scarygirl wrote:While I agree with 99 percent of what you said, can we not leave the THREE year old out of it? She isn't responsible for her parent's actions. She is going to be WRONGLY tarnished enough by this as it is.
No.
Moderator: Andrew
scarygirl wrote:While I agree with 99 percent of what you said, can we not leave the THREE year old out of it? She isn't responsible for her parent's actions. She is going to be WRONGLY tarnished enough by this as it is.
Ehwmatt wrote:scarygirl wrote:While I agree with 99 percent of what you said, can we not leave the THREE year old out of it? She isn't responsible for her parent's actions. She is going to be WRONGLY tarnished enough by this as it is.
No.
scarygirl wrote:I am glad they caught one of the suspects. So sorry that Boston is going through all of this.
As to my previous comments, I was simply suggesting that it is wrong to trust government simply because they are government, democratic or not. Since governments are run by flawed men, it is best to keep them on their toes. The right to question the actions of our ELECTED leaders is not something to be taken lightly. Always question!!! On a personal note, I don't take any grievous harm from any comments made toward me. Opinions are like butt holes, everyone has them.
Boomchild wrote:The situation with the suspects in this tragic event has got me thinking that now more then ever the government's focus on the illegal immigration issue should be securing our borders. That should be FIRST on the list and then worry about the other details later. According to information released, both suspects entered the U.S. legally. Now just think what is possible with our border areas that are not secure.
steveo777 wrote:Boomchild wrote:The situation with the suspects in this tragic event has got me thinking that now more then ever the government's focus on the illegal immigration issue should be securing our borders. That should be FIRST on the list and then worry about the other details later. According to information released, both suspects entered the U.S. legally. Now just think what is possible with our border areas that are not secure.
Usually south of the border immigrants aren't Muslim extremists. I agree we need better control - quit importing people of a belief that America should be destroyed, namely Muslims.
steveo777 wrote:Boomchild wrote:The situation with the suspects in this tragic event has got me thinking that now more then ever the government's focus on the illegal immigration issue should be securing our borders. That should be FIRST on the list and then worry about the other details later. According to information released, both suspects entered the U.S. legally. Now just think what is possible with our border areas that are not secure.
Usually south of the border immigrants aren't Muslim extremists. I agree we need better control - quit importing people of a belief that America should be destroyed, namely Muslims.
scarygirl wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:scarygirl wrote:While I agree with 99 percent of what you said, can we not leave the THREE year old out of it? She isn't responsible for her parent's actions. She is going to be WRONGLY tarnished enough by this as it is.
No.
I thought sins of the father went out with the dark ages....
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
~ Benjamin Franklin
Police perform house-to-house raids in Watertown MA ripping innocent families from their homes
WATERTOWN, MA -- On Friday, April 19, 2013, during a manhunt for a bombing suspect, police and federal agents spent the day storming people's homes and performing illegal searches. While it was unclear initially if the home searches were voluntary, it is now crystal clear that they were absolutely NOT voluntary. Police were filmed ripping people from their homes at gunpoint, marching the residents out with their hands raised in submission, and then storming the homes to perform their illegal searches.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... LrbsUVSVl8
This was part of a larger operation that involved total lockdown of the suburban neighbor to Boston. Roads were barricaded and vehicle traffic was prohibited. A No-Fly Zone was declared over the town. People were "ordered" to stay indoors. Businesses were told not to open. National Guard soldiers helped with the lockdown, and were photographed checking IDs of pedestrians on the streets. All the while, police were performing these disgusting house-to-house searches.
slucero wrote:Trying to figure out how this quotation, which also is inscribed on a plaque in the stairwell of the pedestal of the fucking Statue of Liberty....Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
~ Benjamin Franklin
... can in any way shape or form..., jive with this:Police perform house-to-house raids in Watertown MA ripping innocent families from their homes
WATERTOWN, MA -- On Friday, April 19, 2013, during a manhunt for a bombing suspect, police and federal agents spent the day storming people's homes and performing illegal searches. While it was unclear initially if the home searches were voluntary, it is now crystal clear that they were absolutely NOT voluntary. Police were filmed ripping people from their homes at gunpoint, marching the residents out with their hands raised in submission, and then storming the homes to perform their illegal searches.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... LrbsUVSVl8
This was part of a larger operation that involved total lockdown of the suburban neighbor to Boston. Roads were barricaded and vehicle traffic was prohibited. A No-Fly Zone was declared over the town. People were "ordered" to stay indoors. Businesses were told not to open. National Guard soldiers helped with the lockdown, and were photographed checking IDs of pedestrians on the streets. All the while, police were performing these disgusting house-to-house searches.
I get there are "extenuating circumstances"... that is what martial law (which suspends some of civil law) is for.. but in this case martial law was not declared.... yet unwarranted search happened.
slucero wrote:I get your point.. and for the most part agree... but certainly its a stretch to assume "dragnet/roadblock equals warrant-less search"... especially considering the attack had already occurred. There clearly is danger in simply always assuming a terrorist attack is always "imminent" to validate the action.
I'm concerned about both... the cost of, and the bending of the rule/spirit of the law.
Fact Finder wrote:sluc, I'd guess most residents of that Watertown area were more than happy to have the SWAT dudes check out their property at the time. Do we know if anyone actually affected up in Mass has protested these actions? I haven't heard any except from the bleachers.
Ehwmatt wrote:slucero wrote:I get your point.. and for the most part agree... but certainly its a stretch to assume "dragnet/roadblock equals warrant-less search"... especially considering the attack had already occurred. There clearly is danger in simply always assuming a terrorist attack is always "imminent" to validate the action.
I'm concerned about both... the cost of, and the bending of the rule/spirit of the law.
I hear you. The roadblock cases are really the only cases that are factually anywhere near analogous to this situation... Thankfully. I do think they are illuminating and indicate that such a search might more likely than not be deemed reasonable in such circumstances. Now, whether that violates the spirit of the fourth amendment is a different question from how a federal court would rule. Courts obviously decide points of constitutional law that reasonable Americans disagree with all the time
Voyager wrote:Imagine the fate of the lone surviving suspect....
He cannot speak.
He is facing life in solitary at best, death sentence at worst.
Nobody will ever want to associate with him - ever.
His idolized brother is now dead, leaving him aimless and orphaned.
Cops and prison guards will hate and abuse him for killing a cop.
The public will enjoy watching him languish in a lonely, cold, solitary prison cell with no voice - for life.
In other words, this is one hopeless mother fucker.
The Sushi Hunter wrote:Voyager wrote:Imagine the fate of the lone surviving suspect....
He cannot speak.
He is facing life in solitary at best, death sentence at worst.
Nobody will ever want to associate with him - ever.
His idolized brother is now dead, leaving him aimless and orphaned.
Cops and prison guards will hate and abuse him for killing a cop.
The public will enjoy watching him languish in a lonely, cold, solitary prison cell with no voice - for life.
In other words, this is one hopeless mother fucker.
He's got his relatives who think he and his brother were "framed" plus some people who have conspiracy theories.
scarygirl wrote:The Sushi Hunter wrote:Voyager wrote:Imagine the fate of the lone surviving suspect....
He cannot speak.
He is facing life in solitary at best, death sentence at worst.
Nobody will ever want to associate with him - ever.
His idolized brother is now dead, leaving him aimless and orphaned.
Cops and prison guards will hate and abuse him for killing a cop.
The public will enjoy watching him languish in a lonely, cold, solitary prison cell with no voice - for life.
In other words, this is one hopeless mother fucker.
He's got his relatives who think he and his brother were "framed" plus some people who have conspiracy theories.
I am not being SYMPATHETIC here, but I see the 19 year old's picture and he looks like a normal run of the mill teenager. I just can't imagine what would make an otherwise affable looking kid do that.
scarygirl wrote:I am not being SYMPATHETIC here, but I see the 19 year old's picture and he looks like a normal run of the mill teenager. I just can't imagine what would make an otherwise affable looking kid do that.
Boomchild wrote:scarygirl wrote:I am not being SYMPATHETIC here, but I see the 19 year old's picture and he looks like a normal run of the mill teenager. I just can't imagine what would make an otherwise affable looking kid do that.
What is a shame is that he has thrown his life away at such a young age and for what? What they did is not going to change anything except for the victims he's killed and wounded. The other thing that is bugging me is how authorities are stating that these two acted alone. Personally, I find this hard to believe since in the majority of cases these attacks are done by terrorist cells. I saw a report that the Saudi national that was the first person of interest, has shown up on previous terrorist watch lists. That and he had unexplainable burns on his hands. Then there is the case of the brother
of the 19yr old being fingered by a some nation and reported to the FBI which caused them to look into his background and interview him only to clear him.
tater1977 wrote:He's not going to be tried as an "enemy combatant"???![]()
To be tried as an American citizen in our US court system....
Send him to GITMO...
We need a new US atorney.....
slucero wrote:tater1977 wrote:He's not going to be tried as an "enemy combatant"???![]()
To be tried as an American citizen in our US court system....
Send him to GITMO...
We need a new US atorney.....
He's a U.S. citizen... so its a no-go...
I'd rather he was tried as in the civilian courts.. at least then it can be covered.. the military courts would be closed...
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests