Moderator: Andrew
Ehwmatt wrote:What a cocksucker. Sorry for St. Louis fans, but hey, at least you got two WS and a WS appearance out of the fatass.
fightingilliniJRNY wrote:I'm a die-hard Cardinals fan, and I think this could have been the best thing to happen to the franchise. Don't get me wrong, I'll miss seeing Albert in the Cardinals uniform, but they got his best years for insanely cheap. I would want nothing to do with years 32-41 at that price with no opt-outs or anything. Part of me was hoping that someone would out-bid the Cardinals and they could back out of negotiations.
He'll certainly be as productive for the next five or six years, maybe seven or eight, but it's the last few years that would frighten me at $25 million per. It's almost as if the Angels really, really wanted the next five years and will worry about the next five when they come. Who can blame them, though - this alone will jump-start that franchise like nothing else. Add in C.J. Wilson, and the AL West will be wild.
Now, I very well could be eating my words if he goes for .330/45/130 in each of the next 10 years with six World Series titles.
Fact Finder wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:fightingilliniJRNY wrote:I'm a die-hard Cardinals fan, and I think this could have been the best thing to happen to the franchise. Don't get me wrong, I'll miss seeing Albert in the Cardinals uniform, but they got his best years for insanely cheap. I would want nothing to do with years 32-41 at that price with no opt-outs or anything. Part of me was hoping that someone would out-bid the Cardinals and they could back out of negotiations.
He'll certainly be as productive for the next five or six years, maybe seven or eight, but it's the last few years that would frighten me at $25 million per. It's almost as if the Angels really, really wanted the next five years and will worry about the next five when they come. Who can blame them, though - this alone will jump-start that franchise like nothing else. Add in C.J. Wilson, and the AL West will be wild.
Now, I very well could be eating my words if he goes for .330/45/130 in each of the next 10 years with six World Series titles.
Interesting take. It would just be nice to see some famous athlete somewhere (especially in baseball or b-ball) play their careers in a so-called "small/mid" market and not bolt just for a few extra million on top of hundreds already there.
Ha! We thought the same thing when the Reds signed Griffey Jr. to come home. That didn't work out to well.
Seven Wishes wrote:What a douchebag. I just lost a ton of respect for him.
conversationpc wrote:
I don't know who you're looking at but I've never seen much fat on that muscle-bound dude.
fightingilliniJRNY wrote:Seven Wishes wrote:What a douchebag. I just lost a ton of respect for him.
In all seriousness, why? I don't understand this sentiment. It's not like he bolted for just like $2.5 million extra after saying he wanted to be a Cardinal for life. The Cardinals offered the FOURTH best deal to him this offseason. We can sit back on our high horse and condemn him for this (for some reason or another), but no matter how much you like your current employer - why wouldn't you at least seriously entertain making significantly more at a new location than they are offering you?
Don wrote:With a full no-trade clause, I see the Angels using him more as a designated hitter as they won't be able to dump him so easily if he breaks down during the next ten years.
conversationpc wrote:Bah...Dude is a fairly decent player in the field also, even though he made more errors than usual this last season (11). He has been gold glove caliber before and first basemen don't tend to get beat up all that much.
Ehwmatt wrote:fightingilliniJRNY wrote:We can sit back on our high horse and condemn him for this (for some reason or another), but no matter how much you like your current employer - why wouldn't you at least seriously entertain making significantly more at a new location than they are offering you?
This argument is so lame and worn out. I had a chance to take a LOT more (double figures here without getting tactless) at another employer and turned it down because I liked the people at the other place better.
fightingilliniJRNY wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:fightingilliniJRNY wrote:We can sit back on our high horse and condemn him for this (for some reason or another), but no matter how much you like your current employer - why wouldn't you at least seriously entertain making significantly more at a new location than they are offering you?
This argument is so lame and worn out. I had a chance to take a LOT more (double figures here without getting tactless) at another employer and turned it down because I liked the people at the other place better.
Okay, then I guess you would turn down extra money. But why should everybody do that? And why should someone who takes extra money be labeled a douchebag and cause people to lose respect?
AR wrote:Eventually major league baseball will contract to L.A., Chicago, New York, Philly, Dallas, Atlanta, Miami and Boston. Why bother following a team if you don't live in a big market? Sure a small to mid market team can compete briefly if they do almost everything right. At best though it only creates a small window and once their best players' contracts are up they can't afford to pay them and they get snatched up by one of the "big boys". This is why I went from being a huge baseball fan to basically not caring much anymore.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
AR wrote:Eventually major league baseball will contract to L.A., Chicago, New York, Philly, Dallas, Atlanta, Miami and Boston. Why bother following a team if you don't live in a big market? Sure a small to mid market team can compete briefly if they do almost everything right. At best though it only creates a small window and once their best players' contracts are up they can't afford to pay them and they get snatched up by one of the "big boys". This is why I went from being a huge baseball fan to basically not caring much anymore.
Enigma869 wrote:AR wrote:Eventually major league baseball will contract to L.A., Chicago, New York, Philly, Dallas, Atlanta, Miami and Boston. Why bother following a team if you don't live in a big market? Sure a small to mid market team can compete briefly if they do almost everything right. At best though it only creates a small window and once their best players' contracts are up they can't afford to pay them and they get snatched up by one of the "big boys". This is why I went from being a huge baseball fan to basically not caring much anymore.
The only problem with this argument (and everyone who lives outside of the places you mentioned makes this argument) is that Minnesota almost always fields a competitive team, and they are the poster child for "small market".
AR wrote:
And they are now handcuffed due to the Mauer contract, and were almost contracted once themselves. That's what happens when a small market team tries to keep one of it's good players.
conversationpc wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:What a cocksucker. Sorry for St. Louis fans, but hey, at least you got two WS and a WS appearance out of the fatass.
I don't know who you're looking at but I've never seen much fat on that muscle-bound dude.
Enigma869 wrote:AR wrote:
And they are now handcuffed due to the Mauer contract, and were almost contracted once themselves. That's what happens when a small market team tries to keep one of it's good players.
Sorry dude. The Mauer excuse doesn't work. They defintely paid WAY too much for the hometown kid. That said, Minnesota is ALWAYS very competitive, and that was the case long before Mauer ever got there.
AR wrote:
So they should have just let him walk so a big market team could overpay him?
AR wrote: Also, Minnesota is one of the few exceptions that big market team fans will always point to while baseball is dying in many other markets.
Enigma869 wrote:AR wrote:
So they should have just let him walk so a big market team could overpay him?
Yes. They overpaid for the guy because he's from Minnesota. The guy has a history of being fragile as hell and misses a lot of games. Not to mention, he plays a position that guys fade fast, playing. Dude had AWFUL numbers last season, after getting his payday.AR wrote: Also, Minnesota is one of the few exceptions that big market team fans will always point to while baseball is dying in many other markets.
And your point? Sure people point to Minnesota. They are a small market team who has won a lot of games and are competitive as hell every season. They're the perfect team to point to when someone claims that small market teams can't compete. Last I checked, the Tampa Bay Devil Dogs aren't a big market team by any stretch of the imagination, and have finished ahead of the Red Sox in the past two seasons!
AR wrote:
And the Sox should be embarassed that it happened considering how many more resources they have.
Last I checked the Twins won 63 games last year. One bad contract.
The Red Sox and others will always be able to afford to eat those.
Enigma869 wrote:AR wrote:
And the Sox should be embarassed that it happened considering how many more resources they have.
Last I checked the Twins won 63 games last year. One bad contract.
The Red Sox and others will always be able to afford to eat those.
And last I checked, the Red Sox finished in third place the last two seasons! While I'm not a fan of the current system in baseball, claiming the team with the number one payroll automatically wins is a dopey argument in all sports, because the reality is that it almost NEVER happens that way!
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests