Moderator: Andrew
Tito wrote:I hope Chicago doesn't get it either. For the reasons described above.
Is Chicago Ready to Host the Olympics?
That's the persistent question as the date for selecting the city that will host the 2016 Summer Games draws near. Bid backers in Chicago contend that the Games will bring jobs, an economic boost and international prestige to the city, all at little or no cost to taxpayers. Chicago 2016 has also claimed that support from the private sector coupled with world class management will ensure that Chicago will benefit from hosting the games. Within that debate, however, supporters haven't pointed to a city that has benefited from hosting the games. Montreal didn't finish paying off the billions of dollars of debt it had incurred in 1976 until 2006. More recently Greece teetered on the edge of failing to host the Olympics in 2004 when the government failed to complete construction on time. London is already billions of dollars over budget.
Looking ahead to next year, Vancouver, which will be hosting the 2010 Winter Olympics may shed light on what could lie ahead for Chicago. The Western Canadian city is looking to cover some financial shortfalls as the winter games draw near. The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation is reporting that Vancouver is looking to cover a $12 million shortfall in advertising by inviting U.S. states to become Olympic sponsors. "Many of the states we've approached are very interested and it gives them limited rights to affiliate themselves as partners for the Games," said Dave Guscott, the vice-president of partnerships for VANOC, the Vancouver Olympic committee. "Most are interested in ways they can advance their destination for tourism, for economic development and their interest in sport." Aside from a shortfall in advertising revenue, VANOC has also asked local businesses to temporarily loan workers to the committee to cover a budget shortfall. While such a request isn't novel, VANOC admits that their request for 1,500 short-term workers, to act as drug testers, snow shovelers and managers, is larger than previous plans. "While the final value and number of loaned employees will not be known for several months, the program will result in significant savings to VANOC's operational budget," the Vancouver Organizing Committee told the CBC. "While the final value and number of loaned employees will not be known for several months, the program will result in significant savings to VANOC's operational budget," the Vancouver Organizing Committee said.
Rhiannon wrote:I hope we DO get it. Because that would just be cool. I highly highly HIGHLY doubt I'll stick around as a resident until 2016, so Daly can have at it. Of course, they did send Oprah to represent Chicago in Copenhagen. WTF. Anybody who doesn't get why it'd be awesome to have the Olympics back in the US probably was never on a team or understands school spirit... erm, country spirit...
Behshad wrote:Tito wrote:I hope Chicago doesn't get it either. For the reasons described above.
Well as usual youre wrong!![]()
The amount of business the visitors would bring to the city would really help Chicago out A LOT...
Try to think like Frigga&FroI dont think a $200.000.000 profit would hurt the city , do you !?:)
Rhiannon wrote:I hope we DO get it. Because that would just be cool. I highly highly HIGHLY doubt I'll stick around as a resident until 2016, so Daly can have at it. Of course, they did send Oprah to represent Chicago in Copenhagen. WTF. Anybody who doesn't get why it'd be awesome to have the Olympics back in the US probably was never on a team or understands school spirit... erm, country spirit...
Tito wrote:Rhiannon wrote:I hope we DO get it. Because that would just be cool. I highly highly HIGHLY doubt I'll stick around as a resident until 2016, so Daly can have at it. Of course, they did send Oprah to represent Chicago in Copenhagen. WTF. Anybody who doesn't get why it'd be awesome to have the Olympics back in the US probably was never on a team or understands school spirit... erm, country spirit...
I have country spirit, that is why I don't want it. I don't want to be saddled with MORE debt because of Daley's shit plans.
Tito wrote:Behshad wrote:Tito wrote:I hope Chicago doesn't get it either. For the reasons described above.
Well as usual youre wrong!![]()
The amount of business the visitors would bring to the city would really help Chicago out A LOT...
Try to think like Frigga&FroI dont think a $200.000.000 profit would hurt the city , do you !?:)
They'll lose money. Maybe a few insiders will make money but the everyone else will get screwed.
bluejeangirl76 wrote:Tito wrote:Rhiannon wrote:I hope we DO get it. Because that would just be cool. I highly highly HIGHLY doubt I'll stick around as a resident until 2016, so Daly can have at it. Of course, they did send Oprah to represent Chicago in Copenhagen. WTF. Anybody who doesn't get why it'd be awesome to have the Olympics back in the US probably was never on a team or understands school spirit... erm, country spirit...
I have country spirit, that is why I don't want it. I don't want to be saddled with MORE debt because of Daley's shit plans.
I can't stand that I'm about to agree (slighty) with Tito, but...
Overall I think it could be great for Chicago financially.
And I work in an industry that NEEDS this BAD. Real bad.
Travel & Tourism is way down and has been hit so hard by the enconomic bullshittery of late.
But at the same time I don't trust Daly not to screw this up (and screw US), financially, with his juggling of nickels and whatnot.
Rhiannon wrote:bluejeangirl76 wrote:Tito wrote:Rhiannon wrote:I hope we DO get it. Because that would just be cool. I highly highly HIGHLY doubt I'll stick around as a resident until 2016, so Daly can have at it. Of course, they did send Oprah to represent Chicago in Copenhagen. WTF. Anybody who doesn't get why it'd be awesome to have the Olympics back in the US probably was never on a team or understands school spirit... erm, country spirit...
I have country spirit, that is why I don't want it. I don't want to be saddled with MORE debt because of Daley's shit plans.
I can't stand that I'm about to agree (slighty) with Tito, but...
Overall I think it could be great for Chicago financially.
And I work in an industry that NEEDS this BAD. Real bad.
Travel & Tourism is way down and has been hit so hard by the enconomic bullshittery of late.
But at the same time I don't trust Daly not to screw this up (and screw US), financially, with his juggling of nickels and whatnot.
You'll both get over it if so. Do you realize if we get the bid, they'll HAVE to keep the roads in great shape? Shouldn't that be reason enough by itself? Every town is weary of the financial burden. I remember 96 and Atlanta. I know a lot of people who were living there then. Same thing, they didn't trust the city not to thwart them into tax oblivion. The way I see it, Cook County's taxes are already so high... I'm really not going to notice another few cents tacked on to the dollar.
What matters is that it will force the city to make some much needed improvements. AAANND, it's home field advantage for Team USA.
bluejeangirl76 wrote:Right but it isn't just taxes. I fully expect to see service charges added all over the place to fund this thing too.
This will affect everything... CTA fares have become horrendous enough and personnel has been cut... if 2016 comes here, they will have to add all that personnel back, and how will they afford that? Jack up the fares even more. That's what kills me... they were broke so they jacked up fares and cut jobs... so the only way to afford to bring all those jobs back... raise the fares again.... it's a no win.
Parking costs, road work/upkeep, gas, food, anything they can raise just becuase there will be need/demand...
As I said... it isn't necessarily going to be a disaster, but it's going to affect everything and if it's mismanaged, as things tend to be within Illinois, it isn't necessarily going to make a lot of money either. After Governor Blago and his self-indulging half-million dollar toll plaza signs and Mayor Ricky and the Great Parking Meter Operation, it's easy to see why Chicagoans might be wary of something like this.
But again, it will still be great for the hospitality, retail and restaurant industries, especially downtown.
bluejeangirl76 wrote:And I work in an industry that NEEDS this BAD. Real bad.
Travel & Tourism is way down and has been hit so hard by the enconomic bullshittery of late.
Behshad wrote:how do you figure??? ,,, even if Daly tries to scam bunch of money to himself and his buddies, all the local shops, restaurants etc will see a remendous increase of business, when they most need it.... You dont seem to understand how European and Japanese in general love to spend money at events like this.... specially when things seem so much cheaper to them here than their own country.... Salt Lake city is a perfect example of how much the whole city benefited from this... they turned a 4 lane highway around the city into a 6 and some parts 8 lane, all the costs were covered from the money the tourists brought in..... and add to that the whole team and fight for your nation spirit, you have the formula for one successful even where its a win win situation for everyone, aside from those whose team sucks ass at the sports
Rhiannon wrote:bluejeangirl76 wrote:Tito wrote:Rhiannon wrote:I hope we DO get it. Because that would just be cool. I highly highly HIGHLY doubt I'll stick around as a resident until 2016, so Daly can have at it. Of course, they did send Oprah to represent Chicago in Copenhagen. WTF. Anybody who doesn't get why it'd be awesome to have the Olympics back in the US probably was never on a team or understands school spirit... erm, country spirit...
I have country spirit, that is why I don't want it. I don't want to be saddled with MORE debt because of Daley's shit plans.
I can't stand that I'm about to agree (slighty) with Tito, but...
Overall I think it could be great for Chicago financially.
And I work in an industry that NEEDS this BAD. Real bad.
Travel & Tourism is way down and has been hit so hard by the enconomic bullshittery of late.
But at the same time I don't trust Daly not to screw this up (and screw US), financially, with his juggling of nickels and whatnot.
You'll both get over it if so. Do you realize if we get the bid, they'll HAVE to keep the roads in great shape? Shouldn't that be reason enough by itself? Every town is weary of the financial burden. I remember 96 and Atlanta. I know a lot of people who were living there then. Same thing, they didn't trust the city not to thwart them into tax oblivion. The way I see it, Cook County's taxes are already so high... I'm really not going to notice another few cents tacked on to the dollar.
What matters is that it will force the city to make some much needed improvements. AAANND, it's home field advantage for Team USA.
Rhiannon wrote:It's not about the money or who's profiting how and to what extent... it's HOMETOWN PRIDE. It's bringing something to America to unify and rally everyone together and give us a sense of global community and national honor.
Tito wrote:Rhiannon wrote:It's not about the money or who's profiting how and to what extent... it's HOMETOWN PRIDE. It's bringing something to America to unify and rally everyone together and give us a sense of global community and national honor.
I'm gonna puck. Fuck the elitist, left wing talking points. It is about the money.
Michigan Girl wrote:Tito wrote:Rhiannon wrote:It's not about the money or who's profiting how and to what extent... it's HOMETOWN PRIDE. It's bringing something to America to unify and rally everyone together and give us a sense of global community and national honor.
I'm gonna puck. Fuck the elitist, left wing talking points. It is about the money.
LMAO!!
Puke or play hockey?!??!
Tito wrote:Rhiannon wrote:It's not about the money or who's profiting how and to what extent... it's HOMETOWN PRIDE. It's bringing something to America to unify and rally everyone together and give us a sense of global community and national honor.
I'm gonna puck. Fuck the elitist, left wing talking points. It is about the money.
Tito wrote:You got A LOT to learn newcomer.
Rhiannon wrote:Tito wrote:You got A LOT to learn newcomer.
Oh get off it you sour old pessimist. Since when are the Olympic games a matter of liberal vs. conservative "talking points"? Are you against all forms of fun? I guess we have different priorities if you're just worried about paying more taxes and more windbag downtown agenda instead of seeing how cool it would be to have the Olympics in your area. But you hate foreigners, so I can see where this problem probably stems from for you.
Tito wrote:The winter Olympics are better but that's still blows for the most part too.
Tito wrote:Rhiannon wrote:Tito wrote:You got A LOT to learn newcomer.
Oh get off it you sour old pessimist. Since when are the Olympic games a matter of liberal vs. conservative "talking points"? Are you against all forms of fun? I guess we have different priorities if you're just worried about paying more taxes and more windbag downtown agenda instead of seeing how cool it would be to have the Olympics in your area. But you hate foreigners, so I can see where this problem probably stems from for you.
The thing that has always bothered me about Chicago, is some people's (usually the higher ups/elite) inferiority complex. They want to be a global city, want to New York, want to be this or that. Fuck that. First, we are a global city already. Having the Olympics or not will not change that.
As far as foreigners go, another million for a few weeks won't matter. There is already too many here.
Another point missing from the discussion, the Olympics suck and are boring (lets watch swimming - Yeah!). The winter Olympics are better but that's still blows for the most part too.
Rhiannon wrote:How can you not get the point I'm making?
Tito wrote:I hope Chicago doesn't get it either. For the reasons described above.
Rockindeano wrote:Tito wrote:I hope Chicago doesn't get it either. For the reasons described above.
You miserable Fuck. Have some civic pride, man. Would it kill you to expand your horizon and maybe invite a little worldly culture into your great city, which by the way it is. Watch Vancouver put on it's act in 2 months and tell me you wouldn't want Chicago to be on the world stage for 3 weeks?
bluejeangirl76 wrote:Rhiannon wrote:How can you not get the point I'm making?
How can you not get that you will be much more successful if you go argue with an oak tree for about an hour and a half.
You know what Chicago should host? The GLBT Olympics!! How cool would that be! Tito would move.
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests