Moderator: Andrew
Rockindeano wrote:Eric wrote:Rockindeano wrote:slucero wrote:Treasury Secretary's kinda busy asking Congress to raise the allowable ceiling on the National Debt to 12 Trillion Dollars... cause the country is accumulating it at a rate of 200 Billion a month.. and will hit the 12 Trillion by October... so Timmy kinda busy right now....
Accumulating trillions the Obama way is bad right? Stimulus money, public works projects which provide new infrastructure and good paying jobs all bad bad bad.
Accumulating much more tan Obama the Bush way, in meaningless wars, based on blatant lies is of course money well spent.
Gotcha. Just wanted to make sure I hear where you are coming from, that's all.
You're full of it......you want to pretend that there is no terror war (which Obama is rightfully continuing) and not look at the debt Obama has given us in just 7 months.
Go read some Econ 101 books. While mired in a recession, tax cuts are not the solution. Spending is. Go educate yourself.
As for a terror war? Iraq was never a terror state.
You're full of it.
Rockindeano wrote:RossValoryRocks wrote:Rockindeano wrote:I noticed how none of you pusscocks are talking about good ole Karl Rove.
Naw, he didn't do nothin' wrong now did he?
It was his JOB to advise, and he did. He also said it was the Justice Departments call...nice of you to parse what was actually said so that you can claim some kind of moral victory.
Besides, what is happening NOW is much more important.
The Healthcare fiasco is stalled and it looks like people are actually speaking up and letting the President and the congress know they don't want this.
No, it's not stalled and people aren't speaking up about this. God, you're fucking stupid if you believe that. This is the work of a conservative few organizing chaos.
You people really are pathetic and you are the desperate ones. Disrupting town halls for the purpose of derailing something that the country needs is fcking cowardly. I say fuck all you Cons.
January 17, 2006: "So I think all of you who have spoken out for your courage, your point of view. All of it. Your advocacy is very American and very important."
Fact Finder wrote:Rep. Leonard Boswell (D-IA) claims that President Obama told him "he's willing to be a one-term president if that's what it takes to get health care and energy reform," reports Radio Iowa.
Said Boswell: "The president (said), 'I'm not going to kick the can down the road.' And he said that and I said, 'Well, that's something I'm kind of used to from southern Iowa, you know. I know about kicking the can down the road.' And he said, 'No, if it makes me a one-term president, I'm going to, we're going to take it on because the country is in need of us taking this on.' I respected that very much."
Lula wrote:Fact Finder wrote:Rep. Leonard Boswell (D-IA) claims that President Obama told him "he's willing to be a one-term president if that's what it takes to get health care and energy reform," reports Radio Iowa.
Said Boswell: "The president (said), 'I'm not going to kick the can down the road.' And he said that and I said, 'Well, that's something I'm kind of used to from southern Iowa, you know. I know about kicking the can down the road.' And he said, 'No, if it makes me a one-term president, I'm going to, we're going to take it on because the country is in need of us taking this on.' I respected that very much."
right on!
Barb wrote:Lula wrote:Fact Finder wrote:Rep. Leonard Boswell (D-IA) claims that President Obama told him "he's willing to be a one-term president if that's what it takes to get health care and energy reform," reports Radio Iowa.
Said Boswell: "The president (said), 'I'm not going to kick the can down the road.' And he said that and I said, 'Well, that's something I'm kind of used to from southern Iowa, you know. I know about kicking the can down the road.' And he said, 'No, if it makes me a one-term president, I'm going to, we're going to take it on because the country is in need of us taking this on.' I respected that very much."
right on!
So in other words, I'm going to do this come hell or high water. I don't care if the majority of Americans don't want anything to do with it. I know what's best for them.
ya. RIGHT ON!!
Fact Finder wrote:So The Won had his town hall in New Hampshire the other day right? I wonder why he felt the need to bus in supporters instead of letting in the local folk...hmmmmmm?
Sadly for the Democrats-- The real astroturfed protesters were caught again on their bus:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLS7ehqh ... edded#t=31
Rockindeano wrote:Fact Finder wrote:So The Won had his town hall in New Hampshire the other day right? I wonder why he felt the need to bus in supporters instead of letting in the local folk...hmmmmmm?
Sadly for the Democrats-- The real astroturfed protesters were caught again on their bus:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLS7ehqh ... edded#t=31
LOL, the country still feels at home with Dems rather you blowhards. trust me you, the USA cannot stand the republicans, at all.
Fact Finder wrote:So The Won had his town hall in New Hampshire the other day right? I wonder why he felt the need to bus in supporters instead of letting in the local folk...hmmmmmm?
Sadly for the Democrats-- The real astroturfed protesters were caught again on their bus:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLS7ehqh ... edded#t=31
Rockindeano wrote:LOL, the country still feels at home with Dems rather you blowhards. trust me you, the USA cannot stand the republicans, at all.
Rockindeano wrote:Congratulations on fucking over 45 million of your fellow citizens. Be proud, real proud.
Selfish sonofabitch.
Fact Finder wrote:
88 million folks moved to the public dole just so 44 million can have coverage makes no sense at all. Surley you understand this?
Obama Misread His Mandate
After a rough week for health care reform, Democratic leaders appear to be pulling back on their demand for a public option. It remains to be seen whether liberal Democrats, especially in the House where they are more numerous, will go along with this. But this is still a step in the right direction to get something passed this year.
The public option was an overreach. The White House's erroneous belief that it could get it through the legislature - or at least that it could let four out of five congressional committees push it - was a misinterpretation of last year's election results. It has already made a similar mistake with cap-and-trade, backing a House bill that appears to have no chance of success in the Senate.
Bismarck once commented that politics is the art of the possible. So far, the White House has not exhibited a good understanding of exactly what is possible in this political climate. It has been acting as though the President's election was a major change in the ideological orientation of the country.
A lot of liberals certainly saw it as such. All the strained comparisons of Obama to Franklin Roosevelt were a tipoff that many were talking themselves into the idea that the 2008 election created an opportunity for a substantial, leftward shift in policy. Yet the election of 2008 was not like the 1932 contest. It wasn't like 1952, 1956, 1964, 1972, 1980, 1984, or even 1988, either. Obama's election was narrower than all of these. FDR won 42 of 48 states. Eisenhower won 39, then 41. Johnson won 44 of 50. Nixon won 49. Reagan won 44, then 49. George H.W. Bush won 40. Obama won 28, three fewer than George W. Bush in his narrow 2004 reelection.
This makes a crucial difference when it comes to implementing policy. Our system of government depends not only on how many votes you win, but how broadly distributed those votes are. This prevents one section or faction from railroading another. It is evident in the Electoral College and the House, but above all in the Senate, where 44 senators come from states that voted against Obama last year. That's a consequence of the fact that Obama's election - while historic in many respects, and the largest we have seen in 20 years - was still not as broad-based as many would like to believe. Bully for Obama and the Democrats that they have 60 Senators, but the fact remains that thirteen of them come from McCain states, indicating that the liberals don't get the full run of the show.
For whatever reason, the Obama administration has acted as if those hagiographical comparisons to FDR were apt. It let its liberal allies from the coasts drive the agenda and write the key bills, and it's played straw man semantic games to marginalize the opposition. For all the President's moaning in The Audacity of Hope about how the Bush administration was railroading the minority into accepting far right proposals - he was prepared to let his Northeastern and Pacific Western liberal allies do exactly the same thing: write bills that excite the left, infuriate the right, and scare the center; insist on speedy passage through the Congress; and use budget reconciliation to ram it through in case the expected super majority did not emerge.
This might have flown during FDR's 100 Days. But this is not 1933 and Barack Obama is no Franklin Roosevelt.
Now that his legislative agenda is stalling, we're seeing the predictable critiques about the outdated United States Senate, which is the real source of the bottleneck: the Connecticut Compromise was meant to protect the interests of small states, but not states that are this small. Rhode Island, yes. Wyoming, no! These arguments will be conveniently tabled whenever the Democrats return to minority status, so I won't bother to address their merits. The bigger question is: what did they think was going to happen? It's one thing to bemoan the fundamental unfairness of the Senate; it's another thing to overlook it when you're formulating your legislative program. The map is what it is: that big swath of red that runs through the middle of the country then swings right through the South should have been a tipoff that the stage was not set for coastal governance.
The President should have realized what was possible and what wasn't, and he should have used his substantial influence to push the House toward the kind of centrist compromise the Senate will ultimately require. That's called building a consensus - something he promised he'd do but has not yet made a serious effort at.
Fact Finder wrote:
Who was it that said the Pubbies were dead and buried after the election> Hmmmmmm....it's coming to me.....
Rockindeano wrote:Fact Finder wrote:
Who was it that said the Pubbies were dead and buried after the election> Hmmmmmm....it's coming to me.....
I did, and I stand by it. You will get crushed in the midterms, especially with the economy coming back.
You are the party of "no" and "me me me."
Fact Finder wrote:Rockindeano wrote:Fact Finder wrote:
88 million folks moved to the public dole just so 44 million can have coverage makes no sense at all. Surley you understand this?
Complete lie. There was always the choice to keep your own private plan. Like I said, you selfish fucking Cons derailed a good plan.
Lie? There was also the choice of employers dumping your coverage completely, leaving you high and dry and left to the Fed Govs devices. NO SALE!
Rockindeano wrote:Fact Finder wrote:Rockindeano wrote:Fact Finder wrote:
88 million folks moved to the public dole just so 44 million can have coverage makes no sense at all. Surley you understand this?
Complete lie. There was always the choice to keep your own private plan. Like I said, you selfish fucking Cons derailed a good plan.
Lie? There was also the choice of employers dumping your coverage completely, leaving you high and dry and left to the Fed Govs devices. NO SALE!
You obviously didn't read anything of fair merit. You listened to Fox News and Rush Limbaugh.
There was always the choice to keep your private insurance.
RossValoryRocks wrote:Rockindeano wrote:Fact Finder wrote:
Who was it that said the Pubbies were dead and buried after the election> Hmmmmmm....it's coming to me.....
I did, and I stand by it. You will get crushed in the midterms, especially with the economy coming back.
You are the party of "no" and "me me me."
I have a good recipe for crow Dean...since you will be eating it soon.
Obama's healthcare plan was derailed by his OWN PARTY...or at least members of it.
The conservative "Blue Dog" democrats, once it became appearant that a VAST majority of the people in this country DO NOT want a government run health care system.
And you 44 Million is disengenous too...about 30 million of those are either young people who ELECT not take coverage, or illegals...
Fact Finder wrote:Rockindeano wrote:Fact Finder wrote:
Who was it that said the Pubbies were dead and buried after the election> Hmmmmmm....it's coming to me.....
I did, and I stand by it. You will get crushed in the midterms, especially with the economy coming back.
You are the party of "no" and "me me me."
![]()
![]()
![]()
It's gonna be 1994 all over again, with deadlocked government that gets nothing done. Perfect I say, Fed Gov stay outta the way.
Rockindeano wrote:RossValoryRocks wrote:Rockindeano wrote:Fact Finder wrote:
Who was it that said the Pubbies were dead and buried after the election> Hmmmmmm....it's coming to me.....
I did, and I stand by it. You will get crushed in the midterms, especially with the economy coming back.
You are the party of "no" and "me me me."
I have a good recipe for crow Dean...since you will be eating it soon.
Obama's healthcare plan was derailed by his OWN PARTY...or at least members of it.
The conservative "Blue Dog" democrats, once it became appearant that a VAST majority of the people in this country DO NOT want a government run health care system.
And you 44 Million is disengenous too...about 30 million of those are either young people who ELECT not take coverage, or illegals...
Bring it on Stu. I seem to remember you telling me that last election was going to be really close, like under 10 ev's. I seem to remember vividly telling you it would end up being a 200 ev landslide, which it was. Scoreboard. The country will absolutely not go back to the failed policies of the republicans, not this soon anyway.
The problem here was Obama and Emanuel took on too much too soon.
Also, I read this tidbit in Newsweek- On the endorsement of the Kennedy's, one major stipulation was that in order for Obama to get that endorsement, he had to put health care reform on the top of the list of things to get done. Makes sense.
Oh well, the country suffers but the GOP wins one. Yay.
Rockindeano wrote: There was always the choice to keep your private insurance.
Rockindeano wrote:Congratulations on fucking over 45 million of your fellow citizens. Be proud, real proud.
Selfish sonofabitch.
Rockindeano wrote:Congratulations on fucking over 45 million of your fellow citizens. Be proud, real proud.
Selfish sonofabitch.
August 11, 2009: President Obama..."I have not said that I was a single-payer supporter because frankly we historically have had a employer-based system in this country with private insurers.
OBAMA 2003: "I happen to be a proponent of single-payer, universal health care plan."
OBAMA 2003: "I see no reason why the United States of America, the wealthiest country in the history of the world, is spending 14% -- 14% of its gross national product on health care -- cannot provide basic health insurance to everybody. And that's what Jim's talking about when he says, "Everybody in, nobody out," a single payer health care plan, universal health care plan. That's what I'd like to see but, as all of you know --"
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
Fact Finder wrote:Rockindeano wrote:Fact Finder wrote:
88 million folks moved to the public dole just so 44 million can have coverage makes no sense at all. Surley you understand this?
Complete lie. There was always the choice to keep your own private plan. Like I said, you selfish fucking Cons derailed a good plan.
Lie? There was also the choice of employers dumping your coverage completely, leaving you high and dry and left to the Fed Govs devices. NO SALE!
Rockindeano wrote:Fact Finder wrote:Rockindeano wrote:Fact Finder wrote:
88 million folks moved to the public dole just so 44 million can have coverage makes no sense at all. Surley you understand this?
Complete lie. There was always the choice to keep your own private plan. Like I said, you selfish fucking Cons derailed a good plan.
Lie? There was also the choice of employers dumping your coverage completely, leaving you high and dry and left to the Fed Govs devices. NO SALE!
You obviously didn't read anything of fair merit. You listened to Fox News and Rush Limbaugh.
There was always the choice to keep your private insurance.
Fact Finder wrote:Rockindeano wrote:Fact Finder wrote:
Who was it that said the Pubbies were dead and buried after the election> Hmmmmmm....it's coming to me.....
I did, and I stand by it. You will get crushed in the midterms, especially with the economy coming back.
You are the party of "no" and "me me me."
![]()
![]()
![]()
It's gonna be 1994 all over again, with deadlocked government that gets nothing done. Perfect I say, Fed Gov stay outta the way.
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests