Rockindeano wrote:Art Vandelay wrote:You also have to consider the timeframe for the band. They hadn't released anything new or toured in two years, so they, as a band, weren't relevant on top 10 radio at that particular moment. They were all still dipping their hands into their solo material (Street Talk was simmering down at this point, Neal was doing various side projects and Vital Information was just starting to take off). I would also imagine that this was the time when the shit started to hit the fan regarding the lineup changes. Maybe they just weren't a willingly functional band at the time?
Relevancy doesn't really mean anything in a situation like Live Aid, which by the way was and is a GREAT cause. Bob Geldof was never really "relevant" and Paul McCartney had nothing out new did he?
I think Journey would have tore that place up to be honest.
Yes it is a great cause and yes they would have tore it up. But you can't compare Journey to McCartney. He's a Beatle. He co-wrote some of the most famous songs in rock history. So he's always relevant. Especially in London (where he played that day).