Monker wrote:
Dude, you are suggesting that the SoS should not have meetings with foreign leaders and such because it creates a conflict of interest. If she can't do that, she can't do her job.
As for the donations, to prove some type of corruption, it's not enough to simply point out a conflict of interest....you have to prove that it bought some type of influence. I have not seen that part the equation. In the equation of "donations to the Clinton foundation = corruption".....all anybody focuses on is the donation. That is bullshit. Find the corruption, and then show it was rooted at the Clinton Foundation.
Then there is this suggestion of : "donation to the Clinton Foundation = money in Clinton's pocket"
I have seen no evidence of that, either. If the name of this organization were changed to the "Red Cross" and Bill was CEO, or whatever...I seriously doubt these accusation would be out there. These accusations are basically saying Bill and Hillary are stealing from the foundation....or the foundation is giving money to the Clonton's. Neither of which is true.
Ok. http://nypost.com/2016/08/11/hillary-pl ... on-donors/