The 2008 US Presidential Election Thread

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

Postby brywool » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:10 pm

Just had a chance to watch the Obama pig comment. There's NO way that he was saying that about Palin.
Just because she used the lipstick bulldog thing a few days ago... it's a common saying.

Gimme a break.
User avatar
brywool
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7688
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 5:54 am

Postby conversationpc » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:12 pm

brywool wrote:Just had a chance to watch the Obama pig comment. There's NO way that he was saying that about Palin.
Just because she used the lipstick bulldog thing a few days ago... it's a common saying.

Gimme a break.


THAT'S WHAT EVERYONE HERE HAS BEEN SAYING...No one seriously believes he originally intended to mean that it was about Palin. However, it's also obvious that the crowd AND Obama both caught the untintended message behind it. He didn't apply it to her on purpose but, looking back, it was obviously not a smart thing to utter.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby Lula » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:13 pm

but if there isn't some trumped up controversy over obama, mccain will have to talk about substance.... issues.... and he has to keep quiet on the issues that people actually care about so he doesn't sound like bush.
Until we meet again, may God
Hold you in the palm of his hand.

for Dean
User avatar
Lula
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4561
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 12:10 pm
Location: santa monica

Postby StoneCold » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:14 pm

conversationpc wrote:
brywool wrote:Just had a chance to watch the Obama pig comment. There's NO way that he was saying that about Palin.
Just because she used the lipstick bulldog thing a few days ago... it's a common saying.

Gimme a break.


THAT'S WHAT EVERYONE HERE HAS BEEN SAYING...No one seriously believes he originally intended to mean that it was about Palin. However, it's also obvious that the crowd AND Obama both caught the untintended message behind it. He didn't apply it to her on purpose but, looking back, it was obviously not a smart thing to utter.


How could they not know it was going to be taken that way? The crowd was laughing as soon as he said "lipstick" they were roaring and clapping when he said "still a pig".
User avatar
StoneCold
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6310
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 2:32 pm

Postby conversationpc » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:16 pm

Lula wrote:but if there isn't some trumped up controversy over obama, mccain will have to talk about substance.... issues.... and he has to keep quiet so he doesn't sound like bush.


This whole "McCain voted with Bush 90% of the time" garbage is extremely misleading. Obama voted along party lines 97% of the time, hardly independent thinking, especially considering Congress has only a 9% approval rating. Obama is hardly the progenitor of change.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby Lula » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:20 pm

congress is stuck....wait for the next election. the fact that the maverick voted 90% with bush is frightening. mccain is a different man today, 8+ yrs ago he actually was interesting, now he is just playing the game to get where he wants to be. obama's record may not be the best in some eyes, but for my stance he is much more to my liking.

i look forward to some real debate on the issues and less of the bs smears.... however, it seems obama has just taken the brakes off the liberal 527s, i imagine the next 8 weeks will be ugly.
Until we meet again, may God
Hold you in the palm of his hand.

for Dean
User avatar
Lula
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4561
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 12:10 pm
Location: santa monica

Postby conversationpc » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:22 pm

Lula wrote:congress is stuck....wait for the next election. the fact that the maverick voted 90% with bush is frightening. mccain is a different man today, 8+ yrs ago he actually was interesting, now he is just playing the game to get where he wants to be. obama's record may not be the best in some eyes, but for my stance he is much more to my liking.


I need to research it but the 90% percent number is way overstated from what I gather.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby Lula » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:23 pm

what do you know dave, you're certifiably insane :lol:
Until we meet again, may God
Hold you in the palm of his hand.

for Dean
User avatar
Lula
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4561
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 12:10 pm
Location: santa monica

Postby conversationpc » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:24 pm

Lula wrote:what do you know dave, you're certifiably insane :lol:


I've been insane long before it was popular. :lol:
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby Lula » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:26 pm

conversationpc wrote:
Lula wrote:what do you know dave, you're certifiably insane :lol:


I've been insane long before it was popular. :lol:


a true maverick! sorry, i had to!

good thing dean is not here any more, his blood pressure would be through the roof :lol: but when/if i need ammo, i'll get him from him!
Until we meet again, may God
Hold you in the palm of his hand.

for Dean
User avatar
Lula
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4561
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 12:10 pm
Location: santa monica

Postby conversationpc » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:27 pm

I'm fired up and ornery. Bring it on!

Thought for the day: Considering the libs on the board complain about all the conservatives here assailing them, does anyone remember what it was like here two years ago when I first joined this board? I think there was only myself and RedWingFan standing up for conservative positions and the vitriol used against us was far worse than what any of the conservatives are currently doing on this board (see some of Deano's and TNC's posts for evidence... :lol: ). I fondly remember TNC openly accusing me of snitching on him to Andrew and then his having to eat crow when Andrew told him it wasn't me. Ah, those were the days. :twisted:

That being said, despite being fired up and ornery, I do have to go to bed. :lol:
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby 7 Wishes » Thu Sep 11, 2008 1:00 pm

Well, I'd prefer Ted Nugent to Palin. McCain - Nugent would be unstoppable.
But around town, it was well known...when they got home at night
Their fat and psychopathic wives
Would thrash them within inches of their lives!
User avatar
7 Wishes
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4305
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 3:28 pm

Re: The 2008 US Presidential Election Thread

Postby artist4perry » Thu Sep 11, 2008 1:07 pm

Andrew wrote:All topics...all debates....all future related posts = ONE THREAD.

Ok?

Sounds great! Good luck with that! :wink: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
artist4perry
MP3
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Running around in the vast universe that is my imagination. Send help!

Postby Don » Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:10 pm

Archetype wrote:All I can say is that the United States is doomed if that clear enemy of the state, Barack Obama, gets elected. He WILL turn America into something similar to North Korea.

So, how long has Ruby Ridge had Broadband service?
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Postby Monker » Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:14 pm

conversationpc wrote:THAT'S WHAT EVERYONE HERE HAS BEEN SAYING...No one seriously believes he originally intended to mean that it was about Palin. However, it's also obvious that the crowd AND Obama both caught the untintended message behind it. He didn't apply it to her on purpose but, looking back, it was obviously not a smart thing to utter.


That is complete BULLSHIT. In the other thread, it started with people taking the comment completely out of context and calling him an idiot. Now that you know the context, you are all taking the position that he should have rebuked the crowd...as every commentator has done on the various news chanels.

You are all just a bunch of followers with an inability to think for yourselves.
Monker
MP3
 
Posts: 12647
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 12:40 pm

Postby RossValoryRocks » Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:33 pm

Monker wrote:
conversationpc wrote:THAT'S WHAT EVERYONE HERE HAS BEEN SAYING...No one seriously believes he originally intended to mean that it was about Palin. However, it's also obvious that the crowd AND Obama both caught the untintended message behind it. He didn't apply it to her on purpose but, looking back, it was obviously not a smart thing to utter.


That is complete BULLSHIT. In the other thread, it started with people taking the comment completely out of context and calling him an idiot. Now that you know the context, you are all taking the position that he should have rebuked the crowd...as every commentator has done on the various news chanels.

You are all just a bunch of followers with an inability to think for yourselves.


He is an IDIOT for having uttered it. His body language says he KNEW he shouldn't have said it.

I will give him the benefit of doubt that he didn't mean to say it, but never the less, he understood the ramifications as soon as he started saying it.
User avatar
RossValoryRocks
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3830
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 4:47 pm

Postby Since 78 » Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:36 pm

RossValoryRocks wrote:
Monker wrote:
conversationpc wrote:THAT'S WHAT EVERYONE HERE HAS BEEN SAYING...No one seriously believes he originally intended to mean that it was about Palin. However, it's also obvious that the crowd AND Obama both caught the untintended message behind it. He didn't apply it to her on purpose but, looking back, it was obviously not a smart thing to utter.


That is complete BULLSHIT. In the other thread, it started with people taking the comment completely out of context and calling him an idiot. Now that you know the context, you are all taking the position that he should have rebuked the crowd...as every commentator has done on the various news chanels.

You are all just a bunch of followers with an inability to think for yourselves.


He is an IDIOT for having uttered it. His body language says he KNEW he shouldn't have said it.

I will give him the benefit of doubt that he didn't mean to say it, but never the less, he understood the ramifications as soon as he started saying it.


Exactly!! If he didn't, then he definitely isn't smart enough to run a country.
Image
Image
Still They Ride
User avatar
Since 78
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8194
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 2:21 pm
Location: Pinhead Nation

Postby separate_wayz » Thu Sep 11, 2008 3:15 pm

Smart politicians often couch verbal attacks (especially the more noxious ones) in coded language, so that if they're eventually called out on them, they can say, with plausible deniability: "well, I didn't mean that!".

The linguistic analysis of this brouhaha is a waste of time. The fact is, a lot of reasonable people -- especially women -- interpreted what he said as offensive. That's all that matters -- how it was received, whether that was the intent or not. A less-arrogant candidate would've quickly muttered an half-hearted apology, changed the subject, and gotten back on message. Instead, Barack Obama goes on "Late Night with David Letterman" and keeps the issue alive for another 24-hour news cycle. Is this hubris, arrogance, or stupidity?

If Barack Obama can get pushed off-message so easily (as has happened in the last 48 hours), the next 55 days are going to be excruciating for him. Time is slipping away for him. Momentum is clearly against him. He's losing independents, he's slipped badly among women, and his campaign is badly falling short of fund-raising goals. He has been forced to admit that his "50-state strategy" was a bad idea and a waste of resources, with his campaign effectively pulling out of Georgia, North Carolina, and Montana. If this were a military battle, he would be in the position of getting flanked, and getting ready to have his supply lines cut-off. Very bad news ......

We are now almost two weeks beyond when Sarah Palin was introduced to voters in Dayton, Ohio. Barack Obama's campaign hasn't figured out a workable strategy to counteract her (or the ticket) in the last 13 days. That's an amazing waste of time, given the lateness of the hour. Within exactly three weeks from today, many states will begin early voting. And Obama is spending his time explaining the nuances and hermeneutics of what the phrase "lipstick on a pig" means. Bizarre.
User avatar
separate_wayz
LP
 
Posts: 492
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 9:14 am
Location: USA

Postby mikemarrs » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:52 pm

considering today is september 11 it got me to thinking about military and protecting america.it makes more sense to have someone like mccain in office who will stand up to terrorists and not compromise like obama would.obama was claming he would be willing to meet and talk with these enemies of ours but sometimes thats not exactly a wise thing to do.
User avatar
mikemarrs
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3346
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 4:44 pm
Location: Memphis

Postby mikemarrs » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:57 pm

obama made a major blunder by picking biden as his vice president and not clinton.he may of lost millions of millions in votes by making that critical mistake.then mccain comes along and picks a nice fine lady in palin that was a very sharp decision for various reasons and things like this could be the determining factor when november comes.then you have biden basically admitting that clinton should've been picked for vice president.he may have been trying to kiss up to the clinton supporters but that comment may very well backfire.
User avatar
mikemarrs
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3346
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 4:44 pm
Location: Memphis

Postby strangegrey » Thu Sep 11, 2008 9:57 pm

RossValoryRocks wrote:I will give him the benefit of doubt that he didn't mean to say it, but never the less, he understood the ramifications as soon as he started saying it.


I wont, and that's the problem with alot of the way republican's take a stand on this shit.

Respectfully stu, if this were the other way around and Barack Hussein Obama had a female running mate instead of a stump (who made a lipstick comment during a convention)....and McCain said a "cant put lipstick on a pig" comment...

The press, the entire fucking dumbocrat congress and 3/4 of the rest of the liberal world would have jumped all over McCain for 4 weeks straight. In fact, the resulting political damage that McCain would sustain from liberal vag-flapping would have been so devastating, it could almost derail his entire campaign.

So to that end, I don't give a flying fuck whether or not he meant it or not. I hardly thnk that's the point here...To that end, B. Hussein Obama should have fucking known better. He *should* have people that prevent him from foot-in-mouth situations just like this one....but we all know that the reason why he said what he said is that he's starting to get desperate. Palin's got the dumbocrats so fucking scared, they'll resort to any cheap shot they can to try to sabotage her.

And this is why I feel it's the republican party's responsibility to make those cheap shot motherfuckers eat shit for every fucking under the belt punch they try to take....because if the situation was reversed, the libs would react 10 times worse...
Image
User avatar
strangegrey
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3622
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:31 am
Location: Tortuga

Postby conversationpc » Thu Sep 11, 2008 10:17 pm

Monker wrote:That is complete BULLSHIT. In the other thread, it started with people taking the comment completely out of context and calling him an idiot. Now that you know the context, you are all taking the position that he should have rebuked the crowd...as every commentator has done on the various news chanels.

You are all just a bunch of followers with an inability to think for yourselves.


I will make a slight correction. I haven't said that he meant to call her that.

Don't lump me in with the crowd, asswipe. That's exactly what I've been saying the whole time and unless you can prove otherwise, shut the piehole.
Last edited by conversationpc on Thu Sep 11, 2008 10:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby Saint John » Thu Sep 11, 2008 10:36 pm

I think he hands down was calling her a pig. End of story. He knew how it would be interpreted, but is so used to being coddled by the press he figured he'd just get another free pass like he did for months against Hillary. The party's over for this terrorist sympathizing fuck and he's imploding. Had McCain said "I'm just calling a spade a spade" while referring to one of Obama's policies I wouldn't be a fucking coward and try to hide behind the "Oh, it's an old saying used all the time" spineless defense. He meant to call her a pig. Period. Speech experts have also noted that right before he delivers a "zinger" he puts his finger by his mouth (as if thinking) before he opens his wind hole and says something stupid or controversial. This time was no exception.
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby strangegrey » Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:29 pm

Monker wrote:That is complete BULLSHIT. In the other thread, it started with people taking the comment completely out of context and calling him an idiot. Now that you know the context, you are all taking the position that he should have rebuked the crowd...as every commentator has done on the various news chanels.

You are all just a bunch of followers with an inability to think for yourselves.



Wow, came up with that one all on your own?

I think you're off the mark. Did he make a mistake with this statement? Absolutely. Was it *his* mistake or his campaign's? No one knows for sure. He's not an idiot, but his God-like status is being challenge, because he's not the shit without a teleprompter. I suspect that you're just reeling at the recent discovery that this guy can't cure cancer, turn bong water into malt liquor, or raise from the politically dead three days later.

Don't confuse a tactical fuck up on the part of him/his campaign with the idea that it wasn't or was not a calculated strike. If I walk up to you at a black-tie event and, unprovoked, and punch you square in the mouth...despite the fact that it was a mistake to do something like that at the event, because it was inappropriate and unjustified....it doesn't mean my punching you wasn't premeditated.

The two are not mutually exclusive.
Image
User avatar
strangegrey
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3622
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:31 am
Location: Tortuga

Postby Saint John » Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:33 pm

strangegrey wrote: turn bong water into malt liquor


:lol: :lol: :lol: You'd be part of Snoop's posse if you could pull that off. :wink:
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby Barb » Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:52 pm

Saint John wrote: Had McCain said "I'm just calling a spade a spade" while referring to one of Obama's policies I wouldn't be a fucking coward and try to hide behind the "Oh, it's an old saying used all the time" spineless defense.


This world would stop spinning if McCain or ANY Republican said something like that. My God! They are even trying to intimate that the talk about community organizers at the convention was racist. :roll:
Barb
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:55 pm
Location: Nor Cal

Postby Saint John » Fri Sep 12, 2008 12:01 am

Barb wrote:
Saint John wrote: Had McCain said "I'm just calling a spade a spade" while referring to one of Obama's policies I wouldn't be a fucking coward and try to hide behind the "Oh, it's an old saying used all the time" spineless defense.


This world would stop spinning if McCain or ANY Republican said something like that. My God! They are even trying to intimate that the talk about community organizers at the convention was racist. :roll:


There has also been some whacked out accusations that republicans are making fun of Obama and his "change" talk because republicans think that black people are always begging for change on street corners. :roll:
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby Tito » Fri Sep 12, 2008 12:02 am

Andrew wrote:
Lula wrote:as of late this place looks more like a right wing whacko board rather than a journey board.


It hasn't gone unnoticed.


What's wrong with that? It isn't Pro-Bush.
User avatar
Tito
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 4:47 am
Location: Chicago, Il

Postby Tito » Fri Sep 12, 2008 12:05 am

RedWingFan wrote:
Archetype wrote:All I can say is that the United States is doomed if that clear enemy of the state, Barack Obama, gets elected. He WILL turn America into something similar to North Korea.

Dude, nobody has the power to do that alone. Even a US President.


Not by himself, but don't underestimate the elites. It wouldn't happen overnight.
User avatar
Tito
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 4:47 am
Location: Chicago, Il

Postby Tito » Fri Sep 12, 2008 12:09 am

Lula wrote:congress is stuck....wait for the next election. the fact that the maverick voted 90% with bush is frightening. mccain is a different man today, 8+ yrs ago he actually was interesting, now he is just playing the game to get where he wants to be. obama's record may not be the best in some eyes, but for my stance he is much more to my liking.

i look forward to some real debate on the issues and less of the bs smears.... however, it seems obama has just taken the brakes off the liberal 527s, i imagine the next 8 weeks will be ugly.


90% is misleading. Most of those are procedural votes, unamious votes, renaming post offices, etc. On hard issues it is a lot less (some if not most I disagree with). Mr. Bi-partisan has a 97% vote along party lines, that is NOT bi-partisan. Also, like Obama hasn't played the game. Come on, they're both full of it.
User avatar
Tito
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 4:47 am
Location: Chicago, Il

PreviousNext

Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests