RocknRoll wrote:Rockindeano wrote:RocknRoll wrote:bluejeangirl76 wrote:Michigan Girl wrote:I'm seeing double standards here that do not make sense to me ...TNB is being told to just
pay the fine if he cannot afford insurance and for $30.00 per month he will
have coverage at a really great cheap rate ...BJG claimed the insurance offered
by her company has always been too expensive for her ...shouldn't she be
able to pay the fine and get really great coverage at the same great monthly rate?!?! :?
That's the part I'm not understanding. I read that the fine for not being covered was 2.5% and that health care will eventually be reported on your W2 - so if I didn't have it, the government would know based on it not appearing on the W2, they would hit my tax return for the 2.5% no?? (which will be way more than $300 a year)... so if I'm being fined on my taxes for not being covered, where does that fine go =- I'm assuming it goes to the IRS, so how does paying that fine translate into coverage?
I know I shouldn't be stepping into this discussion this late, but....
If you're young and relatively healthy why wouldn't you just take the fine to IRS (UGH) and than if you get sick get the health insurance since they have to accept you? Let the folks who are paying premiums and the people paying taxes pay for it. Of course, those who support the bill say premiums will be lower under this bill and taxes won't be going up again. I'm still trying to figure out how that will happen. It's just a bad bill and since another 18 states are filing lawsuits against it, it's just the precursor to National Health Insurance. IMO of course.
That's laughable. These states filing lawsuits cannot win. In this case, federal law supersedes any and all state law.
I believe it's in the constitution that this is a state issue. It's going to end up in the Supreme Court. I'd have to do some digging, but I'm betting someone else can fill in the blanks.
Yeah ok. So you are telling me, that all the president's men, no pun intended, spent all this time on a bill, year plus, and they didn't think for a minute if it was constitutional? Come on dude, the president himself is a Constitutional lawyer.
The only issue that maybe has legs as a state issue was the Feds forcing citizens to have to purchase insurance. I believe that has been resolved.