Moderator: Andrew
ebake02 wrote:I find it kind of funny that China was the first to slam the US after the downgrade. If this downgrade drags down our economy then they will loose just as much as we will. Most of what we buy is made in Chinese factories so if we stop buying, they loose money.
slucero wrote:ebake02 wrote:I find it kind of funny that China was the first to slam the US after the downgrade. If this downgrade drags down our economy then they will loose just as much as we will. Most of what we buy is made in Chinese factories so if we stop buying, they loose money.
China's desperately trying to slow their economy down... trying to fend off inflation... slamming the US is perfectly in line with that tactic.
China has Trillions in cash... they can engineer a "soft landing"... the US cannot...
Fact Finder wrote:ebake02 wrote:Blame for this this debt fiasco and the downgrade fall squarely on the shoulders of tea party republicans and far left democrats. They were willing to let this country go into default to get their own way, it's sick.The middle who want to compromise for the greater good have no voice in Washington anymore and I'm tired of it.
Excuse me but it was the Tea Party Budget of Paul Ryan that Moodys said would do the job to keep the credit rating at AAA. I know I'm gonna hear about all the shit that Obama inherited from Bush, but keep in mind, Obama inherited a AAA Credit Rating from Bush. Rating agencies wanted 4 Trillion in cuts to spending and it was the Dems who wouldn't give up their sacred cow programs.
Down 340 as I type, and Gold up $52..
Fact Finder wrote:ebake02 wrote:Blame for this this debt fiasco and the downgrade fall squarely on the shoulders of tea party republicans and far left democrats. They were willing to let this country go into default to get their own way, it's sick.The middle who want to compromise for the greater good have no voice in Washington anymore and I'm tired of it.
Excuse me but it was the Tea Party Budget of Paul Ryan that Moodys said would do the job to keep the credit rating at AAA. I know I'm gonna hear about all the shit that Obama inherited from Bush, but keep in mind, Obama inherited a AAA Credit Rating from Bush. Rating agencies wanted 4 Trillion in cuts to spending and it was the Dems who wouldn't give up their sacred cow programs.
Down 340 as I type, and Gold up $52..
Fact Finder wrote:ebake02 wrote:Blame for this this debt fiasco and the downgrade fall squarely on the shoulders of tea party republicans and far left democrats. They were willing to let this country go into default to get their own way, it's sick.The middle who want to compromise for the greater good have no voice in Washington anymore and I'm tired of it.
Excuse me but it was the Tea Party Budget of Paul Ryan that Moodys said would do the job to keep the credit rating at AAA. I know I'm gonna hear about all the shit that Obama inherited from Bush, but keep in mind, Obama inherited a AAA Credit Rating from Bush. Rating agencies wanted 4 Trillion in cuts to spending and it was the Dems who wouldn't give up their sacred cow programs.
Down 340 as I type, and Gold up $52..
ebake02 wrote:Blame for this this debt fiasco and the downgrade fall squarely on the shoulders of tea party republicans and far left democrats. They were willing to let this country go into default to get their own way, it's sick.The middle who want to compromise for the greater good have no voice in Washington anymore and I'm tired of it.
Seven Wishes wrote:Fact Finder wrote:ebake02 wrote:Blame for this this debt fiasco and the downgrade fall squarely on the shoulders of tea party republicans and far left democrats. They were willing to let this country go into default to get their own way, it's sick.The middle who want to compromise for the greater good have no voice in Washington anymore and I'm tired of it.
Excuse me but it was the Tea Party Budget of Paul Ryan that Moodys said would do the job to keep the credit rating at AAA. I know I'm gonna hear about all the shit that Obama inherited from Bush, but keep in mind, Obama inherited a AAA Credit Rating from Bush. Rating agencies wanted 4 Trillion in cuts to spending and it was the Dems who wouldn't give up their sacred cow programs.
Down 340 as I type, and Gold up $52..
A complete and total lie, LieFinder. All 3 agencies have already explicitly stated that without revenue increases (i.e. ending the Bush tax cuts and modifying corporate tax codes, which would net $800 billion PER YEAR), the plan didn't go far enough. What needed to happen was, as I've stated, some modest changes to "entitlement" programs and the immediate ending of the Bush tax cuts. So don't even think about trying to pin this on the left...nor just on the Tea Baggers, either.
ebake02 wrote:Seven Wishes wrote:Fact Finder wrote:ebake02 wrote:Blame for this this debt fiasco and the downgrade fall squarely on the shoulders of tea party republicans and far left democrats. They were willing to let this country go into default to get their own way, it's sick.The middle who want to compromise for the greater good have no voice in Washington anymore and I'm tired of it.
Excuse me but it was the Tea Party Budget of Paul Ryan that Moodys said would do the job to keep the credit rating at AAA. I know I'm gonna hear about all the shit that Obama inherited from Bush, but keep in mind, Obama inherited a AAA Credit Rating from Bush. Rating agencies wanted 4 Trillion in cuts to spending and it was the Dems who wouldn't give up their sacred cow programs.
Down 340 as I type, and Gold up $52..
A complete and total lie, LieFinder. All 3 agencies have already explicitly stated that without revenue increases (i.e. ending the Bush tax cuts and modifying corporate tax codes, which would net $800 billion PER YEAR), the plan didn't go far enough. What needed to happen was, as I've stated, some modest changes to "entitlement" programs and the immediate ending of the Bush tax cuts. So don't even think about trying to pin this on the left...nor just on the Tea Baggers, either.
I like idea of a penny tax, add .01 to every transaction in the country and I mean everything, store sales, utility bills, loan payments, etc... It's small enough that no one would notice a difference and if you think about all the transactions that take place in the country on a daily basis, that's a truck load of money the government would be bringing in.
S2M wrote:Do some research, Matt....there will never be a VAT in this country. Do some research on the FairTax...you'll better understand. H.R. 25 will solve the financial issues, plus expand the tax base - to include non-taxed(currently) illegals....23% national sales tax would take the place of EVERY single tax currently on the board: income, payroll, death, property, inheritance, compliance - every tax. Add that to an amendment to repeal the 16th, and you have your solution.....everyone is clamoring for everyone to pay the same amount...well there you go....you quit taxing income, and start taxing consumption. Even the pricks like Dan and LieLover can't find fault in that proposal....![]()
S2M wrote:Do some research, Matt....there will never be a VAT in this country. Do some research on the FairTax...you'll better understand. H.R. 25 will solve the financial issues, plus expand the tax base - to include non-taxed(currently) illegals....23% national sales tax would take the place of EVERY single tax currently on the board: income, payroll, death, property, inheritance, compliance - every tax. Add that to an amendment to repeal the 16th, and you have your solution.....everyone is clamoring for everyone to pay the same amount...well there you go....you quit taxing income, and start taxing consumption. Even the pricks like Dan and LieLover can't find fault in that proposal....![]()
Fact Finder wrote:Moody's had revised The US to a "positive outlook" a few months back during the Ryan budget discussions and House vote, which passed the House but the Senate left for dead. Just last night I watched CNBC for 3 hours when the futures market opened and at least 3 people on that show were saying exactly what I just typed above. I think Trump was one of them, he was fucking lambasting DC all around. We don't have a tax problem 7, it's a spending problem and everyone knows it except you. To be fair, Trump did say he'd tighten up those corporate tax loopholes even though he throughly enjoys using them himself.
ebake02 wrote:I still think this downgrade is being blown way out of proportion, -465 points is a little ridiculous if you ask me.
Saint John wrote:ebake02 wrote:I still think this downgrade is being blown way out of proportion, -465 points is a little ridiculous if you ask me.
This downgrade has nothing to do with revenue. It's all about spending more than comes in. Period. Also, there really wasn't a downgrade. The protocol for the last 80 or so years has been to take the highest of the 3 credit agency's ratings, and two still have the U.S. at AAA. This is a combination of panic selling and a complete rejection of the president's move toward Marxism/Socialism. There is nothing in the U. S. Constitution that authorizes Congress to take money from some people and give it it other people, as being done with welfare and the new approach to government operated healthcare. People simply don't want this shit.
Personally, I think we should vote, individually, exactly where the percentage of tax dollars above the budget go (if we could ever get to that point). They could either go to deficit reduction or to welfare. Mine would go to welfare. Charity should be always be voluntary. But that does not include veterans, the handicapped or retards.
ebake02 wrote:Saint John wrote:ebake02 wrote:I still think this downgrade is being blown way out of proportion, -465 points is a little ridiculous if you ask me.
This downgrade has nothing to do with revenue. It's all about spending more than comes in. Period. Also, there really wasn't a downgrade. The protocol for the last 80 or so years has been to take the highest of the 3 credit agency's ratings, and two still have the U.S. at AAA. This is a combination of panic selling and a complete rejection of the president's move toward Marxism/Socialism. There is nothing in the U. S. Constitution that authorizes Congress to take money from some people and give it it other people, as being done with welfare and the new approach to government operated healthcare. People simply don't want this shit.
Personally, I think we should vote, individually, exactly where the percentage of tax dollars above the budget go (if we could ever get to that point). They could either go to deficit reduction or to welfare. Mine would go to welfare. Charity should be always be voluntary. But that does not include veterans, the handicapped or retards.
Are you serious?
Saint John wrote:ebake02 wrote:Saint John wrote:ebake02 wrote:I still think this downgrade is being blown way out of proportion, -465 points is a little ridiculous if you ask me.
This downgrade has nothing to do with revenue. It's all about spending more than comes in. Period. Also, there really wasn't a downgrade. The protocol for the last 80 or so years has been to take the highest of the 3 credit agency's ratings, and two still have the U.S. at AAA. This is a combination of panic selling and a complete rejection of the president's move toward Marxism/Socialism. There is nothing in the U. S. Constitution that authorizes Congress to take money from some people and give it it other people, as being done with welfare and the new approach to government operated healthcare. People simply don't want this shit.
Personally, I think we should vote, individually, exactly where the percentage of tax dollars above the budget go (if we could ever get to that point). They could either go to deficit reduction or to welfare. Mine would go to welfare. Charity should be always be voluntary. But that does not include veterans, the handicapped or retards.
Are you serious?
Laugh it up, funny boy. But The Treasury Department has the third largest expense in the federal budget. Only Defense and income redistribution (The Departments of Health and Human Services, HUD, and Agriculture (food stamps) is higher. As the debt increases, so does the interest payment. Social spending is the largest item in our federal budget.
ebake02 wrote:Saint John wrote:ebake02 wrote:Saint John wrote:ebake02 wrote:I still think this downgrade is being blown way out of proportion, -465 points is a little ridiculous if you ask me.
This downgrade has nothing to do with revenue. It's all about spending more than comes in. Period. Also, there really wasn't a downgrade. The protocol for the last 80 or so years has been to take the highest of the 3 credit agency's ratings, and two still have the U.S. at AAA. This is a combination of panic selling and a complete rejection of the president's move toward Marxism/Socialism. There is nothing in the U. S. Constitution that authorizes Congress to take money from some people and give it it other people, as being done with welfare and the new approach to government operated healthcare. People simply don't want this shit.
Personally, I think we should vote, individually, exactly where the percentage of tax dollars above the budget go (if we could ever get to that point). They could either go to deficit reduction or to welfare. Mine would go to welfare. Charity should be always be voluntary. But that does not include veterans, the handicapped or retards.
Are you serious?
Laugh it up, funny boy. But The Treasury Department has the third largest expense in the federal budget. Only Defense and income redistribution (The Departments of Health and Human Services, HUD, and Agriculture (food stamps) is higher. As the debt increases, so does the interest payment. Social spending is the largest item in our federal budget.
Is that what Fox News told you?
Saint John wrote:ebake02 wrote:Saint John wrote:ebake02 wrote:Saint John wrote:ebake02 wrote:I still think this downgrade is being blown way out of proportion, -465 points is a little ridiculous if you ask me.
This downgrade has nothing to do with revenue. It's all about spending more than comes in. Period. Also, there really wasn't a downgrade. The protocol for the last 80 or so years has been to take the highest of the 3 credit agency's ratings, and two still have the U.S. at AAA. This is a combination of panic selling and a complete rejection of the president's move toward Marxism/Socialism. There is nothing in the U. S. Constitution that authorizes Congress to take money from some people and give it it other people, as being done with welfare and the new approach to government operated healthcare. People simply don't want this shit.
Personally, I think we should vote, individually, exactly where the percentage of tax dollars above the budget go (if we could ever get to that point). They could either go to deficit reduction or to welfare. Mine would go to welfare. Charity should be always be voluntary. But that does not include veterans, the handicapped or retards.
Are you serious?
Laugh it up, funny boy. But The Treasury Department has the third largest expense in the federal budget. Only Defense and income redistribution (The Departments of Health and Human Services, HUD, and Agriculture (food stamps) is higher. As the debt increases, so does the interest payment. Social spending is the largest item in our federal budget.
Is that what Fox News told you?
Nope. Those are faux, pal.
Seven Wishes wrote:Payroll tax exemptions help the middle class
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
RedWingFan wrote:Seven Wishes wrote:Payroll tax exemptions help the middle class
I love how you use the term "Corporate tax loopholes" repeatedly.
Then come right back with "Payroll tax exemptions" for the middle class.
Like the loopholes are mistakes in the tax code or something.
They're all the same thing. You've been trained by the Marxists well.
Are you saying "Corporate tax exemptions" don't help corporations? They don't need to grow their business and hire more people?
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests