You Better Wait

Strange Talking Street Medicine

Moderator: Andrew

You Better Wait

Postby Onestepper » Tue Jan 05, 2010 12:54 pm

Holy tacos that song is breathy. He worked how many years on that song/album? Breath in. Breath out.

Is that what we have to look forward to? Pass.
Onestepper
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1336
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:48 am

Postby ChildInTime » Tue Jan 05, 2010 1:13 pm

Holy tacos... :lol: I'm gonna use that one, now.

And yeah, FTLOSM was a breathy record. But that stuff can be erased in the studio quite easily, so I guess Steev-O kept it in there on purpose for whatever weird artsy-fartsy reason he had. I didn't really mind it, though. But everyone's different, so... *shrug*
*open mouth, insert foot*
User avatar
ChildInTime
45 RPM
 
Posts: 322
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 11:16 am

Re: You Better Wait

Postby madsplash » Tue Jan 05, 2010 1:26 pm

Onestepper wrote:Holy tacos that song is breathy. He worked how many years on that song/album? Breath in. Breath out.

Is that what we have to look forward to? Pass.


It's called tone, character and nuance, along with perfect phrasing, damn near perfect pitch and more control than any other singer, ever. Either you get that or you don't. You go ahead and pass, it'll be your loss, dude. :roll:
madsplash
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1330
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 5:02 am

Postby Michigan Girl » Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:35 am

Breathy is good for this song, very sexy...I love it!!!
I can see why men might not care for it... :wink:
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Postby hoagiepete » Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:40 am

I quit listening to the album because it made me keep gasping for breath. It irritated the hell out of me. Too bad too as there were some good songs ruined by it.
hoagiepete
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1610
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 10:16 am

Re: You Better Wait

Postby Onestepper » Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:40 am

madsplash wrote:
Onestepper wrote:Holy tacos that song is breathy. He worked how many years on that song/album? Breath in. Breath out.

Is that what we have to look forward to? Pass.


It's called tone, character and nuance, along with perfect phrasing, damn near perfect pitch and more control than any other singer, ever. Either you get that or you don't. You go ahead and pass, it'll be your loss, dude. :roll:


You don't need to stick a microphone down your throat to have tone and nuance Einstein. He has multiple other records that have that same 'perfect phrasing' that don't sound like he's blowing into a breathalyser at 2 in the morning. Thanks for trying to educate my opinion. I'll take it into consideration, while I get over the fact that I've somehow lost out on not enjoying the FTLOSM album. I really don't know how I'll survive.

How's that 'end of the year' source working for you now Nostradamus?

We'll see.
Onestepper
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1336
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:48 am

Re: You Better Wait

Postby madsplash » Wed Jan 06, 2010 11:03 am

Onestepper wrote:
madsplash wrote:
Onestepper wrote:Holy tacos that song is breathy. He worked how many years on that song/album? Breath in. Breath out.

Is that what we have to look forward to? Pass.


It's called tone, character and nuance, along with perfect phrasing, damn near perfect pitch and more control than any other singer, ever. Either you get that or you don't. You go ahead and pass, it'll be your loss, dude. :roll:


You don't need to stick a microphone down your throat to have tone and nuance Einstein. He has multiple other records that have that same 'perfect phrasing' that don't sound like he's blowing into a breathalyser at 2 in the morning. Thanks for trying to educate my opinion. I'll take it into consideration, while I get over the fact that I've somehow lost out on not enjoying the FTLOSM album. I really don't know how I'll survive.

How's that 'end of the year' source working for you now Nostradamus?

We'll see.


I'd forgotten what a joy it was to converse with you. Now I remember. :roll: Don't know why I bothered.

That won't happen again, don't worry.
madsplash
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1330
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 5:02 am

Re: You Better Wait

Postby Since 78 » Wed Jan 06, 2010 11:08 am

madsplash wrote:
Onestepper wrote:
madsplash wrote:
Onestepper wrote:Holy tacos that song is breathy. He worked how many years on that song/album? Breath in. Breath out.

Is that what we have to look forward to? Pass.


It's called tone, character and nuance, along with perfect phrasing, damn near perfect pitch and more control than any other singer, ever. Either you get that or you don't. You go ahead and pass, it'll be your loss, dude. :roll:


You don't need to stick a microphone down your throat to have tone and nuance Einstein. He has multiple other records that have that same 'perfect phrasing' that don't sound like he's blowing into a breathalyser at 2 in the morning. Thanks for trying to educate my opinion. I'll take it into consideration, while I get over the fact that I've somehow lost out on not enjoying the FTLOSM album. I really don't know how I'll survive.

How's that 'end of the year' source working for you now Nostradamus?

We'll see.


I'd forgotten what a joy it was to converse with you. Now I remember. :roll: Don't know why I bothered.

That won't happen again, don't worry.


You ever think maybe its the :roll: . Just saying.... carry on.
Image
Image
Still They Ride
User avatar
Since 78
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8194
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 2:21 pm
Location: Pinhead Nation

Re: You Better Wait

Postby Jubilee » Wed Jan 06, 2010 11:36 am

madsplash wrote:
Onestepper wrote:Holy tacos that song is breathy. He worked how many years on that song/album? Breath in. Breath out.

Is that what we have to look forward to? Pass.


It's called tone, character and nuance, along with perfect phrasing, damn near perfect pitch and more control than any other singer, ever. Either you get that or you don't. You go ahead and pass, it'll be your loss, dude. :roll:


I don't think anyone is questioning Perry's phrasing or pitch. Objectively speaking, one has to admit the tone of Perry's voice on this album is thinner and quite a bit raspier than previous efforts. When you couple that with the breathiness, it can be a bit off-puting - even for a loon. A little breathiness, just for effect, on one or two songs is one thing, but an entire album where he sounds like he has a piece of a peanut caught in his throat? He has better breath control than that.

Having said that, when the time comes and "IT" happens, I'll be right there...waiting... :wink: :lol: :lol: :lol:
"I'm always on point like a decimal". -- Megan Thee Stallion
Jubilee
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1820
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 4:06 pm
Location: Right in the Middle

Postby ChildInTime » Wed Jan 06, 2010 3:52 pm

It was quite an odd decision to leave all that breathy stuff on there. But Matt Bellamy from Muse does the same exact thing for whatever weird reason, and Muse is pretty damn popular, so I guess it's a sort of.... style? I dunno. They obviously know what they're doing, even if we don't. :lol: (And the funny thing is Matt's breathy-ness annoys the living daylights out of me, whereas Steve's doesn't bug me at all. Hm. Go figure.)
*open mouth, insert foot*
User avatar
ChildInTime
45 RPM
 
Posts: 322
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 11:16 am

Postby slucero » Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:18 pm

I actually love it that way..... reminds me of the old school singers...

Modern studio mixdown techniques usually result in all the inhalation and exhalation being removed from the vocal track... we've been condition to not hear this anymore because it's cut out.

I think Perry feels that leaving it in makes it sound more realistic.. which is true, since breathing is kind of a necessary part of singing...

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.


~Albert Einstein
User avatar
slucero
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5444
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:17 pm

Re: You Better Wait

Postby WIX » Wed Jan 06, 2010 5:20 pm

Onestepper wrote:Holy tacos that song is breathy. He worked how many years on that song/album? Breath in. Breath out.

Is that what we have to look forward to? Pass.


That man(edit) is the best singer ever, can't take that away! signed #1 Fan!
User avatar
WIX
8 Track
 
Posts: 914
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 11:02 am
Location: Funny is in the Mind of the Beholder!

Re: You Better Wait

Postby Babyblue » Wed Jan 06, 2010 11:02 pm

WIX wrote:
Onestepper wrote:Holy tacos that song is breathy. He worked how many years on that song/album? Breath in. Breath out.

Is that what we have to look forward to? Pass.


That man(edit) is the best singer ever, can't take that away! signed #1 Fan!


Agree with that one.Love it :wink: :D
Styx & Gowan fan forever
Keep On Rocking Guys:)

I will never stop believeing in you SP.:)
Babyblue
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8023
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 11:04 pm
Location: Grits girls raised in the south.

Re: You Better Wait

Postby cheekymonkey » Thu Jan 07, 2010 11:42 am

madsplash wrote:
Onestepper wrote:Holy tacos that song is breathy. He worked how many years on that song/album? Breath in. Breath out.

Is that what we have to look forward to? Pass.


It's called tone, character and nuance, along with perfect phrasing, damn near perfect pitch and more control than any other singer, ever. Either you get that or you don't. You go ahead and pass, it'll be your loss, dude. :roll:


Hey there, good to see you Mad. I totally agree with you, I loved the sound of this album and what he left on. I love this album.
:D :D :D
Life is about being honest, openminded, willing and loving well.
User avatar
cheekymonkey
LP
 
Posts: 426
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 3:24 pm
Location: Banana Belt, (LOL) Ontario, Canada

Postby Lora » Thu Jan 07, 2010 2:31 pm

slucero wrote:I actually love it that way..... reminds me of the old school singers...

Modern studio mixdown techniques usually result in all the inhalation and exhalation being removed from the vocal track... we've been condition to not hear this anymore because it's cut out.

I think Perry feels that leaving it in makes it sound more realistic.. which is true, since breathing is kind of a necessary part of singing...


I totally agree. People are used to listening to compressed crap on their ipods now. I love hearing the natural breathing. It adds to the intimacy of that CD.
User avatar
Lora
8 Track
 
Posts: 878
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:59 am

Postby Saint John » Thu Jan 07, 2010 2:50 pm

slucero wrote:I actually love it that way..... reminds me of the old school singers...

Modern studio mixdown techniques usually result in all the inhalation and exhalation being removed from the vocal track... we've been condition to not hear this anymore because it's cut out.

I think Perry feels that leaving it in makes it sound more realistic.. which is true, since breathing is kind of a necessary part of singing...


Kevin Shirley (and perhaps Nostrildamus) did an awesome job of making TBF rich and full of life, and KS totally bombed on Revelation in that same department. However, I think most of FTLOSM was completely overboard in that department (much like Revelation was "underboard") and if Perry was so worried about "making it sound more realistic" he'd simply sing it live.
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby journey361 » Fri Jan 08, 2010 12:35 pm

Saint John good post but i have to disagree with you on his breathing. I believe that was not his decision alone but rather he had opinions and one or two of them convinced him to go that way. I can't believe that other studio personal would just not mention that or frankly let it slide and go to print.
Someone who he trusts convinced Perry to leave it in. The CD is Steve Perry, sure it's blues or however you want to classify it but the bottom line is it's Perry and he has pipes to kill for. Oh shit, i'm so sorry, i was told by millions that even as studio-tech goes he had lost his voice by then. Could you imagine Steve Perry at 26 or 27 years old on American Idol with his voice. LOL. Simon say's somewhere's there's hope.
journey361
LP
 
Posts: 405
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 7:03 am
Location: indianapolis, indiana

Postby Playitloudforme » Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:19 pm

Ain't got no problems with the song, the breathing, any of it. Damn sexy, period.
User avatar
Playitloudforme
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2003 1:26 pm
Location: Seattle, South Lake Union

Postby sp old ldy » Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:32 pm

Lora wrote:
slucero wrote:I actually love it that way..... reminds me of the old school singers...

Modern studio mixdown techniques usually result in all the inhalation and exhalation being removed from the vocal track... we've been condition to not hear this anymore because it's cut out.

I think Perry feels that leaving it in makes it sound more realistic.. which is true, since breathing is kind of a necessary part of singing...


I totally agree. People are used to listening to compressed crap on their ipods now. I love hearing the natural breathing. It adds to the intimacy of that CD.

I totally agree with you LORA!!!! The first time I heard that breathing OMG, it sounded like he was standing right here in front of me
singing his heart out. I LOVE IT!!!!!!! :D :D :D :D
sp old ldy
LP
 
Posts: 463
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:18 pm

Postby swataz » Sat Jan 09, 2010 12:35 am

I have no issues with the breathiness. I just notice it is all. It's especially prevalent on songs like "Young Hearts Forever".

To me, as a singer, it is nuance and some others who mention the production tricks make a good point. We are very much trained to hear 'perfection' in recordings, and while leaving the breathiness in was intentional, it is a departure for most ears.

Love the album anyway, it reminds me of a simpler time in my life when I was in my mid 20's and riding high!
User avatar
swataz
LP
 
Posts: 439
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 11:35 am

Postby MrsPerry » Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:01 am

I love to hear the breathyness (is that even a word) and fingers on guitar strings. really makes the song for me. :D
Steve, We Need You.
User avatar
MrsPerry
8 Track
 
Posts: 670
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:07 pm
Location: Small Town

Postby annie89509 » Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:49 pm

Playitloudforme wrote:Ain't got no problems with the song, the breathing, any of it. Damn sexy, period.

yeah, very true.
User avatar
annie89509
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2849
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 5:55 am
Location: the big 5-8

Postby CatEyes » Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:53 pm

Lora wrote:[...]
People are used to listening to compressed crap on their ipods now.[...]


Oh hell yes **kitty paw high five**

It seems that most people do not realize how much they are missing as a result of the compression.

pls pardon my typing. I am wearing gloves

cold weather sucks!

cat
The daughters of lions are lions, too.
CatEyes
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1524
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 6:05 am

Postby slucero » Wed Jan 13, 2010 8:57 am


Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.


~Albert Einstein
User avatar
slucero
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5444
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:17 pm

Postby Saint John » Wed Jan 13, 2010 10:43 am

I'd like to think that the album sales of this particular album reflect how good it was. Very mediocre sales for a very mediocre album. I'm a firm believer that Perry's true genius is when he "wings it and sings it." This album was a calculated project of methodical musical nuances and, in the end, the result was shit.
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby annie89509 » Thu Jan 14, 2010 8:01 am

Saint John wrote:I'd like to think that the album sales of this particular album reflect how good it was. Very mediocre sales for a very mediocre album. I'm a firm believer that Perry's true genius is when he "wings it and sings it." This album was a calculated project of methodical musical nuances and, in the end, the result was shit.

YBW is a great song...Missing You and Anyway are mesmerizing...but I'd agree that FTLOSM overall is pretty dull...not as good as Street Talk. I don't know about the calculating part, though. I remember reading old articles where SP used to say about Journey's songs & projects...that they were organic, nothing was calculating. He often referred to the songs as their children. So I tend to believe that goes for his solo projects, as well. He often spoke about writing & singing from his heart and that he would never do anything just because it was "time to." I'm sure anyone who's a SP fan has come across the same stuff I just alluded to.

With FTLOSM, Steve turned producer duties over to Jim Barton of Queensryche(sp?) fame, instead of keeping that title to himself as with ST. I wonder how much of the musical nuances that we hear in the album is JB's doing. Of course, we know it's Steve doing the singing and the control he exerts over everything.

Just thoughts running through my mind :wink:
User avatar
annie89509
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2849
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 5:55 am
Location: the big 5-8

Postby slucero » Thu Jan 14, 2010 9:28 am

Saint John wrote:I'd like to think that the album sales of this particular album reflect how good it was. Very mediocre sales for a very mediocre album. I'm a firm believer that Perry's true genius is when he "wings it and sings it." This album was a calculated project of methodical musical nuances and, in the end, the result was shit.



The measurement of an albums quality is based on how well it sells? That sorta remove the whole "different people like different things" subjectivity thing from the equation doesn't it?

IMHO - unit sales aren't a very good indicator of the quality of a given album... musical climate, promotion and touring have a lot to do with whether or not a given album sells... given the musical climate.... 1994 was probably not the best time for Perry to release FTLOSM, and maybe Perry wasn't really expecting Escape level sales.. maybe releasing FTLOSM was simply an ego stroke for him...

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.


~Albert Einstein
User avatar
slucero
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5444
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:17 pm

Postby Saint John » Thu Jan 14, 2010 10:22 am

slucero wrote:The measurement of an albums quality is based on how well it sells?


That's not what I said, numbnuts. I said that I think it's true for this particular album. The Journey base sorta rejected it. And why shouldn't they? It sucked!

slucero wrote:1994 was probably not the best time for Perry to release FTLOSM, and maybe Perry wasn't really expecting Escape level sales..


It was certianly a good time. It was well promoted and he toured in support of it. Yet album sales were relatively dismal. And that's because the album wasn't good.


slucero wrote:maybe releasing FTLOSM was simply an ego stroke for him...


You'd need hands the size of The fucking Milky Way to stroke his ego (or pick his nose :lol: )!
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby ChildInTime » Thu Jan 14, 2010 10:39 am

^
While you make valid points, you also have to keep in mind the musical landscape of the time period. Journey-like music was not popular at all; everyone was all over grunge at that point... Nirvana this, Pearl Jam that... and FTLOSM obviously sounded nothing like Smells like Teen Spirit. Metal music had the same problem back then-- album sales dramatically decreased for metal bands unless they started pandering to the grunge trend or the whole Pantera macho-metal thing. Which goes to show how fickle some music 'fans' can be.

Even putting this into account, album sales still don't say anything for the quality of this album. Metallica's Saint Anger was ABSOLUTELY HORRIBLE in both production and musical quality. Yet, I believe it went platinum, just because hey! They were METALLICA! They were COOL! Steve Perry and Journey never really had that draw to them past the '80s, honestly.
*open mouth, insert foot*
User avatar
ChildInTime
45 RPM
 
Posts: 322
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 11:16 am

Postby Jana » Thu Jan 14, 2010 11:10 am

ChildInTime wrote:^
While you make valid points, you also have to keep in mind the musical landscape of the time period. Journey-like music was not popular at all; everyone was all over grunge at that point... Nirvana this, Pearl Jam that... and FTLOSM obviously sounded nothing like Smells like Teen Spirit. Metal music had the same problem back then-- album sales dramatically decreased for metal bands unless they started pandering to the grunge trend or the whole Pantera macho-metal thing. Which goes to show how fickle some music 'fans' can be.

Even putting this into account, album sales still don't say anything for the quality of this album. Metallica's Saint Anger was ABSOLUTELY HORRIBLE in both production and musical quality. Yet, I believe it went platinum, just because hey! They were METALLICA! They were COOL! Steve Perry and Journey never really had that draw to them past the '80s, honestly.


What would grunge have to do with people that still had a soft spot for Journey and Perry? TBF sold a million after ten years away with no touring. Think what it would have been with touring. I have many Perry fanatics from back in the Journey day in my office. I'm shocked how many work there that were loons back in the day, and at an office meeting we were discussing Journey b/c I was going to a Journey concert. Every one of them did not like FTLOSM. They said it was disappointing and they liked him with Journey. And even some of them didn't like TBF all that much. They loved the classic Journey sound. Journey/Perry fans just weren't loving FTLOSM on a grand scale. But it wasn't a failure. It went gold after Perry being eight years away. It think that's nothing to cry about.
Jana
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8227
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:21 pm
Location: Anticipating

Next

Return to Steve Perry

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron