So Long Yankees

General Intelligent Discussion & One Thread About That Buttknuckle

Moderator: Andrew

So Long Yankees

Postby Enigma869 » Thu Dec 09, 2010 8:58 pm

First the Red Sox trade for Adrian Gonzalez (who is essentially the same player as Mark Teixeira) and now they just signed Carl Crawford (who I think they gave WAY too much money to). Meanwhile, the Evil Empire just re-signed a washed up, old and tired Derek Jeter. It's a happy day in Red Sox Nation :shock:

http://sports.espn.go.com/boston/mlb/ne ... id=5901372[/url]
John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Postby ScarabGator » Thu Dec 09, 2010 10:21 pm

Definetly good news for the Sox but Im extremely excited about the Braves next season...Dan Uggla is a stud.
User avatar
ScarabGator
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4773
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 4:55 am
Location: in the swamp.....

Postby YoungJRNY » Thu Dec 09, 2010 10:42 pm

And the bidding war to own baseball continues. *Sigh. :)
User avatar
YoungJRNY
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7000
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:54 am
Location: Krypton

Postby Ehwmatt » Thu Dec 09, 2010 11:17 pm

How the fuck could you possibly care either way? MLB is a horrendous league. Absolutely terrible.
User avatar
Ehwmatt
MP3
 
Posts: 10907
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:15 am
Location: Cleveland, OH

Postby Enigma869 » Fri Dec 10, 2010 12:29 am

ScarabGator wrote:Im extremely excited about the Braves next season...Dan Uggla is a stud.


He's no Adrian Gonzalez
John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Postby Ehwmatt » Fri Dec 10, 2010 12:30 am

Enigma869 wrote:
ScarabGator wrote:Im extremely excited about the Braves next season...Dan Uggla is a stud.


He's no Adrian Gonzalez


I keep thinking of Elian Gonzalez, that little Commy who came over here to Florida and got sent back to Cuba. What a ridiculous news story that whole thing was
User avatar
Ehwmatt
MP3
 
Posts: 10907
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:15 am
Location: Cleveland, OH

Re: So Long Yankees

Postby Rockindeano » Fri Dec 10, 2010 2:11 am

Enigma869 wrote:First the Red Sox trade for Adrian Gonzalez (who is essentially the same player as Mark Teixeira) and now they just signed Carl Crawford (who I think they gave WAY too much money to). Meanwhile, the Evil Empire just re-signed a washed up, old and tired Derek Jeter. It's a happy day in Red Sox Nation :shock:

http://sports.espn.go.com/boston/mlb/ne ... id=5901372[/url]


Easy big fella. I remember all the overblown hype about the Miami Heat, and look at those clowns. By the way, the Sox did obviously do well, BUT, if Cashman inks Cliff Lee, then it's all erased. I'll take one excellent pitcher over two excellent hitters.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby S2M » Fri Dec 10, 2010 2:24 am

I remember a game when Carl stole SIX fucking bases off the SAWX....stiil, my excitement is guarded. We still need a catcher who can throw to 2nd, and a couple of DECENT middle relievers.....plus, Wake needs to be the bullie....and I'm STILL not sold that Dice-K is any freakin' good AT ALL. BUT, the additions of Ellsbury, Pedroia, and Youkilis are HUGE....add Gonzo, and Carl....a VERY formidable line-up....
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby lights1961 » Fri Dec 10, 2010 2:38 am

I still cant believe owners are making 5-7 year deals worth anything over 120 million dollars... no one is that good for that long... a few excpetions... the Jeter 3 year deal makes the most sense....and I will say that Cliff Lee will not be worth the $$$ spent on him...
Rick
lights1961
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5362
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 7:33 am

Postby Enigma869 » Fri Dec 10, 2010 2:47 am

lights1961 wrote: the Jeter 3 year deal makes the most sense


Really? Paying Jeter (who will be 37 during the season next year) $17 million dollars per season coming off of the worse season he has ever had "makes sense"? I think it was a fucking absurd contract. 37 year old players don't get better (unless it's Barry Bonds pumping every substance under the sun into his ass cheek)! I think the Red Sox are fucking insane for paying Carl Crawford $20 million dollars per season, because in my opinion, he's not that kind of a player. That said, I'll take Crawford for $20m per over Jeter at $17m per 100 out of 100 times!
John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Postby lights1961 » Fri Dec 10, 2010 2:51 am

Enigma869 wrote:
lights1961 wrote: the Jeter 3 year deal makes the most sense


Really? Paying Jeter (who will be 37 during the season next year) $17 million dollars per season coming off of the worse season he has ever had "makes sense"? I think it was a fucking absurd contract. 37 year old players don't get better (unless it's Barry Bonds pumping every substance under the sun into his ass cheek)! I think the Red Sox are fucking insane for paying Carl Crawford $20 million dollars per season, because in my opinion, he's not that kind of a player. That said, I'll take Crawford for $20m per over Jeter at $17m per 100 out of 100 times!


you never know, he might go out with a bang and have a stellar final couple of years...world series is all that matters right... so if he gets a ring the next year or so...the contract is worth it...

my main statement being that 90% of those contracts with players, if the owners were intellegent would be to have the players at 2-3 year deals... keep them HUNGRY for success... instead of lazy and uninterested after the 3 year of a 7-10 year deal...and your investment goes sour...
Rick
lights1961
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5362
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 7:33 am

Postby S2M » Fri Dec 10, 2010 2:53 am

lights1961 wrote:
Enigma869 wrote:
lights1961 wrote: the Jeter 3 year deal makes the most sense


Really? Paying Jeter (who will be 37 during the season next year) $17 million dollars per season coming off of the worse season he has ever had "makes sense"? I think it was a fucking absurd contract. 37 year old players don't get better (unless it's Barry Bonds pumping every substance under the sun into his ass cheek)! I think the Red Sox are fucking insane for paying Carl Crawford $20 million dollars per season, because in my opinion, he's not that kind of a player. That said, I'll take Crawford for $20m per over Jeter at $17m per 100 out of 100 times!


you never know, he might go out with a bang and have a stellar final couple of years...world series is all that matters right... so if he gets a ring the next year or so...the contract is worth it...

my main statement being that 90% of those contracts with players, if the owners were intellegent would be to have the players at 2-3 year deals... keep them HUNGRY for success... instead of lazy and uninterested after the 3 year of a 7-10 year deal...and your investment goes sour...


Contracts should be performance-based....not potential-based. I'm thinking because baseball money is quaranteed - players should get no more than a 2-year contract.....and then maybe, just maybe that family with 4 kids can go see a game....and alot closer than the Pesky Pole..... :roll: :?
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Re: So Long Yankees

Postby conversationpc » Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:20 am

Rockindeano wrote:
Enigma869 wrote:First the Red Sox trade for Adrian Gonzalez (who is essentially the same player as Mark Teixeira) and now they just signed Carl Crawford (who I think they gave WAY too much money to). Meanwhile, the Evil Empire just re-signed a washed up, old and tired Derek Jeter. It's a happy day in Red Sox Nation :shock:

http://sports.espn.go.com/boston/mlb/ne ... id=5901372[/url]


Easy big fella. I remember all the overblown hype about the Miami Heat, and look at those clowns. By the way, the Sox did obviously do well, BUT, if Cashman inks Cliff Lee, then it's all erased. I'll take one excellent pitcher over two excellent hitters.


Cliff Lee wasn't really all that much above average after the Rangers got him last year. His W-L was 4-6 and his era was barely under 4.00 at 3.98. I don't think he'll be anywhere near his Cy Young form for the Yankees in that stadium, if they happen to sign him.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby conversationpc » Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:21 am

I love these two pickups for the Sox. I seriously hope they don't trade Ellsbury. That lineup would be killer with both him and Crawford at the top.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby Seven Wishes2 » Fri Dec 10, 2010 1:51 pm

Dave, I think the plan is to have Ellsbury bat 9th and have Pedroia lead off.

Still, not a hole in the lineup, although Scutaro is average and Saltamacchia has not proven anything yet. He's much better defensively than Martinez, however.
User avatar
Seven Wishes2
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1621
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:49 am
Location: Charlotte, NC

Postby conversationpc » Fri Dec 10, 2010 8:37 pm

Seven Wishes wrote:Dave, I think the plan is to have Ellsbury bat 9th and have Pedroia lead off.

Still, not a hole in the lineup, although Scutaro is average and Saltamacchia has not proven anything yet. He's much better defensively than Martinez, however.


It would certainly make sense to have Pedroia lead off since he's probably going to get on base more than Ellsbury. Saltalamacchia needs to stay healthy for that lineup, though, and he hasn't really proven he can do that yet.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby Enigma869 » Fri Dec 10, 2010 9:54 pm

conversationpc wrote:
It would certainly make sense to have Pedroia lead off


Pedroia isn't a lead off hitter and doesn't like hitting in that position. I'm fairly certain given the fact that they just signed Carl Crawford to a ridiculous contract, he'll be the guy leading off.
John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Postby marco17 » Sat Dec 11, 2010 2:11 am

Enigma869 wrote:
lights1961 wrote: the Jeter 3 year deal makes the most sense


Really? Paying Jeter (who will be 37 during the season next year) $17 million dollars per season coming off of the worse season he has ever had "makes sense"? I think it was a fucking absurd contract. 37 year old players don't get better (unless it's Barry Bonds pumping every substance under the sun into his ass cheek)! I think the Red Sox are fucking insane for paying Carl Crawford $20 million dollars per season, because in my opinion, he's not that kind of a player. That said, I'll take Crawford for $20m per over Jeter at $17m per 100 out of 100 times!


The Yankees were idiots here. They caved to Jeter [who I liked, tho not a Yankess fan] because he whined he was the modern day equivalent to Ruth, because they thought it would turn into a PR mess.

Boston made some nice, but pricey moves. Now if those freaking asshole McCourts can get their crap together and do something good with my Dodgers I'll be happy. Maybe they can sell them, I can only hope!
marco17
8 Track
 
Posts: 708
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2002 3:20 am

Postby conversationpc » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:33 am

Enigma869 wrote:
conversationpc wrote:
It would certainly make sense to have Pedroia lead off


Pedroia isn't a lead off hitter and doesn't like hitting in that position. I'm fairly certain given the fact that they just signed Carl Crawford to a ridiculous contract, he'll be the guy leading off.


I think he would make a better leadoff hitter than either Crawford or Ellsbury simply for the fact that he gets on base quite a bit more than either of those guys. Both Crawford and Ellsbury have a career OBP around .340 and Pedroia's is closer to .370.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby Enigma869 » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:56 am

conversationpc wrote:I think he would make a better leadoff hitter than either Crawford or Ellsbury simply for the fact that he gets on base quite a bit more than either of those guys. Both Crawford and Ellsbury have a career OBP around .340 and Pedroia's is closer to .370.


While I don't disagree with your point about OBP, there is a lot more to it than just that. Sure, getting on base matters and you can't steal first. That said, Crawford and Ellsbury have FAR more speed than Pedroia will ever have and Crawford gets on base plenty to make him a prototypical lead off guy. Pedroia has hit lead off before and has been rather vocal about his disdain for it.
John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Postby Seven Wishes2 » Sat Dec 11, 2010 7:08 am

He's more like Jeter in his prime - the ideal #2 hitter.

Supposedly, the Sox are close to signing Russell Martin - an average hitter with some pop, but a multiple Gold Glove Award winner. This acquisition would REALLY solidify the lineup and make the Sox the team to beat in MLB.
User avatar
Seven Wishes2
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1621
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:49 am
Location: Charlotte, NC

Postby conversationpc » Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:17 am

Seven Wishes wrote:He's more like Jeter in his prime - the ideal #2 hitter.

Supposedly, the Sox are close to signing Russell Martin - an average hitter with some pop, but a multiple Gold Glove Award winner. This acquisition would REALLY solidify the lineup and make the Sox the team to beat in MLB.


I've never much cared for Martin but I'm not a big fan of Saltalamacchia, either.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby Ftloperry » Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:52 pm

Jeter is the best shortstop in the league today. He got a sweet deal and they obviously think he is worth the money.
User avatar
Ftloperry
8 Track
 
Posts: 980
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 1:43 pm
Location: Space the final frontier

Postby Rockindeano » Sat Dec 11, 2010 1:00 pm

Ftloperry wrote:Jeter is the best shortstop in the league today. He got a sweet deal and they obviously think he is worth the money.


Um, no he is not. he isn't even close to the best shortstop in baseball. Is he a great leader? Absolutely, but he isn't a top 5 or even a top 10 SS in MLB today.
The guy is a Hall of Famer, and I love him, but dude just 250 and change, made ashit ton of errors and IMHO, should switch positions with his third baseman, who is a much better SS.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby conversationpc » Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:40 pm

Rockindeano wrote:
Ftloperry wrote:Jeter is the best shortstop in the league today. He got a sweet deal and they obviously think he is worth the money.


Um, no he is not. he isn't even close to the best shortstop in baseball. Is he a great leader? Absolutely, but he isn't a top 5 or even a top 10 SS in MLB today.
The guy is a Hall of Famer, and I love him, but dude just 250 and change, made ashit ton of errors and IMHO, should switch positions with his third baseman, who is a much better SS.


A ton of errors? He only had 6 errors all year long and only 8 the year before that.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby annie89509 » Sat Dec 11, 2010 10:01 pm

AGonzales hit over .300 at home but only around .250 on the road. But he's a power hitter and, for sure, highly sought after free agent that only a money-rich team like the RedSox could afford to sign him. What will they do with David Ortiz, though? Make him the DH?
User avatar
annie89509
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2849
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 5:55 am
Location: the big 5-8

Postby Enigma869 » Sun Dec 12, 2010 4:35 am

Ftloperry wrote:Jeter is the best shortstop in the league today. He got a sweet deal and they obviously think he is worth the money.


What a fucking MORONIC statement! Jeter isn't close to "the best shortstop in the league" and even when he was in his prime (which isn't now), he was always a VERY average shortstop. The fact that he was awarded a gold glove last season is a complete fucking embarrassment to anyone who has ever called themselves a baseball fan!
John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Postby Enigma869 » Sun Dec 12, 2010 4:37 am

annie89509 wrote: What will they do with David Ortiz, though? Make him the DH?


You do realize that DH is the only position that Ortiz has ever played with the Red Sox, right? Sure, in National League parks they would stick him at first to keep his bat in the lineup, but he has been a DH for 98% of his entire career, so nothing changes there.
John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Postby Saint John » Sun Dec 12, 2010 4:44 am

Enigma869 wrote:
Ftloperry wrote:Jeter is the best shortstop in the league today. He got a sweet deal and they obviously think he is worth the money.


What a fucking MORONIC statement! Jeter isn't close to "the best shortstop in the league" and even when he was in his prime (which isn't now), he was always a VERY average shortstop. The fact that he was awarded a gold glove last season is a complete fucking embarrassment to anyone who has ever called themselves a baseball fan!


Jeter had an excellent season defensively last year. To only commit 6 errors in 151 games is a great accomplishment. That said, the league's best defensive shortstop is Elvis Andruws. The guy has more range, a better arm and is just as fluid as they come. Jeter has lost a significant amount of range, some arm strength and just can't go get those balls in the outfield and in foul territory like he used to. But he's still extremely solid.

As for Ftloperry's statement , Hanley Ramirez and Troy Tulowitzki are both better than Jeter. And that's just off the top of my head.
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby Enigma869 » Sun Dec 12, 2010 4:55 am

Saint John wrote: Jeter has lost a significant amount of range,


He never had any range to lose!
John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Next

Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests