Saint John wrote:StocktontoMalone wrote:When a golfer comes from behind, SJ, it says more about the golfer that choked the lead away than the one who came from behind.....all that shows is the one who was behind had a shitty first couple of rounds and the one intially in the lead had a shitty last round.....basically just outlines the order of the shitty rounds.
Again, you brought nothing to the table.....ASSHAT!
You continue to be a fucking moron who is illogical concerning sports half the time (even though I don't consider golf a sport) and complains the other 50%. The bottom line is that the guy has been a shot or two off the lead and never made a comeback. If he could mount a comeback as often as he does skanky women I might have some respect for him in his profession. It's only when he's been up a shot or two that he's been able to run away from the field and win by 5+ shots. Never when he's down just 1 or 2 entering the final round. It shows that when the chips are down and he's just a tad behind he folds like a tent. A true front runner.
I don't know much about Tiger's history in tournaments and his manner of winning. But, I wanna agree with the basic proposition that the greatest champions find a way to win... however it takes. That's why I'm still waiting to see LeBron find a way to win when the chips are down. He hasn't proved he can do that yet.
