Moderator: Andrew
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Monker wrote:It is all speculation. And, the polls are starting to move against Trump. More people now favor removing him from office. If that trend continues, eventually Republicans will see him as a liability...just as what happened to Nixon. Trump dug his own hold and he just keeps digging.
I don't care about polls.
Impeaching Trump would assure his place in the history books as someone who took on the establishment and lost. Nancy is playing right into his hands.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Monker wrote:LOL. This isn't some kinda debate. I am simply correcting the record that I don't hate you, that I think of you as an incredibly emotionally immature person who displays that immaturity constantly in this thread. Even in this reply, it is so ingrained in who you are that you just can't help yourself.
The record speaks for itself.
You have melodramatically declared your exit from the forum and then immediately came running back.
That is no different than a child having a temper tantrum, taking their ball, and running home. The stunted child is YOU.Monker wrote:You continue the grade school, "meet me after school" crap.
If people want to engage in sub-grade school taunts ("nut jobs", "zombies") then they should be willing to back it up.
Like I said, the loudest voices in the room are writing checks they can't cash.Monker wrote:You new seem traumatized by me baiting you with the "Bazzinga" thing....you simply can't get over it and move on.
I'll simply include your quote below. You didn't bait anyone. You fell for fake news because you are gullible. Then, instead of admitting your error, you decided to lie and claim you were pranking the forum. Does that sound mature to you?Monker wrote:Michael Flynn promised "full cooperation to the Mueller team" and is prepared to testify that as a candidate, Donald Trump "directed him to make contact with the Russians."
BuzzingaMonker wrote:You say you are here to discuss politics, but you never "discuss" anything.
Not with you, no. You are a pathological liar who invents facts out of his prolapsed anus (ex. "Hillary had permission...")Monker wrote:You bring up "Tapegate" and try to say how wonderful you were...even though that entire incident was a moral disaster on this forum, and you openly admitted to posting as other users and you were proud you got away with it. Again, it is all you trying to get attention and also feel more important than you really are.
I simply cited Tapegate as proof that I am not here for attention. If I wanted attention, I would've been partying alongside others with Ross and the gang. You can twist it anyway you want.Monker wrote:Then you bring up the entiring POF thing again in an effort to try to embarrass me, or whatever. Sorry, but your mileage has run out on that one. But, a person going about and doing internet searches on other forum members to try to find embarrassing info on them is childish enough. But, it IS obsessive and weird to hold on to those actions for literally YEARS.
Again, would an emotionally mature person really be cruising various dating sites looking for ass?Monker wrote:Then the Ferengi thing, again trying ti embarrass me, or whatever. Yeah, I love scifi. I have my entire life. Don't really care what you think of it. It's just more of your child like behavior, calling people out and trying to disparage them.
Again, would an emotionally mature person still be watching Buck Rogers in his PJs? Grow up loser.Monker wrote:As for "get a job," etc. It is perfectly OK if you think I'm an unemployed nobody. I don't care. I simply see it as you acting out your emotional maturity.
To re-cap:
-Whines about quitting the forum only to run back
-Engages in schoolyard jeers but runs away from confrontation
-Pranks the entire forum with "Bazingga" games
-Trolls the internet in an attempt to touch boobies for the first time
-Still watching scif cartoons despite having an enlarged artichoke-sized prostate
Ah yes, quite the profile in manly manhood.
Memorex wrote:Andrew wrote:RPM wrote:
Who do you like in the next election and why?
Bernie, Warren and Harris probably.
Wow. Thank God you don't get to vote here. Those are three very awful choices.
Monker wrote:That implies that you feel there are GOOD Democrats to vote for. Who are they?
Memorex wrote:Monker wrote:That implies that you feel there are GOOD Democrats to vote for. Who are they?
There is no Dem running that I feel even comes close to Trump as far as the policies I want. Not that I agree with Trump on every policy, but just overall.
That said, if I was forced to vote for a Democrat, the only two I could stomach are Tulsi Gabbard and Amy Klobuchar. Amy should be out by this weekend or next. She doesn't have much to offer but she came off less insane than the others.
All the rest are just so bad for the economy.
Harris is just a politician and nothing more. No substance whatsoever. She is a disgusting human being. I mean, fucking disgusting. I don't like calling women pigs, but she's a pig.
Booker? Jesus please no.
[/quote]Bernie would be a waste of time. If the country was stupid enough to elect him AND turn the Senate, I think even the Dems would stop his bag of wishful thinking.
Monker wrote:Memorex wrote:There is no Dem running that I feel even comes close to Trump as far as the policies I want. Not that I agree with Trump on every policy, but just overall.
So, really, no matter who Andrew would have mentioned, you would have replied in the same way.
Andrew wrote:Monker wrote:Memorex wrote:There is no Dem running that I feel even comes close to Trump as far as the policies I want. Not that I agree with Trump on every policy, but just overall.
So, really, no matter who Andrew would have mentioned, you would have replied in the same way.
I was shocked and astounded by Memorex's answer. I totally did not see that coming
Andrew wrote:Matthew Rosenberg
@AllMattNYT
Despite what Trump claimed today, the @nytimes did NOT report that Adam Schiff helped write the whistleblower's complaint. In fact, Schiff did not even know the whistleblower's identity, officials told the NYT.
Andrew wrote:Nah, normalcy will return. Today was pathetic. Throwing multiple tantrums and spewing more lies and unfounded made up conspiracy theories. He's just trying to muddy the waters.
Really SAD! BAD!
This is just not going to end well. Not sure how anyone could be proud of this trainwreck,
Monker wrote:You care about them when I say Bernie is in fourth place.
Monker wrote:Impeaching Trump will ensure his administration is one of only a few who had to go through the ordeal. His Presidency will be remembered as one of the most corrupt and divisive in this nation's history.
Trump has no plan. He is fumbling through this and has no idea what he is doing.
Monker wrote:Pelosi had no choice after the whistle blower. Too many Democrats were demanding it...and lawless attitude of Trump MUST have a check at some point, regardless of political consequences.
Monker wrote:LOL...this is just pathetic, seriously.
So, you are now saying I am emotionally immature in a Pee-wee Herman like, "I know you are but what am I" bit. It is just childish and lame.
And, you have issues with sex. It's like you are some kinda middle aged man who kept his porn collection from when he was a teen and proudly goes on public display to show how he can still get off on it. This is stuff a 14yr old would have out grown by now.
You are just a emotionally immature middle aged man who goes on these childish rants just to get attention, feel important and powerful. That is all you are....and it is pitiful.
And, you make it out to be just me you post to...but you have done it to Andrew, V, and almost anybody who disagrees with you. It is just who you are. Given enough time, you rant like a child to everybody who disagrees.
Memorex wrote:
There is no Dem running that I feel even comes close to Trump as far as the policies I want. Not that I agree with Trump on every policy, but just overall.
That said, if I was forced to vote for a Democrat, the only two I could stomach are Tulsi Gabbard and Amy Klobuchar. Amy should be out by this weekend or next. She doesn't have much to offer but she came off less insane than the others.
All the rest are just so bad for the economy. I suspect Warren would be more pragmatic than the others. Harris is just a politician and nothing more. No substance whatsoever. She is a disgusting human being. I mean, fucking disgusting. I don't like calling women pigs, but she's a pig. Booker? Jesus please no. Bernie would be a waste of time. If the country was stupid enough to elect him AND turn the Senate, I think even the Dems would stop his bag of wishful thinking.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Where's the corruption?
RPM wrote:You don’t see what’s coming in 2020 Either.
Prepare for more shock Andrew.....
Andrew wrote:
Andrew wrote:RPM wrote:You don’t see what’s coming in 2020 Either.
Prepare for more shock Andrew.....
There really is NO talking to any of you. What a utter waste of time. No debate, no chance of ever taking of your MAGA hats.
Emperor Trump will fall. But of course it won't be his crimes....it's all a conspiracies!
What about Hilary's emails?! No, it's the Bidens!
Good grief. See ya.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Andrew wrote:
It's a simple question. As most presidential phone calls between leaders are confidential, you have no way of knowing whether this type of request is "corrupt" or not.
RPM wrote: At least Donald Trump Sr.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Monker wrote:You care about them when I say Bernie is in fourth place.
What I cared about, was you posting another dubious claim without any attribution whatsoever.Monker wrote:Impeaching Trump will ensure his administration is one of only a few who had to go through the ordeal. His Presidency will be remembered as one of the most corrupt and divisive in this nation's history.
Trump has no plan. He is fumbling through this and has no idea what he is doing.
Having "no plan" and "fumbling" do not rise to the constitutional standard of impeachable offenses. You are just a sore loser who can't win fairly at the ballot box.Monker wrote:Pelosi had no choice after the whistle blower. Too many Democrats were demanding it...and lawless attitude of Trump MUST have a check at some point, regardless of political consequences.
So name the law that was the broken.
Andrew wrote:RPM wrote: At least Donald Trump Sr.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Jnr?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
RPM wrote:Andrew wrote:RPM wrote: At least Donald Trump Sr.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Jnr?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Ivanka???......![]()
![]()
![]()
Memorex wrote:Andrew wrote:RPM wrote:
Who do you like in the next election and why?
Bernie, Warren and Harris probably.
Wow. Thank God you don't get to vote here. Those are three very awful choices.
Monker wrote:Even Napolitano has said it is impeachable.
Monker wrote:The article you posted started out by saying how wrong everything was in the transcript. You are choosing to ignore the history of impeachment as I posted, the reason it exists as I posted, and even how FOX pundits who you have cited in the past have stated.
Monker wrote:What you are saying above is just more bullshit distraction. It's like saying raping your wife is legal because it goes unreported by other couples. It's bullshit.
Monker wrote: If anything it is more evidence on how critical it is to impeach Trump so that no other President thinks they can get by with this. It's wrong. Period.
Monker wrote:Given Trump's now explicit requests to both China and Ukraine, he is essentially ASKING to be impeached. There is no going back now.
Monker wrote:When you can actually comment without playing these childish games...
Monker wrote:lying about my intention, lying about your own, not accepting plain and simple facts, taking quotes out of context and twisting their meaning, then MAYBE you can have a meaningful conversation.
Monker wrote:You once said that nobody wants to talk to or debate about this stuff to you IRL...as if it was their inability to "debate". Bullshit.
Monker wrote: It is your inability to accept facts, admit when you are wrong, and not constantly twist everything said to be in your advantage, disparage people, and make yourself feel in power.
That is not "debate". It is not discussion. It nothing but you acting like a child, playing games, trolling for attention and essentially turning these discussions into you dictating your opinion as fact. I don't think you even know how to have a conversation without doing such things.
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests