD wrote:My Pendulum Swings Both Ways


You may want to clarify that or people will think you're publicly proclaiming you are bisexual. Nothing wrong with that if you are, but I'm not sure that's what you meant to broadcast.

:lol:





Thanks for asking that one!!
What's left After You Fall?.....A Cover Band?
portland
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7457
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:57 am
Location: Maine

Postby DracIsBack » Sat May 30, 2009 5:07 am

Jana wrote:I'm sure Bono is no more arrogant the Jon Bon Jovi, Bruce Springsteen, Steve Perry, etcl. Some just put forward a more humble persona to the public.


I don't know what people are like in private. Haven't met 'em!
DracIsBack
8 Track
 
Posts: 747
Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 7:04 am

Postby MrsPerry » Sat May 30, 2009 5:12 am

Poison has had the same line up from the get go.
Steve, We Need You.
User avatar
MrsPerry
8 Track
 
Posts: 670
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:07 pm
Location: Small Town

Postby JasonD » Sat May 30, 2009 5:15 am

Voyager wrote:
JasonD wrote:My Pendulum Swings Both Ways


You may want to clarify that or people will think you're publicly proclaiming you are bisexual. Nothing wrong with that if you are, but I'm not sure that's what you meant to broadcast.

:lol:


Image
.
.

Image

Image
User avatar
JasonD
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2477
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 8:33 am
Location: Detroit, Michigan

Postby Jana » Sat May 30, 2009 5:20 am

JasonD wrote:
Voyager wrote:
JasonD wrote:My Pendulum Swings Both Ways


You may want to clarify that or people will think you're publicly proclaiming you are bisexual. Nothing wrong with that if you are, but I'm not sure that's what you meant to broadcast.

:lol:


Image


Bobby from Tennessee is going to be in heaven. :wink:
Jana
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8227
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:21 pm
Location: Anticipating

Re: What 70-80's band still have original lineups?

Postby SF-Dano » Sat May 30, 2009 5:23 am

squirt1 wrote:Aerosmith or Rollings Stones????? Now if some member died that is understandable.


Well absolutely not the Rolling Stones. Aerosmith, yeah, though there was a brief few years when Perry and Whitford left the band.

So going by the Aerosmith rule - Motley Crue would apply also.

ZZtop and U2 are the only 2 bands that I can think of that actually have kept there original line-ups through their whole carreer (so far). Discounting changing drummers- the rule can apply to Judas Priest and Spinal Tap also :lol: .

Just shows how hard it must be to keep a group of musicians on the same page for the extra long haul.
Image
User avatar
SF-Dano
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1991
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2002 9:00 am
Location: Near Sacramento missin' my City by the Bay

Postby Duncan » Sat May 30, 2009 5:26 am

MrsPerry wrote:Poison has had the same line up from the get go.


Apart from having 3 different guitarists.



----------------
Now playing: Cream - Sitting On Top Of The World
User avatar
Duncan
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1726
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 8:57 am
Location: Sadly Broke, South Glos

Postby Voyager » Sat May 30, 2009 5:35 am

Jana wrote:
JasonD wrote:
Voyager wrote:
JasonD wrote:My Pendulum Swings Both Ways


You may want to clarify that or people will think you're publicly proclaiming you are bisexual. Nothing wrong with that if you are, but I'm not sure that's what you meant to broadcast.

:lol:


Image


Bobby from Tennessee is going to be in heaven. :wink:


Not to mention Stevew and Fri.... errrr.... nevermind.

:lol:
User avatar
Voyager
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5929
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 4:23 pm
Location: BumFunk Egypt

Postby Voyager » Sat May 30, 2009 5:36 am

Now that we're on the topic... is the Boy George band still the same lineup?

:lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Voyager
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5929
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 4:23 pm
Location: BumFunk Egypt

Postby jrnyman28 » Sat May 30, 2009 7:00 am

MrsPerry wrote:Poison has had the same line up from the get go.


Actually there was a time when CC was replaced by Ritchie Kotzen and later by Blues Sarecino. But they have been going stron with their 'originals' for a LONG time.
jrnyman28
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6732
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 2:15 pm

Postby jrnyman28 » Sat May 30, 2009 7:02 am

Voyager wrote:Now that we're on the topic... is the Boy George band still the same lineup?

:lol: :lol: :lol:


If you want to go there...I recently heard that the rest of Culture Club intend to go on without Boy George to which I say "What's the point?"
jrnyman28
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6732
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 2:15 pm

Postby Voyager » Sat May 30, 2009 7:11 am

jrnyman28 wrote:
Voyager wrote:Now that we're on the topic... is the Boy George band still the same lineup?

:lol: :lol: :lol:


If you want to go there...I recently heard that the rest of Culture Club intend to go on without Boy George to which I say "What's the point?"


Yeah... kind of like when Journey decided to go on without Steve Perry.

:lol: :roll:
User avatar
Voyager
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5929
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 4:23 pm
Location: BumFunk Egypt

Postby MrsPerry » Sat May 30, 2009 9:07 am

jrnyman28 wrote:
MrsPerry wrote:Poison has had the same line up from the get go.


Actually there was a time when CC was replaced by Ritchie Kotzen and later by Blues Sarecino. But they have been going stron with their 'originals' for a LONG time.


I did not know that. learn something new every day.
Steve, We Need You.
User avatar
MrsPerry
8 Track
 
Posts: 670
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:07 pm
Location: Small Town

Postby Don » Sat May 30, 2009 9:30 am

MrsPerry wrote:
jrnyman28 wrote:
MrsPerry wrote:Poison has had the same line up from the get go.


Actually there was a time when CC was replaced by Ritchie Kotzen and later by Blues Sarecino. But they have been going stron with their 'originals' for a LONG time.


I did not know that. learn something new every day.


Didn't they kick CC off the bus in the middle of a tour?
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Postby journey361 » Sat May 30, 2009 9:57 am

The Greg Kin Band :lol:
journey361
LP
 
Posts: 405
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 7:03 am
Location: indianapolis, indiana

Postby S2M » Sat May 30, 2009 9:58 am

journey361 wrote:The Greg Kin Band :lol:


Kihn
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby journey361 » Sat May 30, 2009 9:59 am

Ok, TY, long time ago
journey361
LP
 
Posts: 405
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 7:03 am
Location: indianapolis, indiana

Postby Michigan Girl » Sat May 30, 2009 9:59 am

Gunbot wrote:
MrsPerry wrote:
jrnyman28 wrote:
MrsPerry wrote:Poison has had the same line up from the get go.


Actually there was a time when CC was replaced by Ritchie Kotzen and later by Blues Sarecino. But they have been going stron with their 'originals' for a LONG time.


I did not know that. learn something new every day.


Didn't they kick CC off the bus in the middle of a tour?


No, he just got off to do a few episodes of the Surreal Life!! :wink:
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Postby Arianddu » Sat May 30, 2009 5:11 pm

a-ha
Why treat life as a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving in an attractive & well-preserved body? Get there by skidding in sideways, a glass of wine in one hand, chocolate in the other, body totally worn out, screaming WOOHOO! What a ride!
User avatar
Arianddu
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4509
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 11:43 pm
Location: Adelaide, Australia

Postby DracIsBack » Sat May 30, 2009 10:21 pm

Arianddu wrote:a-ha


Speaking of which, there was another guy who I thought was a candidate for butchering his voice, but he still does a decent job nailing the high notes

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srkLilJ6_3I
DracIsBack
8 Track
 
Posts: 747
Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 7:04 am

Postby strangegrey » Sat May 30, 2009 11:25 pm

verslibre wrote:
Ehwmatt wrote:Rush is the first that comes to mind.


Neil Peart is not the "original drummer."

I think only ZZ Top, King's X and U2 qualify.

The Police, too, I guess. They had a different guitarist before Andy Summers, but Andy's on every album so he may as well be the "original guitarist."


I dunno, the intent with original lineup, so far as the OP is concerned....I think, is what band is still together with the lineup they achieved success with.

Hell, If Night Ranger were still touring with Watson and Gerald....could you make the argument that the original players of this band were only Gillis and Blades and the other members of the band "Stereo"?

At what point is a band 'christened' as original.


Most people know Rush to have always been Peart, Lifeson and Lee. John Rutzy's involvement with the band is about as much a footnote as you can get....While the real hair-splitters will argue the band isn't in it's original incarnation, I think the flavor of the post is more to determine how many of these bands have stuck together in their 'famous lineup'....


To that end, Rush get's the nod from me. They've survived the bullshit and are still playing together, not fighting over money, power or fame. That's where it counts for me...
User avatar
strangegrey
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3622
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:31 am
Location: Tortuga

Postby strangegrey » Sat May 30, 2009 11:27 pm

Gunbot wrote:
MrsPerry wrote:
jrnyman28 wrote:
MrsPerry wrote:Poison has had the same line up from the get go.


Actually there was a time when CC was replaced by Ritchie Kotzen and later by Blues Sarecino. But they have been going stron with their 'originals' for a LONG time.


I did not know that. learn something new every day.


Didn't they kick CC off the bus in the middle of a tour?


I think that was Kotzen. They literally threw him over a fence and drove away when they found out he was fucking Rikki Rocket's girl.
User avatar
strangegrey
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3622
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:31 am
Location: Tortuga

Postby JasonD » Sun May 31, 2009 1:45 am

Does Fleetwood Mac qualify as an intact original lineup or must all surviving members still be in place?
.
.

Image

Image
User avatar
JasonD
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2477
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 8:33 am
Location: Detroit, Michigan

Postby Aaron » Sun May 31, 2009 2:14 am

Motley
Taking life a quarter mile at a time .... [img]
User avatar
Aaron
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2510
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2002 9:55 pm
Location: Indiana, USA

Postby Ehwmatt » Sun May 31, 2009 6:04 am

strangegrey wrote:
verslibre wrote:
Ehwmatt wrote:Rush is the first that comes to mind.


Neil Peart is not the "original drummer."

I think only ZZ Top, King's X and U2 qualify.

The Police, too, I guess. They had a different guitarist before Andy Summers, but Andy's on every album so he may as well be the "original guitarist."


I dunno, the intent with original lineup, so far as the OP is concerned....I think, is what band is still together with the lineup they achieved success with.

Hell, If Night Ranger were still touring with Watson and Gerald....could you make the argument that the original players of this band were only Gillis and Blades and the other members of the band "Stereo"?

At what point is a band 'christened' as original.


Most people know Rush to have always been Peart, Lifeson and Lee. John Rutzy's involvement with the band is about as much a footnote as you can get....While the real hair-splitters will argue the band isn't in it's original incarnation, I think the flavor of the post is more to determine how many of these bands have stuck together in their 'famous lineup'....


To that end, Rush get's the nod from me. They've survived the bullshit and are still playing together, not fighting over money, power or fame. That's where it counts for me...


Exactly what I had in mind, thanks Frank.
User avatar
Ehwmatt
MP3
 
Posts: 10907
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:15 am
Location: Cleveland, OH

Postby verslibre » Sun May 31, 2009 6:20 am

strangegrey wrote:Most people know Rush to have always been Peart, Lifeson and Lee. John Rutzy's involvement with the band is about as much a footnote as you can get....While the real hair-splitters will argue the band isn't in it's original incarnation, I think the flavor of the post is more to determine how many of these bands have stuck together in their 'famous lineup'....


To that end, Rush get's the nod from me. They've survived the bullshit and are still playing together, not fighting over money, power or fame. That's where it counts for me...


I've been a Rush fan for 20+ years. It's not about hair-splitting, it's just about the facts. John Rutsey's the drummer on the first album (which I don't even own on CD, because I don't feel I need it). IIRC, he was in the band for years, so purely out of respect I wouldn't piss on him and throw him to the curb and call him a "footnote." OTOH, I don't wish there was another album like the first Rush album. Suffice it to say without Neil, Rush WOULD be a footnote in the back pages of Classic Rock 101.

strangegrey wrote:I think the flavor of the post is more to determine how many of these bands have stuck together in their 'famous lineup'....


"Famous line-up" and "original line-up" aren't necessarily the same, hence my original post. :wink:
"Heer's ta swimmen wid bowlegged wimmen!"
verslibre
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6873
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 12:55 pm

Postby Pacfanweb » Sun May 31, 2009 7:20 am

How about Aerosmith? I believe they have the same guys that appeared on their first album. Most bands had other members before they actually made an album.
Pacfanweb
45 RPM
 
Posts: 328
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 2:20 am

Postby Hollywood » Sun May 31, 2009 7:35 am

JasonD wrote:Does Fleetwood Mac qualify as an intact original lineup or must all surviving members still be in place?


I would say that they are not original as only two orginal members are still in the band. If Christine McVie would rejoin they would have their most successful lineup, but not original.
"We Were Born To Be Loved'"
Hollywood
LP
 
Posts: 510
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 11:39 am
Location: Las Vegas, NV

PreviousNext

Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests

cron