RedWingFan wrote:Anyone else astonished that from Infinity to Trial By Fire = 18 years. And Trial By Fire to today = 20 years????
Hard to believe. That makes a lot of us who have been along for the whole ride pretty old.

Moderator: Andrew
RedWingFan wrote:Anyone else astonished that from Infinity to Trial By Fire = 18 years. And Trial By Fire to today = 20 years????
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Aaron wrote:I did listen to the cd several times. I was so offended by Schon's playing I discarded the cd quickly.
Offended? By what? As if de-tuning is something new?Aaron wrote:It did not meet my expectations on key to drive a positive vibe, lead guitar work that lacked soul and emotion (non wankfest playing) and vocal capability. There was zero soul in Neal's playing on this cd.
Sorry. Statements like this just have no credibility at all.
"On key to drive a positive vibe" - whatever the fuck that means. Are we discussing a rock band or the latest Tony Robbins motivational seminar?
Aaron wrote:The vocals were decent but too conservative with no risky maneuvers by Arnel. His vocals felt like he was protecting for live performances versus putting down his best in the studio regardless his live obligations.
Again, ridiculous. Arnel is pretty much shooting for the stratosphere on the cd. The vocals on this cd were recorded TWICE and the band spent more time on the vocals for Eclipse than Revelation.Aaron wrote:And the only track from Revelation worth it's salt is "Never Walk Away",
NWA is one of the most derivative songs on the album, sounding like a straight rip-off of JSS/Schon's "Believe In Me" and "Never Too Late" from Generations. As Schon said, "I don't see the point of repeating the same song with different chords."
So in total, you like one song off of Revelation, hate Eclipse and also hate Faith in the Heartland. Why not gather your cd collection, go to Tiger stadium and torch that shit. The hate is strong with you dude.Aaron wrote:...thanks to Jeremey for that.
Why? Jeremey said he changed NWA's lyrics mostly, not the melody. So again, you are just a crazed liar making OTT statements not backed-up by reality.Aaron wrote:And it's a good thing you have a keyboard because if we we're having a conversation we could not understand a word you're saying with Schon's Schlong in your mouth so much.
Says the guy pouting like a little bitch whose Power Wheels Barbie roadster got a flat. I think you're just "offended" because Neal is giving the D to Michaele and sending your Aqua Velva-sprayed love letters back marked 'Return to Sender.' Fucking nutcase.
Aaron wrote:Dude you need to back off the keyboard and turn The Kardashians back on. You may listen to music but you're clearly not a musician or a vocalist. Back to your omniscient view bro ...![]()
FamilyMan wrote:If an evolution of sound was what Neal and the band were looking for, then they shouldn't have jettisoned Jeff Scott Soto. The whole lead singer search which Neal himself has said they did was for the purpose of finding "the legacy sound / a tenor voice." I'd say Eclipse was a case of Neal wanting it both ways - and the result was it disappointed both legions of fans: those who admire Neal's jamming & shredding and those who only crave the hits.
FamilyMan wrote:If an evolution of sound was what Neal and the band were looking for, then they shouldn't have jettisoned Jeff Scott Soto.
FamilyMan wrote:...and the result was it disappointed both legions of fans: those who admire Neal's jamming & shredding and those who only crave the hits.
Eric wrote:As much as I love Eclipse...the point - playing up "the legacy sound" and then making Eclipse - has merit.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:FamilyMan wrote:If an evolution of sound was what Neal and the band were looking for, then they shouldn't have jettisoned Jeff Scott Soto.
We don't know the exact reasons why JSS was let go.FamilyMan wrote:...and the result was it disappointed both legions of fans: those who admire Neal's jamming & shredding and those who only crave the hits.
Based on what? If you are going by sales figures, then the band has been disappointing vast legions since Arrival flopped in 2001. I think you mean to say that YOU are disappointed.
FamilyMan wrote:If the band viewed Eclipse as successful, or that the fans wanted to hear it, they'd be playing it on tour. The fact they don't tells me they don't think those songs are crowd pleasers.
The_Noble_Cause wrote: Actually, they were playing "Ritual" and "She's a Mystery" as recently as 2014. Three years after Eclipse came out.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:FamilyMan wrote:If the band viewed Eclipse as successful, or that the fans wanted to hear it, they'd be playing it on tour. The fact they don't tells me they don't think those songs are crowd pleasers.
Actually, they were playing "Ritual" and "She's a Mystery" as recently as 2014. Three years after Eclipse came out.
But the band has previously been criticized for dropping Arrival songs from the set when they first toured behind it. So this is nothing new. The conclusion you draw ("If they don't play it live, it's not a success") can be applied to pretty much every album they've done since reforming in 1998. It would really be nice if you knew what the hell you were talking about before posting.
FamilyMan wrote:The set list tells you a lot about what the band's thinking is.
FamilyMan wrote:But Jon Cain, I suspect, is feeling the frustration of not having a true songwriting chemistry with anyone since SP. And therefore thinks going back into the studio is a waste of time and resources.
JourneyHard wrote:Journey should have released Chain of Love as a single with the beginning part cut out. Those lyrics are repeated later in the song so they wouldn't be lost. And then they could have paid off some rock djs to play the song. All of a sudden, the whole band seems strapped for cash. I don't know what is going on. You have to spend money to make money. Chain of Love could have been a minor hit for rock fans. And then they could play it every summer along with the dirty dozen.
Archetype wrote:Chain of Love and Anything is Possible are the top tracks from Eclipse to me.
Onestepper wrote:I blasted City of Love for the first time in a long time this weekend. Unfortunately it was the only song on the album I can really enjoy. Anything Is Possible is just a cheesy tune that does nothing for me.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Onestepper wrote:I blasted City of Love for the first time in a long time this weekend. Unfortunately it was the only song on the album I can really enjoy. Anything Is Possible is just a cheesy tune that does nothing for me.
If Anything is Possible is cheesy, what does that make City of Hope? At least the band has a precedent for writing wannabe feel good uplifting anthems like AIP in the past with Be Good to Yourself or Change for the Better. City of Hope raises the bar for trite cheeseball lyrics with crap like "across oceans of blue, where a dream can come true"... it's truly Cain at his worst. And then to make matters worse, they shamelessly try to capitalize on the DSB resurgence with Arnel singing "Never. Stop. Believing. Change. Will. Come." Yuck. Neal's playing just barely redeems the song.
Monker wrote:AIP is an anthem? LOL....too funny.
It's also funny that you compare City of Hope to DSB...
when AIP is clearly taking on the DSB theme and doesn't need to simply throw in similar lyrics.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Onestepper wrote:I blasted City of Love for the first time in a long time this weekend. Unfortunately it was the only song on the album I can really enjoy. Anything Is Possible is just a cheesy tune that does nothing for me.
If Anything is Possible is cheesy, what does that make City of Hope? At least the band has a precedent for writing wannabe feel good uplifting anthems like AIP in the past with Be Good to Yourself or Change for the Better. City of Hope raises the bar for trite cheeseball lyrics with crap like "across oceans of blue, where a dream can come true"... it's truly Cain at his worst. And then to make matters worse, they shamelessly try to capitalize on the DSB resurgence with Arnel singing "Never. Stop. Believing. Change. Will. Come." Yuck. Neal's playing just barely redeems the song.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Aaron wrote:Dude you need to back off the keyboard and turn The Kardashians back on. You may listen to music but you're clearly not a musician or a vocalist. Back to your omniscient view bro ...![]()
I don't need to attend the Juliard Conservatory of Music to know your ears are caked with shit. Kim K has more brains in her badonk than you do in your entire head. A few stubborn truths....
FACT - Arnel is not holding back on the album. His accent came back from his time in Manilla and much of the vocals had to be recorded TWICE. The guys spent more time and $$$ recording Arnel on this album than on Revelation. That's just indisputable.
FACT - Jeremey contributed to TWO songs on Revelation. To "thank him" for the album being good is just a complete posting.php?mode=quote&f=69&p=4720385#reviewexaggeration (aka lie).
FACT - Releasing a long-form concept album with proggy influences is anything but "chasing the next shining star." Is that what all the kids are listening to these days? Gimme a break.![]()
FACT - Singing show tunes in your car on your way to man the fryolator at Jack in the Box does NOT make you a musician or a vocalist. I've never claimed to be a musician. But many of my friends are, and they don't say dumb shit like "on key to drive a positive vibe." That's about as musician-speak as saying "It's a real toe tapper" or "It made me want to get up and shake my ass." Go drown yourself in a vat of hot piss.
Aaron wrote:If you listen to his vocals they are easy for him to achieve.
Aaron wrote:If you care to compare is range on Eclipse vs the catalog you find he is loafing on his vocals.
Aaron wrote:What makes Perry, Sammy, Lou, Brad, etc communicate their emotion is because they hung their ball sack out full bore on recordings. They were only thinking about doing their best work, not what they can cover live and that is what made them the best at what they do/did. Think about Arnel and how came into this gig. The only thing he is thinking about is how can he cover the material live, and give himself a break on the hard stuff. It's natural and you're shallow in thought.
Aaron wrote:Your facts are bullshit and really show you're politically savy with your talking points but incapable.
Aaron wrote:So since you've never claimed to be a musician how would know what musicians do? Do you play? Do you sing? Are you in a band? We all know the answer is naw.
Aaron wrote:The only thing you show is typical bullying political bs with nothing to back it up. Thanks for your points Hillary, it's appreciated.
Aaron wrote:Man this forum has dropped to whale crap level capability. Man I miss Dean!
Aaron wrote:Good luck to you TCN and you're omniscient political bs that has no depth.
Aaron wrote:Oh yea, how many cd's did Eclipse sell? Barely 100,000 units. I bought 2 so I personally was .002% of total sales.
Aaron wrote:Yawn, I'll stop here.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Onestepper wrote:I blasted City of Love for the first time in a long time this weekend. Unfortunately it was the only song on the album I can really enjoy. Anything Is Possible is just a cheesy tune that does nothing for me.
If Anything is Possible is cheesy, what does that make City of Hope? At least the band has a precedent for writing wannabe feel good uplifting anthems like AIP in the past with Be Good to Yourself or Change for the Better. City of Hope raises the bar for trite cheeseball lyrics with crap like "across oceans of blue, where a dream can come true"... it's truly Cain at his worst. And then to make matters worse, they shamelessly try to capitalize on the DSB resurgence with Arnel singing "Never. Stop. Believing. Change. Will. Come." Yuck. Neal's playing just barely redeems the song.
Onestepper wrote:You're not going to convince people otherwise.
And if I were to critique every song by their lyrical prose, and how goofy some of them are, we'd be here all day.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests