Moderator: Andrew
They make it sound like it would just fall out of the sky. It would slow down, but would still have forward momentum and come down at at angle. Do you know how fast planes fly? That doesn't sound right at all.RPM wrote:no, makes sense, all forward motion, other than propulsion at moment of impact would be halted,
resulting in the fastest way to bring it straight down. Very brave pro's we have !
conversationpc wrote:Two unbelievable things here:
1 - We would not have fighter jets ARMED AND READY for an event like this, even pre-9/11.
2 - That we would let anyone know even after the fact that we didn't have jets armed and ready.
Rick wrote:conversationpc wrote:Two unbelievable things here:
1 - We would not have fighter jets ARMED AND READY for an event like this, even pre-9/11.
2 - That we would let anyone know even after the fact that we didn't have jets armed and ready.
I think they only admitted that they weren't armed and ready before 9/11. I didn't see where it said it was still that way. But I agree that it's unbelievable that they didn't have something armed and ready, even then.
Melissa wrote:My father worked on F-16's, as well as B-52's, for years and years in the A.F., they have pretty good reasons why they don't just routinely keep those things loaded down with the thousands of pounds of missiles, rockets, AND bombs they are capable of carrying. But a message board community must know more about these fighters and bombers than the A.F. does.
Not to mention the fact that people who aren't used to military aircraft over their heads (I grew up with them, was a part of life!) bitch and complain they are too "dangerous" to do things like fly overs at sporting events, etc. And active duty military should be able to carry firearms on themselves at all times, but no, people are "scared" and bitch about that too, so then you get the Fort Hood incident.
Easy to blast the U.S. military, yet they are damned if they do and damned if they don't. If they HAD been fully loaded and shot any of those planes down, they'd be monsters for killing all the innocents onboard too right? They'd never be right in the eyes of civilians who have no clue no matter WHAT they do.
Melissa wrote:So glad you're always around with something to say to whatever I say B, yet no comment from you on the Muslim stuff in the other 9/11 thread.
Not educating anyone, just find it ridiculous for any of us to think we know what's best for how any of this was handled that day.
Behshad wrote:Melissa wrote:So glad you're always around with something to say to whatever I say B, yet no comment from you on the Muslim stuff in the other 9/11 thread.
Not educating anyone, just find it ridiculous for any of us to think we know what's best for how any of this was handled that day.
So glad you take compliments as a negative things.yep I'm only STALKING you
![]()
![]()
Why should I discuss anything about 9/11 and the Muslims , because of my heritage ?!
Everyone here knows that I'm not a Muslim, so what's your point really ?! You think I should only stick to subjects that I grew up around ?! In the future I will check with you first before I post to make sure I'm in the right thread.
Melissa wrote:Behshad wrote:Melissa wrote:So glad you're always around with something to say to whatever I say B, yet no comment from you on the Muslim stuff in the other 9/11 thread.
Not educating anyone, just find it ridiculous for any of us to think we know what's best for how any of this was handled that day.
So glad you take compliments as a negative things.yep I'm only STALKING you
![]()
![]()
Why should I discuss anything about 9/11 and the Muslims , because of my heritage ?!
Everyone here knows that I'm not a Muslim, so what's your point really ?! You think I should only stick to subjects that I grew up around ?! In the future I will check with you first before I post to make sure I'm in the right thread.
Your "so glad you're here to educate us" sounds like a smart ass comment, but that's the downfall of a message board. Oh well. And you were all over my case when I had the opinion a mosque shouldn't be built at ground zero as if I made horrid remarks about Muslims, which I did NOT, yet the horrid remarks that ARE made about them here you don't go after. Just confusing I guess, but you also KNOW I'm a doormat and not a fighter, so I guess it's easy.
Behshad wrote:I'm not here to defend Muslims. Specially not those who attacked us. The mosque thing was about the freedom of people of this country regardless of their religion , that's what I was defending , people's rights!
And I did post in the other thread as instructed , master
And I like to fight against fighters not doormats like Steveo , so you're a fighter in my book. With ammo !
Melissa wrote:Behshad wrote:I'm not here to defend Muslims. Specially not those who attacked us. The mosque thing was about the freedom of people of this country regardless of their religion , that's what I was defending , people's rights!
And I did post in the other thread as instructed , master
And I like to fight against fighters not doormats like Steveo , so you're a fighter in my book. With ammo !
Right, and all I did was defend the rights of the victims' families to keep a ground sacred that contained their loved ones pulverized ashes. I didn't instruct you to do anything, or accuse you of anything either, simply made the comment that I'm glad you're around to make sure I'm set straight. What's next for me, hot sauce?
And no, I'm not a fighter. I wish!
Behshad wrote:The ground is sacred , regardless of what building is around it. If anything why not close down the souvenir & T-shirt shop a block away from ground zero , where they make a profit of other people's loss ?!
And no hot sauce for you. You'd like it too much
StevePerryHair wrote:They make it sound like it would just fall out of the sky. It would slow down, but would still have forward momentum and come down at at angle. Do you know how fast planes fly? That doesn't sound right at all.RPM wrote:no, makes sense, all forward motion, other than propulsion at moment of impact would be halted,
resulting in the fastest way to bring it straight down. Very brave pro's we have !
DrFU wrote:My dad (who flew for AA for 30 years) used to joke that airliners glided like "leaded manhole covers" when they lost power.
That was the first thing I thought of when I heard about Captain Sully landing his in the Hudson.
Behshad wrote:
Ten years has gone and people still believe that the heroic actions of those onboard took this plane down. Even Rumsfeld slipped out what really happen
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNuosBnlw5s&sns=em
They did what they had to do , nothing to be ashamed of.
Behshad wrote:...Donald Rumsfeld said the plane was shot down...
"I think all of us have a sense if we imagine the kind of world we would face if the people who bombed the mess hall in Mosul, or the people who did the bombing in Spain, or the people who attacked the United States in New York, shot down the plane over Pennsylvania and attacked the Pentagon..." [WorldNetDaily]
Sorry Stu , but Dan didn't wanna wait past midnight to carry on this discussion .
Saint John wrote:Behshad wrote:...Donald Rumsfeld said the plane was shot down...
"I think all of us have a sense if we imagine the kind of world we would face if the people who bombed the mess hall in Mosul, or the people who did the bombing in Spain, or the people who attacked the United States in New York, shot down the plane over Pennsylvania and attacked the Pentagon..." [WorldNetDaily]
Sorry Stu , but Dan didn't wanna wait past midnight to carry on this discussion .
Oh, I see, you can call him (Rumsfeld) a liar and murderer, but when he makes a verbal gaffe ... it's indisputably factual.A multitude of witnesses, calls from the plane and evidence be damned. You do realize that people saw the plane come out of the sky, flying as if there was a struggle for control and then crash into a field, right?
Saint John wrote:There were many, many eyewitnesses that actually, get this, saw the plane crash!
Here are some of the eyewitness accounts for flight 93, and they all seem to corroborate:
Eyewitnesses
"I never seen anything like it," Barron said. "Just like a big pile of charcoal."
A mushroom of flame rose 200 feet and disappeared. Then there was a curtain of black smoke and finally a trail of fire as pieces of the fuselage shot hundreds of yards into the woods.
"But I got there and there was nothing, nothing there but charcoal. Instantly, it was charcoal."
Charles Sturtz, 53, who lives just over the hillside from the crash site, said a fireball 200 feet high shot up over the hill. He got to the crash scene even before the firefighters.
"The biggest pieces you could find were probably four feet [long]. Most of the pieces you could put into a shopping bag, and there were clothes hanging from the trees."
"Then you heard the explosion and felt the blast and saw the fire and smoke."
"When it decided to drop, it dropped all of a sudden, like a stone," said Tom Fritz, 63. Fritz was sitting on his porch on Lambertsville Road, about a quarter mile from the crash site, when he heard a sound that "wasn't quite right" and looked up in the sky.
"There was a great explosion and you could see the flames. It was a massive, massive explosion. Flames and then smoke and then a massive, massive mushroom cloud."
Peterson called 9-1-1 and ran to the crash site but found only burning jet parts, pieces of clothing, and seat cushions.
A witness said he heard two loud bangs before watching the plane take a downward turn of nearly 90 degrees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The plane seemed to be fully, or largely, intact. "I didn't see no smoke, nothing," said Nevin Lambert, an elderly farmer who witnessed the crash from his side yard less than a half-mile away.
Lambert also said he also later found a couple of pieces of debris, one a piece of metal, less than 12 inches across, with some insulation attached.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Then a call came in from one of Madigan’s troopers: He had just heard an explosion so violent it shook his home. Soon phones at the barracks were ringing off the hook. Madigan and other troopers rushed to the scene, …
Rick King, 42, of Shanksville, was behind the wheel of the first fire truck to arrive at the crash scene, …
The former assistant chief of the Shanksville volunteer fire department had heard Flight 93 scream overhead, seen a massive fireball light up the sky and felt an explosion rock the entire town of Shanksville. …
But besides a burning landing-gear tire, smoldering branches in the nearby woods and a few brush fires, there was little to indicate a jetliner had just crashed, he says. “Where is this plane? And where are the people?” he remembers thinking as he stepped off the truck. (16)
"It was like an atomic bomb hit," said John Walsh, 72, who heard the crash and drove to the site while still in his bathrobe. "When I got there, the plane was obliterated. You couldn't see the cockpit or the wings or nothing."
Saint John wrote:Behshad wrote:...Donald Rumsfeld said the plane was shot down...
"I think all of us have a sense if we imagine the kind of world we would face if the people who bombed the mess hall in Mosul, or the people who did the bombing in Spain, or the people who attacked the United States in New York, shot down the plane over Pennsylvania and attacked the Pentagon..." [WorldNetDaily]
Sorry Stu , but Dan didn't wanna wait past midnight to carry on this discussion .
Oh, I see, you can call him (Rumsfeld) a liar and murderer, but when he makes a verbal gaffe ... it's indisputably factual.A multitude of witnesses, calls from the plane and evidence be damned. You do realize that people saw the plane come out of the sky, flying as if there was a struggle for control and then crash into a field, right?
DrFU wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:They make it sound like it would just fall out of the sky. It would slow down, but would still have forward momentum and come down at at angle. Do you know how fast planes fly? That doesn't sound right at all.RPM wrote:no, makes sense, all forward motion, other than propulsion at moment of impact would be halted,
resulting in the fastest way to bring it straight down. Very brave pro's we have !
My dad (who flew for AA for 30 years) used to joke that airliners glided like "leaded manhole covers" when they lost power.
That was the first thing I thought of when I heard about Captain Sully landing his in the Hudson.
steveo777 wrote:DrFU wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:They make it sound like it would just fall out of the sky. It would slow down, but would still have forward momentum and come down at at angle. Do you know how fast planes fly? That doesn't sound right at all.RPM wrote:no, makes sense, all forward motion, other than propulsion at moment of impact would be halted,
resulting in the fastest way to bring it straight down. Very brave pro's we have !
My dad (who flew for AA for 30 years) used to joke that airliners glided like "leaded manhole covers" when they lost power.
That was the first thing I thought of when I heard about Captain Sully landing his in the Hudson.
An Airplane can fly with no engines on as long as there is enough altitude to trade for air speed. Once air speed drops to a certain point the wings go into a stall
and cannot sustain the plane in flight. At this point it would drop vertically.
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests