bluejeangirl76 wrote:Arianddu wrote:Ginger is quite capable of making her own mind up about people. There is a lot she and I agree to disagree on, and some of that is how we feel about other people. Please don't presume to think that she will attack someone because I dislike them; Ginger is a classy woman who is above that sort of petty behaviour; it's one of the reasons why I admire her; I suspect it's one of the reasons why so many people here respect her so much.
You are absolutely 100% correct about that. Ginger is kind and respectful and it about the last person whose name should ever come up in a topic like this. But I guess if a person comes in and agrees with something Phyllis doesn't like, it MUST mean they were somehow "put up" to it, right?It's always ok for Phyllis to express herself and defend her comments with "If you can do it I can do it..." - but then when you actually do it, it's an "attack". Whatever.
This is what made me laugh:
"Excuse me if I don't feel sorry for any of you since I have not started threads against anyone like Ari and Behshad have done several times."
Wow. So let me see if I've grasped the rules here - it's bad if you start a thread about someone... But it's totally ok to come in as the FIRST post and jump all over Linda's thread about supporting this site, and carrying on 20+ pages of arguing between two threads with just about everyone on this site. I guess as long as you don't start a thread, it's also ok to drag up peoples' personal business and talk about things that went on in PM - (it's called "private" message for a reason). I guess it's also ok to sit in on a throne in judgement of every single person here, but it's an absolute outrage when they give the same back to you.
Good god.
BJG - according to Phyllis you talk like a man (wtf?) so - can I have your vocal babies?


