K.C.Journey Fan wrote:Monker is so full of it. Luntz was on Fox. He leans liberal. He had 8 polls. Four had Clinton leading, four had Trump leading. all of them within 2%.
And, you are insane. See the bit that somebody has in their sig about repeating the same thing over and over.
I have already said they were tied - THREE TIMES NOW.
I've been reading on Yahoo that Sanders voters are going to a Green Party.
Which means absolutely nothing. I heard on CNN that Clinton isn't worried about Sanders voters because she has already solidified almost all of them...and Sanders endorses her. So, a few hundred (out of MILLIONS) going Green or Libertarian means NOTHING>
I just saw video on Fox from this morning of HUNDREDS of Sanders voters in front of the DNC Convention chanting," Hell No DNC, we won't vote for Hillary".
It won't matter. Bernie is going to get up there and give a speech pouncing all over Trump and the Republicans, telling his followers to let go of this angst, and vote for Clinton because the alternative is horrifying. You will NOT see him up there telling his delegates to "vote your conscience." LOL
So, yeah, you may see a "few hundred" unrelenting protesters...but that does not represent the millions of Sanders voters who will support Clinton. It will pass...because they are irrelevant.
Trump slammed Shultz saying "She's mad because she cheated and stole the election for Clinton and now she's out".
Yeah, and Trump is so accurate in the things he makes up and vomits out of his orange head.
Now the liberal spin is Putin released the emails because he loves Trump.
That is not what was said, and it isn't being repeated by other Democrats. That sounds like FOX's view that people like you want to perpetuate. ONE person said they came from Russia. I don't even remember his name.
However, I'm sure they do have all of those Emails. Just as the NSA has them, I have no doubt that Russia also has listening posts that pick up the exact same communications. You are foolish if you believe Russia (and the USSR prior) would allow the US to have such an intelligence advantage.
Democrats are trying to make WHY the emails were released the focus, instead of the contents, which by the way if you read, they certainly prove Democrats have no intention of ever working with Conservatives.
Good. After the pact to obstruct Obama, IMO, the Republican party is unfit to be a part of the legislative process. Until they prove they will legislate with good intentions, they should be ignored.
Seems they are the ones whining about Conservatives no working with them
They don't. It is well documented that McConnel and Paul Cantor met in 2009 to discuss how to respond to Obama winning the Presidency. They obstructed anything and everything Obama or the Democrats proposed. That is a well documented FACT. It is a strategy that had its origins back to the early 1990's. Here is a good timeline:
http://washingtonmonthly.com/2015/02/01 ... struction/The DNC Convention already looks like a far bigger joke then the RNC they are trying to trash. It hasen't even started yet. Berrnie could make Cruz look like a Trump supporter when he's done talking about Clinton. I doubt it though. democrats always put party before country.
Sanders has already endorsed Clinton and said Kaine is better than Trump on his worst day. He called for a resignation and got what he wanted. The Democrats handled it a lot better than Trump and the Republicans. Trump put Cruz on stage and allowed him to get his last plea in...and then showed up to upstage him in an arrogant way. I do not believe those kind of antics will happen and the DNC...not because the Democrats are "better" but because they are not ego maniacs who spread fear and insults to gain popularity.
See above. The entire Republican party put their party above the needs of their country during Obama's first term. Every Republican member of congress should face an indictment for treason.
By Wednesday, you all will be talking about some other bullshit "news".
