Monker wrote:Wow, so you think the Secretary of State and the leaders of the House Foreign Affairs committee are "government hacks". That is ridiculous.
Of course I do.
Recent US secretary's include Hillary, Kerry, and Rex Tillerson. I think all three qualify as hacks or idiots. The House Foreign Affairs rosters reads like a who's who of spineless bitches.
Monker wrote:That letter is very clear that the SOS validated that Russia's use of chemicals were in line with the law that forces more sanctions on Russia. The SOS's opinion is what mattered, and the law matters. Trump has no choice but to impose more sanctions.
If you have proof that the nerve agent is exclusive to Russia, I would love to hear it. The evidence was circumstantial at best.
Monker wrote:I did not say "consensus". The letter was from both the leader of the Democrats and the leader of the Republicans. In other words, this is not the Democrats pushing a Democrat agenda. It is the Foreign Affair committee as a whole pushing the issue.
So in other words, a bi-partisan consensus.
Monker wrote:The bottom line is these Russian sanctions are not something Trump wants to do, but is forced to by law and by congress forcing him to.
Sanctions shouldn't be applied due to the Skripal poisoning. The evidence was as flimsy as Russia hacking and Iraqi WMDS. Good for Trump!
Monker wrote: It is not Trump being tough on Russia.
Was Trump forced by law to strike and kill hundreds of Russians in Syria?
What about applying sanctions on Russia over Ukraine?
What about sanctioning Russian financial institutions supporting Venezuela?
You are citing one example (Skripal poisoning) when there have been countless others.
Monker wrote: That does not change my opinion that no President in my lifetime has deserved to be impeached more than Trump.
Your opinion is worthless.
You believe non-stop bullshit (ex. Hillary had permission to use a private server! / Mueller will jail Trump and his kids! / Comey didn't leak! / All US intel agencies agree on hacking!).