That's an understatement.


I kid. But seriously, those are pretty cool.
Moderator: Andrew
Deacon wrote:I've come to expect this from you.
With the intelligence capacity of a half-eaten doughnut and the debating skills of a challenged kindergartner, you've become quite predictable.
Oh well.
DavidC wrote:Deacon wrote:I've come to expect this from you.
With the intelligence capacity of a half-eaten doughnut and the debating skills of a challenged kindergartner, you've become quite predictable.
Oh well.
Actually, I can't relate to your "half-eaten doughnut" dilemna or your obvious debating skills of a challenged kindergartner, but it has become quite clear to all of us that you are intimately acquainted with both.Predicitable is your middle name.....always on the hunt to continue to prove yourself. Relax, Deacon. You're among friends (and superiors)
We like you..........silly and scared stammerings and all.
DavidC wrote:Actually, I can't relate to your "half-eaten doughnut" dilemna or your obvious debating skills of a challenged kindergartner, but it has become quite clear to all of us that you are intimately acquainted with both.Predicitable is your middle name.....always on the hunt to continue to prove yourself. Relax, Deacon. You're among friends (and superiors)
We like you..........silly and scared stammerings and all.
Deacon wrote:You're totally right, A4P. Hence why Gideon and I tend to add in snappy and catchy phrases and analogies rather than straight shot insulting.
DavidC wrote:Deacon wrote:You're totally right, A4P. Hence why Gideon and I tend to add in snappy and catchy phrases and analogies rather than straight shot insulting.
When at first, or second, or third, ad nauseum don't succeed...............try, try again. And again. And again. And....![]()
This whole thing reminds me, does anybody here think that AP was allowed to talk enough at the press conference? Seems to me that Neal and Jon were trying to talk for him. At least he had the good sense to just sit there and shut up. IMO.
DavidC wrote:Deacon wrote:You're totally right, A4P. Hence why Gideon and I tend to add in snappy and catchy phrases and analogies rather than straight shot insulting.
When at first, or second, or third, ad nauseum don't succeed...............try, try again. And again. And again. And....![]()
This whole thing reminds me, does anybody here think that AP was allowed to talk enough at the press conference? Seems to me that Neal and Jon were trying to talk for him. At least he had the good sense to just sit there and shut up. IMO.
Jana wrote:DavidC wrote:Deacon wrote:You're totally right, A4P. Hence why Gideon and I tend to add in snappy and catchy phrases and analogies rather than straight shot insulting.
When at first, or second, or third, ad nauseum don't succeed...............try, try again. And again. And again. And....![]()
This whole thing reminds me, does anybody here think that AP was allowed to talk enough at the press conference? Seems to me that Neal and Jon were trying to talk for him. At least he had the good sense to just sit there and shut up. IMO.
F--K off.
Deacon wrote:DavidC wrote:Actually, I can't relate to your "half-eaten doughnut" dilemna or your obvious debating skills of a challenged kindergartner, but it has become quite clear to all of us that you are intimately acquainted with both.Predicitable is your middle name.....always on the hunt to continue to prove yourself. Relax, Deacon. You're among friends (and superiors)
We like you..........silly and scared stammerings and all.
Oh, the irony.
I'm unaware of what "predicitability" is. Would you please inform me, as well as the rest of the eagerly awaiting audience?
Jana wrote:DavidC wrote:Deacon wrote:You're totally right, A4P. Hence why Gideon and I tend to add in snappy and catchy phrases and analogies rather than straight shot insulting.
When at first, or second, or third, ad nauseum don't succeed...............try, try again. And again. And again. And....![]()
This whole thing reminds me, does anybody here think that AP was allowed to talk enough at the press conference? Seems to me that Neal and Jon were trying to talk for him. At least he had the good sense to just sit there and shut up. IMO.
F--K off.
DavidC wrote:If you need to me to explain "predictability" to you, then you are beyond hope. But then.......I KNEW you were going to say that!!!!
Deacon wrote:Jana wrote:DavidC wrote:Deacon wrote:You're totally right, A4P. Hence why Gideon and I tend to add in snappy and catchy phrases and analogies rather than straight shot insulting.
When at first, or second, or third, ad nauseum don't succeed...............try, try again. And again. And again. And....![]()
This whole thing reminds me, does anybody here think that AP was allowed to talk enough at the press conference? Seems to me that Neal and Jon were trying to talk for him. At least he had the good sense to just sit there and shut up. IMO.
F--K off.
He'll take that as an offer for sex.
Deacon wrote:DavidC wrote:If you need to me to explain "predictability" to you, then you are beyond hope. But then.......I KNEW you were going to say that!!!!
Obviously you didn't.
If you did, you would have spelled it correctly, oh merciful Guru.
DavidC wrote:Deacon wrote:You're totally right, A4P. Hence why Gideon and I tend to add in snappy and catchy phrases and analogies rather than straight shot insulting.
When at first, or second, or third, ad nauseum don't succeed...............try, try again. And again. And again. And....![]()
This whole thing reminds me, does anybody here think that AP was allowed to talk enough at the press conference? Seems to me that Neal and Jon were trying to talk for him. At least he had the good sense to just sit there and shut up. IMO.
DavidC wrote:Deacon wrote:DavidC wrote:If you need to me to explain "predictability" to you, then you are beyond hope. But then.......I KNEW you were going to say that!!!!
Obviously you didn't.
If you did, you would have spelled it correctly, oh merciful Guru.
Why? How do YOU spell predictability?
steveo777 wrote:DavidC wrote:Deacon wrote:You're totally right, A4P. Hence why Gideon and I tend to add in snappy and catchy phrases and analogies rather than straight shot insulting.
When at first, or second, or third, ad nauseum don't succeed...............try, try again. And again. And again. And....![]()
This whole thing reminds me, does anybody here think that AP was allowed to talk enough at the press conference? Seems to me that Neal and Jon were trying to talk for him. At least he had the good sense to just sit there and shut up. IMO.
What the fuck is that supposed to mean? He did speak when spoken to.
Deacon wrote:DavidC wrote:Deacon wrote:DavidC wrote:If you need to me to explain "predictability" to you, then you are beyond hope. But then.......I KNEW you were going to say that!!!!
Obviously you didn't.
If you did, you would have spelled it correctly, oh merciful Guru.
Why? How do YOU spell predictability?
Not "predicitability" as you did initially.
I, personally, remove that extra "i" that is in there.
DavidC wrote:Oh............scrolling back, you spell it "predicitability". You can take your foot out of your mouth now.
Deacon wrote:DavidC wrote:Deacon wrote:DavidC wrote:If you need to me to explain "predictability" to you, then you are beyond hope. But then.......I KNEW you were going to say that!!!!
Obviously you didn't.
If you did, you would have spelled it correctly, oh merciful Guru.
Why? How do YOU spell predictability?
Not "predicitability" as you did initially.
I, personally, remove that extra "i" that is in there.
Deacon wrote:DavidC wrote:Oh............scrolling back, you spell it "predicitability". You can take your foot out of your mouth now.
I'm not finding you, the probable adult that you are, acting like a child too funny.
It concerns me that you get amusement out of these antics.
artist4perry wrote:Deacon wrote:DavidC wrote:Deacon wrote:DavidC wrote:If you need to me to explain "predictability" to you, then you are beyond hope. But then.......I KNEW you were going to say that!!!!
Obviously you didn't.
If you did, you would have spelled it correctly, oh merciful Guru.
Why? How do YOU spell predictability?
Not "predicitability" as you did initially.
I, personally, remove that extra "i" that is in there.
It's I before C except for after May day, when you should no longer wear white shoes.............
DavidC wrote:Deacon wrote:DavidC wrote:Oh............scrolling back, you spell it "predicitability". You can take your foot out of your mouth now.
I'm not finding you, the probable adult that you are, acting like a child too funny.
It concerns me that you get amusement out of these antics.
Oh? At that matters to....................................who? (Here come the cronies!!! LOL!)
DavidC wrote:artist4perry wrote:Deacon wrote:DavidC wrote:Deacon wrote:DavidC wrote:If you need to me to explain "predictability" to you, then you are beyond hope. But then.......I KNEW you were going to say that!!!!
Obviously you didn't.
If you did, you would have spelled it correctly, oh merciful Guru.
Why? How do YOU spell predictability?
Not "predicitability" as you did initially.
I, personally, remove that extra "i" that is in there.
It's I before C except for after May day, when you should no longer wear white shoes.............
Unless you're oh so scandalous.....
LLL wrote:Deacon wrote:DavidC wrote:Deacon wrote:DavidC wrote:If you need to me to explain "predictability" to you, then you are beyond hope. But then.......I KNEW you were going to say that!!!!
Obviously you didn't.
If you did, you would have spelled it correctly, oh merciful Guru.
Why? How do YOU spell predictability?
Not "predicitability" as you did initially.
I, personally, remove that extra "i" that is in there.
OH MY GOSH - BOTH OF YOU SHUT THE F*CK UP ALREADY!
Arguing over who is better at arguing? Take this shit to PMs. It has gotten beyond ridiculous. And DavidC you have now achieved the award for the newbie whose bullshit agenda has gotten old the fastest around here. Cool it or take your ass back to Popwatch.
LLL wrote:Deacon wrote:DavidC wrote:Deacon wrote:DavidC wrote:If you need to me to explain "predictability" to you, then you are beyond hope. But then.......I KNEW you were going to say that!!!!
Obviously you didn't.
If you did, you would have spelled it correctly, oh merciful Guru.
Why? How do YOU spell predictability?
Not "predicitability" as you did initially.
I, personally, remove that extra "i" that is in there.
OH MY GOSH - BOTH OF YOU SHUT THE F*CK UP ALREADY!
Arguing over who is better at arguing? Take this shit to PMs. It has gotten beyond ridiculous. And DavidC you have now achieved the award for the newbie whose bullshit agenda has gotten old the fastest around here. Cool it or take your ass back to Popwatch.
artist4perry wrote:LLL wrote:Deacon wrote:DavidC wrote:Deacon wrote:DavidC wrote:If you need to me to explain "predictability" to you, then you are beyond hope. But then.......I KNEW you were going to say that!!!!
Obviously you didn't.
If you did, you would have spelled it correctly, oh merciful Guru.
Why? How do YOU spell predictability?
Not "predicitability" as you did initially.
I, personally, remove that extra "i" that is in there.
OH MY GOSH - BOTH OF YOU SHUT THE F*CK UP ALREADY!
Arguing over who is better at arguing? Take this shit to PMs. It has gotten beyond ridiculous. And DavidC you have now achieved the award for the newbie whose bullshit agenda has gotten old the fastest around here. Cool it or take your ass back to Popwatch.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests