President Barack Obama - Term 1 and 2 Thread

by **brandonx76** » Fri Sep 18, 2009 2:40 pm

Glen Beck is a scumbag. Can I say that here??! Ok, I just did. Needed to get that out..ok...carry on

by **AlteredDNA** » Fri Sep 18, 2009 5:22 pm

brandonpfn wrote:Glen Beck is a scumbag. Can I say that here??! Ok, I just did. Needed to get that out..ok...carry on

Why do you think he's a scumbag?

by **donnaplease** » Fri Sep 18, 2009 10:33 pm

Fact Finder wrote:
AlteredDNA wrote:
brandonpfn wrote:Glen Beck is a scumbag. Can I say that here??! Ok, I just did. Needed to get that out..ok...carry on

Why do you think he's a scumbag?

Maybe brandonpfn is an ex-ACORN worker.

Or a pimp. :twisted:

by **Eric** » Fri Sep 18, 2009 10:53 pm

Behshad wrote:
Eric wrote:
Behshad wrote:
Eric wrote:
Behshad wrote:
Yep, he wouldve just sat on his old ass and let this country fall even worse than it did during Bush's time,,

You're full of shit

Wow. You sure know how to argue

Just following your lead.....ridiculous statements with no backing. Not keeping your word to allies, like Obama did today, is what is making this country fall. I've offered plans, ideas for Social security and health care in this thread..... and people like you watch your late night comedy shows to come up with silly quips. This great country has the potential to be hurt greatly by Obama's agenda.

You need me to prove to you that Bush fucked up this country the 8 years he was in the office , then YOURE the one who gets your ideas from a late night show.
Anything that Obama is TRYING right now it to get this great country back on it's feet.
Obama may not have all the answers but he is TRYING. Bush was more worried about personal gains than this country's interests.
You didn't have any fucking plans to offer when Bush was in charge. Where were you hiding then. Or let me guess , Bush was great and during his time we had the best economy ever.

Economy was stronger during Bush than it is now...THATS...for damn sure. And I wrote an Social Security plan during 2005.....at least he tried to fix that before it goes in the tank.

by **Behshad** » Fri Sep 18, 2009 11:49 pm

Eric wrote:
Behshad wrote:
Eric wrote:
Behshad wrote:
Eric wrote:
Behshad wrote:
Yep, he wouldve just sat on his old ass and let this country fall even worse than it did during Bush's time,,

You're full of shit

Wow. You sure know how to argue

Just following your lead.....ridiculous statements with no backing. Not keeping your word to allies, like Obama did today, is what is making this country fall. I've offered plans, ideas for Social security and health care in this thread..... and people like you watch your late night comedy shows to come up with silly quips. This great country has the potential to be hurt greatly by Obama's agenda.

You need me to prove to you that Bush fucked up this country the 8 years he was in the office , then YOURE the one who gets your ideas from a late night show.
Anything that Obama is TRYING right now it to get this great country back on it's feet.
Obama may not have all the answers but he is TRYING. Bush was more worried about personal gains than this country's interests.
You didn't have any fucking plans to offer when Bush was in charge. Where were you hiding then. Or let me guess , Bush was great and during his time we had the best economy ever.

Economy was stronger during Bush than it is now...THATS...for damn sure. And I wrote an Social Security plan during 2005.....at least he tried to fix that before it goes in the tank. You think Obama is trying to fix anything??????? What are you on!? WOW. He has an agenda to change this country from what it is to what he thinks it should be....which any American should be scared to death of!

Lets go with your logic here....

Economywas better during Bush's 8 years than it is now = Bush better president than Obama

Economy was better during Clinton's 8 years than Bush's = Clinton a better president than Bush

right ?:)

by **Eric** » Fri Sep 18, 2009 11:54 pm

Behshad wrote:
Eric wrote:
Behshad wrote:
Eric wrote:
Behshad wrote:
Eric wrote:
Behshad wrote:
Yep, he wouldve just sat on his old ass and let this country fall even worse than it did during Bush's time,,

You're full of shit

Wow. You sure know how to argue

Just following your lead.....ridiculous statements with no backing. Not keeping your word to allies, like Obama did today, is what is making this country fall. I've offered plans, ideas for Social security and health care in this thread..... and people like you watch your late night comedy shows to come up with silly quips. This great country has the potential to be hurt greatly by Obama's agenda.

You need me to prove to you that Bush fucked up this country the 8 years he was in the office , then YOURE the one who gets your ideas from a late night show.
Anything that Obama is TRYING right now it to get this great country back on it's feet.
Obama may not have all the answers but he is TRYING. Bush was more worried about personal gains than this country's interests.
You didn't have any fucking plans to offer when Bush was in charge. Where were you hiding then. Or let me guess , Bush was great and during his time we had the best economy ever.

Economy was stronger during Bush than it is now...THATS...for damn sure. And I wrote an Social Security plan during 2005.....at least he tried to fix that before it goes in the tank. You think Obama is trying to fix anything??????? What are you on!? WOW. He has an agenda to change this country from what it is to what he thinks it should be....which any American should be scared to death of!

Lets go with your logic here....

Economywas better during Bush's 8 years than it is now = Bush better president than Obama

Economy was better during Clinton's 8 years than Bush's = Clinton a better president than Bush

right ?:)

Clinton ignored a lot of problems.....at least W and Obama didn't/aren't doing that. The economy was strongest 1996-1998 out of anytime during the last 16 years, however, it was also quite solid 2002-2006. In fact, personally, 2005-2006 were definitely my 2 best years economically speaking.

by **RedWingFan** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 1:37 pm

Have you ever wondered if you're a racist or not? Here's a simple flow chart to check once and for all!!!!

http://www.missourah.com/2009/09/15/oba ... low-chart/

by **Lula** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 6:32 am

Fact Finder wrote:
Lula wrote:don't waste your time trying to build a case against obama using acorn, it won't work. it's like the other side trying to connect the dots with the bush admin and the carlisle group, haliburton, etc...

Ok, I won't waste my time. I'll let that dastardly right wing blog The Washington Post do it....granted, they are a day late and a dollar short as two kids have exposed their bias, but what the hell, I always say better late than never.

Obama's ties to ACORN date to his days as a community organizer in Chicago. He represented Acorn in a lawsuit in 1994 and conducted two leadership training sessions for Acorn's Chicago chapter in the late 1990s. In 1992, Obama served as director of Project Vote in Chicago, helping to register 150,000 voters on the South Side.

well aware of this. i see nothing wrong here; voter registration campaigns serve a great purpose.

by **treetopovskaya** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:33 am

maybe people who don't know how to register to vote shouldn't be voting. it's not rocket science. voters shouldn't have to have their hands held.

i'm fine with the "rock the vote" type booths you'll see at concerts, fairs, schools, swap meets, etc... but this door to door stuff along with having people bussed in and fed pushes the limits of voter registration rules.

by **Rockindeano** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:40 am

treetopovskaya wrote:maybe people who don't know how to register to vote shouldn't be voting. it's not rocket science. voters shouldn't have to have their hands held.

i'm fine with the "rock the vote" type booths you'll see at concerts, fairs, schools, swap meets, etc... but this door to door stuff along with having people bussed in and fed pushes the limits of voter registration rules.

Stop the lecture please. With your fucked up sense of reason, you shouldn't be allowed to vote either.

Yes, I am serious.

by **treetopovskaya** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:51 am

fucktartdeano wrote:
treetopovskaya wrote:maybe people who don't know how to register to vote shouldn't be voting. it's not rocket science. voters shouldn't have to have their hands held.

i'm fine with the "rock the vote" type booths you'll see at concerts, fairs, schools, swap meets, etc... but this door to door stuff along with having people bussed in and fed pushes the limits of voter registration rules.

Stop the lecture please. With your fucked up sense of reason, you shouldn't be allowed to vote either.

Yes, I am serious.

do you see the irony in your statement there?

thanks for your 2 cents... you can keep the change.

by **treetopovskaya** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:55 am

Fact Finder wrote:During the last election cycle ACORN registered 1.2Million New Voters. Over 400,000 of them were invalid. It's not beyond the realm of possibility that without ACORN there would be no TOTUS.

stop trying to link obama & acorn together!!

};C)

by **treetopovskaya** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:58 am

Fact Finder wrote:That's almost my sig line..

thanks for your 2 cents... you can keep the change.

I wonder, when someone says "a penny for your thoughts" and you give them your 2 cents worth, what happens to the extra penny?

big gov takes it. }:C)

(i would have said brother but i don't want to be labeled a racist!)

}:C))

by **treetopovskaya** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:10 am

Fact Finder wrote:Also, about these ACORN stories we are FINALLY getting now...

Sowing the seeds of destruction

ACORN's shady tactics made headlines last week. But their shocking radicalism is nothing new.

Why in the hell didn't the media cover this before the election, so Americans would have known of the radical tendencies of The Won? Where were they, and why?

some covered it. no one was listening... that or people just don't are.

by **Rockindeano** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:15 am

Fact Finder wrote:Also, about these ACORN stories we are FINALLY getting now...

Sowing the seeds of destruction

ACORN's shady tactics made headlines last week. But their shocking radicalism is nothing new.

Why in the hell didn't the media cover this before the election, so Americans would have known of the radical tendencies of The Won? Where were they, and why?

Oh go fuck yourself. Now you're saying the President is a racist.

Man, has this place gone to shit. Congratulations on being the worst poster ever.

by **Rockindeano** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:17 am

Fact Finder wrote:During the last election cycle ACORN registered 1.2Million New Voters. Over 400,000 of them were invalid. It's not beyond the realm of possibility that without ACORN there would be no TOTUS.

Oh really? Ok, playing along, here's a much better chance that without Katherine Harris as Florida Sec of State, our nation wouldn't be so fucked up now because Gore won that fucking election. Nice, real nice.

by **Rockindeano** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:18 am

treetopovskaya wrote:
fucktartdeano wrote:
treetopovskaya wrote:maybe people who don't know how to register to vote shouldn't be voting. it's not rocket science. voters shouldn't have to have their hands held.

i'm fine with the "rock the vote" type booths you'll see at concerts, fairs, schools, swap meets, etc... but this door to door stuff along with having people bussed in and fed pushes the limits of voter registration rules.

Stop the lecture please. With your fucked up sense of reason, you shouldn't be allowed to vote either.

Yes, I am serious.

do you see the irony in your statement there?

thanks for your 2 cents... you can keep the change.

I will keep the change thank you. Obama has to try to do something to pull us out of the great deep shitholed mire that your guy got us into.

by **treetopovskaya** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:22 am

Rockindeano wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:Also, about these ACORN stories we are FINALLY getting now...

Sowing the seeds of destruction

ACORN's shady tactics made headlines last week. But their shocking radicalism is nothing new.

Why in the hell didn't the media cover this before the election, so Americans would have known of the radical tendencies of The Won? Where were they, and why?

Oh go fuck yourself. Now you're saying the President is a racist.

Man, has this place gone to shit. Congratulations on being the worst poster ever.

how does radical = racist???

wt?

by **Lula** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 9:04 am

katherine harris' inability to do the right thing forced the supreme court to become involved. a travesty and embarrassment for this nation.

again i ask myself- why? why come into this thread? i am perplexed at the way of thinking of some of you. i'm sure my way of thinking has some of you perplexed as well. i'm just shaking my head. i'll take my leave now.

by **RedWingFan** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 9:30 am

Lula wrote:a travesty and embarrassment for this nation.

The travesty was the democrat party trying to change the election law from "3 dislodged corners" constituting a vote, to counting zero dislodged corners and dimples, AFTER THE ELECTION!!!! Embarrassing!!!

by **Lula** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:59 am

nothing exactly ff, just our beliefs, philosophies, etc...

by **Carrington** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 11:52 am

Fact Finder wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:
Breitbart: Prepare for a “blockbuster” “from left field” next week

Uh oh.......are the Dems and the state run media going to have to change thier pants??.... :shock:

by **RossValoryRocks** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:15 pm

Lula wrote:katherine harris' inability to do the right thing forced the supreme court to become involved. a travesty and embarrassment for this nation.

again i ask myself- why? why come into this thread? i am perplexed at the way of thinking of some of you. i'm sure my way of thinking has some of you perplexed as well. i'm just shaking my head. i'll take my leave now.

You do know that no matter what way the votes were recounted, George Bush won Flordia right?

If they had used Gore's standard he would have won by MORE.

Katherine Harris abided by the laws of the State of Florida in certifying the election.

Get over 2000. You libs keep going back to Bush on everything, once again proving that you have no new ideas. Not that the Republican's are any better, but for fuck's sake, move on: Bush is no longer the President.

Obama is, and he is doing a flat out shitty job right now, because he is bending over to appeal to his base.

by **RossValoryRocks** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:22 pm

Rockindeano wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:During the last election cycle ACORN registered 1.2Million New Voters. Over 400,000 of them were invalid. It's not beyond the realm of possibility that without ACORN there would be no TOTUS.

Oh really? Ok, playing along, here's a much better chance that without Katherine Harris as Florida Sec of State, our nation wouldn't be so fucked up now because Gore won that fucking election. Nice, real nice.

As I said to Lula, by no standard applied to the recount would Gore have won Florida.

NONE.

ZIP.

ZERO.

ZILCH.

Using the standard that Gore wanted Bush would have won by MORE votes.

Gore was a shitty candidate. He couldn't even win his OWN FUCKING STATE! If he could have pulled that miralce off, then Florida would have been a moot issue.

You asked what I mean by intellectually bankrupt, and this what I mean, you don't do your research...at all, you keeping bringing up the past, with no eyes to the future.

You don't even pay attention to what is going on right NOW. If you live in the past you will never move forward.

by **treetopovskaya** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:28 pm

Fact Finder wrote:

ROTFLMMFAO!!!!! }=C))

*right click save*

by **G.I.Jim** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:30 pm

treetopovskaya wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:

ROTFLMMFAO!!!!! }=C))

*right click save*

THAT was awesome! :lol:

I couldn't have said it any better.

by **Lula** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:36 pm

RossValoryRocks wrote:
Lula wrote:katherine harris' inability to do the right thing forced the supreme court to become involved. a travesty and embarrassment for this nation.

again i ask myself- why? why come into this thread? i am perplexed at the way of thinking of some of you. i'm sure my way of thinking has some of you perplexed as well. i'm just shaking my head. i'll take my leave now.

You do know that no matter what way the votes were recounted, George Bush won Flordia right?

If they had used Gore's standard he would have won by MORE.

Katherine Harris abided by the laws of the State of Florida in certifying the election.

Get over 2000. You libs keep going back to Bush on everything, once again proving that you have no new ideas. Not that the Republican's are any better, but for fuck's sake, move on: Bush is no longer the President.

Obama is, and he is doing a flat out shitty job right now, because he is bending over to appeal to his base.

harris handled the whole thing pathetically. i have nothing to say about the 2000 and 2004 elections. i am not stuck in the past stu, not at all. and you're wrong about obama, he isn't bending nearly enough to appeal to his base. many progressives are disappointed in his lack of actions. i'm done here, not debating anymore. kiss kiss.

by **treetopovskaya** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 1:44 pm

Lula wrote:katherine harris' inability to do the right thing forced the supreme court to become involved. a travesty and embarrassment for this nation.

again i ask myself- why? why come into this thread? i am perplexed at the way of thinking of some of you. i'm sure my way of thinking has some of you perplexed as well. i'm just shaking my head. i'll take my leave now.

at least people can debate with you respectfully & not call you names like dumb, stupid, bitch, cocksucker, etc... telling you to get fucked or to fuck off.

*rolls eyes*

by **Lula** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 1:56 pm

treetopovskaya wrote:
Lula wrote:katherine harris' inability to do the right thing forced the supreme court to become involved. a travesty and embarrassment for this nation.

again i ask myself- why? why come into this thread? i am perplexed at the way of thinking of some of you. i'm sure my way of thinking has some of you perplexed as well. i'm just shaking my head. i'll take my leave now.

at least people can debate with you respectfully & not call you names like dumb, stupid, bitch, cocksucker, etc... telling you to get fucked or to fuck off.

*rolls eyes*

huh?

by **treetopovskaya** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 2:17 pm

Lula wrote:
treetopovskaya wrote:
Lula wrote:katherine harris' inability to do the right thing forced the supreme court to become involved. a travesty and embarrassment for this nation.

again i ask myself- why? why come into this thread? i am perplexed at the way of thinking of some of you. i'm sure my way of thinking has some of you perplexed as well. i'm just shaking my head. i'll take my leave now.

at least people can debate with you respectfully & not call you names like dumb, stupid, bitch, cocksucker, etc... telling you to get fucked or to fuck off.

*rolls eyes*

huh?

do you not see how YOUR buddies talk to people here? how some of the lefty "men" talk to the opposition? calling people dumb, stupid, bitches, cocksuckers, telling people to fuck off... or telling them to get fucked (your buddy tnc said that to indyjoe... nice huh?).

MR

President Barack Obama - Term 1 and 2 Thread

Who is online