Monker wrote:Great...if you want to comment on my opinion of Eclipse you can find one of those other posts and reply to that one instead...because I am offering NO opinion of Eclipse here - YOU ARE.
Selectively discussing the charting position of Eclipse, while ignoring the low sales of the majority of recent Journey cds, is transparently biased. How is that not expressing an opinion? Your agenda is showing.
Monker wrote:WTF! LOOK at what you are quoting. I put quotes around "stuff" because THAT IS WHAT YOU SAID. I did NOT put quotes around Journey. Therefore, you are misquoting me AGAIN. I said 'Journey "stuff"' BECAUSE you said "post-Perry stuff" and I changed "post-Perry" to "Journey" so it made more sense - and I DID NOT PUT QUOTES AROUND IT BECAUSE YOU DIDN"T SAY IT. And, it is even in context because Revelation is "post-Perry stuff" - which is what you said!
So rather than quote what I actually said, you admit that you pulled a few words out of context, changed the words around, and pretty much distorted it to fit your own agenda. Ah, very good.
Monker wrote:You don't know what "Journey stuff" is because you don't want to concede an argument that you can't win. Get over it already.
Journey stuff is pretty all encompassing. I said post-Perry material. Y'know, unsuccessful albums like Arrival, Red 13, Generations etc.
Monker wrote:No, you said "post-Perry stuff"....and the fans DID embrace Revelation - in a big way.
Revelation sold well like all the hits packages have so far. For all you know, Revelation was embraced by Tony Soprano fans.
Monker wrote:And, you can say the same about "post-Perry stuff". You do realize these are YOUR WORDS you are arguing against, right?
Not really. I see Escape-era T-shirts at the mall. Nobody is selling Generations or Revelation T-shirts. Other post-Perry stuff like concert sales and DVDs have done well because of the hits.
Monker wrote:Which has NOTHING to do with the quote you made, which when put in context is replying to your fictional idea of Revelation being released on its own. You do not know how that would have changed things.
All previous cds of post-Perry original material have not done well commercially, while hits packages (like Manila and Vegas dvd) have. It only stands to reason. There is at least a track record to inform my opinion. Your idea that Revelation sold well based on the strength of new songs has no basis in anything other than wishful thinking.
Monker wrote:That was not the argument....YOU SAID, the fans did not embrace "post-Perry Stuff". They did with Revelation. Period.
2/3 of Revelation is all Perry-era material. Try again. If anything Eclipse's sales performance is a damning referendum on Revelation. I guess those fans didn't like what they heard on Revelation to come back for seconds.
Monker wrote:None of that changes the FACT that Arrival sold three times what Eclipse did, and it even had a minor hit single.
Back then the record industry still existed and Itunes wasn't even a thing. This is such a bogus argument.
Monker wrote:Red 13 and Generation were not released in a way that would even garner that type of support.
They were released to stores and available to the public. VH1 Classic also aired a video for Faith in the Heartland.
Monker wrote:I remember on BT posting that since they were releasing Red 13 on their own that it could sell significantly less and make the band the same amount of money....selling 100,000 copies is probably making Journey the same as a platinum album would. Allen Craft replied and said I was absolutely correct and that is why they were doing it. It was an EXPERIMENT in releasing music on their website.
I think you are forgetting that the band lost their deal at Sony. Schon says they walked away. Others say Sony dropped them. When it came to Red 13, Cain later said the band "got their asses handed to them."
Monker wrote:To compare it to a release by Wal-Mart is just wrong...apples to oranges.
In both cases, the band made an album and it was released to stores.
Monker wrote:Generations was given away at almost all of their concerts for that tour. It was LATER released by Sanctuary. So, you haven an album that had tens of thousands of copies GIVEN AWAY and then went to retail. Those sales can't be compared to a Wal-Mart exclusive like Eclipse. Again, it's apples to oranges.
Numerous artists have given cds away at concerts and they still sold well later. Again, you are misinformed.
Monker wrote:You do know how to read, correct? Every post you make a full of lies. I did not say any of that, just read what you quoted above.
That's rich coming from the guy who openly admits to inventing quotes. Bottom line: prove that original material w/out Perry is commercially viable or go fuck off.