Moderator: Andrew
I told dick head if we deported all the mexicans our roads would shut down,and our grass would be 10 feet highepresley wrote:Look, I don't know enough about the Tito/Andrew/Soto thing to comment, but I do support Drew's right to call the shots. We're all just visitors. Tito can be amusing, but the racially toned comments he gets into sometimes are what turns me off, big time. I live in Texas and have grown up with Hispanics my whole life, it's part of the fabric of Texas, no lie. When he says stupid shit like, "The Los Lonely Boys" need to be deported, it's ignorant and racist. I support LEGAL immigration, but I damn sure don't think anyone with a Spanish surname should be sent packing "back"!. Ok, that was a soapbox at Tito's expense and it was not meant personally--but gay bashing and racially charged statements are archaic and ignorant--It's freaking 2009, don't we have other bigger issues at hand??
Tito likes has fat ass slappedbluejeangirl76 wrote:Someone needs some attention, I see.Someone toss Dan and Tito a couple toys and some Zwiebacks. That should hold them for a bit.
![]()
But since Joe was such a "great father", maybe let him do the babysitting. Tito, don't come crying to us when your head gets slammed into a wall a few times or you have belt marks on your ass.
Gunbot wrote:He's like every other politician. He advocates the deportation of Illegals in one post while promoting the unauthorized entry of Arnel's peeps across our borders.
To say that I am disappointed doesn't even begin to touch the depths of my angst towards these hypocritical comments, penned by Senor Tito.
mdaemon wrote:Gunbot wrote:He's like every other politician. He advocates the deportation of Illegals in one post while promoting the unauthorized entry of Arnel's peeps across our borders.
To say that I am disappointed doesn't even begin to touch the depths of my angst towards these hypocritical comments, penned by Senor Tito.
eh? when did he say that?
He just dont like mexicansGunbot wrote:mdaemon wrote:Gunbot wrote:He's like every other politician. He advocates the deportation of Illegals in one post while promoting the unauthorized entry of Arnel's peeps across our borders.
To say that I am disappointed doesn't even begin to touch the depths of my angst towards these hypocritical comments, penned by Senor Tito.
eh? when did he say that?
It was his last blog before this one.
http://titomusic.blogspot.com/2008/09/a ... ticle.html
You're not taking this stuff seriously, are you?
Behshad wrote:Yes but Michael went to court and the judge ruled not guilty.
strangegrey wrote:Go play billy jean, rub your legs together and revel in the gooey ooze seeping from your vag
bluejeangirl76 wrote:strangegrey wrote:Go play billy jean, rub your legs together and revel in the gooey ooze seeping from your vag
Clearly, you are not a mincer of words.
strangegrey wrote:Behshad wrote:Yes but Michael went to court and the judge ruled not guilty.
Ugh, Um....listen, I'm mostly recused from this TrippleJ crap....but this is something to address. So let's try to remain serious for a quick minute.
The judge didn't rule dick. A *jury* declared him not guilty, given the burden of proof on the prosecution. It doesn't mean he didn't do what he was accused of. It means the prosecution couldn't prove it according to the burden of proof. OJ was ruled not guilty too....not many people believe he didn't tear his wife's neck off and ventilated Ron Goldberg with a knife, however.
The court case in 2003 actually raised more suspicion surrounding jackson, not alleviated it. Michael Jackson did admit during testimony to some VERY strange behavior....the prosecution dropped the ball with connecting the dots....but the fact patterns which alot of us use to draw are *own* conclusions were very much admissible in court and did indeed happen..
So using the Court case in 2003 to prove Jackson completely and utterly blameless to the accusations, is faulty logic.
If you don't believe Jackson to be guilty of this stuff, great. Go play billy jean, rub your legs together and revel in the gooey ooze seeping from your vag (Not you behshad, just speaking rhetorically). But there's seriously enough facts in this case, irrespective of a jury being unable to grant the prosecution their wish, to have a perfectly valid opinion that Jackson fucked boys drunk on Jesus Juice...
Behshad wrote:strangegrey wrote:Behshad wrote:Yes but Michael went to court and the judge ruled not guilty.
Ugh, Um....listen, I'm mostly recused from this TrippleJ crap....but this is something to address. So let's try to remain serious for a quick minute.
The judge didn't rule dick. A *jury* declared him not guilty, given the burden of proof on the prosecution. It doesn't mean he didn't do what he was accused of. It means the prosecution couldn't prove it according to the burden of proof. OJ was ruled not guilty too....not many people believe he didn't tear his wife's neck off and ventilated Ron Goldberg with a knife, however.
The court case in 2003 actually raised more suspicion surrounding jackson, not alleviated it. Michael Jackson did admit during testimony to some VERY strange behavior....the prosecution dropped the ball with connecting the dots....but the fact patterns which alot of us use to draw are *own* conclusions were very much admissible in court and did indeed happen..
So using the Court case in 2003 to prove Jackson completely and utterly blameless to the accusations, is faulty logic.
If you don't believe Jackson to be guilty of this stuff, great. Go play billy jean, rub your legs together and revel in the gooey ooze seeping from your vag (Not you behshad, just speaking rhetorically). But there's seriously enough facts in this case, irrespective of a jury being unable to grant the prosecution their wish, to have a perfectly valid opinion that Jackson fucked boys drunk on Jesus Juice...
Thought you were done with MJ?
bluejeangirl76 wrote:You know he only posted all that just so he could talk about "vag".The boy ain't right, B. Not right.
Saint John wrote:Tito has a blog up, folks. I think it's worth a read.![]()
http://titomusic.blogspot.com/
he is nutty as fruit cake,I miss the poor bastardCarla777 wrote:Saint John wrote:Tito has a blog up, folks. I think it's worth a read.![]()
http://titomusic.blogspot.com/
Is he serious about MJ dad? hahaha i'll give him some points for being funny!
Arianddu wrote:Rhiannon wrote:Tittoballs likes to be introspective and rhetorical with his studies on society.
He just loves everyone... but illegals.
He's just misunderstood. Like Michael.![]()
Perhaps this song should be renamed "Tito's Anthem" - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2FT4FprxDg
Gunbot wrote:mdaemon wrote:Gunbot wrote:He's like every other politician. He advocates the deportation of Illegals in one post while promoting the unauthorized entry of Arnel's peeps across our borders.
To say that I am disappointed doesn't even begin to touch the depths of my angst towards these hypocritical comments, penned by Senor Tito.
eh? when did he say that?
It was his last blog before this one.
http://titomusic.blogspot.com/2008/09/a ... ticle.html
You're not taking this stuff seriously, are you?
artist4perry wrote:Gunbot wrote:mdaemon wrote:Gunbot wrote:He's like every other politician. He advocates the deportation of Illegals in one post while promoting the unauthorized entry of Arnel's peeps across our borders.
To say that I am disappointed doesn't even begin to touch the depths of my angst towards these hypocritical comments, penned by Senor Tito.
eh? when did he say that?
It was his last blog before this one.
http://titomusic.blogspot.com/2008/09/a ... ticle.html
You're not taking this stuff seriously, are you?
Gunby, your av and sig, what is with the tortured toys? Emo flashbacks?
if you played with trucks instead of dolls you wouldnt scare so easily,Ill send you a teddy bearJasonD wrote:artist4perry wrote:Gunbot wrote:mdaemon wrote:Gunbot wrote:He's like every other politician. He advocates the deportation of Illegals in one post while promoting the unauthorized entry of Arnel's peeps across our borders.
To say that I am disappointed doesn't even begin to touch the depths of my angst towards these hypocritical comments, penned by Senor Tito.
eh? when did he say that?
It was his last blog before this one.
http://titomusic.blogspot.com/2008/09/a ... ticle.html
You're not taking this stuff seriously, are you?
Gunby, your av and sig, what is with the tortured toys? Emo flashbacks?
Gunbot's avatars are starting to scare me. I'm gonna have to sleep with a nite lite soon.
moangel58 wrote:I have no time for that man, he wants to make Paris a star now, is he going to beat her ass if she misses a note too? Something about that man that irritates me to no end. The only reason I watched that special last night was to hear about MJ. That man repulses me, sorry but I feel for Katherine, but that man needs to stay away from those children. Hopefully the court will see that. Maybe Katherine can keep them as long as she keeps that man away from them.
stevew2 wrote:if you played with trucks instead of dolls you wouldnt scare so easily,Ill send you a teddy bear
moangel58 wrote:I have no time for that man, he wants to make Paris a star now, is he going to beat her ass if she misses a note too? Something about that man that irritates me to no end. The only reason I watched that special last night was to hear about MJ. That man repulses me, sorry but I feel for Katherine, but that man needs to stay away from those children. Hopefully the court will see that. Maybe Katherine can keep them as long as she keeps that man away from them.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests