They're Eating The Dogs Presidential Thread

[verslibre]

Obviously, ICBMs in silos are pretty easy targets, but with our early warning technology, will be well on their way to nuking someone else before anything incoming arrives.

Yeah, and we'll all still be fucked, regardless.

"OoOoO! Got you first!"

[Monker]

LONG Overdue.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-signs- ... 53196.html

What is "long over due" is President Trump passing ANY legislation and not leading by executive order.

When Obama was signing executive orders, you and your ilk were calling him a dictator. At least Obama passed some of his agenda through congress.

[The_Noble_Cause]

LONG Overdue.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-signs- ... 53196.html

What is "long over due" is President Trump passing ANY legislation and not leading by executive order.

When Obama was signing executive orders, you and your ilk were calling him a dictator. At least Obama passed some of his agenda through congress.

The same people that wrote Obama's agenda are now welcoming him home with $400K speeches. This is why Democrats lost and will continue to lose. Regarding Executive Orders....Trump is avoiding the gridlock of a broken system. Smart move.

[Monker]

LONG Overdue.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-signs- ... 53196.html

What is "long over due" is President Trump passing ANY legislation and not leading by executive order.

When Obama was signing executive orders, you and your ilk were calling him a dictator. At least Obama passed some of his agenda through congress.

The same people that wrote Obama's agenda are now welcoming him home with $400K speeches. This is why Democrats lost and will continue to lose. Regarding Executive Orders....Trump is avoiding the gridlock of a broken system. Smart move.

Most of his agenda he can't pass without congress. He can't build his wall. He can't do tax reform. He can't repeal/replace ObamaCare....all of which Trump said would be "easy". The Republican party can not stand behind a Republican President and pass his agenda in congress. What a lame excuse, "broken system". The system seems to be working just fine by keeping these crazy ideas being legislated.

[Monker]

LONG Overdue.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-signs- ... 53196.html

What is "long over due" is President Trump passing ANY legislation and not leading by executive order.

When Obama was signing executive orders, you and your ilk were calling him a dictator. At least Obama passed some of his agenda through congress.

Obama also had his staff in place by now and didn't have to put up with liberal tempertantrums.

Trump's staff are not members of congress. Democrats are not causing problems for Trump passing legislation...it's the "Freedom Caucus"/Tea Party vs. moderate Republicans. In fact, if Trump wants to get ANYTHING done, he may have to work around the Tea Party and see what Democrats will work with him and moderate Republicans on. Remember - Trump is a liberal, not a conservative.

[The_Noble_Cause]

Most of his agenda he can't pass without congress. He can't build his wall. He can't do tax reform. He can't repeal/replace ObamaCare....all of which Trump said would be "easy". The Republican party can not stand behind a Republican President and pass his agenda in congress. What a lame excuse, "broken system". The system seems to be working just fine by keeping these crazy ideas being legislated.

And yet the list of Trump accomplishments keeps growing. Meanwhile, the DNC is going on unity tours with Bernie Sanders to try to repair the rift from the stolen primary (y'know, the one YOU denied was happening). Reap what you sow.

[Monker]

"Democrats are not causing problems for Trump passing legislation".
Horse shit ! If liberals had a brain, they'd figure out they could side with moderates and shut the Tea Party out. Like I've said before, if Trump wanted to give every family in the country one million of his own money , you and those like you would find something to bitch about.

You are a moron.

I said, in the post that you replied to, "In fact, if Trump wants to get ANYTHING done, he may have to work around the Tea Party and see what Democrats will work with him and moderate Republicans on. "

Democrats have NO incentive to simply start working with Trump on HIS and the Republican agenda. If TRUMP wants to make a deal on things that both he AND Democrats want, then you could see something get done. For example, maybe AMEND ObamaCare...but Democrats have NO incentive to REPEAL and REPLACE it. Until that time, I'm sure the Democrats sitting back and watching the Republicans fail at every legislative turn.

Trump is not a master deal maker...THAT is probably the biggest lie that is now being exposed.

[Monker]

Meanwhile, the DNC is going on unity tours with Bernie Sanders to try to repair the rift from the stolen primary (y'know, the one YOU denied was happening). Reap what you sow.

I don't care. I'm not a Democrat.

[tj]

Most of his agenda he can't pass without congress. He can't build his wall. He can't do tax reform. He can't repeal/replace ObamaCare....all of which Trump said would be "easy". The Republican party can not stand behind a Republican President and pass his agenda in congress. What a lame excuse, "broken system". The system seems to be working just fine by keeping these crazy ideas being legislated.

And yet the list of Trump accomplishments keeps growing. Meanwhile, the DNC is going on unity tours with Bernie Sanders to try to repair the rift from the stolen primary (y'know, the one YOU denied was happening). Reap what you sow.

The Unity Tour is blowing up i their face with the DNC Chairman saying ANY proflife people don't have a place in the party. Even NARAL, which is adamantly opposed to prolife legislation and anything to limit abortion, says that this is stupid.

[ohsherrie]

TNC, I love you. Just wanted you to know. I feel no need to respond to any of the nonsense because you handle it so well.

[The_Noble_Cause]

TNC, I love you. Just wanted you to know. I feel no need to respond to any of the nonsense because you handle it so well.

Thank you, ohsherrie. Miss you around these parts.

[Monker]

"Democrats are not causing problems for Trump passing legislation".
Horse shit ! If liberals had a brain, they'd figure out they could side with moderates and shut the Tea Party out. Like I've said before, if Trump wanted to give every family in the country one million of his own money , you and those like you would find something to bitch about.

You are a moron.

I said, in the post that you replied to, "In fact, if Trump wants to get ANYTHING done, he may have to work around the Tea Party and see what Democrats will work with him and moderate Republicans on. "

Democrats have NO incentive to simply start working with Trump on HIS and the Republican agenda. If TRUMP wants to make a deal on things that both he AND Democrats want, then you could see something get done. For example, maybe AMEND ObamaCare...but Democrats have NO incentive to REPEAL and REPLACE it. Until that time, I'm sure the Democrats sitting back and watching the Republicans fail at every legislative turn.

Trump is not a master deal maker...THAT is probably the biggest lie that is now being exposed.

Sooner or later Democrats are going to need something dumbass, Trump has Obama's Veto Pen.

Republicans are in control of the Presidency and both houses of congress. Republicans COMPLETELY control the agenda. What Democrats "want" or "need" is completely irrelevant - unless TRUMP GOES TO THEM to make a deal. HE is the one who is in control. Besides, Democrats don't have to do anything to obstruct Republicans......Republicans are so good at obstruction, they now do it to their own party!

And, again, Democrats are NOT going to repeal/replace ObamaCare. If that is the starting point, I'm sure the entire Democratic party will tell him to go do some pussy grabbing and talk to the press about the Civil War...because THAT is all he is good for.

[JBlake]

Hillary Clinton has recently been quoted as saying:

""I’m now back to being an activist citizen, and part of the resistance,"

Yeah, and doing that she's become one of the most wealthiest Americans. So how does one get so rich just being an activist citizen and part of the resistance?

[verslibre]

All the ex-Presidents command extortionist speaking fees. Who cares. Nobody's forcing anyone to pay them.

[The_Noble_Cause]

All the ex-Presidents command extortionist speaking fees. Who cares. Nobody's forcing anyone to pay them.

I care. It's a symptom of a very sick system.

[verslibre]

Think of how much Trump's gonna charge.

[The_Noble_Cause]

I don't care. I'm not a Democrat.

It would be one thing if you were on here defending Democratic ideals, but you literally defend the DNC. During the primaries, you defended the DNC for rigging the primaries. More recently, you were on here defending DNC Chair, Donna Brazile, for sending debate questions to Hillary in advance. You are the biggest shill in the world.

[JBlake]

Think of how much Trump's gonna charge.

That's easy. Put it into perspective, Trump lives on his own property, isn't collecting the POTUS salary, and when he's done with his term(s) he'll go back to successfully running his own business.....again.

High dollar Ex-President speeches are usually for career politicians who want/need to make money without any other means. Bama's never had a real job in his entire life. Yeah, Bama needs all the speeches he can get, as does the Clinton crime family.

[verslibre]

Don't leave the Republicans out of it. GWB's apparently gotten up to 250K, though he regularly gets 100K. I've never heard anything particularly philosophical or witty escape his lips, so one must wonder about those who feel it a swell idea to fork over hundreds of thousands to hear Shrub "wax eloquent" before an assembly.

It's about the celebrity. That's the only reason Bill got a truly massive sum to go speak in Hong Kong, while regularly collecting 250-500K stateside per speech.

[JBlake]

Don't leave the Republicans out of it. GWB's apparently gotten up to 250K, though he regularly gets 100K. I've never heard anything particularly philosophical or witty escape his lips, so one must wonder about those who feel it a swell idea to fork over hundreds of thousands to hear Shrub "wax eloquent" before an assembly.

It's about the celebrity. That's the only reason Bill got a truly massive sum to go speak in Hong Kong, while regularly collecting 250-500K stateside per speech.

Read a little closer to what I wrote: "High dollar Ex-President speeches are usually" See it now? GWB is one of the exceptions and thus why I didn't write "only" but instead "usually".

[JBlake]

Don't leave the Republicans out of it. GWB's apparently gotten up to 250K, though he regularly gets 100K. I've never heard anything particularly philosophical or witty escape his lips, so one must wonder about those who feel it a swell idea to fork over hundreds of thousands to hear Shrub "wax eloquent" before an assembly.

It's about the celebrity. That's the only reason Bill got a truly massive sum to go speak in Hong Kong, while regularly collecting 250-500K stateside per speech.

Bill spoke in Hong Kong? You talking about Bill as in Clinton? It's funny that anytime Trump talks to the Chinese or the Russians, that's all Baaaaadddddd stuff. But Bill did a speech in Hong Kong and that was fine, hell, Bill even did a speech in Russia and that was also fine. Amazing how that works.

[verslibre]

Don't leave the Republicans out of it. GWB's apparently gotten up to 250K, though he regularly gets 100K. I've never heard anything particularly philosophical or witty escape his lips, so one must wonder about those who feel it a swell idea to fork over hundreds of thousands to hear Shrub "wax eloquent" before an assembly.

It's about the celebrity. That's the only reason Bill got a truly massive sum to go speak in Hong Kong, while regularly collecting 250-500K stateside per speech.

Read a little closer to what I wrote: "High dollar Ex-President speeches are usually" See it now? GWB is one of the exceptions and thus why I didn't write "only" but instead "usually".

You mention they're for "career politicians," and then you zero in on the usual suspects and ignore the ones you don't want under the lamp. Biased much? I was just tossing more information on the pile. No need for you to be defensive or feel distressed.

[verslibre]

Don't leave the Republicans out of it. GWB's apparently gotten up to 250K, though he regularly gets 100K. I've never heard anything particularly philosophical or witty escape his lips, so one must wonder about those who feel it a swell idea to fork over hundreds of thousands to hear Shrub "wax eloquent" before an assembly.

It's about the celebrity. That's the only reason Bill got a truly massive sum to go speak in Hong Kong, while regularly collecting 250-500K stateside per speech.

I see it's still over your head. No surprise. AGAIN, IT ISN'T REPUBLICANS BITCHING
ABOUT WHAT OBAMA IS MAKING. Get it now?

Oh ya,

Kornhole Crumpler, back away from the sheep's asshole and begin reading again at the line "It's about the celebrity."

Did you bury the G.E.D. you got last year under the pile of manure in your back yard? Nothing to be ashamed of, dude. Own it.

[verslibre]

Bill spoke in Hong Kong? You talking about Bill as in Clinton? It's funny that anytime Trump talks to the Chinese or the Russians, that's all Baaaaadddddd stuff. But Bill did a speech in Hong Kong and that was fine, hell, Bill even did a speech in Russia and that was also fine. Amazing how that works.

Yeah, Bill spoke over there in 2005. Who was President then? That's the difference...right? Or maybe it makes no difference. But we were discussing outrageous speaking fees, or so I thought...

[verslibre]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2017/05/02/when-is-it-okay-to-say-the-president-might-be-nuts/?tid=hybrid_experimentrandom_2_na&utm_term=.4c37738bf2de

[Boomchild]

It's about the celebrity. That's the only reason Bill got a truly massive sum to go speak in Hong Kong, while regularly collecting 250-500K stateside per speech.

Sure. What a extreme coincidence that when Hillary was appointed SOS, Billy Bob's speaking fees went way up. Not to mention the surge in "donations" to The Clinton Foundation.

[Boomchild]

Some things never change.

[verslibre]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2017/05/02/when-is-it-okay-to-say-the-president-might-be-nuts/?tid=hybrid_experimentrandom_2_na&utm_term=.4c37738bf2de

If your going to use WOPO then don't throw one of your tantrums if we use Breitbart of Drudge.

AND

I read Drudge Report all the time. Have for years. You always think you have me figured out, but you can't even read the analog scale at the feed store you work at, Maynard.

[verslibre]

It's about the celebrity. That's the only reason Bill got a truly massive sum to go speak in Hong Kong, while regularly collecting 250-500K stateside per speech.

Sure. What a extreme coincidence that when Hillary was appointed SOS, Billy Bob's speaking fees went way up. Not to mention the surge in "donations" to The Clinton Foundation.

I'm not disagreeing with you.

[verslibre]

I don't share your sexual interests, besides you'd have a goat instead of a sheep. Thanks again for proving you are nothing more then a smug little asshole adding nothing to the thread. Again asswipe, it's you liberal,snowflake assholes that are whining about what lying Barry is putting away. And Bill Clinton got such huge amounts because his wife had the power as SOS to sell us out, which they had no problem doing. Notice how that, along with the Clinton Foundation have dried up? Just like you should. Pole smoker.

Oh ya,

All that vitriol. All that energy wasted. If only you'd worked on your punctuation back in high school in the early Sixties. You'd be a real postal clerk by now.

Here, this will make you feel better for a whole minute.



P.S. Your mom (not the woman above) says I haven't dried up. Far from it!