Moderator: Andrew
However, and perhaps unavoidably, Pineda lacks the visceral depth breathed into the songs by Perry, who crafted many of them. More apparently, after five years under his belt as the band's singer, Pineda still seemed awkward at times. He exuded energy with his ceaseless dashing and leaping about, but his repeated microphone flips came off as something he is still trying to master in Frontman 101 classes. And his stage patter included only requisite stage exhortations like, "How you doing, Illinois?!"
Journey/Survivor wrote:Neal Schon is and always has been the heart and soul of Journey. If you don't have Neal Schon, you don't have Journey.
The Sushi Hunter wrote:Journey/Survivor wrote:Neal Schon is and always has been the heart and soul of Journey. If you don't have Neal Schon, you don't have Journey.
Probably very true. But Perry is also much a part of this band as well. Just look at how many songs from the Perry era are still being played at concerts and sold on Journey albums.
Review: Flashes of brilliance, but far from perfect Journey show
Pineda boasts a commanding set of pipes, just about as strong as Perry's in his heyday. However, and perhaps unavoidably, Pineda lacks the visceral depth breathed into the songs by Perry, who crafted many of them. More apparently, after five years under his belt as the band's singer, Pineda still seemed awkward at times. He exuded energy with his ceaseless dashing and leaping about, but his repeated microphone flips came off as something he is still trying to master in Frontman 101 classes. And his stage patter included only requisite stage exhortations like, "How you doing, Illinois?!"
Review: Flashes of brilliance, but far from perfect Journey show
he is still trying to master in Frontman 101 classes
tater1977 wrote:Meantime, Pineda boasts a commanding set of pipes, just about as strong as Perry's in his heyday. However, and perhaps unavoidably, Pineda lacks the visceral depth breathed into the songs by Perry, who crafted many of them. More apparently, after five years under his belt as the band's singer, Pineda still seemed awkward at times. He exuded energy with his ceaseless dashing and leaping about, but his repeated microphone flips came off as something he is still trying to master in Frontman 101 classes. And his stage patter included only requisite stage exhortations like, "How you doing, Illinois?!"
Journey/Survivor wrote:Neal Schon is and always has been the heart and soul of Journey. If you don't have Neal Schon, you don't have Journey.
tater1977 wrote:It might as well have been Loverboy Karaoke Night.
Voyager wrote:Likeswise, without Steve Perry all you have is Journey karaoke night. It's no different than Led Zeppelin without Robert Plant, Aerosmith without Steven Tyler, or the Rolling Stones without Mick Jagger.
The Sushi Hunter wrote:Voyager wrote:Likeswise, without Steve Perry all you have is Journey karaoke night. It's no different than Led Zeppelin without Robert Plant, Aerosmith without Steven Tyler, or the Rolling Stones without Mick Jagger.
That's exactly what I've been saying all along. In Journey's situation though, it's partially that they are caught between a rock and a hard place because the classic Perry era tunes are so popular over all the other songs that they do and Arnel does a great job providing the vocals for those specific songs, they continue to do them. And when they do them, it's pretty much a Journey karaoke deal just about. This is primarily the reason why I've stressed that I wish they would not do the classics any longer and just concentrate on new materials. But then you got that factor with the classic Journey songs that are so popular.
And I was just thinking about Steven Tyler and Aerosmith over the weekend while I was listening to one of their albums. I was comparing the situation if Tyler left Aerosmith like Perry left Journey and if a Tyler replacement would work out. I conclude that Aerosmith couldn't be without Tyler for sure.
jestor92 wrote:Hell Schon was able to prove that when he started Soul SirkUS and Planet US.
The Sushi Hunter wrote:Voyager wrote:Likeswise, without Steve Perry all you have is Journey karaoke night. It's no different than Led Zeppelin without Robert Plant, Aerosmith without Steven Tyler, or the Rolling Stones without Mick Jagger.
That's exactly what I've been saying all along. In Journey's situation though, it's partially that they are caught between a rock and a hard place because the classic Perry era tunes are so popular over all the other songs that they do and Arnel does a great job providing the vocals for those specific songs, they continue to do them. And when they do them, it's pretty much a Journey karaoke deal just about. This is primarily the reason why I've stressed that I wish they would not do the classics any longer and just concentrate on new materials. But then you got that factor with the classic Journey songs that are so popular.
And I was just thinking about Steven Tyler and Aerosmith over the weekend while I was listening to one of their albums. I was comparing the situation if Tyler left Aerosmith like Perry left Journey and if a Tyler replacement would work out. I conclude that Aerosmith couldn't be without Tyler for sure.
annie89509 wrote:The Sushi Hunter wrote:Voyager wrote:Likeswise, without Steve Perry all you have is Journey karaoke night. It's no different than Led Zeppelin without Robert Plant, Aerosmith without Steven Tyler, or the Rolling Stones without Mick Jagger.
That's exactly what I've been saying all along. In Journey's situation though, it's partially that they are caught between a rock and a hard place because the classic Perry era tunes are so popular over all the other songs that they do and Arnel does a great job providing the vocals for those specific songs, they continue to do them. And when they do them, it's pretty much a Journey karaoke deal just about. This is primarily the reason why I've stressed that I wish they would not do the classics any longer and just concentrate on new materials. But then you got that factor with the classic Journey songs that are so popular.
And I was just thinking about Steven Tyler and Aerosmith over the weekend while I was listening to one of their albums. I was comparing the situation if Tyler left Aerosmith like Perry left Journey and if a Tyler replacement would work out. I conclude that Aerosmith couldn't be without Tyler for sure.
Was it last year, or the year before, that Joe Perry says they're looking for replacement because ST won't commit to the band or touring? Wonder what's happening with Aerosmith currently.
“After some long…hard…thoughts…I’ve decided it’s time for me to let go of my mistress ‘American Idol’ before she boils my rabbit,” he said. “I strayed from my first love, Aerosmith, and I’m back — but instead of begging on my hands and knees, I’ve got two fists in the air and I’m kicking the door open with my band.”
annie89509 wrote:The Sushi Hunter wrote:Voyager wrote:Likeswise, without Steve Perry all you have is Journey karaoke night. It's no different than Led Zeppelin without Robert Plant, Aerosmith without Steven Tyler, or the Rolling Stones without Mick Jagger.
That's exactly what I've been saying all along. In Journey's situation though, it's partially that they are caught between a rock and a hard place because the classic Perry era tunes are so popular over all the other songs that they do and Arnel does a great job providing the vocals for those specific songs, they continue to do them. And when they do them, it's pretty much a Journey karaoke deal just about. This is primarily the reason why I've stressed that I wish they would not do the classics any longer and just concentrate on new materials. But then you got that factor with the classic Journey songs that are so popular.
And I was just thinking about Steven Tyler and Aerosmith over the weekend while I was listening to one of their albums. I was comparing the situation if Tyler left Aerosmith like Perry left Journey and if a Tyler replacement would work out. I conclude that Aerosmith couldn't be without Tyler for sure.
Was it last year, or the year before, that Joe Perry says they're looking for replacement because ST won't commit to the band or touring? Wonder what's happening with Aerosmith currently.
tater1977 wrote:annie89509 wrote:The Sushi Hunter wrote:Voyager wrote:Likeswise, without Steve Perry all you have is Journey karaoke night. It's no different than Led Zeppelin without Robert Plant, Aerosmith without Steven Tyler, or the Rolling Stones without Mick Jagger.
That's exactly what I've been saying all along. In Journey's situation though, it's partially that they are caught between a rock and a hard place because the classic Perry era tunes are so popular over all the other songs that they do and Arnel does a great job providing the vocals for those specific songs, they continue to do them. And when they do them, it's pretty much a Journey karaoke deal just about. This is primarily the reason why I've stressed that I wish they would not do the classics any longer and just concentrate on new materials. But then you got that factor with the classic Journey songs that are so popular.
And I was just thinking about Steven Tyler and Aerosmith over the weekend while I was listening to one of their albums. I was comparing the situation if Tyler left Aerosmith like Perry left Journey and if a Tyler replacement would work out. I conclude that Aerosmith couldn't be without Tyler for sure.
Was it last year, or the year before, that Joe Perry says they're looking for replacement because ST won't commit to the band or touring? Wonder what's happening with Aerosmith currently.
http://www.classicrockmagazine.com/news ... ven-tyler/
September 24 2012
Steven Tyler says the stage fall that sent him to rehab in 2009 and led to the near-collapse of Aerosmith turned out to be “magic.” The singer explains: “The guys were angry because it was a great tour, and I was angry. I fucked it up by falling off the stage. I know what I did. I didn’t get back to them and they started to look for other lead singers, which pissed me off even more. It was not nice at the moment. I was totally incensed that these guys didn’t call me back – but I had done something to them. It’s just the boys’ club. We can be rough with each other.”
The_Noble_Cause wrote:jestor92 wrote:Hell Schon was able to prove that when he started Soul SirkUS and Planet US.
PlanetUs never got a shot. With Hagar's name attached and Satch on co-guitar, it could've been somethin killer. Or at least better than Chickenfoot.
jestor92 wrote:The_Noble_Cause wrote:jestor92 wrote:Hell Schon was able to prove that when he started Soul SirkUS and Planet US.
PlanetUs never got a shot. With Hagar's name attached and Satch on co-guitar, it could've been somethin killer. Or at least better than Chickenfoot.
You would think that, but they couldn't even get a contract for a record. I remember Hagar saying something like "We have this song that we tried to get in Spiderman, but it was too fucking heavy" or something along those lines. They never got a contract and Anthony and Hagar went back to VH. Schon started Soul SirkUS and was playing in front of a few hundred people at places like the Crock Rock in Allentown, PA. No one cares about Schon or Cain unless they're in Journey at this point. They either put out music under the Journey name or the music falls on deaf ears. PlanetUs, Soul SirkUS, and Hardline was proof of that.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 7 guests