Schon comes clean... well sort of...

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

Postby Saint John » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:15 am

Tito wrote:
Saint John wrote:
Tito wrote:Neal has NEVER been a buffoon. Unless you consider being too loyal - buffoonery.


Everyone has been a buffoon at one time or another. Thank you for being so kind and using yourself as an example just now. :lol: :twisted: :shock: :P


I have never been a buffoon. :evil:


That's it!!! Gayle, post the pictures!!! :lol: :shock: :twisted: :P :wink: Care to retract that statement, brah? :lol:
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby Tito » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:16 am

Saint John wrote:
Tito wrote:
Saint John wrote:
Tito wrote:Neal has NEVER been a buffoon. Unless you consider being too loyal - buffoonery.


Everyone has been a buffoon at one time or another. Thank you for being so kind and using yourself as an example just now. :lol: :twisted: :shock: :P


I have never been a buffoon. :evil:


That's it!!! Gayle, post the pictures!!! :lol: :shock: :twisted: :P :wink: Care to retract that statement, brah? :lol:


I don't want my picture on the internet. :evil: :lol: Comment stands.
User avatar
Tito
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 4:47 am
Location: Chicago, Il

Postby Michigan Girl » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:21 am

Onestepper wrote:
Michigan Girl wrote:
Tito wrote:
WykkedSensation wrote:
Saint John wrote:
Onestepper wrote:Not sure what people are not seeing in those comments. They are not mean spirited or even 'harsh'. It appears to be a diplomatic way of saying what everyone was looking for as a reason to let JSS go. He didn't say 'he sucked' or anything close to that. Just that it didn't fit their sound. I think that is reasonable.

My belief is that most people would have a completely different feeling about those comments if they had handled the termination more professionally, and actually discussed the issue of why they wanted to go in a different direction to JSS one on one. I don't think how or what he said in the interview was that bad.


Agreed on all counts.



Ditto.


Count me in.


Did any one of you read the entire article? It's not just about JSS!!! :roll: :wink:


What's your point? I think that subject got the attention because it is the first time (that I know of) anyone from the band has gone on record about the split. I think the 'no comment' statement was addressed in a different thread.


Oh, so in this thread we're supposed to focus on another part of the article :?
thanks for clearing that up for me, I wasn't aware of the rules!!! :wink:
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Re: Schon comes clean... well sort of...

Postby Onestepper » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:22 am

Deb wrote:
- JSS? Nondescript? That one actually made me laugh out loud.....coming from somebody who's got an SP vocal duplicate fronting Journey now. :lol: :roll: No disrespect to Arnel, I like the guy.............but I lose more and more respect for NS everytime he opens his mouth. :roll:


Did you hear the song(s) NS is referring to? How in the world could you possibly know what his opinions on the material should be? Just because you like JSS doesn't mean that NS's feelings on his work for the demos is to be completely discarded.

And I don't think this has anything to do with Arnel.
Onestepper
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1337
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:48 am

Postby Onestepper » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:23 am

Michigan Girl wrote:
Onestepper wrote:
Michigan Girl wrote:
Tito wrote:
WykkedSensation wrote:
Saint John wrote:
Onestepper wrote:Not sure what people are not seeing in those comments. They are not mean spirited or even 'harsh'. It appears to be a diplomatic way of saying what everyone was looking for as a reason to let JSS go. He didn't say 'he sucked' or anything close to that. Just that it didn't fit their sound. I think that is reasonable.

My belief is that most people would have a completely different feeling about those comments if they had handled the termination more professionally, and actually discussed the issue of why they wanted to go in a different direction to JSS one on one. I don't think how or what he said in the interview was that bad.


Agreed on all counts.



Ditto.


Count me in.


Did any one of you read the entire article? It's not just about JSS!!! :roll: :wink:


What's your point? I think that subject got the attention because it is the first time (that I know of) anyone from the band has gone on record about the split. I think the 'no comment' statement was addressed in a different thread.


Oh, so in this thread we're supposed to focus on another part of the article :?
thanks for clearing that up for me, I wasn't aware of the rules!!! :wink:


Stop it. You know that's not what I meant. I'm asking you what else is in there that we are supposed to get from the article, and also noted why I thought people focused on the JSS issue. Geez. :shock:
Onestepper
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1337
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:48 am

Postby Tito » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:25 am

Actually, I think Neal is correct. That's probably part of the problem for Soto, he's nondescript. I've heard people say before, "Good at many things, great at nothing."
User avatar
Tito
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 4:47 am
Location: Chicago, Il

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:29 am

Tito wrote:Actually, I think Neal is correct. That's probably part of the problem for Soto, he's nondescript. I've heard people say before, "Good at many things, great at nothing."


By virtue of not sounding like Perry, Jeff is more interesting.
At long last, Neal was forging new ground, with a writing partnership fans hadn't seen since Perry/Schon/Cain.
We've gone down the soundalike path before.
It ends badly.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16055
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Re: Schon comes clean... well sort of...

Postby Deb » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:34 am

Onestepper wrote:
Deb wrote: JSS? Nondescript? That one actually made me laugh out loud.....coming from somebody who's got an SP vocal duplicate fronting Journey now. :lol: :roll: No disrespect to Arnel, I like the guy.............but I lose more and more respect for NS everytime he opens his mouth. :roll:


Did you hear the song(s) NS is referring to? How in the world could you possibly know what his opinions on the material should be? Just because you like JSS doesn't mean that NS's feelings on his work for the demos is to be completely discarded.

And I don't think this has anything to do with Arnel.


LOL, thank you for telling me what my opinion of NS comments should be. :lol: :roll:
Deb
MP3
 
Posts: 14934
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 11:23 am
Location: Gotta Love The Ride!

Re: Schon comes clean... well sort of...

Postby Onestepper » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:36 am

Deb wrote:
Onestepper wrote:
Deb wrote: JSS? Nondescript? That one actually made me laugh out loud.....coming from somebody who's got an SP vocal duplicate fronting Journey now. :lol: :roll: No disrespect to Arnel, I like the guy.............but I lose more and more respect for NS everytime he opens his mouth. :roll:


Did you hear the song(s) NS is referring to? How in the world could you possibly know what his opinions on the material should be? Just because you like JSS doesn't mean that NS's feelings on his work for the demos is to be completely discarded.

And I don't think this has anything to do with Arnel.


LOL, thank you for telling me what my opinion on NS comments should be. :lol: :roll:


Just staying consistent with what you did in the previous message. You are welcome. 8)
Onestepper
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1337
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:48 am

Postby tammy » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:41 am

Onestepper wrote:Not sure what people are not seeing in those comments. They are not mean spirited or even 'harsh'. It appears to be a diplomatic way of saying what everyone was looking for as a reason to let JSS go. He didn't say 'he sucked' or anything close to that. Just that it didn't fit their sound. I think that is reasonable.

My belief is that most people would have a completely different feeling about those comments if they had handled the termination more professionally, and actually discussed the issue of why they wanted to go in a different direction to JSS one on one. I don't think how or what he said in the interview was that bad.


True. He said, "IT" didn't sound like Journey to them. But, there must've also been an issue with personalities clashing 'cuz he said, "personality-wise". I think the way things are now is what was meant to be...Arnel is doing very well with Journey & I think he was the right choice...'his sound' fits the glass slipper. Good things are also on the horizon for JSS & SA....and, hopefully SP. :)
tammy
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2338
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:17 am
Location: leftside

Postby Michigan Girl » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:42 am

Tito wrote:[quote="Michigan Girl"]
Count me in.
Did any one of you read the entire article? It's not just about JSS!!! :roll: :wink:[/quote]

Is there a link?[/quote]

You need to correct this...Michigan girl DID NOT say count me in!!! :wink:
The article is posted on the 1st page (top) of this thread...READ IT!!! 8)
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Postby Saint John » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:43 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:By virtue of not sounding like Perry, Jeff is more interesting.

Gold (soon to be Platinum) albums and sold out sheds seem to tell me that people are very interested in this lineup.

The_Noble_Cause wrote:At long last, Neal was forging new ground, with a writing partnership fans hadn't seen since Perry/Schon/Cain.

Pure speculation. I've never seen anyone in the industry tout Soto as a great lyricist. As far as I know, in the U.S., the guy has penned a total of zero hits.

The_Noble_Cause wrote:We've gone down the soundalike path before.
It ends badly.

I suspect Journey with Soto would have ended worse than Van Halen with Cherone. The masses, the band and management knew he wasn't a good fit. The initial circle jerk he received from the band was nothing more than the shear glee of being live again and not having to look over your shoulder anymore. Once they were able to objectively judge their latest incarnation they realized he had to go.
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby Onestepper » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:44 am

tammy wrote:
Onestepper wrote:Not sure what people are not seeing in those comments. They are not mean spirited or even 'harsh'. It appears to be a diplomatic way of saying what everyone was looking for as a reason to let JSS go. He didn't say 'he sucked' or anything close to that. Just that it didn't fit their sound. I think that is reasonable.

My belief is that most people would have a completely different feeling about those comments if they had handled the termination more professionally, and actually discussed the issue of why they wanted to go in a different direction to JSS one on one. I don't think how or what he said in the interview was that bad.


True. He said, "IT" didn't sound like Journey to them. But, there must've also been an issue with personalities clashing 'cuz he said, "personality-wise". I think the way things are now is what was meant to be...Arnel is doing very well with Journey & I think he was the right choice...'his sound' fits the glass slipper. Good things are also on the horizon for JSS & SA....and, hopefully SP. :)


It's also funny how no one mentions that NS talked about what a great showman JSS was. It's amazing how people can make him wrong for wanting a certain sound for his band. And if the lead singer doesn't represent the sound he wants, that must make the decision maker wrong.
Onestepper
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1337
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:48 am

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:51 am

Saint John wrote:Gold (soon to be Platinum) albums and sold out sheds seem to tell me that people are very interested in this lineup.


Total novelty act.
Jeff would have built something that withstood the test of time, while standing on its own two feet.
What they have now is cheap nostalgia.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16055
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby larryfromnextdoor » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:52 am

but i wonder what songs neal if refering that he sent to soto? certainly he didnt expect that the "pilgrim" song could get any better...
larryfromnextdoor
MP3
 
Posts: 10331
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 3:40 am

Postby Deb » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:54 am

Onestepper wrote:
tammy wrote:
Onestepper wrote:Not sure what people are not seeing in those comments. They are not mean spirited or even 'harsh'. It appears to be a diplomatic way of saying what everyone was looking for as a reason to let JSS go. He didn't say 'he sucked' or anything close to that. Just that it didn't fit their sound. I think that is reasonable.

My belief is that most people would have a completely different feeling about those comments if they had handled the termination more professionally, and actually discussed the issue of why they wanted to go in a different direction to JSS one on one. I don't think how or what he said in the interview was that bad.


True. He said, "IT" didn't sound like Journey to them. But, there must've also been an issue with personalities clashing 'cuz he said, "personality-wise". I think the way things are now is what was meant to be...Arnel is doing very well with Journey & I think he was the right choice...'his sound' fits the glass slipper. Good things are also on the horizon for JSS & SA....and, hopefully SP. :)


It's also funny how no one mentions that NS talked about what a great showman JSS was. It's amazing how people can make him wrong for wanting a certain sound for his band. And if the lead singer doesn't represent the sound he wants, that must make the decision maker wrong.


Who's making him wrong? He's entitled to have his band sound anyway he wants, just as I'm entitled to like it or not. I was just laughing at his use of the word "nondescript". I like the current line up, not enough to be jazzed about it though. Nothing "unique" about it IMO, unlike a JSS fronted Journey would have been....even by virtue of JSS not sounding just like Perry.

Where I find him wrong and lose respect for him is in how he talks about any and all of his past frontmen.
Deb
MP3
 
Posts: 14934
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 11:23 am
Location: Gotta Love The Ride!

Postby Saint John » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:56 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Saint John wrote:Gold (soon to be Platinum) albums and sold out sheds seem to tell me that people are very interested in this lineup.


Total novelty act.
Jeff would have built something that withstood the test of time, while standing on its own two feet.
What they have now is cheap nostalgia.


We're just gonna have to agree to disagree on this one.
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby Deb » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:58 am

Saint John wrote:
The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Saint John wrote:Gold (soon to be Platinum) albums and sold out sheds seem to tell me that people are very interested in this lineup.


Total novelty act.
Jeff would have built something that withstood the test of time, while standing on its own two feet.
What they have now is cheap nostalgia.


We're just gonna have to agree to disagree on this one.


That was easy. :lol:
Last edited by Deb on Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
Deb
MP3
 
Posts: 14934
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 11:23 am
Location: Gotta Love The Ride!

Postby mistiejourney » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:58 am

Onestepper wrote:Not sure what people are not seeing in those comments. They are not mean spirited or even 'harsh'. It appears to be a diplomatic way of saying what everyone was looking for as a reason to let JSS go. He didn't say 'he sucked' or anything close to that. Just that it didn't fit their sound. I think that is reasonable.

My belief is that most people would have a completely different feeling about those comments if they had handled the termination more professionally, and actually discussed the issue of why they wanted to go in a different direction to JSS one on one. I don't think how or what he said in the interview was that bad.


I agree. We know the issue was the "legacy" sound. It was how they handled the situation that sucked (and always will). Nothin' wrong with Jeff's voice, they wanted an alto-tenor.

My question is why they made him an official member BEFORE they heard what a baritone-ish voice sounded like on the new material. Wouldn't you do that before you made the offer? It sounds to me like Jeff's talent/ability wasn't the issue.

Too bad they didn't have the balls to level with man. One call with , hey buddy - thanks for bailing us out but we really thing we need a tenor to go on and Alllll this uproar would have never happened and I would probably still have some respect for Neal and Jon. As it stands now, I appreciate their talent but they are, what's the term, douchbags?
Image

Kim in CA : )
User avatar
mistiejourney
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2415
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 2:33 pm
Location: San Francisco Bay Area

Postby Arkansas » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:58 am

larryfromnextdoor wrote: ... certainly he didnt expect that the "pilgrim" song could get any better...


Now THAT is funny. What a 'steamer' that song is...


later~
Arkansas
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2565
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 2:23 am
Location: duh?

Postby Tito » Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:02 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Saint John wrote:Gold (soon to be Platinum) albums and sold out sheds seem to tell me that people are very interested in this lineup.


Total novelty act.
Jeff would have built something that withstood the test of time, while standing on its own two feet.
What they have now is cheap nostalgia.


WTF are you talking about. Novelty acts don't do what their doing right now. This is the best they've done in over 20 years.
How do you know they would've built something that would've stood the test of time with Soto? Where's the evidence? Winds of Freedom ain't gonna cut it. Did Soul Sirkus leave something to last? I don't think so.
This is not nostalgia. Maybe earlier in the decade it was, but 10 years after reforming this thing they have never had this type of success. It wouldn't be peaking 10 years later as it is now.

P.S. Congratulations Tito on (this being) your 1,000th career post.
User avatar
Tito
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 4:47 am
Location: Chicago, Il

Postby Michigan Girl » Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:25 am

Tito wrote:
The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Saint John wrote:Gold (soon to be Platinum) albums and sold out sheds seem to tell me that people are very interested in this lineup.


Total novelty act.
Jeff would have built something that withstood the test of time, while standing on its own two feet.
What they have now is cheap nostalgia.


WTF are you talking about. Novelty acts don't do what their doing right now. This is the best they've done in over 20 years.
How do you know they would've built something that would've stood the test of time with Soto? Where's the evidence? Winds of Freedom ain't gonna cut it. Did Soul Sirkus leave something to last? I don't think so.
This is not nostalgia. Maybe earlier in the decade it was, but 10 years after reforming this thing they have never had this type of success. It wouldn't be peaking 10 years later as it is now.

P.S. Congratulations Tito on (this being) your 1,000th career post.


Yeah, congrats.....wish you had something to say!!! :lol: :wink:
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Postby Saint John » Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:55 am

Tito wrote:P.S. Congratulations Tito on (this being) your 1,000th career post.


Sounds like we need an appreciation thread!!! :lol: :shock: :twisted:
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby stevew2 » Thu Jul 31, 2008 2:02 am

Tito wrote:
Saint John wrote:lol...at least you realize I was joking. Schon has certainly been a buffoon at times,


Neal has NEVER been a buffoon. Unless you consider being too loyal - buffoonery.
That is retarded. If Neal would shit on you,you would sit there and pick out the corn. Loyal to whom?? Friga maybe. They proballablly share the same bunk on the bus, and not because they have to
User avatar
stevew2
MP3
 
Posts: 13073
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:20 pm
Location: Maryland

Postby Tito » Thu Jul 31, 2008 2:02 am

mistiejourney wrote:I agree. It was how they handled the situation that sucked (and always will). Nothin' wrong with Jeff's voice, they wanted an alto-tenor.



From this outsider, they handled the situation perfect.
User avatar
Tito
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 4:47 am
Location: Chicago, Il

Postby Deb » Thu Jul 31, 2008 2:12 am

Tito wrote:
mistiejourney wrote:I agree. It was how they handled the situation that sucked (and always will). Nothin' wrong with Jeff's voice, they wanted an alto-tenor.



From this outsider, they handled the situation perfect.


Go figure. :roll:

And coming from this outsider, I find your avatar very disrespectful. :evil: And you guys got on the cases of people posting NS(napoleon) avatars? :?
Deb
MP3
 
Posts: 14934
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 11:23 am
Location: Gotta Love The Ride!

Postby Saint John » Thu Jul 31, 2008 2:13 am

Deb wrote:
Tito wrote:
mistiejourney wrote:I agree. It was how they handled the situation that sucked (and always will). Nothin' wrong with Jeff's voice, they wanted an alto-tenor.



From this outsider, they handled the situation perfect.


Go figure. :roll:

And coming from this outsider, I find your avatar very disrespectful. :evil: And you guys got on the cases of people posting NS(napoleon) avatars? :?


No photoshopping, no foul. :wink:
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby Tito » Thu Jul 31, 2008 2:15 am

Deb wrote:
Tito wrote:
mistiejourney wrote:I agree. It was how they handled the situation that sucked (and always will). Nothin' wrong with Jeff's voice, they wanted an alto-tenor.



From this outsider, they handled the situation perfect.


Go figure. :roll:

And coming from this outsider, I find your avatar very disrespectful. :evil: And you guys got on the cases of people posting NS(napoleon) avatars? :?


I never complained about any Neal avatars. I have only complained about one avatar only.
User avatar
Tito
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 4:47 am
Location: Chicago, Il

Postby stevew2 » Thu Jul 31, 2008 2:15 am

Tito wrote:
mistiejourney wrote:I agree. It was how they handled the situation that sucked (and always will). Nothin' wrong with Jeff's voice, they wanted an alto-tenor.



From this outsider, they handled the situation perfect.
Yea,for the casual fan, and retards like you that will let accept everything the does as gold
User avatar
stevew2
MP3
 
Posts: 13073
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:20 pm
Location: Maryland

Postby Tito » Thu Jul 31, 2008 2:15 am

stevew2 wrote:
Tito wrote:
Saint John wrote:lol...at least you realize I was joking. Schon has certainly been a buffoon at times,


Neal has NEVER been a buffoon. Unless you consider being too loyal - buffoonery.
That is retarded. If Neal would shit on you,you would sit there and pick out the corn. Loyal to whom?? Friga maybe. They proballablly share the same bunk on the bus, and not because they have to


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: For the right price - yes I would. :shock: :lol: :lol: :lol: :shock:
User avatar
Tito
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 4:47 am
Location: Chicago, Il

PreviousNext

Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests