Moderator: Andrew
bluejeangirl76 wrote:Gray area. Unless something's changed from what I read a couple weeks ago, they aren't looking to put it *at* ground zero, just near it. So maybe the question is "how close is too close?" The answer is probably "anywhere in downtown Manhattan.![]()
I read something like 2 blocks away was the plan. Too close, if you ask me. Just because they legally "can" doesn't make it a good idea. It's bound to cause a lot of trouble.... protests, even violence... it will be an endless source of discontent.
Since 78 wrote:No way, legal or not, shows a total lack of respect if its anywhere near ground zero
bluejeangirl76 wrote:Gray area. Unless something's changed from what I read a couple weeks ago, they aren't looking to put it *at* ground zero, just near it. So maybe the question is "how close is too close?" The answer is probably "anywhere in downtown Manhattan.![]()
I read something like 2 blocks away was the plan. Too close, if you ask me. Just because they legally "can" doesn't make it a good idea. It's bound to cause a lot of trouble.... protests, even violence... it will be an endless source of discontent.
Monker wrote:bluejeangirl76 wrote:Gray area. Unless something's changed from what I read a couple weeks ago, they aren't looking to put it *at* ground zero, just near it. So maybe the question is "how close is too close?" The answer is probably "anywhere in downtown Manhattan.![]()
I read something like 2 blocks away was the plan. Too close, if you ask me. Just because they legally "can" doesn't make it a good idea. It's bound to cause a lot of trouble.... protests, even violence... it will be an endless source of discontent.
So, should the mosque's that already exist in the area be destroyed?
bluejeangirl76 wrote:Since 78 wrote:No way, legal or not, shows a total lack of respect if its anywhere near ground zero
Totally... that's what I was getting at... and I was just listening to a discussion on the radio about it... I didn't quite catch it all, but it seems they got a huge group of construction workers to sign something saying they will refuse to work on it if there build it there, but if they move it uptown, they will all agree to build it. So it really is a "how close it too close" issue, and if that's true about the construction workers, then I was right - anywhere downtown is "too close" if they're okay with it being moved uptown.
hoagiepete wrote:I have more questions than answers.
It should not be prohibited.
Where is the Muslim's common sense? Are they doing it to antagonize?
It is 2 blocks away. If not there...how many blocks is far enough?
When are the Muslims finally going to do something about their radicals? They need to do something from within.
If one Christian knew another was plotting to kill a bunch of people, would they do nothing, just because they are Christians too?
Rick wrote:hoagiepete wrote:I have more questions than answers.
It should not be prohibited.
Where is the Muslim's common sense? Are they doing it to antagonize?
It is 2 blocks away. If not there...how many blocks is far enough?
When are the Muslims finally going to do something about their radicals? They need to do something from within.
If one Christian knew another was plotting to kill a bunch of people, would they do nothing, just because they are Christians too?
If you haven't seen the Muslim Demographic video, you should watch it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-3X5hIFXYU
hoagiepete wrote:Rick wrote:hoagiepete wrote:I have more questions than answers.
It should not be prohibited.
Where is the Muslim's common sense? Are they doing it to antagonize?
It is 2 blocks away. If not there...how many blocks is far enough?
When are the Muslims finally going to do something about their radicals? They need to do something from within.
If one Christian knew another was plotting to kill a bunch of people, would they do nothing, just because they are Christians too?
If you haven't seen the Muslim Demographic video, you should watch it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-3X5hIFXYU
I guess we'd all better get humpin!
SF-Dano wrote:hoagiepete wrote:Rick wrote:hoagiepete wrote:I have more questions than answers.
It should not be prohibited.
Where is the Muslim's common sense? Are they doing it to antagonize?
It is 2 blocks away. If not there...how many blocks is far enough?
When are the Muslims finally going to do something about their radicals? They need to do something from within.
If one Christian knew another was plotting to kill a bunch of people, would they do nothing, just because they are Christians too?
If you haven't seen the Muslim Demographic video, you should watch it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-3X5hIFXYU
I guess we'd all better get humpin!
It is nothing new to breed a people out of their lands. It has happened with some smaller countries already. Kossovo being the most recent that comes to mind. So the smaller countries are being taken over now and the bigger ones (as in the video) are on the near horizon. It is truely a scary situation, one that I hope is not yet a lost cause to try and turn the tide.
BobbyinTN wrote:The church you protest against today might be your church that's protested against tomorrow. Setting a precedent like this, to say who can worship and who can't or where they can worship, is a very slippery slope, especially for Christians who want to continue to worship as they please.
conversationpc wrote:BobbyinTN wrote:The church you protest against today might be your church that's protested against tomorrow. Setting a precedent like this, to say who can worship and who can't or where they can worship, is a very slippery slope, especially for Christians who want to continue to worship as they please.
It isn't a question of who can or can't worship. They have the legal right but they should exercise their moral right to decide not to do something this intolerant.
BobbyinTN wrote:conversationpc wrote:It isn't a question of who can or can't worship. They have the legal right but they should exercise their moral right to decide not to do something this intolerant.
But why is it intolerant? There are good Christians and bad Christians. Good Muslims and bad Muslims.
I honestly don't get it. I live in Tennessee where there's a church on every fuckin' corner and while I don't agree with 99% of Christianity, I don't protest those churches being there. Of course I would if they startes some shit like the Mormons with Prop. 8. Mormons suck. LOL
BobbyinTN wrote:conversationpc wrote:BobbyinTN wrote:The church you protest against today might be your church that's protested against tomorrow. Setting a precedent like this, to say who can worship and who can't or where they can worship, is a very slippery slope, especially for Christians who want to continue to worship as they please.
It isn't a question of who can or can't worship. They have the legal right but they should exercise their moral right to decide not to do something this intolerant.
But why is it intolerant? There are good Christians and bad Christians. Good Muslims and bad Muslims.
I honestly don't get it. I live in Tennessee where there's a church on every fuckin' corner and while I don't agree with 99% of Christianity, I don't protest those churches being there. Of course I would if they startes some shit like the Mormons with Prop. 8. Mormons suck. LOL
conversationpc wrote:BobbyinTN wrote:conversationpc wrote:It isn't a question of who can or can't worship. They have the legal right but they should exercise their moral right to decide not to do something this intolerant.
But why is it intolerant? There are good Christians and bad Christians. Good Muslims and bad Muslims.
I honestly don't get it. I live in Tennessee where there's a church on every fuckin' corner and while I don't agree with 99% of Christianity, I don't protest those churches being there. Of course I would if they startes some shit like the Mormons with Prop. 8. Mormons suck. LOL
Having the legal right to do something doesn't mean it should be done. Like it or not and whether or not the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks were all Muslim, the perception of the new Mosque being built there is that it's a slap in the face. I would feel the same way if it was a major Christian group wanting to build a church there if the 9/11 attacks had been done by Christian radicals.
Unfortunately, the Imam who's heading this project up has a history of supporting terrorism and terrorist groups, not to mention his blaming of the U.S. for the attacks in the first place. He represents the elements that were responsible for something like that to have happened in the first place.
S2M wrote:BobbyinTN wrote:conversationpc wrote:BobbyinTN wrote:The church you protest against today might be your church that's protested against tomorrow. Setting a precedent like this, to say who can worship and who can't or where they can worship, is a very slippery slope, especially for Christians who want to continue to worship as they please.
It isn't a question of who can or can't worship. They have the legal right but they should exercise their moral right to decide not to do something this intolerant.
But why is it intolerant? There are good Christians and bad Christians. Good Muslims and bad Muslims.
I honestly don't get it. I live in Tennessee where there's a church on every fuckin' corner and while I don't agree with 99% of Christianity, I don't protest those churches being there. Of course I would if they startes some shit like the Mormons with Prop. 8. Mormons suck. LOL
Wrong. Fags suck.![]()
BobbyinTN wrote:Look man, I think all religion should be wiped off the planet and it would be a better place to live.
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests