JSS Rocks! wrote:Why Def Leppard can even be used in the same conversation with Queen is mind boggling.
Freddie is 100 times the vocalist and front man than Joe could ever be.
Look, I like Lep...I like alot of their early stuff and really like a lot of their album cuts (non singles)
But Queen is in an a whole other league.
But like Andrew said, some folks get Queen, some don't.
One of the most original bands ever.
If Queen doesn't exist, Def Leppard doesn't either....and I think Joe Elliott will be the first to say such a thing.
I'm not going to dis the Leppers their due either....but to say that Def Leppard has a better catalog than Queen is just fucking lunacy.....Def Leppard had 2 great albums in their career...and a whole lot of bad ones.
Queen has an entire career of great albums. It's a difference. a big one.
Queen is one of those generational spanning rock groups. They had achieved monumental status in the 70s, 80s and 90s....and maintained that status with the help of Paul Rogers in this past decade.
Def Leppard, love em or not, never escaped the stigma of the 80s. They were hated in the 90s, and now, they're desperately trying to reinvent themselves as a 70s band. Kinda sad. When you think of someone trying to reinvent themselves, doing so with eyes to the past and not future, is always a recipe for failure...