Memorex wrote:I guess you haven't heard the word censure then. Because that's the talking point Dems are bringing up now to give Pelosi a way out of this impeachment disaster.
That is just not true. There is no real movement to censure rather than impeach Trump. It's not a 'disaster'. If after that past few weeks more people more people moved from supporting impeachment then it may happen...but the reality is that opinion hasn't shifted at all, one way or the other. As I said above, there is no evidence of a political consequence for Democrats supporting impeachment. None.
Remember, not one of the people that have testified in these hearings matter in the senate. Because there, you go by true legal rules where hearsay is not admissible. And there were no witnesses that claimed any wrong doing based on anything other than hearsay.
LOL...that is just not true.
The Dems know that. They cannot let this go to the senate. If they do the end result is a person who was accused by a partisan group, acquitted in the senate, and more popular than ever with his base and others.
Again, there is NO evidence that this is going to happen. Sure, he'll hang on to his minority base...but, that's not enough to elect him. The "and others" is very debatable. I would say he has lost support of many of them even without the impeachment happening.
Do you really want Donald Trump going around the country saying over and over and over how he has been acquitted multiple times no matter how the Dems have tried to get him.
Yes, I do. Then he will be ignoring the REAL issues that people care about. As long as whoever is nominated by the Democrats ignores Trump and campaigns on what people really care about - it will be at Trump's loss.
I promise you Pelosi does not want that.
I doubt you know anything about what Pelosi wants.
And neither do Dems running for re-election in swing states.
The Democrats in those swing states were the authors of the op-ed that urged Pelosi to start the hearings in the first place. They knew what they were getting into. IMO, they would rather lose their re-election for doing the right thing than compromise their own values for a political win. It used to be that Republicans could claim the higher ground when it came to moral decisions - not any longer.
IMO, this entire process has proven how amoral the thinking of the Republican party has truly become. The morals of a President asking another country to investigate the other party should never be allowed by EITHER party. The Republicans are the home of the amoral minority of this country who only think in terms political advantage - not what morally correct, or good/bad for the country as a whole. In fact, your post wreaks of that very attitude.