Moderator: Andrew
G.I.Jim wrote:Anyone here know a couple who go to a forum with you , then start arguing load enough that people around you start to look??
Angel wrote:Behshad wrote:Angel wrote:Behshad wrote:Come on now. If we were to use the PM for all the personal messages, f-bombs, etc, this place would be nothing but BackTalk !
Good point...but really, how many threads do we need dedicated to an argument between two people????
3?
Apparently.
Angel wrote:Angel wrote:Behshad wrote:Angel wrote:Behshad wrote:Come on now. If we were to use the PM for all the personal messages, f-bombs, etc, this place would be nothing but BackTalk !
Good point...but really, how many threads do we need dedicated to an argument between two people????
3?
Apparently.
Jeremey wrote:LOL, I would definitely confront them! Or just wait 5 years then bring it up on an Internet forum like some kind of fucking loser....Oh wait, that couple was me and my wife five years ago! And that loser is you!
Hahaha, man Jim, you got a LOT of great, irrelevant stories! What else you got, champ?
G.I.Jim wrote:Jeremey wrote:LOL, I would definitely confront them! Or just wait 5 years then bring it up on an Internet forum like some kind of fucking loser....Oh wait, that couple was me and my wife five years ago! And that loser is you!
Hahaha, man Jim, you got a LOT of great, irrelevant stories! What else you got, champ?
I have mentioned no names, just like your other innocent thread mentioned no names. You chose to bring yourself into this. You started that thread and threatened to expose personal/legal problems that someone else has been going through, even though he had nothing to do with you or our argument today. The only thing that I've discussed with that other person was having him verify how much percentage you took off the top of the band's earnings. He had nothing to do with it otherwise, yet you threaten him through nasty text messages today, and threaten to expose his personal issues? And it wasn't "passive aggressive" just like you've said in your thread. It was just saying what needed to be said for that person. You are the only person who's brought personal stuff into this.
G.I.Jim wrote:Jeremey wrote:LOL, I would definitely confront them! Or just wait 5 years then bring it up on an Internet forum like some kind of fucking loser....Oh wait, that couple was me and my wife five years ago! And that loser is you!
Hahaha, man Jim, you got a LOT of great, irrelevant stories! What else you got, champ?
I have mentioned no names, just like your other innocent thread mentioned no names. You chose to bring yourself into this. You started that thread and threatened to expose personal/legal problems that someone else has been going through, even though he had nothing to do with you or our argument today. The only thing that I've discussed with that other person was having him verify how much percentage you took off the top of the band's earnings. He had nothing to do with it otherwise, yet you threaten him through nasty text messages today, and threaten to expose his personal issues? And it wasn't "passive aggressive" just like you've said in your thread. It was just saying what needed to be said for that person. You are the only person who's brought personal stuff into this.
RossValoryRocks wrote:In all seriousness...you guys need to go to PM's with this shit.
I don't know about anyone else, but I don't want to see this shit...I was here for when it went down THE first time.
This is personal business between you both and doesn't have a place here, really.
No one here is going to pick a winner between the both of you based on internet posts.
Take it to court or PM's, or text but do it away from here.
RossValoryRocks wrote:In all seriousness...you guys need to go to PM's with this shit.
I don't know about anyone else, but I don't want to see this shit...I was here for when it went down THE first time.
This is personal business between you both and doesn't have a place here, really.
No one here is going to pick a winner between the both of you based on internet posts.
Take it to court or PM's, or text but do it away from here.
Jeremey wrote:Jim's only victory in all this is making me look just as shitty as him. I'm not the one that brings this shit up on a weekly basis, but apparently I'm always the one who takes shit for defending myself..
RossValoryRocks wrote:If I was looking to book Frontiers to my establishment, I would do a web search on the band and as many of the members as I knew the names of...I bet many places do it, do you want them to see this shit?
Be the bigger man Jeremey...and stop.
Saint John wrote:RossValoryRocks wrote:If I was looking to book Frontiers to my establishment, I would do a web search on the band and as many of the members as I knew the names of...I bet many places do it, do you want them to see this shit?
Be the bigger man Jeremey...and stop.
This isn't gonna hamper Frontiers in any way. This is great stuff, Stu!
mikemarrs wrote:
LMAO,jim leave the vicodin to me and deano
RossValoryRocks wrote:If I was looking to book Frontiers for a gig in my establishment, I would do a web search on the band and as many of the members as I knew the names of...I bet many places do it, do you want them to see this shit?
Be the bigger man Jeremey...and stop.
Jeremey wrote:G.I.Jim wrote:Jeremey wrote:LOL, I would definitely confront them! Or just wait 5 years then bring it up on an Internet forum like some kind of fucking loser....Oh wait, that couple was me and my wife five years ago! And that loser is you!
Hahaha, man Jim, you got a LOT of great, irrelevant stories! What else you got, champ?
I have mentioned no names, just like your other innocent thread mentioned no names. You chose to bring yourself into this. You started that thread and threatened to expose personal/legal problems that someone else has been going through, even though he had nothing to do with you or our argument today. The only thing that I've discussed with that other person was having him verify how much percentage you took off the top of the band's earnings. He had nothing to do with it otherwise, yet you threaten him through nasty text messages today, and threaten to expose his personal issues? And it wasn't "passive aggressive" just like you've said in your thread. It was just saying what needed to be said for that person. You are the only person who's brought personal stuff into this.
You didn't answer my question, Jim, DO YOU WANT TO BRING MY CHILDREN INTO THIS?
Simple question?
G.I.Jim wrote:
Nope, and the only person who has brought you into this is you. I wouldn't bring families or personal stuff into this. You're the one who seems intent on doing it yourself.
G.I.Jim wrote:Jeremey wrote:G.I.Jim wrote:Jeremey wrote:LOL, I would definitely confront them! Or just wait 5 years then bring it up on an Internet forum like some kind of fucking loser....Oh wait, that couple was me and my wife five years ago! And that loser is you!
Hahaha, man Jim, you got a LOT of great, irrelevant stories! What else you got, champ?
I have mentioned no names, just like your other innocent thread mentioned no names. You chose to bring yourself into this. You started that thread and threatened to expose personal/legal problems that someone else has been going through, even though he had nothing to do with you or our argument today. The only thing that I've discussed with that other person was having him verify how much percentage you took off the top of the band's earnings. He had nothing to do with it otherwise, yet you threaten him through nasty text messages today, and threaten to expose his personal issues? And it wasn't "passive aggressive" just like you've said in your thread. It was just saying what needed to be said for that person. You are the only person who's brought personal stuff into this.
You didn't answer my question, Jim, DO YOU WANT TO BRING MY CHILDREN INTO THIS?
Simple question?
Nope, and the only person who has brought you into this is you. I wouldn't bring families or personal stuff into this. You're the one who seems intent on doing it yourself.
RossValoryRocks wrote:G.I.Jim wrote:Jeremey wrote:G.I.Jim wrote:Jeremey wrote:LOL, I would definitely confront them! Or just wait 5 years then bring it up on an Internet forum like some kind of fucking loser....Oh wait, that couple was me and my wife five years ago! And that loser is you!
Hahaha, man Jim, you got a LOT of great, irrelevant stories! What else you got, champ?
I have mentioned no names, just like your other innocent thread mentioned no names. You chose to bring yourself into this. You started that thread and threatened to expose personal/legal problems that someone else has been going through, even though he had nothing to do with you or our argument today. The only thing that I've discussed with that other person was having him verify how much percentage you took off the top of the band's earnings. He had nothing to do with it otherwise, yet you threaten him through nasty text messages today, and threaten to expose his personal issues? And it wasn't "passive aggressive" just like you've said in your thread. It was just saying what needed to be said for that person. You are the only person who's brought personal stuff into this.
You didn't answer my question, Jim, DO YOU WANT TO BRING MY CHILDREN INTO THIS?
Simple question?
Nope, and the only person who has brought you into this is you. I wouldn't bring families or personal stuff into this. You're the one who seems intent on doing it yourself.
Symantics Jim. You said/He said...and you can't prove anything...you are putting innuendo out and REALLY coming close to straying into that slander/libel area.
Seriously. Go look it up, what the legal test for it is...you maybe aren't over the line, but you are really walking the edge.
You should stop too...because this isn't the place for it. You know it too.
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests