I love the Superbowl!

General Intelligent Discussion & One Thread About That Buttknuckle

Moderator: Andrew

I love the Superbowl!

Postby TRAGChick » Sun Feb 07, 2010 11:00 am

And I just want the BEST TEAM TO WIN!!!!

:twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
Facebook: Search TRAG
Image
TRAGChick
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6634
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 10:23 am

Re: I love the Superbowl!

Postby G.I.Jim » Sun Feb 07, 2010 11:29 am

TRAGChick wrote:And I just want the BEST TEAM TO WIN!!!!

:twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:


I just want the commercials to win! That's the ONLY reason to watch it. Oh yeah... and for the half-time show!!! :D
The artist formerly known as Jim. :-)
G.I.Jim
MP3
 
Posts: 10100
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 1:06 pm
Location: Your Momma's house

Re: I love the Superbowl!

Postby Everett » Sun Feb 07, 2010 11:30 am

G.I.Jim wrote:
TRAGChick wrote:And I just want the BEST TEAM TO WIN!!!!

:twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:


I just want the commercials to win! That's the ONLY reason to watch it. Oh yeah... and for the half-time show!!! :D


How could we push drew to land a spot in next year's super bowl?
All in a day's work
Everett
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5791
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 8:17 pm
Location: Milwaukee, WI

Re: I love the Superbowl!

Postby bluejeangirl76 » Sun Feb 07, 2010 11:47 am

G.I.Jim wrote:
TRAGChick wrote:And I just want the BEST TEAM TO WIN!!!!

:twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:


I just want the commercials to win! That's the ONLY reason to watch it. Oh yeah... and for the half-time show!!! :D


+1
User avatar
bluejeangirl76
MP3
 
Posts: 13346
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:36 am

Re: I love the Superbowl!

Postby G.I.Jim » Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:21 pm

bluejeangirl76 wrote:
G.I.Jim wrote:
TRAGChick wrote:And I just want the BEST TEAM TO WIN!!!!

:twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:


I just want the commercials to win! That's the ONLY reason to watch it. Oh yeah... and for the half-time show!!! :D


+1


Damn... you mean we actually AGREE on something? :shock:
The artist formerly known as Jim. :-)
G.I.Jim
MP3
 
Posts: 10100
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 1:06 pm
Location: Your Momma's house

Re: I love the Superbowl!

Postby Don » Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:29 pm

G.I.Jim wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:
G.I.Jim wrote:
TRAGChick wrote:And I just want the BEST TEAM TO WIN!!!!

:twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:


I just want the commercials to win! That's the ONLY reason to watch it. Oh yeah... and for the half-time show!!! :D


+1


Damn... you mean we actually AGREE on something? :shock:


Screw the game itself, here you go. Click the photos so you can watch the videos.

http://adland.tv/superbowlads/2010-supe ... ommercials
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Postby JasonD » Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:25 am

What the hell is up with the "no pants" theme in a lot of the Superbowl commercials? :roll:
.
.

Image

Image
User avatar
JasonD
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2477
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 8:33 am
Location: Detroit, Michigan

Re: I love the Superbowl!

Postby steveo777 » Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:30 am

Thenightbull wrote:
G.I.Jim wrote:
TRAGChick wrote:And I just want the BEST TEAM TO WIN!!!!

:twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:


I just want the commercials to win! That's the ONLY reason to watch it. Oh yeah... and for the half-time show!!! :D


How could we push drew to land a spot in next year's super bowl?


Uh, give him a cool $2.5m. :wink:
User avatar
steveo777
MP3
 
Posts: 11311
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:15 pm
Location: Citrus Heights, Ca

Postby JasonD » Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:30 am

Superbowl commercial...... Dove, for men. :shock:



Major fail. That is SO not gonna sell. :P
Last edited by JasonD on Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
.
.

Image

Image
User avatar
JasonD
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2477
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 8:33 am
Location: Detroit, Michigan

Re: I love the Superbowl!

Postby JasonD » Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:33 am

steveo777 wrote:
Thenightbull wrote:
G.I.Jim wrote:
TRAGChick wrote:And I just want the BEST TEAM TO WIN!!!!

:twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:


I just want the commercials to win! That's the ONLY reason to watch it. Oh yeah... and for the half-time show!!! :D


How could we push drew to land a spot in next year's super bowl?


Uh, give him a cool $2.5m. :wink:


What would Drew be advertising, I wonder?
.
.

Image

Image
User avatar
JasonD
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2477
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 8:33 am
Location: Detroit, Michigan

Postby artist4perry » Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:48 am

Comercials and the SAINTS. Not that I am a big fan of the STs mind you, but because my ex loved the Colts. :twisted:
User avatar
artist4perry
MP3
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Running around in the vast universe that is my imagination. Send help!

Re: I love the Superbowl!

Postby Everett » Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:59 am

JasonD wrote:
steveo777 wrote:
Thenightbull wrote:
G.I.Jim wrote:
TRAGChick wrote:And I just want the BEST TEAM TO WIN!!!!

:twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:


I just want the commercials to win! That's the ONLY reason to watch it. Oh yeah... and for the half-time show!!! :D


How could we push drew to land a spot in next year's super bowl?


Uh, give him a cool $2.5m. :wink:


What would Drew be advertising, I wonder?


Obviously the site :roll: :lol: :wink:
All in a day's work
Everett
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5791
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 8:17 pm
Location: Milwaukee, WI

Postby WalkInMyShoes » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:11 am

Just got home from work - halftime show is awful!

I'm getting the shakes because I'm starting to feel the annual football withdrawal - last 30 min until next fall!
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
User avatar
WalkInMyShoes
LP
 
Posts: 596
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:30 am

Postby Babyblue » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:14 am

artist4perry wrote:Comercials and the SAINTS. Not that I am a big fan of the STs mind you, but because my ex loved the Colts. :twisted:



Comercials not to bad. :wink: :lol: I want the Saints to win this one. :wink: :D
Styx & Gowan fan forever
Keep On Rocking Guys:)

I will never stop believeing in you SP.:)
Babyblue
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8023
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 11:04 pm
Location: Grits girls raised in the south.

Postby KDOUBLEU » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:16 am

The Who sounded pretty good tonight.
KDOUBLEU
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1383
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 3:48 am
Location: Grand Rapids Michigan

Postby Babyblue » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:17 am

KDOUBLEU wrote:The Who sounded pretty good tonight.


I thought so as well. :wink: :D
Styx & Gowan fan forever
Keep On Rocking Guys:)

I will never stop believeing in you SP.:)
Babyblue
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8023
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 11:04 pm
Location: Grits girls raised in the south.

Postby KDOUBLEU » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:19 am

Fact Finder wrote:
KDOUBLEU wrote:The Who sounded pretty good tonight.


They sounded good but Daltry was getting "some help". Twice he was off with the track.
Yea I noticed that as well.
KDOUBLEU
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1383
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 3:48 am
Location: Grand Rapids Michigan

Postby Ehwmatt » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:21 am

Fact Finder wrote:
KDOUBLEU wrote:The Who sounded pretty good tonight.


They sounded good but Daltry was getting "some help". Twice he was off with the track.


Yup. Roger can't really do much besides scream any more. The Who are still cool motherfuckers though
User avatar
Ehwmatt
MP3
 
Posts: 10907
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:15 am
Location: Cleveland, OH

Postby brywool » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:40 am

KDOUBLEU wrote:The Who sounded pretty good tonight.


You're kidding, right?
They were terrible. Zak was great, Roger and especially Pete were terrible.
He was kind of singing whenever he felt like it and playing major slop guitar.
Worst Who performance I've ever seen.
NO. He's NOT Steve F'ing Perry. But he's Arnel F'ing Pineda and I'm okay with that.
User avatar
brywool
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7688
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 5:54 am

Postby JasonD » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:45 am

Oooo, I love the E*TRADE babies!!! :D Cute!!!
.
.

Image

Image
User avatar
JasonD
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2477
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 8:33 am
Location: Detroit, Michigan

Postby KDOUBLEU » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:47 am

brywool wrote:
KDOUBLEU wrote:The Who sounded pretty good tonight.


You're kidding, right?
They were terrible. Zak was great, Roger and especially Pete were terrible.
He was kind of singing whenever he felt like it and playing major slop guitar.
Worst Who performance I've ever seen.
Theyre old men for gods sake give them a break. I thought they did alright. And better than the Stones.
KDOUBLEU
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1383
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 3:48 am
Location: Grand Rapids Michigan

Postby Jana » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:51 am

KDOUBLEU wrote:
brywool wrote:
KDOUBLEU wrote:The Who sounded pretty good tonight.


You're kidding, right?
They were terrible. Zak was great, Roger and especially Pete were terrible.
He was kind of singing whenever he felt like it and playing major slop guitar.
Worst Who performance I've ever seen.
Theyre old men for gods sake give them a break. I thought they did alright. And better than the Stones.


No way. I loved the Stones. :D :D

The Stones at haltime - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bg6DTytwrLA

The Who at haltime - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PEM4uFcaF0
Last edited by Jana on Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
Jana
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8227
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:21 pm
Location: Anticipating

Postby JasonD » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:52 am

I guess you gotta be a die-hard Who fan to notice the suckitude level of their performance, b/c I'm not a die-hard fan & they sounded okay to me. :?
.
.

Image

Image
User avatar
JasonD
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2477
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 8:33 am
Location: Detroit, Michigan

Postby brywool » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:57 am

KDOUBLEU wrote:
brywool wrote:
KDOUBLEU wrote:The Who sounded pretty good tonight.


You're kidding, right?
They were terrible. Zak was great, Roger and especially Pete were terrible.
He was kind of singing whenever he felt like it and playing major slop guitar.
Worst Who performance I've ever seen.
Theyre old men for gods sake give them a break. I thought they did alright. And better than the Stones.


Better than the Stones? I'd call it a draw. They both sucked.
McCartney's old too and still kicks ass live. Many bands are pushing or above 60 and are still doing great.
Being old may have something to do with Roger, and I'm actually cutting him a bit of slack.
Pete's voice is pretty much still intact. However, his age doesn't excuse sloppy, under rehearsed playing.
Pete's guitar parts are not that difficult and it was like he just showed up and phoned it in and acted really loopy even for Pete.
Regarding his voice, he would just kind of sing wherever he felt like it.
You can't do that and any musician making a living can tell you that. You sing where you're supposed to and stay off the mic unless you're going to be there for your parts.
Otherwise, they could've left the backup band to just do the harmony stuff.That has nothing to do with age. I hope Roger was all over Pete after the gig.
Last edited by brywool on Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
NO. He's NOT Steve F'ing Perry. But he's Arnel F'ing Pineda and I'm okay with that.
User avatar
brywool
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7688
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 5:54 am

Postby brywool » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:58 am

JasonD wrote:Oooo, I love the E*TRADE babies!!! :D Cute!!!


Funny add. I like the original kid though.
NO. He's NOT Steve F'ing Perry. But he's Arnel F'ing Pineda and I'm okay with that.
User avatar
brywool
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7688
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 5:54 am

Postby Ehwmatt » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:59 am

brywool wrote:
KDOUBLEU wrote:
brywool wrote:
KDOUBLEU wrote:The Who sounded pretty good tonight.


You're kidding, right?
They were terrible. Zak was great, Roger and especially Pete were terrible.
He was kind of singing whenever he felt like it and playing major slop guitar.
Worst Who performance I've ever seen.
Theyre old men for gods sake give them a break. I thought they did alright. And better than the Stones.


Better than the Stones? I'd call it a draw. They both sucked.
McCartney's old too and still kicks ass live. Many bands are pushing or above 60 and are still doing great.
Being old may have something to do with Roger, and I'm actually cutting him a bit of slack.
Pete's voice is pretty much still intact. However, his age doesn't excuse sloppy, under rehearsed playing.
Pete's guitar parts are not that difficult and it was like he just showed up and phoned it in and acted really loopy even for Pete.
Regarding his voice, he would just kind of sing wherever he felt like it.
You can't do that and any musician making a living can tell you that. You sing where you're supposed to and stay off the mic unless you're going to be there for your parts.
Otherwise, they could've left the backup band to just do the harmony stuff. I hope Roger was all over Pete after the gig.


I think Roger's problems are more due to his gruff style and screaming rather than infirmities of age. The guy looks to be in the shape of a fit 30-something year old! He just can't do it any more. My dad caught him a few months back and Roger literally couldn't even talk on the mic between the songs and had to quit an hour into the show because he couldn't sing any more.
User avatar
Ehwmatt
MP3
 
Posts: 10907
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:15 am
Location: Cleveland, OH

Postby brywool » Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:04 pm

Ehwmatt wrote:
brywool wrote:
KDOUBLEU wrote:
brywool wrote:
KDOUBLEU wrote:The Who sounded pretty good tonight.


You're kidding, right?
They were terrible. Zak was great, Roger and especially Pete were terrible.
He was kind of singing whenever he felt like it and playing major slop guitar.
Worst Who performance I've ever seen.
Theyre old men for gods sake give them a break. I thought they did alright. And better than the Stones.


Better than the Stones? I'd call it a draw. They both sucked.
McCartney's old too and still kicks ass live. Many bands are pushing or above 60 and are still doing great.
Being old may have something to do with Roger, and I'm actually cutting him a bit of slack.
Pete's voice is pretty much still intact. However, his age doesn't excuse sloppy, under rehearsed playing.
Pete's guitar parts are not that difficult and it was like he just showed up and phoned it in and acted really loopy even for Pete.
Regarding his voice, he would just kind of sing wherever he felt like it.
You can't do that and any musician making a living can tell you that. You sing where you're supposed to and stay off the mic unless you're going to be there for your parts.
Otherwise, they could've left the backup band to just do the harmony stuff. I hope Roger was all over Pete after the gig.


I think Roger's problems are more due to his gruff style and screaming rather than infirmities of age. The guy looks to be in the shape of a fit 30-something year old! He just can't do it any more. My dad caught him a few months back and Roger literally couldn't even talk on the mic between the songs and had to quit an hour into the show because he couldn't sing any more.


I think I remember you saying that a few months ago. Roger is way physically fit but NEEDS a voice coach. I was AMAZED that they did "See Me". They SHOULD have stuck with My Generation and some lower tunes for Roger. However, if the band had been good (meaning if Pete didn't walk over all the vocal parts and sing shit harmonies and play sloppy ass guitar), I think it would've been a lot better. It looked like Pete didn't rehearse. Also, when you've got a full backup band playing and singing all the harmonies and stuff, I would think that it'd make you pretty lazy and complacent, so you'd kind of just sing wherever you felt like it.
I wasn't thrilled.
NO. He's NOT Steve F'ing Perry. But he's Arnel F'ing Pineda and I'm okay with that.
User avatar
brywool
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7688
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 5:54 am

Postby Ehwmatt » Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:06 pm

brywool wrote:
Ehwmatt wrote:
brywool wrote:
KDOUBLEU wrote:
brywool wrote:
KDOUBLEU wrote:The Who sounded pretty good tonight.


You're kidding, right?
They were terrible. Zak was great, Roger and especially Pete were terrible.
He was kind of singing whenever he felt like it and playing major slop guitar.
Worst Who performance I've ever seen.
Theyre old men for gods sake give them a break. I thought they did alright. And better than the Stones.


Better than the Stones? I'd call it a draw. They both sucked.
McCartney's old too and still kicks ass live. Many bands are pushing or above 60 and are still doing great.
Being old may have something to do with Roger, and I'm actually cutting him a bit of slack.
Pete's voice is pretty much still intact. However, his age doesn't excuse sloppy, under rehearsed playing.
Pete's guitar parts are not that difficult and it was like he just showed up and phoned it in and acted really loopy even for Pete.
Regarding his voice, he would just kind of sing wherever he felt like it.
You can't do that and any musician making a living can tell you that. You sing where you're supposed to and stay off the mic unless you're going to be there for your parts.
Otherwise, they could've left the backup band to just do the harmony stuff. I hope Roger was all over Pete after the gig.


I think Roger's problems are more due to his gruff style and screaming rather than infirmities of age. The guy looks to be in the shape of a fit 30-something year old! He just can't do it any more. My dad caught him a few months back and Roger literally couldn't even talk on the mic between the songs and had to quit an hour into the show because he couldn't sing any more.


I think I remember you saying that a few months ago. Roger is way physically fit but NEEDS a voice coach. I was AMAZED that they did "See Me". They SHOULD have stuck with My Generation and some lower tunes for Roger. However, if the band had been good (meaning if Pete didn't walk over all the vocal parts and sing shit harmonies and play sloppy ass guitar), I think it would've been a lot better. It looked like Pete didn't rehearse. Also, when you've got a full backup band playing and singing all the harmonies and stuff, I would think that it'd make you pretty lazy and complacent, so you'd kind of just sing wherever you felt like it.
I wasn't thrilled.


Yeah, the full backup band was a huge crutch. I think they hate My Generation, don't they? or at least one of them does. I hate that song too. So overrated.
User avatar
Ehwmatt
MP3
 
Posts: 10907
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:15 am
Location: Cleveland, OH

Postby brywool » Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:11 pm

Ehwmatt wrote:
brywool wrote:
Ehwmatt wrote:
brywool wrote:
KDOUBLEU wrote:
brywool wrote:
KDOUBLEU wrote:The Who sounded pretty good tonight.


You're kidding, right?
They were terrible. Zak was great, Roger and especially Pete were terrible.
He was kind of singing whenever he felt like it and playing major slop guitar.
Worst Who performance I've ever seen.
Theyre old men for gods sake give them a break. I thought they did alright. And better than the Stones.


Better than the Stones? I'd call it a draw. They both sucked.
McCartney's old too and still kicks ass live. Many bands are pushing or above 60 and are still doing great.
Being old may have something to do with Roger, and I'm actually cutting him a bit of slack.
Pete's voice is pretty much still intact. However, his age doesn't excuse sloppy, under rehearsed playing.
Pete's guitar parts are not that difficult and it was like he just showed up and phoned it in and acted really loopy even for Pete.
Regarding his voice, he would just kind of sing wherever he felt like it.
You can't do that and any musician making a living can tell you that. You sing where you're supposed to and stay off the mic unless you're going to be there for your parts.
Otherwise, they could've left the backup band to just do the harmony stuff. I hope Roger was all over Pete after the gig.


I think Roger's problems are more due to his gruff style and screaming rather than infirmities of age. The guy looks to be in the shape of a fit 30-something year old! He just can't do it any more. My dad caught him a few months back and Roger literally couldn't even talk on the mic between the songs and had to quit an hour into the show because he couldn't sing any more.


I think I remember you saying that a few months ago. Roger is way physically fit but NEEDS a voice coach. I was AMAZED that they did "See Me". They SHOULD have stuck with My Generation and some lower tunes for Roger. However, if the band had been good (meaning if Pete didn't walk over all the vocal parts and sing shit harmonies and play sloppy ass guitar), I think it would've been a lot better. It looked like Pete didn't rehearse. Also, when you've got a full backup band playing and singing all the harmonies and stuff, I would think that it'd make you pretty lazy and complacent, so you'd kind of just sing wherever you felt like it.
I wasn't thrilled.


Yeah, the full backup band was a huge crutch. I think they hate My Generation, don't they? or at least one of them does. I hate that song too. So overrated.

Overrated, but much easier to pull off for them.
NO. He's NOT Steve F'ing Perry. But he's Arnel F'ing Pineda and I'm okay with that.
User avatar
brywool
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7688
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 5:54 am

Postby artist4perry » Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:34 pm

I loved the Cheap trick comercial "The GREEN police" song. Cute, environmental, and funny. Gold stars for the Cheap trick for doing that one. They would kick the Who's butt live. :wink:[url]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFkbSAH7yb4

It was Cheap trick......the song is on their web site. :D
Last edited by artist4perry on Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
artist4perry
MP3
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Running around in the vast universe that is my imagination. Send help!

Next

Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests