Moderator: Andrew
S2M wrote:Rowling is the biggest literary thief I've ever seen....another rags to riches story borne on the wings of burglary. She makes George Lucas look like the King of Originality....
That being said, I've seen all 7 movies so far....I've read none.
S2M wrote:Rowling is the biggest literary thief I've ever seen....another rags to riches story borne on the wings of burglary. She makes George Lucas look like the King of Originality....
.
S2M wrote:Rowling is the biggest literary thief I've ever seen....another rags to riches story borne on the wings of burglary. She makes George Lucas look like the King of Originality....
That being said, I've seen all 7 movies so far....I've read none.
conversationpc wrote:S2M wrote:Rowling is the biggest literary thief I've ever seen....another rags to riches story borne on the wings of burglary. She makes George Lucas look like the King of Originality....
Who cares?That being said, I've seen all 7 movies so far....I've read none.
Who cares, part 2?
Gideon wrote:Had the pleasure of taking the gf to see it today. Incredibly entertaining film, this part reserved mostly for the action.
Gideon wrote:Character deaths on the heroes' side were surprisingly brutal and one in particular was among the most horrific I've seen in recent memory.
kgdjpubs wrote:true, but they did a fair amount of character moments, which is really what made the film work. There were fewer battle scenes than the previews would suggest, but it's a pretty much nonstop ride.
k wrote:If I'm thinking of the one you're thinking of, definitely yes. Actually, I can think of two that were very ugly. Both could qualify, but one easily takes the cake.
k wrote:They had a huge challenge with the final book since it was way too much for one movie and not enough for two. Cutting it would have probably ripped the emotional core out of the story, so I think they made the right choice. The certainly did from a financial aspect.
I think the tension was a bit messed up after the forest, but that's probably just the way it is with that story, and there isn't any way around that. There are a couple of stunning moments of movie-making magic that are well worth the price of admission.
There have been some missteps along the way that may have a lot to do with compounding problems from not knowing how things were going to end and what would be important to see. That said, they have gotten a lot more right than wrong. Either way, very good film and a worthy send-off to the books. Nice to see a rare summer blockbuster that lives up to the hype.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
Gideon wrote:k wrote:If I'm thinking of the one you're thinking of, definitely yes. Actually, I can think of two that were very ugly. Both could qualify, but one easily takes the cake.
You certainly are. One could say that the death I'm thinking of was very.... cutthroat.
Can't quite remember the second one you're thinking of, though, though my next guess would be the one that really.... bites.
Gideon wrote:k wrote:They had a huge challenge with the final book since it was way too much for one movie and not enough for two. Cutting it would have probably ripped the emotional core out of the story, so I think they made the right choice. The certainly did from a financial aspect.
I think the tension was a bit messed up after the forest, but that's probably just the way it is with that story, and there isn't any way around that. There are a couple of stunning moments of movie-making magic that are well worth the price of admission.
There have been some missteps along the way that may have a lot to do with compounding problems from not knowing how things were going to end and what would be important to see. That said, they have gotten a lot more right than wrong. Either way, very good film and a worthy send-off to the books. Nice to see a rare summer blockbuster that lives up to the hype.
There were a few questionable moments, but I enjoyed that they dispensed with the bullshit deus ex machina duel found in the book and we were treated to an actual duel-and-chase at the end. The book's version was depressingly anticlimactic.
Everett wrote:So i'm guessing everyone but harry get's it in this one right?
S2M wrote:To answer your question, ginger, Rowling five-finger discounts from many fantasy authors...most notably:
Tolkien's LOTR
Orson Scott Card's 'Ender's Game'
Jane Yolen's "Wizard's Hall"
I've read all three of these. The theft is obvious. She gets unwarranted praise for pioneering this style of fantasy...not unlike Evanescence did for bringing their unoriginal gothic style to the mainstream. Someone mentioned deus ex machina? She is the master of this literary tool.
verslibre wrote:S2M wrote:To answer your question, ginger, Rowling five-finger discounts from many fantasy authors...most notably:
Tolkien's LOTR
Orson Scott Card's 'Ender's Game'
Jane Yolen's "Wizard's Hall"
I've read all three of these. The theft is obvious. She gets unwarranted praise for pioneering this style of fantasy...not unlike Evanescence did for bringing their unoriginal gothic style to the mainstream. Someone mentioned deus ex machina? She is the master of this literary tool.
Everyone knows she lifts her ideas wholesale. She's still filthy stinkin' rich and there's nothing anybody can do about it. IIRC she also settled out of court years ago with an American author who sued her.
I'm just glad I won't have to hear Haaayyyyyyyy-rrrrryyy Pawwt-tuhhhhhhh! on the fuckin' TV, anymore. At least not after the ads for this movie die down.
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests