Canada bans the song "Money for Nothing" from radi

General Intelligent Discussion & One Thread About That Buttknuckle

Moderator: Andrew

Postby conversationpc » Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:20 am

Behshad wrote:I'm asking you , Dave ! Read what Lynn said above ;)


The question was stupid. If I don't think it should be legal, what sense does it make to say it would be OK to black out parts of it. It's illegal to sexually abuse a child last I checked. :roll:
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby Behshad » Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:24 am

conversationpc wrote:
Behshad wrote:I'm asking you , Dave ! Read what Lynn said above ;)


The question was stupid. If I don't think it should be legal, what sense does it make to say it would be OK to black out parts of it. It's illegal to sexually abuse a child last I checked. :roll:



Your comparison was stupid. Child porn is illegal, not censored !
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby conversationpc » Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:27 am

Behshad wrote:
conversationpc wrote:
Behshad wrote:I'm asking you , Dave ! Read what Lynn said above ;)


The question was stupid. If I don't think it should be legal, what sense does it make to say it would be OK to black out parts of it. It's illegal to sexually abuse a child last I checked. :roll:



Your comparison was stupid. Child porn is illegal, not censored !


It's two sides of the same coin. Censored or illegal? Same difference. Both require the force of government to achieve the same ends.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby StevePerryHair » Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:31 am

conversationpc wrote:
Behshad wrote:
conversationpc wrote:
Behshad wrote:I'm asking you , Dave ! Read what Lynn said above ;)


The question was stupid. If I don't think it should be legal, what sense does it make to say it would be OK to black out parts of it. It's illegal to sexually abuse a child last I checked. :roll:



Your comparison was stupid. Child porn is illegal, not censored !


It's two sides of the same coin. Censored or illegal? Same difference. Both require the force of government to achieve the same ends.


No it's not. Saying that Child porn is "censored" by making it illegal is a pretty far stretch. It is an illegal sexual act on a minor to exploit them that way. That is not censorship. A person has to be of legal age to consent to that kind of thing. Then it's NOT censored. It's a poor comparison.
User avatar
StevePerryHair
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8504
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:07 pm
Location: Mickey's World

Postby conversationpc » Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:42 am

StevePerryHair wrote:No it's not. Saying that Child porn is "censored" by making it illegal is a pretty far stretch. It is an illegal sexual act on a minor to exploit them that way. That is not censorship. A person has to be of legal age to consent to that kind of thing. Then it's NOT censored. It's a poor comparison.


Yes, it is. Child porn is illegal, censored, whatever you want to call it, in most countries. Regardless of what you think, "censored" or "illegal" in this case is basically the same thing.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby StevePerryHair » Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:45 am

conversationpc wrote:
StevePerryHair wrote:No it's not. Saying that Child porn is "censored" by making it illegal is a pretty far stretch. It is an illegal sexual act on a minor to exploit them that way. That is not censorship. A person has to be of legal age to consent to that kind of thing. Then it's NOT censored. It's a poor comparison.


Yes, it is. Child porn is illegal, censored, whatever you want to call it, in most countries. Regardless of what you think, "censored" or "illegal" in this case is basically the same thing.


NO it's not. Something can be CENSORED and NOT illegal. You can't be arrested for using the word faggot. Yet it can be censored. But child porn is illegal no matter what way you look at it, literally. Your comparison is not good. :)
User avatar
StevePerryHair
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8504
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:07 pm
Location: Mickey's World

Postby DrFU » Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:47 am

Behshad wrote: Child porn is illegal


The aforementioned Toddlers and Tiaras:

Image






Image
DrFU
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3272
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 1:43 pm

Postby StevePerryHair » Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:51 am

DrFU wrote:
Behshad wrote: Child porn is illegal


The aforementioned Toddlers and Tiaras:

Image






Image



I agree Linda... that SHOULD be porn! :lol: I know that's a stretch since they are clothed, but really, some sick men would see them sexually with all that makeup and crap. And my God!! She has MADONNA CONES ON!! :shock: At the very least, I think it is a form of legalized child abuse! Some parents are really insane.
User avatar
StevePerryHair
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8504
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:07 pm
Location: Mickey's World

Postby conversationpc » Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:55 am

StevePerryHair wrote:NO it's not. Something can be CENSORED and NOT illegal. You can't be arrested for using the word faggot. Yet it can be censored. But child porn is illegal no matter what way you look at it, literally. Your comparison is not good. :)


Yes, it is. The FCC, for instance, censors certain words from being broadcast over the airwaves for non-subscription radio stations. If a station breaks that law, they are fined or lose their license. The comparison IS good.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby G.I.Jim » Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:56 am

All of this comes from a country I lived in for 11 YEARS! I remember when I was growing up there, that there was a HUGE fuss about Bugs Bunny being banned there, and a lot of people (including my parents) where like WTF??? G.I. Joe and Transformers where allowed, yet they said Bugs Bunny was taken off air because of violence. Pretty funny thinking back about it. :lol:
The artist formerly known as Jim. :-)
G.I.Jim
MP3
 
Posts: 10100
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 1:06 pm
Location: Your Momma's house

Postby conversationpc » Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:56 am

StevePerryHair wrote:I agree Linda... that SHOULD be porn! :lol: I know that's a stretch since they are clothed, but really, some sick men would see them sexually with all that makeup and crap. And my God!! She has MADONNA CONES ON!! :shock: At the very least, I think it is a form of legalized child abuse! Some parents are really insane.


It really torques me that prima-donna parents put their kids through this crap and basically force their CHILDREN to grow up instead of letting them just be a kid.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby conversationpc » Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:57 am

G.I.Jim wrote:All of this comes from a country I lived in for 11 YEARS! I remember when I was growing up there, that there was a HUGE fuss about Bugs Bunny being banned there, and a lot of people (including my parents) where like WTF??? G.I. Joe and Transformers where allowed, yet they said Bugs Bunny was taken off air because of violence. Pretty funny thinking back about it. :lol:


At least those Bugs Bunny cartoons did it all with a sense of humor.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby Melissa » Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:57 am

DrFU wrote:Toddlers and Tiaras


Ugh, I unfortunately caught part of that show just channel surfing one night, and it disgusted me. They even make these little girls wear these hideous denture looking "teeth" over their own BABY teeth so they look more "grown up" and "perfect". And the make up and hair, ugh! And then the moms :shock: Some of them seemed certifiably insane :shock:
Melissa
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5542
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:00 pm

Postby Behshad » Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:58 am

conversationpc wrote:
StevePerryHair wrote:NO it's not. Something can be CENSORED and NOT illegal. You can't be arrested for using the word faggot. Yet it can be censored. But child porn is illegal no matter what way you look at it, literally. Your comparison is not good. :)


Yes, it is. The FCC, for instance, censors certain words from being broadcast over the airwaves for non-subscription radio stations. If a station breaks that law, they are fined or lose their license. The comparison IS good.


No it's not ! :lol:
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby conversationpc » Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:58 am

Behshad wrote:
conversationpc wrote:
StevePerryHair wrote:NO it's not. Something can be CENSORED and NOT illegal. You can't be arrested for using the word faggot. Yet it can be censored. But child porn is illegal no matter what way you look at it, literally. Your comparison is not good. :)


Yes, it is. The FCC, for instance, censors certain words from being broadcast over the airwaves for non-subscription radio stations. If a station breaks that law, they are fined or lose their license. The comparison IS good.


No it's not ! :lol:


Neener, neener, neener. :lol:
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby StevePerryHair » Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:59 am

conversationpc wrote:
StevePerryHair wrote:NO it's not. Something can be CENSORED and NOT illegal. You can't be arrested for using the word faggot. Yet it can be censored. But child porn is illegal no matter what way you look at it, literally. Your comparison is not good. :)


Yes, it is. The FCC, for instance, censors certain words from being broadcast over the airwaves for non-subscription radio stations. If a station breaks that law, they are fined or lose their license. The comparison IS good.


That does not make it illegal for the masses to use though. That is an FCC thing because the airwaves are owned by the government. They CAN control what they control with legal ramifications. Porn is illegal whether at home, on the streets, on the airwaves, ANYWHERE. It is a sex crime. They are two different things. You are comparing apples to oranges here.
User avatar
StevePerryHair
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8504
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:07 pm
Location: Mickey's World

Postby DrFU » Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:00 pm

Melissa wrote:
DrFU wrote:Toddlers and Tiaras


Ugh, I unfortunately caught part of that show just channel surfing one night, and it disgusted me. They even make these little girls wear these hideous denture looking "teeth" over their own BABY teeth so they look more "grown up" and "perfect". And the make up and hair, ugh! And then the moms :shock: Some of them seemed certifiably insane :shock:


The basic message is sexualized childhood, sponsored by a major cable channel and mainstream advertisers. I think it is the scariest show on TV.
DrFU
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3272
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 1:43 pm

Postby StevePerryHair » Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:02 pm

DrFU wrote:
Melissa wrote:
DrFU wrote:Toddlers and Tiaras


Ugh, I unfortunately caught part of that show just channel surfing one night, and it disgusted me. They even make these little girls wear these hideous denture looking "teeth" over their own BABY teeth so they look more "grown up" and "perfect". And the make up and hair, ugh! And then the moms :shock: Some of them seemed certifiably insane :shock:


The basic message is sexualized childhood, sponsored by a major cable channel and mainstream advertisers. I think it is the scariest show on TV.


It is. And the mom's make me sick! They are living vicariously through their daughters. For the beauty contests they could never win? Notice, most of the mom's are not really "beauty" contestants themselves. I think their daughters become some sick extension of themselves. Unreal that it's okay to do that to children really.
Last edited by StevePerryHair on Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
StevePerryHair
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8504
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:07 pm
Location: Mickey's World

Postby conversationpc » Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:02 pm

StevePerryHair wrote:That is an FCC thing because the airwaves are owned by the government. They CAN control what they control with legal ramifications.


Yes, thank you! :)
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby G.I.Jim » Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:04 pm

conversationpc wrote:
StevePerryHair wrote:I agree Linda... that SHOULD be porn! :lol: I know that's a stretch since they are clothed, but really, some sick men would see them sexually with all that makeup and crap. And my God!! She has MADONNA CONES ON!! :shock: At the very least, I think it is a form of legalized child abuse! Some parents are really insane.


It really torques me that prima-donna parents put their kids through this crap and basically force their CHILDREN to grow up instead of letting them just be a kid.


Hater! :lol: :lol:
The artist formerly known as Jim. :-)
G.I.Jim
MP3
 
Posts: 10100
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 1:06 pm
Location: Your Momma's house

Postby StevePerryHair » Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:06 pm

conversationpc wrote:
StevePerryHair wrote:That is an FCC thing because the airwaves are owned by the government. They CAN control what they control with legal ramifications.


Yes, thank you! :)


Thank you for what?? You are making no sense. You are still wrong. It's not illegal for instance if I right here on MR.com call YOU a faggot! :P :lol: But if I find child porn and post it here all the time, someone could turn me in. One illegal, one not. Radio stations and what they air is controlled by the government for what is said, but the masses are not. The MASSES are not allowed to have or be involved in child porn. That is NOT censorship to the masses to say the RADIO can't say faggot. Porn is not censorship no matter what way you look at it. FCC is mainly a civil fine. If ignored, THEN it can be criminal for AVOIDING the fine. Apples/Oranges.
User avatar
StevePerryHair
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8504
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:07 pm
Location: Mickey's World

Postby Behshad » Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:07 pm

I really see both your points , with Lynns points being valid and Daves points not so much :lol:
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby DrFU » Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:09 pm

StevePerryHair wrote:
DrFU wrote:
Melissa wrote:
DrFU wrote:Toddlers and Tiaras


Ugh, I unfortunately caught part of that show just channel surfing one night, and it disgusted me. They even make these little girls wear these hideous denture looking "teeth" over their own BABY teeth so they look more "grown up" and "perfect". And the make up and hair, ugh! And then the moms :shock: Some of them seemed certifiably insane :shock:


The basic message is sexualized childhood, sponsored by a major cable channel and mainstream advertisers. I think it is the scariest show on TV.


It is. And the mom's make me sick! They are living vicariously through their daughters. For the beauty contests they could never win? Notice, most of the mom's are not really "beauty" contestants themselves. I think their daughters become some sick extension of themselves. Unreal that it's okay to do that to children really.


I'm a big fan of sex ... it's just something clearly belongs in adulthood ... and a parent's job is to protect her/his kids, not pimp them out.
DrFU
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3272
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 1:43 pm

Postby StevePerryHair » Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:12 pm

Behshad wrote:I really see both your points , with Lynns points being valid and Daves points not so much :lol:


:lol: :lol:

Well he is trying to say that FCC fines are the same kind of "illegal" as porn. They are not. FCC fines are civil, and only arrestable if they don't pay the fines. The FINES are the reason, not the word being used. Porn is NOT a civil crime. There is no "FINE" involved.
User avatar
StevePerryHair
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8504
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:07 pm
Location: Mickey's World

Postby conversationpc » Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:12 pm

StevePerryHair wrote:Thank you for what?? You are making no sense. You are still wrong. It's not illegal for instance if I right here on MR.com call YOU a faggot! :P :lol: But if I find child porn and post it here all the time, someone could turn me in. One illegal, one not. Radio stations and what they air is controlled by the government for what is said, but the masses are not. The MASSES are not allowed to have or be involved in child porn. That is NOT censorship to the masses to say the RADIO can't say faggot. Porn is not censorship no matter what way you look at it. FCC is mainly a civil fine. If ignored, THEN it can be criminal for AVOIDING the fine. Apples/Oranges.


In my view, if something is censored by the government, i.e. made illegal by force of law, it's the same thing.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby StevePerryHair » Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:15 pm

conversationpc wrote:
StevePerryHair wrote:Thank you for what?? You are making no sense. You are still wrong. It's not illegal for instance if I right here on MR.com call YOU a faggot! :P :lol: But if I find child porn and post it here all the time, someone could turn me in. One illegal, one not. Radio stations and what they air is controlled by the government for what is said, but the masses are not. The MASSES are not allowed to have or be involved in child porn. That is NOT censorship to the masses to say the RADIO can't say faggot. Porn is not censorship no matter what way you look at it. FCC is mainly a civil fine. If ignored, THEN it can be criminal for AVOIDING the fine. Apples/Oranges.


In my view, if something is censored by the government, i.e. made illegal by force of law, it's the same thing.



Well then your mind is messed up :lol:
User avatar
StevePerryHair
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8504
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:07 pm
Location: Mickey's World

Postby conversationpc » Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:16 pm

Bah...My apologies. I have real issues pissing me off in the real world and I tend to get it out by arguing. Sorry.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby Rick » Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:16 pm

They should have just banned gay people, then none of this would have happened. :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Rick
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16726
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:29 am
Location: Texas

Postby StevePerryHair » Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:17 pm

Rick wrote:They should have just banned gay people, then none of this would have happened. :lol: :lol: :lol:


Rick!! :lol: :lol:
User avatar
StevePerryHair
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8504
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:07 pm
Location: Mickey's World

Postby conversationpc » Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:18 pm

StevePerryHair wrote:
Rick wrote:They should have just banned gay people, then none of this would have happened. :lol: :lol: :lol:


Rick!! :lol: :lol:


Rick -----> new Westboro Baptist Church member :lol:
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

PreviousNext

Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Memorex and 15 guests