Moderator: Andrew
tj wrote:Rolie's statement that you can't get too far out ahead of your audience or you lose them would have been wise to consider with their last album.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:tj wrote:Rolie's statement that you can't get too far out ahead of your audience or you lose them would have been wise to consider with their last album.
Because playing it safe with earlier albums, like Arrival, worked wonders, right?To date, "Revelation" is the only post-Perry album to be a bonafide hit. To crib a phrase from James Carville, "it's the re-records, stupid!"
Majestic wrote:Both Arrival and Revelation (new material disk) "played it safe" by sticking pretty close to the classic formula. Revelation having two disks made the sales numbers bigger but I don't think the re-records was why, do you? It could have been a double album of anything, I think, and the numbers would be the same.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Majestic wrote:Both Arrival and Revelation (new material disk) "played it safe" by sticking pretty close to the classic formula. Revelation having two disks made the sales numbers bigger but I don't think the re-records was why, do you? It could have been a double album of anything, I think, and the numbers would be the same.
Without the hits, the safe sounding Arrival AND the more experimental Eclipse, both crash landed straight into the $1 bargain bin at Walmart. Not to mention Red 13 and Generations. So no, I don't agree with what you're saying. Revelation was released on the heels of Don't Stop Believin mania and capitalized on the popularity of that song. Good on Schon for taking some creative risks on Eclipse, sales figures be damned.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Without the hits, the safe sounding Arrival AND the more experimental Eclipse, both crash landed straight into the $1 bargain bin at Walmart. Not to mention Red 13 and Generations. So no, I don't agree with what you're saying. Revelation was released on the heels of Don't Stop Believin mania and capitalized on the popularity of that song. Good on Schon for taking some creative risks on Eclipse, sales figures be damned.
Jeremey wrote:Here's the important thing to remember – the re-records didn't play nearly as much a role in the success of that record other than the "platinum math" of a double CD. People wanted to buy new music from Journey, they wanted to hear Pineda, they loved his story and the band actually recorded new material that lived up to their brand.
Understand this: If the band had released a single CD of re-recorded hits with Pineda, or Augeri, or Jeff Scot Soto, Revelations would not have had the success it did.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Jeremey wrote:Here's the important thing to remember – the re-records didn't play nearly as much a role in the success of that record other than the "platinum math" of a double CD. People wanted to buy new music from Journey, they wanted to hear Pineda, they loved his story and the band actually recorded new material that lived up to their brand.
Understand this: If the band had released a single CD of re-recorded hits with Pineda, or Augeri, or Jeff Scot Soto, Revelations would not have had the success it did.
That's an eloquent historical recap, Jeremey. I always enjoy your posts. Unfortunately, five releases and counting, I don't think there is ANY proof that there is a demand in the marketplace, beyond die-hard fans, for new Journey music (not during the Augeri or the Pineda years). As I mentioned, Revelation DID come out during the DSB-mania and the band enjoyed a nice spike in publicity. No denying that. The Revelation combo package included a cd of hits, a DVD of mostly hits, and a cd of new tunes - all sold at the affordable Walmart "nice price." Take away the new tunes and, in my opinion, it would have sold just as well. After all, the initial deal with Walmart was to re-record the hits - that pretty much says it all. As a totally non-scientific example, I was at a BBQ in the summer of 2008. An old friend of mine, who happened to be a regular viewer of Sopranos, purchased the Revelation package and was blaring the re-records loudly in his backyard patio. When I tried to get him to spin the disc of new material, he wouldn't. No interest. AT ALL. He later admitted he lost it or threw it out! None of this should be surprising. This is similar to casual concertgoers who hit the beer tent anytime the band plays something new. Obviously, this is not to diminish your writing contributions. I enjoy Revelation, and most of the post-Perry releases. I just don't see any evidence of the band succeeding based on new material. Journey and Arnel were hot in the same way as Psy and Gangnam Style or that really annoying Friday song on YouTube. A blip on the zeitgeist radar. Nothing more. Neal and the band mistook this fleeting pop-cultural hype for reality and overestimated the American public's embrace of this lineup. So they released Eclipse expecting Revelation-like sales figures. Instead, they now find themselves right back in Arrival low ranking purgatory hell. And no amount of "playing it safe" or including more Cain ballads on the next cd is likely to change that.
FamilyMan wrote:I think both you boys are correct in your assessments. One anecdote I can share: When Eclipse was coming out, the band's publicist reached out to me (I was at CBS News) and asked if we could do a sequel of sorts to the CBS Sunday Morning piece on the new Journey lineup. We both agreed that the new album wasn't enough to sell the story. I can't remember now if it was her idea or mine to peg the story to the 30th Anniversary of "Don't Stop Believin'" which had now become a stadium anthem for the SF Giants and other franchises. But we agreed that the journey (pardon the pun) of that song was a fun new prism through which we could look at the band, and retell Arnel's story of triumph - because by 2011, they'd already played Manila and the band's trip to the Philippines had been documented by Ramona Diaz. We booked Neal, Jon and Arnel for the new interview, which was centered around "DSB." After the shoot, Neal complained to the publicist that we didn't ask enough about Eclipse. He seemed to be genuinely dumbfounded that we were more interested in a 30 year-old song rather than a new fresh project. Neal was really jazzed about Eclipse. He thought it was the best thing they'd done in years - perhaps since Perry. I think the public's rejection of it came as a complete surprise and hit him hard.
The_Noble_Cause wrote: Take away the new tunes and, in my opinion, it would have sold just as well.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests