Moderator: Andrew
marco17 wrote:Just my opinion....And, I am sure we'll get a lot of differing thoughts here...
I think at the beginning Neal and Jon were happy with their decision and if they weren't happy, they never would have gone on with him. I think when SA began to have vocal problems Neal lost interest. I think Cain liked Steve, thought he was a good fit, and that was a major reason why he lasted as long as he did. It may have had to do with chemistry on/off stage and comfort. If there wasn't something to that, why would they have ever risked using canned vocals to get through shows?
I think Augeri's time with Journey is significant because if it were not for him, Journey would not have continued. I am sure someone will say that it would have with someone else, but it didn't, it continued with Augeri. There are a lot of good tracks from his time, certainly not as memorable as those from the Perry era, but it was also a different time for the music business. Journey had been out of the spotlight for a long time, and was now coming back without Perry. They all worked their asses off, and yes, maybe they are more successful now because with Arnel they have been able to promote the "worldly" thing and DSB has been all over everything, but they played a lot of the same venues in 2-3 band tours as they do now. But, regardless, they would not be where they are today if it weren't for the Augeri years and all the touring they did during that time. I also think that there is a generation of Journey fans (like me) who never had the chance to see Journey fronted by Perry. We were either introduced to Journey through Remember Me, or seeing them first fronted by SA, and now Arnel.
This is certainly subjective and so I am sure a lot of the responses are going to be, but that's just my 2 cents.
Enigma869 wrote:Augeri's "significance" to Journey isn't a factor in my opinion, because Journey's history was written long before anyone knew Steve Augeri's name, and the same goes for Arnel. The reality is that people who don't visit boards like MelodicRock have no idea who Steve Augeri is. Not to mention, those same people view Journey as a 1980's band and nothing really beyond that. Journey's history was cemented by a group of guys and a brilliant collection of music that Steve Augeri and Arnel Pineda had nothing to do with.
YoungJRNY wrote:Enigma869 wrote:Augeri's "significance" to Journey isn't a factor in my opinion, because Journey's history was written long before anyone knew Steve Augeri's name, and the same goes for Arnel. The reality is that people who don't visit boards like MelodicRock have no idea who Steve Augeri is. Not to mention, those same people view Journey as a 1980's band and nothing really beyond that. Journey's history was cemented by a group of guys and a brilliant collection of music that Steve Augeri and Arnel Pineda had nothing to do with.
Pretty much but their contributions can not go unnoticed. Augeri gave Journey back their backbone for the fanbase. Journey has fans all over the world and they are obviously a band where the fanbase has a strong stranglehold over. This couldn't be done without Augeri and now with Arnel. They all contributed. They made albums with the Journey label with their voices on it. They allowed the band to continue to stay in the spot-light and give the fanbase their band, something that would never have happened waiting for Perry. It's obvious in Andrew's interview that Perry is scared to absolute death of his own voice, he doesn't believe in himself. He's burned out forever and Journey knew they were burned out forever if they waited for Perry. Augeri and Arnel allowed the band to not only continue, but also put in their worth of new records to put out and keep Journey alive and well. That's significant in my eyes because quite frankly, I wouldn't be here today typing if Augeri wouldn't of taken the gig to go forward.
YoungJRNY wrote:Journey has fans all over the world and they are obviously a band where the fanbase has a strong stranglehold over.
YoungJRNY wrote:This couldn't be done without Augeri and now with Arnel.
YoungJRNY wrote: They made albums with the Journey label with their voices on it.
YoungJRNY wrote: It's obvious in Andrew's interview that Perry is scared to absolute death of his own voice, he doesn't believe in himself. He's burned out forever and Journey knew they were burned out forever if they waited for Perry.
Enigma869 wrote:YoungJRNY wrote:Journey has fans all over the world and they are obviously a band where the fanbase has a strong stranglehold over.
Right, and so do many other 80's bands and most of those fans are there to listen to the back catalog of music.YoungJRNY wrote:This couldn't be done without Augeri and now with Arnel.
It could be done with Mickey Mouse. The reality is that 99.9% of the fans who attend these concerts don't visit this site and have zero clue who is up there singing the songs. Their connection is to the music and most probably would have no idea that the guy who originally sang those songs isn't the same guy they're listening to.YoungJRNY wrote: They made albums with the Journey label with their voices on it.
Right...but beyond close family and friends, nobody noticed!YoungJRNY wrote: It's obvious in Andrew's interview that Perry is scared to absolute death of his own voice, he doesn't believe in himself. He's burned out forever and Journey knew they were burned out forever if they waited for Perry.
The great thing about Perry is he his legacy is firmly cemented as the voice who created this music. That will never change regardless of how burnt out he may or may not be. As Perry said in Drew's interview (and elsewhere), they've tried to run in three different singers to imitate what he did, and it's just never worked. I think the other thing that Perry really understands is that bands like Journey are yesterday's news, and I grew up as one of their biggest fans. They're about as relevant in 2011 as Atari!
parfait wrote:If you want Perry, then go watch the Houston DVD. If you want to see them live, then go buy a ticket for one of their shows.
Enigma869 wrote: The reality is that people who don't visit boards like MelodicRock have no idea who Steve Augeri is.
Red13JoePa wrote:As with perry.
"Journey" is what is known, be it DSB or OS.
Enigma869 wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:As with perry.
"Journey" is what is known, be it DSB or OS.
Agreed, but Perry is the voice that made the songs famous and also had reasonable success with a solo album so he was a bit more known.
Red13JoePa wrote:Enigma869 wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:As with perry.
"Journey" is what is known, be it DSB or OS.
Agreed, but Perry is the voice that made the songs famous and also had reasonable success with a solo album so he was a bit more known.
Agreed maybe a bit more known than the Schon or Cain names however it took him making a that was ersatz Journey to do it.
Rich from a guy who dinged the band on trying to continue to sound like themselves in this interview here
Behshad wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:Enigma869 wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:As with perry.
"Journey" is what is known, be it DSB or OS.
Agreed, but Perry is the voice that made the songs famous and also had reasonable success with a solo album so he was a bit more known.
Agreed maybe a bit more known than the Schon or Cain names however it took him making a that was ersatz Journey to do it.
Rich from a guy who dinged the band on trying to continue to sound like themselves in this interview here
Why is it so hard to understand that what he meant was He hadnt heard of Arnel or Augeri before they joined Journey![]()
![]()
He knew who Jeff was BEFORE Journey brought him onboard.
marco17 wrote:Just my opinion....And, I am sure we'll get a lot of differing thoughts here...
I think at the beginning Neal and Jon were happy with their decision and if they weren't happy, they never would have gone on with him. I think when SA began to have vocal problems Neal lost interest. I think Cain liked Steve, thought he was a good fit, and that was a major reason why he lasted as long as he did. It may have had to do with chemistry on/off stage and comfort. If there wasn't something to that, why would they have ever risked using canned vocals to get through shows?
I think Augeri's time with Journey is significant because if it were not for him, Journey would not have continued. I am sure someone will say that it would have with someone else, but it didn't, it continued with Augeri. There are a lot of good tracks from his time, certainly not as memorable as those from the Perry era, but it was also a different time for the music business. Journey had been out of the spotlight for a long time, and was now coming back without Perry. They all worked their asses off, and yes, maybe they are more successful now because with Arnel they have been able to promote the "worldly" thing and DSB has been all over everything, but they played a lot of the same venues in 2-3 band tours as they do now. But, regardless, they would not be where they are today if it weren't for the Augeri years and all the touring they did during that time. I also think that there is a generation of Journey fans (like me) who never had the chance to see Journey fronted by Perry. We were either introduced to Journey through Remember Me, or seeing them first fronted by SA, and now Arnel.
This is certainly subjective and so I am sure a lot of the responses are going to be, but that's just my 2 cents.
Enigma869 wrote:They're about as relevant in 2011 as Atari!
Enigma869 wrote:parfait wrote:If you want Perry, then go watch the Houston DVD. If you want to see them live, then go buy a ticket for one of their shows.
Thanks for the brilliant assessment, Yogurt Man!
Oh...and fuck France!
Red13JoePa wrote:Enigma869 wrote: The reality is that people who don't visit boards like MelodicRock have no idea who Steve Augeri is.
As with perry.
"Journey" is what is known, be it DSB or OS.
SF-Dano wrote:Enigma869 wrote:They're about as relevant in 2011 as Atari!
I think they are relevent to anyone who enjoys their newer music. Relevant in the grander picture of the music business? Not so much, but then, I personally could care less about the music and artists that are deemed "relevant" by the music business these days.
Look - this band has continued to make a pretty decent living playing live and giving their current fans new music. Are they a top tier name in the industry anymore? Obviously not. But who among their true peers is? Only a very select few (Bon Jovi, Aerosmith, U2, maybe Def Leappard?). Journey is at the top of that ladder just below those groups as far as AOR acts go.
Yoda wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:Enigma869 wrote: The reality is that people who don't visit boards like MelodicRock have no idea who Steve Augeri is.
As with perry.
"Journey" is what is known, be it DSB or OS.
I don't know Red, I'd have to disagree with you on the as with Perry part. Like him or not, he's pretty famous.
Red13JoePa wrote:Yoda wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:Enigma869 wrote: The reality is that people who don't visit boards like MelodicRock have no idea who Steve Augeri is.
As with perry.
"Journey" is what is known, be it DSB or OS.
I don't know Red, I'd have to disagree with you on the as with Perry part. Like him or not, he's pretty famous.
Most loons think this way.
Navarro wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:Yoda wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:Enigma869 wrote: The reality is that people who don't visit boards like MelodicRock have no idea who Steve Augeri is.
As with perry.
"Journey" is what is known, be it DSB or OS.
I don't know Red, I'd have to disagree with you on the as with Perry part. Like him or not, he's pretty famous.
Most loons think this way.
I would say for most of us 35 and up Steve Perry is pretty famous. Oh Sherrie and Foolish Heart were pretty big hits. Most of us grew up with Steve's music and voice. I would say younger than 35 are pretty clueless about who SP is.
Yoda wrote:Navarro wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:Yoda wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:Enigma869 wrote: The reality is that people who don't visit boards like MelodicRock have no idea who Steve Augeri is.
As with perry.
"Journey" is what is known, be it DSB or OS.
I don't know Red, I'd have to disagree with you on the as with Perry part. Like him or not, he's pretty famous.
Most loons think this way.
I would say for most of us 35 and up Steve Perry is pretty famous. Oh Sherrie and Foolish Heart were pretty big hits. Most of us grew up with Steve's music and voice. I would say younger than 35 are pretty clueless about who SP is.
This is where I'm getting at. I don't know how old Red is, but I'm assuming he must be younger than 35 to think Perry's fame is on the same level as Augeri. To me, growing up in the 80's, that's pretty ridiculous. Perry was about as famous as the likes of Madonna, Phil Collins, and Rod Stewart back then. While his bread and butter was Journey - like you said - Oh Sherrie and Foolish Heart were huge! Certainly, I can see his point if you don't include the late 70's, 80's, and 90's.
Yoda wrote:Navarro wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:Yoda wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:Enigma869 wrote: The reality is that people who don't visit boards like MelodicRock have no idea who Steve Augeri is.
As with perry.
"Journey" is what is known, be it DSB or OS.
I don't know Red, I'd have to disagree with you on the as with Perry part. Like him or not, he's pretty famous.
Most loons think this way.
I would say for most of us 35 and up Steve Perry is pretty famous. Oh Sherrie and Foolish Heart were pretty big hits. Most of us grew up with Steve's music and voice. I would say younger than 35 are pretty clueless about who SP is.
This is where I'm getting at. I don't know how old Red is, but I'm assuming he must be younger than 35 to think Perry's
fame is on the same level as Augeri. To me, growing up in the 80's, that's pretty ridiculous. Perry was about as famous as the likes of Madonna, Phil Collins, and Rod Stewart back then. While his bread and butter was Journey - like you said - Oh
Sherrie and Foolish Heart were huge! Certainly, I can see his point if you don't include the late 70's, 80's, and 90's.
Jana wrote:Yoda wrote:Navarro wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:Yoda wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:Enigma869 wrote: The reality is that people who don't visit boards like MelodicRock have no idea who Steve Augeri is.
As with perry.
"Journey" is what is known, be it DSB or OS.
I don't know Red, I'd have to disagree with you on the as with Perry part. Like him or not, he's pretty famous.
Most loons think this way.
I would say for most of us 35 and up Steve Perry is pretty famous. Oh Sherrie and Foolish Heart were pretty big hits. Most of us grew up with Steve's music and voice. I would say younger than 35 are pretty clueless about who SP is.
This is where I'm getting at. I don't know how old Red is, but I'm assuming he must be younger than 35 to think Perry's
fame is on the same level as Augeri. To me, growing up in the 80's, that's pretty ridiculous. Perry was about as famous as the likes of Madonna, Phil Collins, and Rod Stewart back then. While his bread and butter was Journey - like you said - Oh
Sherrie and Foolish Heart were huge! Certainly, I can see his point if you don't include the late 70's, 80's, and 90's.
Not worldwide was the name Steve Perry as famous as Madonna, even back then, no way. The woman has sold over 300 million albums.
Red13JoePa wrote:Enigma869 wrote: The reality is that people who don't visit boards like MelodicRock have no idea who Steve Augeri is.
As with perry.
"Journey" is what is known, be it DSB or OS.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 197 guests